Timeline for 11.0.4 development

Lindenmaier, Goetz goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com
Wed Apr 3 09:50:23 UTC 2019


Hi Andrew,

... to be sure my further tagging and merging of repos is agreed upon ...:

The dates I proposed here:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk-updates-dev/2019-April/000866.html
seem to have basic consensus.
I took your mail 
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk-updates-dev/2019-April/000873.html
as an approval so far.  Andrew Hughes and Christoph have agreed,
too, as I understand.

Could you please, as a project lead, confirm that we 
will act upon this schedule?

Then Christoph will put it on the webpage.
If it's on the webpage, I hope the dates get more visibility. If then
any concerns are raised, we can still update them.

Best regards,
  Goetz.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat.com>
> Sent: Mittwoch, 3. April 2019 10:32
> To: Lindenmaier, Goetz <goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com>; 'Andrew John Hughes'
> <gnu.andrew at redhat.com>; jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: Timeline for 11.0.4 development
> 
> On 4/2/19 10:09 PM, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote:
> > I proposed the tagging date here, and didn't get any objections:
> > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk-updates-dev/2019-
> February/000648.html
> 
> This has happened a couple of times now: people have posted something,
> received no objections, and taken it as consent. That is not how
> things work. We proceed by consensus: that is, we try to reach an
> agreement that a substantial majority of us are happy with.
> 
> I realize that getting people to reply can be painful, but that's the
> only way to achieve a consensus.
> 
> --
> Andrew Haley
> Java Platform Lead Engineer
> Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
> EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671


More information about the jdk-updates-dev mailing list