Downport 8217338: [Containers] Improve systemd slice memory limit support

[Langer, Christoph]

Hi,

> > We have the Committers' Workshop upcoming. We can discuss this problem
> > there.
> That's a good idea.  Christoph will be there from our side.
> Unfortunately I won't make it.

Yes, we should definitely take this topic to discussion in the workshop.

/Christoph

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat.com>
> > Sent: Mittwoch, 8. Januar 2020 12:20
> > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz <goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com>; Severin Gehwolf
> > <sgehwolf at redhat.com>
> > Cc: jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net
> > Subject: Re: Downport 8217338: [Containers] Improve systemd slice
> memory
> > limit support
> >
> > On 1/8/20 10:19 AM, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote:
> > > PS: the current process of bringing changes to 11 that were
> > > downported by Oracle is extremely cumbersome.  I am doing
> > > lots of completely pointless webrevs/reviews, and I have to
> > > coordinate with a row of other resources: reviewer, approval,
> > > testing. In the end I have 15-30 open changes for downport,
> > > some not reviewed, some not approved, some in the testing,
> > > some I need to fix as they did not pass testing. This leads to errors.
> > > And only from the testing I ever got useful feedback ...
> > > It would be much better if I could just push all changes that
> > > applied without substantial conflicts after they passed testing.
> >
> > We have the Committers' Workshop upcoming. We can discuss this
> problem
> > there.
> >
> > --
> > Andrew Haley  (he/him)
> > Java Platform Lead Engineer
> > Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
> > https://keybase.io/andrewhaley
> > EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671