[11u] RFR(M): 8233787 backport: Break cycle in vm_version* includes

Hohensee, Paul hohensee at amazon.com
Thu Apr 15 17:55:12 UTC 2021


I'll sponsor.

-----Original Message-----
From: "Schmidt, Lutz" <lutz.schmidt at sap.com>
Date: Thursday, April 15, 2021 at 7:16 AM
To: "Hohensee, Paul" <hohensee at amazon.com>, "jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net" <jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net>
Cc: build-dev <build-dev at openjdk.java.net>
Subject: RE: [11u] RFR(M): 8233787 backport: Break cycle in vm_version* includes

Dear all,

would somebody please be willing to sponsor this backport patch?

Thank you,
Lutz


On 14.04.21, 19:05, "jdk-updates-dev on behalf of Schmidt, Lutz" <jdk-updates-dev-retn at openjdk.java.net on behalf of lutz.schmidt at sap.com> wrote:

    Thanks for reviewing, Paul!
    Best,
    Lutz

    On 14.04.21, 19:01, "Hohensee, Paul" <hohensee at amazon.com> wrote:

        Lgtm.

        Thanks,
        Paul

        -----Original Message-----
        From: jdk-updates-dev <jdk-updates-dev-retn at openjdk.java.net> on behalf of "Schmidt, Lutz" <lutz.schmidt at sap.com>
        Date: Tuesday, April 13, 2021 at 12:51 AM
        To: "jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net" <jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net>
        Cc: build-dev <build-dev at openjdk.java.net>
        Subject: [11u] RFR(M): 8233787 backport: Break cycle in vm_version* includes

        Dear Community,

        I would appreciate receiving reviews for this downport change. It consists of many modified files. In most cases, it’s only #include statement changes, caused by factoring out abstract_vm_version.{c|h}pp from vm_version.{c|h}pp. The change did not apply cleanly, for the most part because of this split. The other merge conflicts were trivial (include rearrangement and copyright headers).

        Original bug:          https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8233787
        Downport webrev:       https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~lucy/webrevs/8233787.11u.01/
        Merge conflicts:       https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~lucy/webrevs/8233787-jdk11u.conflicts
        Conflict resolve diff: https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~lucy/webrevs/8233787-jdk11u.conflictresolve

        Tests:
        SAP's internal build and test farm (all OpenJDK platforms (no 32-bit), and more). Tests include JCK, jtreg (hotspot and jdk), and SAP-private tests. No issues found.

        Your effort is very much appreciated!

        Thanks,
        Lutz

        P.S.: build-dev on CC: because a small build change is included.







More information about the jdk-updates-dev mailing list