Backporting features [was Re: RFR (11u, XXL): Upstream/backport Shenandoah to JDK11u]
Andrew John Hughes
gnu.andrew at redhat.com
Mon Feb 17 18:42:13 UTC 2020
On 17/02/2020 18:41, Claes Redestad wrote:
>
>
> On 2020-02-17 19:31, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>> As Andrew Dinn has already said well, and in greater detail, the onus
>> for divergence can not rest solely on the shoulders of the OpenJDK
>> project.
>
> I did not imply otherwise, just pointing out that this is a reality the
> OpenJDK must take into consideration regardless of who's to blame. All
> I'm saying is that exasperating the divergence might not be in the best
> interest of either party.
>
> /Claes
>
True, and this is something we have taken into consideration and
continue to do so.
My key point is that such considerations are inevitably limited when one
is comparing against a black box.
--
Andrew :)
Senior Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04 C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222
https://keybase.io/gnu_andrew
More information about the jdk-updates-dev
mailing list