RFR: JDK-8221990: (Backport) Program fails when using JDK addressed by UNC path and using Security Manager
Adam Farley8
adam.farley at uk.ibm.com
Thu Apr 25 12:25:06 UTC 2019
Thank you. :)
Best Regards
Adam Farley
IBM Runtimes
"Langer, Christoph" <christoph.langer at sap.com> wrote on 25/04/2019
07:48:05:
> From: "Langer, Christoph" <christoph.langer at sap.com>
> To: Adam Farley8 <adam.farley at uk.ibm.com>
> Cc: "jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net"
<jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net>
> Date: 25/04/2019 07:48
> Subject: RE: RFR: JDK-8221990: (Backport) Program fails when using
> JDK addressed by UNC path and using Security Manager
>
> Hi Adam,
>
> I pushed it now: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk-updates/jdk11u-dev/
> rev/ab9db1fbc27f
>
> Best regards
> Christoph
>
> From: Adam Farley8 <adam.farley at uk.ibm.com>
> Sent: Montag, 15. April 2019 18:08
> To: Langer, Christoph <christoph.langer at sap.com>
> Cc: jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net
> Subject: RE: RFR: JDK-8221990: (Backport) Program fails when using
> JDK addressed by UNC path and using Security Manager
>
> Hi Christoph,
>
> Thanks for the sponsor offer. Much appreciated. :)
>
> No functional changes in the webrev, though I believe some of the
> line numbers have changed, so I added webrev anyway to avoid
complications.
>
> Good to know about not needing to create a backport bug.
>
> Best Regards
>
> Adam Farley
> IBM Runtimes
>
>
> "Langer, Christoph" <christoph.langer at sap.com> wrote on 15/04/2019
16:09:38:
>
> > From: "Langer, Christoph" <christoph.langer at sap.com>
> > To: Adam Farley8 <adam.farley at uk.ibm.com>, "jdk-updates-
> > dev at openjdk.java.net" <jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net>
> > Date: 15/04/2019 16:12
> > Subject: RE: RFR: JDK-8221990: (Backport) Program fails when using
> > JDK addressed by UNC path and using Security Manager
> >
> > Hi Adam,
> >
> > thanks for doing this 11u patch-request. I will sponsor it for you,
> > once it's approved.
> >
> > I have added your fix request comment from the backport issue
> > (JDK-8221990) to the original bug (JDK-8218618) and set the backport
> > issue to fix version 11-pool. The backport will get resolved by the
push.
> >
> > Since the patch applies cleanly (which I've verified myself), it
> > would not have been necessary to post a webrev. Or did you do any
> > changes in the webrev? Furthermore, it's also not necessary to
> > create the backport bug manually. A backport issue will be created
> > when a fix is pushed with a commit message referencing the original
issue.
> >
> > Best regards
> > Christoph
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: jdk-updates-dev <jdk-updates-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net> On
> > > Behalf Of Adam Farley8
> > > Sent: Montag, 15. April 2019 12:37
> > > To: jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net
> > > Subject: RFR: JDK-8221990: (Backport) Program fails when using JDK
> > > addressed by UNC path and using Security Manager
> > >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > Sponsor requested, please.
> > >
> > > PolicyFile jtreg tests have been run, and they don't encounter new
> > > failures after the patch.
> > >
> > > Webrev: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?
> >
>
u=http-3A__cr.openjdk.java.net_-7Eafarley_8221990_webrev_&d=DwIFAg&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-
> > siA1ZOg&r=P5m8KWUXJf-
> >
>
CeVJc0hDGD9AQ2LkcXDC0PMV9ntVw5Ho&m=DPYwXfUdsE94iXgc5DL9SQFY8DwFn4QF4AIAwIGP_1k&s=1OOy5RodAWFWJhjs0b5ZxiWSihAQvWYx-
> > y3Sz_s2kKg&e=
> > >
> > > Bug: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?
> >
>
u=https-3A__bugs.openjdk.java.net_browse_JDK-2D8221990&d=DwIFAg&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-
> > siA1ZOg&r=P5m8KWUXJf-
> >
>
CeVJc0hDGD9AQ2LkcXDC0PMV9ntVw5Ho&m=DPYwXfUdsE94iXgc5DL9SQFY8DwFn4QF4AIAwIGP_1k&s=0NeqG3FFSZlkm2V2PXnEQaGSAraBGIQFqH2b_fQ366g&e=
> > >
> > > Best Regards
> > >
> > > Adam Farley
> > > IBM Runtimes
> > >
> > > Unless stated otherwise above:
> > > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with
number
> > > 741598.
> > > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire
PO6
> > > 3AU
> >
>
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with
> number 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
More information about the jdk-updates-dev
mailing list