[11u] Downport closed changes?

[Lindenmaier, Goetz]

Hi Chris, 

Thanks a lot!
Would have been great if it had been 77 and not 1, but still �� !

Best regards,
  Goetz.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Hegarty <chris.hegarty at oracle.com>
> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2019 1:25 PM
> To: Lindenmaier, Goetz <goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com>
> Cc: jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: [11u] Downport closed changes?
> 
> Hi Goetz,
> 
> > On 13 Dec 2019, at 12:19, Lindenmaier, Goetz <goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > To avoid confusion, I split the page in two …
> 
> Thanks for the clarification. I quickly scanned the list and opened any
> bug that I am confident was mistakenly not-open in the first place. So,
> just 8203672 ( that I know of ).
> 
> -Chris.
> 
> > Best regards,
> >  Goetz.
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: jdk-updates-dev <jdk-updates-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net>
> On
> >> Behalf Of Lindenmaier, Goetz
> >> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2019 1:12 PM
> >> To: 'Chris Hegarty' <chris.hegarty at oracle.com>
> >> Cc: jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net
> >> Subject: [CAUTION] RE: [11u] Downport closed changes?
> >>
> >> Hi Chris,
> >>
> >> The list has two parts:
> >> First changes that are not in 11u.
> >> Second changes that are closed but already in 11u.
> >> Second holds for all the security fixes, e.g..
> >>
> >> Maybe I should put it on two pages ... it's easy to
> >> miss the heading in the middle.
> >>
> >> Best,
> >>  Goetz.
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Chris Hegarty <chris.hegarty at oracle.com>
> >>> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2019 1:05 PM
> >>> To: Lindenmaier, Goetz <goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com>
> >>> Cc: jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net
> >>> Subject: Re: [11u] Downport closed changes?
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>>> On 13 Dec 2019, at 11:42, Lindenmaier, Goetz
> >> <goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> Although Oracle has the policy to push only changes that have
> >>>> publicly visible JBS bugs, they once in a while push changes
> >>>> where the bug is hidden.
> >>>> Currently, we can see which changes are downported by Oracle
> >>>> to their internal 11u project, and do so for OpenJDK, too.
> >>>> This is not the case for such closed bugs.
> >>>>
> >>>> Therefore I enumerated these closed bugs and want to ask
> >>>> the 11u community to scan the list and eventually downport
> >>>> changes that seem useful in 11u.
> >>>>
> >>>> Overall, there are 78 bugs to look at, see this list:
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/closed_bugs_not_in_11/closed_bugs_no
> >>> t_in_11.html
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Maybe I don’t understand what this list is trying to convey, so as an
> >>> example: 8223892 is on the list, but is also in jdk11u [1]. Why is
> >>> 8223892 on the list if it is already in 11u?
> >>>
> >>> -Chris.
> >>>
> >>> [1] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk-updates/jdk11u/log?rev=8223892