[11u] RFR: JDK-8223697 jfr tool can't format duration values greater than 1 minute

Hohensee, Paul hohensee at amazon.com
Thu Oct 24 18:22:54 UTC 2019


This is an instance of a fanout problem that will become more common as tip's code base diverges from that of 11u. Maintainers, shall we make it a policy to do predecessor backports such that we can get clean 'master' backports?

Thanks,

Paul

On 10/24/19, 7:36 AM, "jdk-updates-dev on behalf of Jie Kang" <jdk-updates-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net on behalf of jkang at redhat.com> wrote:

    On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 3:49 AM Severin Gehwolf <sgehwolf at redhat.com> wrote:
    >
    > Hi Jie,
    >
    > On Wed, 2019-10-23 at 16:15 -0400, Jie Kang wrote:
    > > Hi,
    > >
    > > Please review this backport for [1]. The fix did not apply cleanly due
    > > to line differences from missing backport of [2]. The additions are
    > > the same but at different lines than in jdk/jdk.
    > >
    > > This fix is quite small and useful for the jfr tool in jdk 11. The
    > > tier one and jfr tests ran successfully on my machine.
    >
    > Is there a good reason NOT to backport JDK-8215771 as well? Then this
    > patch would apply cleanly AFAUI and JDK-8215771 seems useful in itself.
    > JDK-8215771 seems small enough. Thoughts?
    
    Hi Severin,
    
    I considered JDK-8215771 to be of the 'feature enhancement' type,
    while this (JDK-8223697) is of 'bug fix' type. This was my thinking
    for the backport request of this but not of JDK-8215771. However, I
    realize I can request a fix for JDK-8215771 to see if it is acceptable
    to the 11u maintainers. It will indeed make this a clean backport and
    bring in useful changes. I will proceed as such; thanks for bringing
    this up!
    
    
    Regards,
    Jie Kang
    
    >
    > Thanks,
    > Severin
    >
    > > Webrev:
    > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jkang/JDK-8223697/webrev.01/
    > > Bug:
    > > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8223697
    > >
    > > [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8223697
    > > [2] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8215771
    > >
    > >
    > > Regards,
    > > Jie Kang
    > >
    >
    



More information about the jdk-updates-dev mailing list