[11u] RFR: 8258414: OldObjectSample events too expensive

Jaroslav Bachorik j.bachorik at gmail.com
Fri Apr 23 14:09:13 UTC 2021


Hi all,

I am really sorry, gmail moved this thread to a spam folder and that's why
I didn't respond.

I am preparing the rollback.

-JB-

On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 2:42 PM Schmidt, Lutz <lutz.schmidt at sap.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm in full support of the decision. Bad patches with multiple causes of
> failure should be rolled back and retried - after thorough rework, testing
> and reviews.
>
> The bare minimum requirement for committers pushing a change is to be at
> least responsive on a mediocre level. Push, go away and let the others
> clean up is generally not well accepted by the community.
>
> Best regards,
> Lutz
>
> On 23.04.21, 10:53, "jdk-updates-dev on behalf of Thomas Stüfe" <
> jdk-updates-dev-retn at openjdk.java.net on behalf of thomas.stuefe at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>     Hi Florian and others,
>
>     we decided on a clean rollback instead of letting fixes pile on. Atm
> there
>     is a lack of trust in this patch, sorry.
>
>     Please roll back it - and Alekseys subsequent build fix from yesterday
> -
>     back and retry with a fully tested, complete patch. Thank you.
>
>     Cheers, Thomas
>
>
>
>
>     On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 2:19 PM Aleksey Shipilev <shade at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>     > On 4/22/21 1:12 PM, Langer, Christoph wrote:
>     > > Maybe for now it would be most appropriate to back it out and redo
> it
>     > later when the problems are understood/fixed?
>     >
>     > Yes, I'd vote for reversal to get 11u back to sane state.
>     >
>     > --
>     > Thanks,
>     > -Aleksey
>     >
>     >
>
>


More information about the jdk-updates-dev mailing list