[11u] RFR: 8255781: Bump patch update version for OpenJDK: jdk-11.0.9.1

Severin Gehwolf sgehwolf at redhat.com
Wed Nov 4 14:02:21 UTC 2020


On Wed, 2020-11-04 at 11:06 +0000, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote:
> > Are you saying there will be 11.0.9.1+0 and 11.0.9.1+1?
> Yes ��

:)

> It's a branch point, isn't it?

Sorry, mea culpa. I failed to recognize the "and" in "... and there
will be a 11.0.9.1+0". Nevermind me.

Thanks,
Severin

> Best regards,
>   Goetz.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Severin Gehwolf <sgehwolf at redhat.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 4, 2020 10:44 AM
> > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz <goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com>; jdk-updates-
> > dev at openjdk.java.net
> > Subject: Re: [11u] RFR: 8255781: Bump patch update version for OpenJDK:
> > jdk-11.0.9.1
> > 
> > On Wed, 2020-11-04 at 09:33 +0000, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote:
> > > Hi Severin,
> > > 
> > > Yes, and there will be a 11.0.9.1+0.
> > 
> > Why not 11.0.9.1+1? We've never had a build zero other than for branch
> > points. Are you saying there will be 11.0.9.1+0 and 11.0.9.1+1?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Severin
> > 
> > > Best regards,
> > >   Goetz.
> > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Severin Gehwolf <sgehwolf at redhat.com>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 4, 2020 10:22 AM
> > > > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz <goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com>; jdk-updates-
> > > > dev at openjdk.java.net
> > > > Subject: Re: [11u] RFR: 8255781: Bump patch update version for
> > > > OpenJDK:
> > > > jdk-11.0.9.1
> > > > 
> > > > On Mon, 2020-11-02 at 19:47 +0000, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > 
> > > > > As decided in this mail thread, I'll bump the version of jdk-
> > > > > updates/jdk11u
> > > > to 11.0.9.1.
> > > > > I'll push this change and the fix latest on Wednesday, Nov 4th.
> > > > > I'll add
> > > > corresponding tags, too.
> > > > > Please review.
> > > > > 
> > > > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr20/8255781-
> > Bump_version_11.0.9.1-
> > > > jdk11/01/
> > > > 
> > > > What's the tag and build number going to be? I take it something
> > > > like
> > > > this?
> > > > 
> > > > Tag(s):
> > > >  jdk-11.0.9.1+1
> > > >  jdk-11.0.9.1-ga (pointing to jdk-11.0.9.1+1)
> > > > 
> > > > Thus, build number 1.
> > > > 
> > > > Thoughts?
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Severin



More information about the jdk-updates-dev mailing list