11u RFR: 8232569: Use test image from different jib profile for testing

[Lindenmaier, Goetz]

Hi,

+1
I think this is a candidate for the label "openjdk-na" then.

Best regards,
  Goetz.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: jdk-updates-dev <jdk-updates-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net> On
> Behalf Of Langer, Christoph
> Sent: Montag, 9. März 2020 17:29
> To: Erik Joelsson <erik.joelsson at oracle.com>; jdk-updates-
> dev at openjdk.java.net
> Cc: build-dev <build-dev at openjdk.java.net>
> Subject: [CAUTION] RE: 11u RFR: 8232569: Use test image from different jib
> profile for testing
>
> Thanks Erik, for this clarification.
>
> We won't backport it then.
>
> Cheers
> Christoph
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Erik Joelsson <erik.joelsson at oracle.com>
> Sent: Montag, 9. März 2020 16:44
> To: Langer, Christoph <christoph.langer at sap.com>; jdk-updates-
> dev at openjdk.java.net
> Cc: build-dev <build-dev at openjdk.java.net>
> Subject: Re: 11u RFR: 8232569: Use test image from different jib profile for
> testing
>
>
> On 2020-03-09 08:14, Langer, Christoph wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Please help reviewing this Oracle parity backport
> > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8232569
> > Original Change: https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/559c46cd0e8b
> > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~clanger/webrevs/8232569.11u/
> >
> > I had to make several adaptions because some predecessors were missing
> regarding jcov. Will run the change through our nightly tests but I doubt the file
> is used there.
> >
> > Is this file only used in internal Oracle builds or does it have use cases
> outside? (I guess this question unmasks my ignorance in that area ��)
>
> This file is only used by Oracle. It's used to interact with our
> dependency management and build configuration system ("jib"), which is
> internal. We keep it in the source code since this configuration is very
> highly version specific and frequently changes in lock step with other
> source code changes. While the exact meaning of the contents of the file
> isn't obvious to an external reader, certain things pertaining to how
> Oracle configures builds can still be gleaned from it and may be useful
> to some (current compiler versions, values of some configure options etc).
>
> I would very much recommend against trying to merge changes here for
> OpenJDK update releases.
>
> /Erik
>
> > Thanks
> > Christoph
> >