11u: Push of JDK-8210192 to jkd11u repository
Rob McKenna
rob.mckenna at oracle.com
Sat Mar 2 00:41:49 UTC 2019
Please subscribe to the list at:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/jdk-updates-dev
-Rob
On 01/03/19 08:30, Jiangli Zhou wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 8:01 AM Jiangli Zhou <jianglizhou at google.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Christoph,
> >
> > Thank you for noticing this! Sorry for pushing to the wrong repo. It is
> > indeed my mistake due to a lack of education on the update repo process.
> >
> > To make sure I won't make the same mistake again in the future, could you
> > (or Andrew or Aleksey) please point me to the current process guideline
> > (still catching up on these). Thanks!
> >
>
> Please ignore the above. I found the info on jdk-updates-dev mailing list.
> Looks like my new email address is still not added to the jdk-updates-dev
> mailing list, so I haven't noticed the process change (my email sending to
> the mailing list doesn't go through either currently). I'll try to ping Rob
> on the mailing list access.
>
> Thanks!
> Jiangli
>
>
> > Best regards,
> > Jiangli
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 12:49 AM Langer, Christoph <
> > christoph.langer at sap.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> the backport for JDK-8210192 has been pushed to jdk11u. Looking at the
> >> fix request, I don’t think it was explicitly targeted for 11.0.3, so it
> >> should have been gone to jk11u-dev (11.0.4).
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Looking at the issue, I think it’s simple and riskless enough to keep it
> >> and not taking some “repair” action such as backing it out. Andrew, do you
> >> concur?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> In any case, we should try to avoid such pushes in the future.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Best regards
> >>
> >> Christoph
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
More information about the jdk-updates-dev
mailing list