[ping] [11u] RFR(S): 8236700: Upgrading JSZip from v3.1.5 to v3.2.2

[Lindenmaier, Goetz]

Hi,

Could I please get a review?

Thanks!
  Goetz.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: jdk-updates-dev <jdk-updates-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net> On
> Behalf Of Lindenmaier, Goetz
> Sent: Friday, March 27, 2020 7:47 AM
> To: jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net
> Subject: [CAUTION] [11u] RFR(S): 8236700: Upgrading JSZip from v3.1.5 to
> v3.2.2
> 
> Hi
> 
> I would like to downport this change for parity with 11.0.8-oracle.
> The patch does not apply clean.
> 
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr20/8236700-upgrade_jszip-jdk11/01/
> 
> The .js files have been moved to another location in 14:
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8221644  jquery directory should
> be renamed
> (Later, they have been removed altogether
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8237909  Remove zipped index
> files feature)
> 
> The move could be undone by simply editing the paths in the patch.
> The patch then applies clean to the .js files.
> 
> A part of the license change did not apply.
> The corresponding text is not in 11. It was introduced
> when moving the pako license into the jszip license.
> The bugs that document this are closed, but here the link
> to the changes:
>   8219803: Nodeca Pako license text needs to be inserted in JSZip license text
>   http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/5d97784f08bf
>   8228492: Remove pako.md
>   http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/5b5747ed8f34
> 
> I just dropped the sentence.
> 
> Please review.
> 
> Thanks, Goetz.