Confirmation about jdk11u approval process

[Lindenmaier, Goetz]

Hi Ichiroh,

> BTW, I have one more question.
> Japanese era name will be changed on May 1, 2019.
> Then new Japanese era name will be announced on April 1, 2019. [1]
> Is it possible to apply the changes for new Japanese era name into
> 11.0.3 ?
> I assume i18n members will submit the changes.
We pushed some era changes to 11.0.3 aka jdk11u. Is something
missing? Maybe you can verify them �� ... I'm not familiar with
Japanese eras ...

Best regards,
  Goetz


> 
> [1]
> https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2019/01/04/national/politics-
> diplomacy/name-japans-next-imperial-era-announced-april-1-abe-
> confirms/#.XH1mZWPgqpo
> 
> Thanks,
> Ichiroh Takiguchi
> 
> On 2019-03-04 22:09, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> > On 3/4/19 1:13 PM, Ichiroh Takiguchi wrote:
> >> Hello Aleksey.
> >>
> >> For [1], it's only happened on 64bit CPU.
> >> So actually, JDK6.
> >> But it's still older...
> >> I will obey maintainers decision.
> >>
> >> I appreciate if you push [2] - [6] to 11.0.3.
> >
> > Wait. As I said, all current pushes go to 11.0.4, *unless* maintainer
> > specifically granted the
> > approval specifically for 11.0.3. Which did not happen for any of
> > these six issues. So, [1]-[6]
> > would go to 11.0.4, okay?
> >
> > As I applied all the patches to current jdk11u-dev, I realized that
> > some of them are AIX-specific.
> > While the whole bunch passes tier1 tests on my Linux x86_64, we better
> > confirm it does not break
> > AIX. It is unclear from the Fix Requests: have you tested these on
> > AIX? Or, should we ask Christoph
> > to do it?
> >
> > The changeset bunch is here:
> >
> > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shade/backports-11u/ibm-
> charsets/webrev.01/
> >
> > -Aleksey