[11u] RFR: 8265099: Revert backport to 11u of 8236859: WebSocket over authenticating proxy fails with NPE
Hohensee, Paul
hohensee at amazon.com
Mon Apr 12 22:32:10 UTC 2021
Thanks, Christoph. Pushed.
-----Original Message-----
From: "Langer, Christoph" <christoph.langer at sap.com>
Date: Monday, April 12, 2021 at 3:16 PM
To: "Hohensee, Paul" <hohensee at amazon.com>, "jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net" <jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net>, Ilarion Nakonechnyy <ilarion at azul.com>
Cc: "Doerr, Martin" <martin.doerr at sap.com>
Subject: RE: [11u] RFR: 8265099: Revert backport to 11u of 8236859: WebSocket over authenticating proxy fails with NPE
OK, I agree. The reversion looks correct to me. I've also approved the issue in JBS.
Cheers
Christoph
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hohensee, Paul <hohensee at amazon.com>
> Sent: Dienstag, 13. April 2021 00:08
> To: Langer, Christoph <christoph.langer at sap.com>; jdk-updates-
> dev at openjdk.java.net; Ilarion Nakonechnyy <ilarion at azul.com>
> Cc: Doerr, Martin <martin.doerr at sap.com>
> Subject: Re: [11u] RFR: 8265099: Revert backport to 11u of 8236859:
> WebSocket over authenticating proxy fails with NPE
>
> Also, reversion and redo is the tip dev process, which, having been subject to
> it :), imo is the right way to handle it for update releases.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jdk-updates-dev <jdk-updates-dev-retn at openjdk.java.net> on
> behalf of "Hohensee, Paul" <hohensee at amazon.com>
> Date: Monday, April 12, 2021 at 3:04 PM
> To: "Langer, Christoph" <christoph.langer at sap.com>, "jdk-updates-
> dev at openjdk.java.net" <jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net>, Ilarion
> Nakonechnyy <ilarion at azul.com>
> Cc: "Doerr, Martin" <martin.doerr at sap.com>
> Subject: Re: [11u] RFR: 8265099: Revert backport to 11u of 8236859:
> WebSocket over authenticating proxy fails with NPE
>
> I'd rather revert it now and file a redo issue. We don't know who might be
> doing 11u nightlies that are currently broken, and fixing the infrastructure
> may need another backport (or several). If the fix is just referencing a library
> that's in a different place, then the redo patch can include it.
>
> Thanks,
> Paul
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Langer, Christoph" <christoph.langer at sap.com>
> Date: Monday, April 12, 2021 at 2:57 PM
> To: "Hohensee, Paul" <hohensee at amazon.com>, "jdk-updates-
> dev at openjdk.java.net" <jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net>, Ilarion
> Nakonechnyy <ilarion at azul.com>
> Cc: "Doerr, Martin" <martin.doerr at sap.com>
> Subject: RE: [11u] RFR: 8265099: Revert backport to 11u of 8236859:
> WebSocket over authenticating proxy fails with NPE
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> I think reverting is fine. However, I don't know whether Ilarion will be able to
> provide a fix on short call. The error "can't find
> jdk.test.lib.net.SimpleSSLContext in test directory or libraries" sounds a bit
> like an infrastructure thing which maybe isn't too hard to repair? Maybe we
> want to give him a day or two and then just push a fix? What do you think
> (also @Ilarion...)?
>
> Best regards
> Christoph
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: jdk-updates-dev <jdk-updates-dev-retn at openjdk.java.net> On
> > Behalf Of Hohensee, Paul
> > Sent: Montag, 12. April 2021 23:31
> > To: jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net
> > Subject: [DMARC FAILURE] [11u] RFR: 8265099: Revert backport to 11u of
> > 8236859: WebSocket over authenticating proxy fails with NPE
> >
> > The recent backport of 8236859 to 11.0.12 causes tier2 failures in
> > java/net/httpclient. I’d like to revert the backport for now.
> >
> > Original issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8236859
> > Original patch: https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/ed8e7bf32188
> >
> > 11.0.12 backport issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-
> 8264988
> > 11.0.12 patch: https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk-updates/jdk11u-
> > dev/rev/57e3fa3574ec
> >
> > Reversion issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8265099
> > Reversion webrev:
> > https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~phh/8265099/webrev.11u.00/
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Paul
>
>
More information about the jdk-updates-dev
mailing list