Tagging proposal for JDK GA releases

Volker Simonis volker.simonis at gmail.com
Wed Jan 16 08:05:41 UTC 2019


On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 10:23 PM Andrew Hughes <gnu.andrew at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 at 18:57, Seán Coffey <sean.coffey at oracle.com> wrote:
> >
> > Note that the JDK 8u201/8u202 sources were pushed today and included the
> > new jdk8uxxx-ga style mercurial tags for the first time. (Thanks Aleksei).
> >
> > This should be useful for frameworks in the future to help detect GA
> > availability etc.
> >
> > regards,
> > Sean.
> >
>
> That does make things easier in deciding what tag is the final one, especially
> when we tend to get ones after GA (e.g. jdk8u192-b25, jdk8u201-b79).
>
> Following this CPU, I do have a request for another new tag. There seems to be
> no tag in the updates tree for when it is branched for the next release. A
> jdk8uxxx-rdp2/jdk-xx.0.x-rdp2 would be most welcome. I noticed with 11 this
> time, that I ended up having to manually apply a bunch of non-security fixes
> that were in the jdk-updates tree, but there was no way to pull them in
> through a defined tag. Having *-rdp2 as a base for applying CPU patches
> ahead of time would be helpful and ensure our final version is closer to
> what Oracle eventually push upstream.

+1

>
> Thanks,
> --
> Andrew :)
>
> Senior Free Java Software Engineer
> Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
>
> Web Site: http://fuseyism.com
> Twitter: https://twitter.com/gnu_andrew_java
> PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
> Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222


More information about the jdk-updates-dev mailing list