[11u] OpenJDK 11.0.3 post GA fixes JDK-8210739 and JDK-8203679

[Langer, Christoph]

Hi Andrew,

so, the CPU is out. May I please ask you to decide on whether these two additional fixes shall be pushed to jdk11u and an additional jdk-11.0.3+8 tag shall be done. I think the case is similar as with jdk8u212-b04. One could of course also go in the sense of Severin's mail and defer people to the 11.0.4 EA builds. But I guess it's kind of a service to the community to add the two changes on top of 11.0.3 GA since they are part of the Oracle builds as well.

Thanks
Christoph


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat.com>
> Sent: Dienstag, 16. April 2019 10:40
> To: Langer, Christoph <christoph.langer at sap.com>; jdk-updates-
> dev at openjdk.java.net; Andrew John Hughes <gnu.andrew at redhat.com>
> Cc: Martijn Verburg <martijnverburg at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [11u] OpenJDK 11.0.3 post GA fixes JDK-8210739 and JDK-
> 8203679
> 
> On 4/16/19 9:02 AM, Langer, Christoph wrote:
> 
> > I suggest we push both of these fixes (which apply cleanly and are
> > pretty local to their area) to jdk11u after Andrew (Hughes) has
> > pushed the CPU changes and after that add a jdk-11.0.3+8 tag. Then,
> > downstream vendors can chose to create another update based on the
> > new tag if they need to deliver binary versions that include these
> > fixes. I'll also run these fixes through our SAP test system but I
> > don't expect any regressions.
> >
> > Any opinions?
> 
> Once the CPU release is out, any suitably qualified person may request
> pushes from 11u-dev to 11u, and anyone may make a release from 11u. I
> know of no reason why people should not tag intermediate releases.
> 
> --
> Andrew Haley
> Java Platform Lead Engineer
> Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
> EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671