[ping]: Timeline for 11.0.4 development

[Langer, Christoph]

Hi,

since there was no further feedback on this, I'll update the Wiki page accordingly today. I discussed with Götz to leave out the exact tag numbers but the dates will be as written below.

Best regards
Christoph

> -----Original Message-----
> From: jdk-updates-dev <jdk-updates-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net> On
> Behalf Of Lindenmaier, Goetz
> Sent: Mittwoch, 10. April 2019 14:22
> To: 'Andrew Haley' <aph at redhat.com>; 'Andrew John Hughes'
> <gnu.andrew at redhat.com>; 'jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net' <jdk-
> updates-dev at openjdk.java.net>
> Subject: [CAUTION] [ping]: Timeline for 11.0.4 development
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Any further comments on this?  Should we put these dates
> on the wiki page?
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk-updates-dev/2019-
> April/000866.html
> 
> to repeate my initial mail:
> 
> I propose to explicitly state the following dates on
> https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/JDKUpdates/JDK11u
> 
> As for 11.0.3, I can do the builds, tests and tags proposed here
> until RC phase.
> JDK 11.0.4 timeline
> 
>   *   March 2019 jdk11u-dev forest open
>   *   Tuesday, April 30: Branch jdk11u-dev to jdk11u
>   *   Wednesday, Mai 1 2019: Tag 11.0.4+1
>   *   Wendesday, Mai 29 2019: Tag 11.0.4+5 RDP2
>   *   Wednesday June 26 2019: Tag 11.0.4+9 RC phase (code freeze)
>   *   Mid July 2019 GA
> 
> JDK 11.0.5 timeline
> 
>   *   Wednesday, Mai 1 2019 Tag 11.0.5+0 in jdk11u-dev, Forest open for
> development.
> 
> Best regards,
>   Goetz.
> 
> 
> 
> > The dates I proposed here:
> > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk-updates-dev/2019-
> > April/000866.html
> > seem to have basic consensus.
> > I took your mail
> > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk-updates-dev/2019-
> > April/000873.html
> > as an approval so far.  Andrew Hughes and Christoph have agreed,
> > too, as I understand.
> >
> > Could you please, as a project lead, confirm that we
> > will act upon this schedule?
> >
> > Then Christoph will put it on the webpage.
> > If it's on the webpage, I hope the dates get more visibility. If then
> > any concerns are raised, we can still update them.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >   Goetz.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat.com>
> > > Sent: Mittwoch, 3. April 2019 10:32
> > > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz <goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com>; 'Andrew John
> > Hughes'
> > > <gnu.andrew at redhat.com>; jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net
> > > Subject: Re: Timeline for 11.0.4 development
> > >
> > > On 4/2/19 10:09 PM, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote:
> > > > I proposed the tagging date here, and didn't get any objections:
> > > > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk-updates-dev/2019-
> > > February/000648.html
> > >
> > > This has happened a couple of times now: people have posted
> something,
> > > received no objections, and taken it as consent. That is not how
> > > things work. We proceed by consensus: that is, we try to reach an
> > > agreement that a substantial majority of us are happy with.
> > >
> > > I realize that getting people to reply can be painful, but that's the
> > > only way to achieve a consensus.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Andrew Haley
> > > Java Platform Lead Engineer
> > > Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
> > > EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671