Confirmation about jdk11u approval process

Ichiroh Takiguchi takiguc at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Mon Mar 4 12:13:19 UTC 2019


Hello Aleksey.

For [1], it's only happened on 64bit CPU.
So actually, JDK6.
But it's still older...
I will obey maintainers decision.

I appreciate if you push [2] - [6] to 11.0.3.

Thanks,
Ichiroh Takiguchi

On 2019-03-04 20:13, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> On 3/4/19 12:10 PM, Ichiroh Takiguchi wrote:
>> I have additional question.
>> How can I determine these are for 11.0.3 or 11.0.4 ?
> 
> 11.0.3 had been forked for stabilization already. If you haven't had
> the agreement with maintainer
> (Andrew) about pushing some of them to 11.0.3, all these go to 11.0.4.
> 
> It looks to me only [1] can be considered critical, but I also see
> Andrew being skeptical about the
> impact of it. Me too, actually, given how old the bug is: it seems to
> go all we way back to JDK 1.2,
> 20 years? Seems like there is no rush to get it in 11.0.3, and it can
> go to 11.0.4?
> 
>> If these are for 11.0.3, I need to find out the sponsor for them
>> as soon as possible.
> 
> I can sponsor these for you.
> 
>> [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8211393
>> [2] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8208634
>> [3] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8213618
>> [4] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8212794
>> [5] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8214533
>> [6] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8217880
> 
> -Aleksey



More information about the jdk-updates-dev mailing list