[11u] RFR 8250928: JFR: Improve hash algorithm for stack traces
Jaroslav Bachorík
jaroslav.bachorik at datadoghq.com
Fri Sep 18 10:41:15 UTC 2020
Ok, opening an RFR for JDK-8252754 backport since I had to adjust the
patch's hunk offsets a bit.
https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk-updates-dev/2020-September/003832.html
Cheers,
-JB-
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 2:01 PM Langer, Christoph
<christoph.langer at sap.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I agree to Aleksey's comments. Both should be pushed as separate commits but in one go.
>
> Cheers
> Christoph
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: jdk-updates-dev <jdk-updates-dev-retn at openjdk.java.net> On
> > Behalf Of Aleksey Shipilev
> > Sent: Mittwoch, 16. September 2020 11:57
> > To: Jaroslav Bachorík <jaroslav.bachorik at datadoghq.com>
> > Cc: jdk-updates-dev <jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net>
> > Subject: Re: [11u] RFR 8250928: JFR: Improve hash algorithm for stack traces
> >
> > On 9/3/20 7:00 PM, Jaroslav Bachorík wrote:
> > > Hearing no objections, here is a new webrev:
> > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8250928/11u/01/webrev
> >
> > Let's not diverge here?
> >
> > Better backport JDK-8252754 as the follow-up, and push JDK-8250928 (this
> > one) and JDK-8252754
> > (follow-up) together.
> >
> > The first variant looks fine:
> > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8250928/11u/webrev/
> >
> > ...provided it it pushed along with JDK-8252754.
> >
> > --
> > Thanks,
> > -Aleksey
>
More information about the jdk-updates-dev
mailing list