Handling Backport Changesets

[Andrew John Hughes]

On 29/03/2019 16:49, Volker Simonis wrote:
> Good idea!
> 
> From my naive understanding, this is merely a question of changing
> "jcheck" in such a way that it allows these sort of extra comments. As
> project owner you can disable "jcheck" altogether, in which case we
> could start using the new comments right away. I'd nevertheless vote
> for keeping "jcheck" but extend it to allow the new format.
> 
> Regards,
> Volker
> 

Well, I'm not project owner; that would be aph :) (TooManyAndrewsException)

jcheck catches quite a lot of stuff, much as it annoys me sometimes, so
I prefer to keep it enabled if possible. Also, this proposal would apply
to Oracle-maintained repositories as well (e.g. jdk12).
-- 
Andrew :)

Senior Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222
https://keybase.io/gnu_andrew