RFR: JDK-8221990: (Backport) Program fails when using JDK addressed by UNC path and using Security Manager

[Langer, Christoph]

Hi Adam,

I pushed it now: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk-updates/jdk11u-dev/rev/ab9db1fbc27f

Best regards
Christoph

From: Adam Farley8 <adam.farley at uk.ibm.com>
Sent: Montag, 15. April 2019 18:08
To: Langer, Christoph <christoph.langer at sap.com>
Cc: jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net
Subject: RE: RFR: JDK-8221990: (Backport) Program fails when using JDK addressed by UNC path and using Security Manager

Hi Christoph,

Thanks for the sponsor offer. Much appreciated. :)

No functional changes in the webrev, though I believe some of the line numbers have changed, so I added webrev anyway to avoid complications.

Good to know about not needing to create a backport bug.

Best Regards

Adam Farley
IBM Runtimes


"Langer, Christoph" <christoph.langer at sap.com<mailto:christoph.langer at sap.com>> wrote on 15/04/2019 16:09:38:

> From: "Langer, Christoph" <christoph.langer at sap.com<mailto:christoph.langer at sap.com>>
> To: Adam Farley8 <adam.farley at uk.ibm.com<mailto:adam.farley at uk.ibm.com>>, "jdk-updates-
> dev at openjdk.java.net<mailto:dev at openjdk.java.net>" <jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net<mailto:jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net>>
> Date: 15/04/2019 16:12
> Subject: RE: RFR: JDK-8221990: (Backport) Program fails when using
> JDK addressed by UNC path and using Security Manager
>
> Hi Adam,
>
> thanks for doing this 11u patch-request. I will sponsor it for you,
> once it's approved.
>
> I have added your fix request comment from the backport issue
> (JDK-8221990) to the original bug (JDK-8218618) and set the backport
> issue to fix version 11-pool. The backport will get resolved by the push.
>
> Since the patch applies cleanly (which I've verified myself), it
> would not have been necessary to post a webrev. Or did you do any
> changes in the webrev? Furthermore, it's also not necessary to
> create the backport bug manually. A backport issue will be created
> when a fix is pushed with a commit message referencing the original issue.
>
> Best regards
> Christoph
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: jdk-updates-dev <jdk-updates-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net<mailto:jdk-updates-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net>> On
> > Behalf Of Adam Farley8
> > Sent: Montag, 15. April 2019 12:37
> > To: jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net<mailto:jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net>
> > Subject: RFR: JDK-8221990: (Backport) Program fails when using JDK
> > addressed by UNC path and using Security Manager
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Sponsor requested, please.
> >
> > PolicyFile jtreg tests have been run, and they don't encounter new
> > failures after the patch.
> >
> > Webrev: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?
> u=http-3A__cr.openjdk.java.net_-7Eafarley_8221990_webrev_&d=DwIFAg&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-
> siA1ZOg&r=P5m8KWUXJf-
> CeVJc0hDGD9AQ2LkcXDC0PMV9ntVw5Ho&m=DPYwXfUdsE94iXgc5DL9SQFY8DwFn4QF4AIAwIGP_1k&s=1OOy5RodAWFWJhjs0b5ZxiWSihAQvWYx-
> y3Sz_s2kKg&e=
> >
> > Bug: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?
> u=https-3A__bugs.openjdk.java.net_browse_JDK-2D8221990&d=DwIFAg&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-
> siA1ZOg&r=P5m8KWUXJf-
> CeVJc0hDGD9AQ2LkcXDC0PMV9ntVw5Ho&m=DPYwXfUdsE94iXgc5DL9SQFY8DwFn4QF4AIAwIGP_1k&s=0NeqG3FFSZlkm2V2PXnEQaGSAraBGIQFqH2b_fQ366g&e=
> >
> > Best Regards
> >
> > Adam Farley
> > IBM Runtimes
> >
> > Unless stated otherwise above:
> > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> > 741598.
> > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
> > 3AU
>

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU