What is 11-pool Fix Version sued for?

Langer, Christoph christoph.langer at sap.com
Mon Jul 22 06:37:39 UTC 2019


Hi Rob,

that sounds like a good suggestion. Obviously people, especially those that are not familiar with all the update project processes, will sometimes get something wrong. But that can always be corrected. ��

Can you, at the same time, please fix the 8-pool issues? In 8u the 8-pool version will only be picked up for Oracle releases currently. Openjdk8u pushes for 8-pool items are completely ignored by hgupdater.

Cheers
Christoph

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob McKenna <rob.mckenna at oracle.com>
> Sent: Montag, 22. Juli 2019 01:17
> To: Martijn Verburg <martijnverburg at gmail.com>
> Cc: Langer, Christoph <christoph.langer at sap.com>; jdk-updates-
> dev at openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: What is 11-pool Fix Version sued for?
> 
> Hi folks,
> 
> By coincidence a couple of us were discussing this issue last week.
> 
> We use it for tracking purposes a lot of the time. (I can check my -pool
> records to find outstanding issues)
> 
> We're actually thinking of moving over to an NN-pool-<orgname> type
> arrangement to avoid stepping on OpenJDK's toes. That is to say, we'll
> use NN-pool-oracle on bugs we'd like to track for -oracle releases.
> 
> This would mean that if you see a -pool record, you know someone intends
> to fix it in an OpenJDK release. (e.g. 11.0.6 as opposed to
> 11.0.6-oracle)
> 
> One slight issue with that is that Oracle engineers may end up using the
> -pool-oracle fixVersion out of habit, even where they intend to push to an
> OpenJDK release. (e.g. 13.0.2)
> 
> Feedback appreciated!
> 
>     -Rob
> 
> On 20/07/19 11:03, Martijn Verburg wrote:
> > Thanks, Christoph,
> >
> > When you say planned does that mean an engineer from . an org has
> already
> > grabbed it to backport or should I/we just look at the assigned field and
> > assuming it's empty, post here if we want to try and tackle it?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Martijn
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 20 Jul 2019 at 07:49, Langer, Christoph <christoph.langer at sap.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Martijn,
> > >
> > > 11-pool more or less shows, that a fix or backport of some issue to 11 is
> > > planned. When the actual fix is pushed, 11-pool will be replaced with the
> > > target release version (e.g. 11.0.5 or such). It if for instance needed, if
> > > a backport involves a CSR - so one can attach the CSR to the 11-pool issue
> > > before actually committing a fix.
> > >
> > > HTH
> > > Christoph
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: jdk-updates-dev <jdk-updates-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net>
> On
> > > > Behalf Of Martijn Verburg
> > > > Sent: Freitag, 19. Juli 2019 21:28
> > > > To: jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net
> > > > Subject: What is 11-pool Fix Version sued for?
> > > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > Would I be correct in thinking that `11-pool` contains a host of suitable
> > > > issues that are available to be picked up by anyone to submit a patch
> > > for?
> > > >
> > > > JBS search for a reference:
> > > >
> > > > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-
> > > >
> 8227650?jql=project%20%3D%20JDK%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%2011-
> > > > pool
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Martijn
> > >


More information about the jdk-updates-dev mailing list