[11u] [JFR] RFR(XXL) 8226511: Implement JFR Event Streaming

[Mario Torre]

Hi Martijn,

Thanks, this is great news!

Cheers,
Mario

Il giorno lun 30 mar 2020 alle ore 23:01 Martijn Verburg
<martijnverburg at gmail.com> ha scritto:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Microsoft will be able to commit some folks to this from mid-April onward
> and will be willing to help maintain the JFR backport across 8u and 11u
> alongside Alibaba and other interested folks going forward.
>
> I'll get the engineers to jump on this list and start the learning process.
>
> Cheers,
> Martijn
>
>
> On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 06:06, Denghui Dong <denghui.ddh at alibaba-inc.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I believe there will be some volunteers, at least we(Alibaba) are willing
> > to do it. Of course,
> > the premise of all this is that the maintainers agree with the work.
> >
> > As Erik said, JFR Streaming has changed the internal implementation of
> > jfr, so I think we need
> > to create an incubator branch and a small discussion group to trace this
> > work, and we need some experienced people to help us.
> >
> > Besides, JFR has just entered 8u, so I agree with Mario that it isn't
> > appropriate time to discuss
> > backporting JFR Streaming to 8u.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Denghui
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > From:Mario Torre <neugens at redhat.com>
> > Send Time:2020年3月25日(星期三) 00:31
> > To:Martijn Verburg <martijnverburg at gmail.com>
> > Cc:jdk-updates-dev <jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net>
> > Subject:Re: [11u] [JFR] RFR(XXL) 8226511: Implement JFR Event Streaming
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 5:19 PM Martijn Verburg
> > <martijnverburg at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Could we create a project/tree/branch for this work (jdk11u-jfr-test or
> > some such) that a bunch of us could work on together to ensure the
> > stability and quality of the patch before it goes into 11u?
> >
> > For the JFR backport we created a small team, most of us were, if not
> > full time, at least "stable" on the project. While anyone could join
> > and share some knowledge, review a patch, or contribute some work, a
> > stable team means we can ensure questions and reviews are done
> > correctly and timely (after all, this is what happens in OpenJDK as
> > well).
> >
> > So the question here would be if there is enough of manpower to
> > dedicate to this project from the interested parties.
> >
> > Denghui has already done the backport but my experience with JFR tells
> > me that work will be needed on top of this anyway.
> >
> > If we have consensus that this should go into the release (from the
> > maintainers) and the we have a critical mass of developers that are
> > willing to dedicate to it, then we can request an incubator repository
> > like we did with the JFR backport.
> >
> > In other words, we need to have some volunteers that understand this
> > may be a time intensive work for the next weeks or months, and that
> > will need to be maintained after this when it's merged.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Mario
> > --
> > Mario Torre
> > Associate Manager, Software Engineering
> > Red Hat GmbH <https://www.redhat.com>
> > 9704 A60C B4BE A8B8 0F30  9205 5D7E 4952 3F65 7898



-- 
pgp key: http://subkeys.pgp.net/ PGP Key ID: 80F240CF
Fingerprint: BA39 9666 94EC 8B73 27FA  FC7C 4086 63E3 80F2 40CF

Java Champion - Blog: http://neugens.wordpress.com - Twitter: @neugens
Proud GNU Classpath developer: http://www.classpath.org/
OpenJDK: http://openjdk.java.net/projects/caciocavallo/

Please, support open standards:
http://endsoftpatents.org/