[11u] RFR: 8258414: OldObjectSample events too expensive
Jaroslav Bachorik
j.bachorik at gmail.com
Fri Apr 23 14:09:13 UTC 2021
Hi all,
I am really sorry, gmail moved this thread to a spam folder and that's why
I didn't respond.
I am preparing the rollback.
-JB-
On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 2:42 PM Schmidt, Lutz <lutz.schmidt at sap.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm in full support of the decision. Bad patches with multiple causes of
> failure should be rolled back and retried - after thorough rework, testing
> and reviews.
>
> The bare minimum requirement for committers pushing a change is to be at
> least responsive on a mediocre level. Push, go away and let the others
> clean up is generally not well accepted by the community.
>
> Best regards,
> Lutz
>
> On 23.04.21, 10:53, "jdk-updates-dev on behalf of Thomas Stüfe" <
> jdk-updates-dev-retn at openjdk.java.net on behalf of thomas.stuefe at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Florian and others,
>
> we decided on a clean rollback instead of letting fixes pile on. Atm
> there
> is a lack of trust in this patch, sorry.
>
> Please roll back it - and Alekseys subsequent build fix from yesterday
> -
> back and retry with a fully tested, complete patch. Thank you.
>
> Cheers, Thomas
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 2:19 PM Aleksey Shipilev <shade at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On 4/22/21 1:12 PM, Langer, Christoph wrote:
> > > Maybe for now it would be most appropriate to back it out and redo
> it
> > later when the problems are understood/fixed?
> >
> > Yes, I'd vote for reversal to get 11u back to sane state.
> >
> > --
> > Thanks,
> > -Aleksey
> >
> >
>
>
More information about the jdk-updates-dev
mailing list