RFA [11u]: JDK-8206120, JDK-8211398, JDK-8218915

[Seán Coffey]

I'm happy to push this for Deepak once the requests are approved. I 
sponsored the original changes related to the specification changes for 
Deepak also.

regards,
Sean.

On 27/02/2019 06:43, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
>
> Yes, I think too that the Japanese Era changes need to go to jdk11u aka 11.0.3.
>
> Best regards,
>    Goetz.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: jdk-updates-dev <jdk-updates-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net> On
>> Behalf Of Langer, Christoph
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2019 11:15 PM
>> To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat.com>; jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net;
>> Deepak Kejriwal <deepak.kejriwal at oracle.com>
>> Subject: [CAUTION] RFA [11u]: JDK-8206120, JDK-8211398, JDK-8218915
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I hereby request the approval to push the change that fixes JDK-8206120,
>> JDK-8211398 and JDK-8218915 directly to jk11u. The fix is contained in
>> jdk11.0.3-oracle now.
>>
>> The backport has been reviewed in:
>> https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2019-
>> February/058596.html.
>>
>> @Deepak: Would you want to push the change yourself, once approved? Or
>> shall I do it for you, based on the webrev?
>>
>> Best regards
>> Christoph