jdk-11.0.2+9 re-publish?

[Seán Coffey]

I'm not sure if we should be requiring such metadata edits
in the repo every three months. In JDK 8 update builds, the
update release version got set at build time.

Perhaps the same should be done for JDK 11.0.x builds via
the configure script.
e.g. --with-version-update=5 --with-version-update=2019-12-12

regards,
Sean.

On 22/01/2019 07:31, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think problems like the wrong date could be avoided if changes like
> "8212613: Bump update version for jdk11.0.2 cpu forest"
> are done in the open before the corresponding closed
> 11.0.x repo is branched off.
>
> For 11.0.3, this will now depend on the new maintainer
> (unclear to me whether there will be a somehow 'closed'
> repo) but for 12.0.1 and following this would be a good
> idea I think.
>
> Best regards,
>    Goetz.
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: jdk-updates-dev <jdk-updates-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net> On
>> Behalf Of Rob McKenna
>> Sent: Montag, 21. Januar 2019 17:41
>> To: Andrew Leonard <andrew_m_leonard at uk.ibm.com>
>> Cc: jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net
>> Subject: Re: jdk-11.0.2+9 re-publish?
>>
>> Hi Andrew, this has just been pushed. Apologies for the delay.
>>
>>      -Rob
>>
>> On 21/01/19 11:36, Andrew Leonard wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> Do we expect to see the re-publish for the build date fix in the open?
>>> I don't see a change nor tag for jdk-11.0.2+9 yet ...?
>>> Thanks
>>> Andrew
>>>
>>> Andrew Leonard
>>> Java Runtimes Development
>>> IBM Hursley
>>> IBM United Kingdom Ltd
>>> Phone internal: 245913, external: 01962 815913
>>> internet email: andrew_m_leonard at uk.ibm.com
>>>
>>>
>>> Unless stated otherwise above:
>>> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
>>> 741598.
>>> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
>> 3AU