[11u] RFR: 8222299: [TESTBUG] move hotspot container tests to hotspot/containers
Severin Gehwolf
sgehwolf at redhat.com
Mon Aug 19 15:20:04 UTC 2019
On Mon, 2019-08-19 at 16:45 +0200, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> On 8/19/19 4:38 PM, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> > Change of plans. I think it makes more sense to get JDK-8219997 and
> > JDK-8221894 backported too. Why? Risk is low, test-only/doc changes and
> > the documentation is actually acurate for JDK 11u as well for jdk-
> > 11.0.5+3 onwards. More below.
>
> Yes, that would make more sense.
See these threads for backport requests:
JDK-8221894: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk-updates-dev/2019-August/001684.html
JDK-8219997: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk-updates-dev/2019-August/001681.html
> > Latest webrev which now matches JDK 13 with *only* the ProblemList.txt
> > omission:
> > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-8222299/jdk11/03/webrev/
>
> Looks okay to me.
Thanks!
> I would have expected two files from 8219997 to be added as explicit changeset, basically this one:
> https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/dcaced4cbb83
>
> Webrev leads me to think they were added as new files in 8222299 changeset? It is not very relevant
> the issue is closed, we have the entire changeset at our disposal anyway.
I'm not sure what you mean (perhaps even a moot point now?). 8219997
isn't (yet) in OpenJDK 11u, thus JDK-8222299, could not possibly move
the files somewhere else. That was true for webrev 02. webrev 03
(latest) changed that by depending on JDK-8219997 backport. Perhaps I'm
missing something?
Thanks,
Severin
More information about the jdk-updates-dev
mailing list