[11u]: 8255351: Add detection for Graviton 2 CPUs

[Hohensee, Paul]

In that case: maintainers, what's your sense of whether 8256488 and 8257436 backports would be approved? The two patches apply cleanly net of copyright date and context.

Thanks,
Paul

-----Original Message-----
From: Volker Simonis <volker.simonis at gmail.com>
Date: Thursday, December 3, 2020 at 12:13 PM
To: "Hohensee, Paul" <hohensee at amazon.com>
Cc: Vladimir Kozlov <vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com>, "jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net" <jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net>
Subject: RE: [11u]: 8255351: Add detection for Graviton 2 CPUs

Hi Paul, Vladimir,

I think we should only downport this change together with JDK-8257436
and JDK-8256488 which fix some regressions for the SIMD case.

I've put a corresponding comment into JDK-8255351 and linked the two
issues there (sorry, should have done this earlier).

Best regards,
Volker

On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 8:54 PM Hohensee, Paul <hohensee at amazon.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the very quick review, Vladimir. Protocol is to tag issues that need review after review approval. Now that I have yours I've tagged 8255351.
>
> Paul
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jdk-updates-dev <jdk-updates-dev-retn at openjdk.java.net> on behalf of Vladimir Kozlov <vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com>
> Date: Thursday, December 3, 2020 at 11:35 AM
> To: "jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net" <jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net>
> Subject: RE: [11u]: 8255351: Add detection for Graviton 2 CPUs
>
> Changes look good but I don't see backport request in JBS.
>
> Thanks,
> Vladimir K
>
> On 12/3/20 11:25 AM, Hohensee, Paul wrote:
> > Please review this 11u backport.
> >
> > JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8255351
> > Patch: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/commit/2215e5a4
> > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~phh/8255351/webrev.11u.01/
> >
> > Patch changed by adding copyright date update, and modifying trailing context in hunk #2.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Paul
> >
>