[11u] JBS issues with missing backports

[Langer, Christoph]

Hi,

as per the mail below, I've skimmed the jdk11u-dev changesets and found the following 5 bugs that got pushed but don't have a backport record in JBS:

https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8209420
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8211233
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8214857
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8225189
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8215792

If Oracle can confirm that there's no hidden items and there was an issue with hgupdater, I would go and manually create the backports.

Thanks
Christoph

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aleksey Shipilev <shade at redhat.com>
> Sent: Montag, 26. August 2019 13:59
> To: Langer, Christoph <christoph.langer at sap.com>; jdk-updates-
> dev at openjdk.java.net; Seán Coffey <sean.coffey at oracle.com>; Rob
> McKenna <rob.mckenna at oracle.com>
> Cc: Yangfei (Felix) <felix.yang at huawei.com>
> Subject: Re: [aarch64-port-dev ] Request for Approval: Backport patches to
> fix volatile access inconsistency
> 
> On 8/26/19 1:56 PM, Langer, Christoph wrote:
> > Hi Oracle folks (e.g. Rob or Seán),
> >
> > Aleksey had pushed these changes last week:
> >
> >>>>   3) https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8209420
> >>>>   4) https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8211233
> >>>>   5) https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8214857
> >
> >>   https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk-updates/jdk11u-dev/rev/4f787d0086fc
> >>   https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk-updates/jdk11u-dev/rev/4cf59897e14f
> >>   https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk-updates/jdk11u-dev/rev/04dd2501a9df
> >
> > However, if you look at the bugs in JBS, there are no backports linked for
> 11.0.5. I assume there have been some Oracle internal 11-pool items that got
> resolved!? Or was there some other issue in the system?
> >
> > Please advise on how this should be cleaned up.
> 
> I think hgupdater is foobared for a while now (I asked ops@ last week), so no
> linked issues. There
> are lots of backports like that: changesets are there, backport issues not
> created yet.
> 
> --
> Thanks,
> -Aleksey