OpenJDK 11u backport of JDK-8148188: Enhance the security libraries to record events of interest

[Langer, Christoph]

Thanks, David.

Then I probably did the right thing by manually creating the backport bug.

cc-ing ops at o.j.n: Maybe you want to have a look why hgupdater failed in this case?

Cheers
Christoph

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Holmes <david.holmes at oracle.com>
> Sent: Sonntag, 23. Juni 2019 00:15
> To: Langer, Christoph <christoph.langer at sap.com>; jdk-updates-
> dev at openjdk.java.net; security-dev <security-dev at openjdk.java.net>
> Subject: Re: OpenJDK 11u backport of JDK-8148188: Enhance the security
> libraries to record events of interest
> 
> Hi Christoph,
> 
> On 22/06/2019 2:25 pm, Langer, Christoph wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I pushed the backport of JDK-8148188 [0] to jdk11u-dev [1] on Friday. I was
> wondering why no 11.0.5 backport JBS item was created. I then manually
> created JDK-8226636 [2], but the minute I had created it I got an idea what
> the reason for that strange JBS/hgupdater behavior was (all other pushes
> around this commit seem to have correct backport bugs). I now suspect that
> there existed a confidential 11-pool backport item already which was
> resolved by my push.
> >
> > Can anybody within Oracle please check this and if I’m correct, please also
> check whether the backport bug can be made public? I’d then close JDK-
> 8226636 as duplicate. But maybe I’m wrong with that guess… please
> enlighten me ��
> 
> No there was no confidential issue resolved by your push. I would have
> to suspect hgupdater may be down, or else some other hgupdater
> configuration problem.
> 
> David
> ------
> 
> > Thanks
> > Christoph
> >
> > [0] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8148188
> > [1] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk-updates/jdk11u-dev/rev/5f98a6a92842
> > [2] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8226636
> >