[11u] Downport closed changes?

Lindenmaier, Goetz goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com
Fri Dec 13 12:19:01 UTC 2019


Hi,

To avoid confusion, I split the page in two ...

Best regards,
  Goetz.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: jdk-updates-dev <jdk-updates-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net> On
> Behalf Of Lindenmaier, Goetz
> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2019 1:12 PM
> To: 'Chris Hegarty' <chris.hegarty at oracle.com>
> Cc: jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net
> Subject: [CAUTION] RE: [11u] Downport closed changes?
> 
> Hi Chris,
> 
> The list has two parts:
> First changes that are not in 11u.
> Second changes that are closed but already in 11u.
> Second holds for all the security fixes, e.g..
> 
> Maybe I should put it on two pages ... it's easy to
> miss the heading in the middle.
> 
> Best,
>   Goetz.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chris Hegarty <chris.hegarty at oracle.com>
> > Sent: Friday, December 13, 2019 1:05 PM
> > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz <goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com>
> > Cc: jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net
> > Subject: Re: [11u] Downport closed changes?
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > > On 13 Dec 2019, at 11:42, Lindenmaier, Goetz
> <goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Although Oracle has the policy to push only changes that have
> > > publicly visible JBS bugs, they once in a while push changes
> > > where the bug is hidden.
> > > Currently, we can see which changes are downported by Oracle
> > > to their internal 11u project, and do so for OpenJDK, too.
> > > This is not the case for such closed bugs.
> > >
> > > Therefore I enumerated these closed bugs and want to ask
> > > the 11u community to scan the list and eventually downport
> > > changes that seem useful in 11u.
> > >
> > > Overall, there are 78 bugs to look at, see this list:
> > >
> >
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/closed_bugs_not_in_11/closed_bugs_no
> > t_in_11.html
> >
> >
> > Maybe I don’t understand what this list is trying to convey, so as an
> > example: 8223892 is on the list, but is also in jdk11u [1]. Why is
> > 8223892 on the list if it is already in 11u?
> >
> > -Chris.
> >
> > [1] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk-updates/jdk11u/log?rev=8223892


More information about the jdk-updates-dev mailing list