[11u] RFR(S): 8236700: Upgrading JSZip from v3.1.5 to v3.2.2

Lindenmaier, Goetz goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com
Mon Apr 6 07:44:23 UTC 2020


Hi Christoph, 

Thanks for reviewing!

Best regards,
  Goetz.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Langer, Christoph <christoph.langer at sap.com>
> Sent: Monday, April 6, 2020 8:10 AM
> To: Lindenmaier, Goetz <goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com>; jdk-updates-
> dev at openjdk.java.net
> Subject: RE: [11u] RFR(S): 8236700: Upgrading JSZip from v3.1.5 to v3.2.2
> 
> Hi Goetz,
> 
> looks correct.
> 
> Best regards
> Christoph
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: jdk-updates-dev <jdk-updates-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net> On
> > Behalf Of Lindenmaier, Goetz
> > Sent: Freitag, 27. März 2020 07:47
> > To: jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net
> > Subject: [CAUTION] [11u] RFR(S): 8236700: Upgrading JSZip from v3.1.5 to
> > v3.2.2
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > I would like to downport this change for parity with 11.0.8-oracle.
> > The patch does not apply clean.
> >
> > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr20/8236700-upgrade_jszip-jdk11/01/
> >
> > The .js files have been moved to another location in 14:
> > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8221644  jquery directory
> should
> > be renamed
> > (Later, they have been removed altogether
> > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8237909  Remove zipped index
> > files feature)
> >
> > The move could be undone by simply editing the paths in the patch.
> > The patch then applies clean to the .js files.
> >
> > A part of the license change did not apply.
> > The corresponding text is not in 11. It was introduced
> > when moving the pako license into the jszip license.
> > The bugs that document this are closed, but here the link
> > to the changes:
> >   8219803: Nodeca Pako license text needs to be inserted in JSZip license
> text
> >   http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/5d97784f08bf
> >   8228492: Remove pako.md
> >   http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/5b5747ed8f34
> >
> > I just dropped the sentence.
> >
> > Please review.
> >
> > Thanks, Goetz.


More information about the jdk-updates-dev mailing list