AArch64: 8216350 and 8215951
Andrew John Hughes
gnu.andrew at redhat.com
Fri Mar 15 16:34:37 UTC 2019
On 14/03/2019 13:37, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 3/14/19 11:30 AM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> Okay, I can push all three (8211320, 8216350, 8215951) to jdk11u (11.0.3). Confirm?
>
Can we please use the critical-request/approved labels as suggested in
[0] for these cases? At present, it is not clear from the bugs why they
were pushed to 11.0.3 instead of 11.0.4, and there's no easy way to
search for such cases otherwise.
Speaking for myself doing maintenance work on 8u, I would prefer to be
able to easily prioritise those bugs for the imminent release, rather
than the next one.
> Yes. Also please look at https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8211064. Please
> label it with jdk11u-fix-request. This is an old one which seems to have fallen
> down the back of the sofa.
>
Interestingly, this actually found its way to 7 before 11!
https://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3669
[0] https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2019-March/008916.html
--
Andrew :)
Senior Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04 C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222
https://keybase.io/gnu_andrew
More information about the jdk-updates-dev
mailing list