What is 11-pool Fix Version sued for?
Langer, Christoph
christoph.langer at sap.com
Mon Jul 22 06:37:39 UTC 2019
Hi Rob,
that sounds like a good suggestion. Obviously people, especially those that are not familiar with all the update project processes, will sometimes get something wrong. But that can always be corrected.
Can you, at the same time, please fix the 8-pool issues? In 8u the 8-pool version will only be picked up for Oracle releases currently. Openjdk8u pushes for 8-pool items are completely ignored by hgupdater.
Cheers
Christoph
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob McKenna <rob.mckenna at oracle.com>
> Sent: Montag, 22. Juli 2019 01:17
> To: Martijn Verburg <martijnverburg at gmail.com>
> Cc: Langer, Christoph <christoph.langer at sap.com>; jdk-updates-
> dev at openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: What is 11-pool Fix Version sued for?
>
> Hi folks,
>
> By coincidence a couple of us were discussing this issue last week.
>
> We use it for tracking purposes a lot of the time. (I can check my -pool
> records to find outstanding issues)
>
> We're actually thinking of moving over to an NN-pool-<orgname> type
> arrangement to avoid stepping on OpenJDK's toes. That is to say, we'll
> use NN-pool-oracle on bugs we'd like to track for -oracle releases.
>
> This would mean that if you see a -pool record, you know someone intends
> to fix it in an OpenJDK release. (e.g. 11.0.6 as opposed to
> 11.0.6-oracle)
>
> One slight issue with that is that Oracle engineers may end up using the
> -pool-oracle fixVersion out of habit, even where they intend to push to an
> OpenJDK release. (e.g. 13.0.2)
>
> Feedback appreciated!
>
> -Rob
>
> On 20/07/19 11:03, Martijn Verburg wrote:
> > Thanks, Christoph,
> >
> > When you say planned does that mean an engineer from . an org has
> already
> > grabbed it to backport or should I/we just look at the assigned field and
> > assuming it's empty, post here if we want to try and tackle it?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Martijn
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 20 Jul 2019 at 07:49, Langer, Christoph <christoph.langer at sap.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Martijn,
> > >
> > > 11-pool more or less shows, that a fix or backport of some issue to 11 is
> > > planned. When the actual fix is pushed, 11-pool will be replaced with the
> > > target release version (e.g. 11.0.5 or such). It if for instance needed, if
> > > a backport involves a CSR - so one can attach the CSR to the 11-pool issue
> > > before actually committing a fix.
> > >
> > > HTH
> > > Christoph
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: jdk-updates-dev <jdk-updates-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net>
> On
> > > > Behalf Of Martijn Verburg
> > > > Sent: Freitag, 19. Juli 2019 21:28
> > > > To: jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net
> > > > Subject: What is 11-pool Fix Version sued for?
> > > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > Would I be correct in thinking that `11-pool` contains a host of suitable
> > > > issues that are available to be picked up by anyone to submit a patch
> > > for?
> > > >
> > > > JBS search for a reference:
> > > >
> > > > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-
> > > >
> 8227650?jql=project%20%3D%20JDK%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%2011-
> > > > pool
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Martijn
> > >
More information about the jdk-updates-dev
mailing list