[11u] RFR(S): 8223326: Regression introduced by CPU sync: java.security.AccessControlException: access denied ("java.net.NetPermission" "setSocketImpl")

[Doerr, Martin]

Hi Paul,

thanks for the review.

We had already asked, but this one can't get opened up. I would have preferred a normal backport, too.

Best regards,
Martin


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hohensee, Paul <hohensee at amazon.com>
> Sent: Montag, 23. März 2020 19:29
> To: Doerr, Martin <martin.doerr at sap.com>; core-libs-
> dev at openjdk.java.net; jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net
> Subject: RE: [11u] RFR(S): 8223326: Regression introduced by CPU sync:
> java.security.AccessControlException: access denied
> ("java.net.NetPermission" "setSocketImpl")
> 
> The changeset references JDK-8223326, which is private. If possible, ask
> Oracle to make it public so we can do a normal backport rather than file an
> 11u-specific issue. The backport itself looks fine.
> 
> Thanks,
> Paul
> 
> On 3/23/20, 11:08 AM, "jdk-updates-dev on behalf of Doerr, Martin" <jdk-
> updates-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net on behalf of
> martin.doerr at sap.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>     Hi,
> 
>     I'd like to backport JDK-8223326 from jdk/jdk.
> 
>     11u backport issue:
>     https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8241460
> 
>     Original change:
>     https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/29624901d8bc
> 
>     11u backport webrev:
> 
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mdoerr/8223326_nio_socket_11u/webrev.00/
> 
>     I had to integrate the change manually due to context changes. However,
> the new code fits to the 11u versions.
> 
>     Please review.
> 
>     Best regards,
>     Martin
> 
>