11.0.9 misses JDK-8250861
Lindenmaier, Goetz
goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com
Thu Oct 29 11:31:10 UTC 2020
Hi,
So should we release a 11.0.9.0.1 version?
I could post a RFR for the version change.
I think we should also bump the release date, then.
But to which date? Maybe Monday, 2.11.?
Actually, we have detected another problem introduced
in 11.0.8, Christoph has the details.
It increases memory footprint severely and came up
in our productive systems. Unfortunately, no fix
exists yet in OpenJDK, we are working on it.
But it might be another candidate for a 11.0.9.0.1.
Best regards,
Goetz.
-----Original Message-----
From: jdk-updates-dev <jdk-updates-dev-retn at openjdk.java.net> On Behalf Of Andrew Haley
Sent: Donnerstag, 29. Oktober 2020 12:10
To: jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: 11.0.9 misses JDK-8250861
Hi,
On 29/10/2020 10:45, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2020-10-29 at 10:22 +0000, Doerr, Martin wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> we have observed a crash with SIGSEGV in the C2 code on SPARC (but
>> it's not in platform specific code) in 11.0.9. This code was
>> introduced with
>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk-updates/jdk11u/rev/ed3959f95671
>>
>> Fix is already available:
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8250861
>>
>> I've requested backport for 11.0.10 so I'm planning to push it to
>> jdk11u-dev. Does anybody need it in jdk11u?
>
> Approved for 11.0.10.
>
> I'll let others chime in on whether or not this warrants a respin for
> 11.0.9.
I would have thought so.
--
Andrew Haley (he/him)
Java Platform Lead Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
https://keybase.io/andrewhaley
EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671
More information about the jdk-updates-dev
mailing list