[11u] RFR 8259319: Illegal package access when SunPKCS11 requires SunJCE's classes
Lindenmaier, Goetz
goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com
Thu Jan 21 15:24:51 UTC 2021
Hi Martin,
The downport looks good to me.
Best regards,
Goetz.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jdk-updates-dev <jdk-updates-dev-retn at openjdk.java.net> On Behalf
> Of Martin Balao
> Sent: Friday, January 15, 2021 9:29 PM
> To: jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net
> Subject: [11u] RFR 8259319: Illegal package access when SunPKCS11 requires
> SunJCE's classes
>
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to have a review for the 11u backport of JDK-8259319 [1].
>
> Webrev.00:
>
> *
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbalao/webrevs/8259319/8259319.webrev.jdk1
> 1u.00/
>
> jdk/jdk patch does not apply cleanly because of the following conflicts:
>
> * src/java.base/share/classes/module-info.java
> * JDK-11 does not have JDK-8225054 [2], so the context is different.
> This change is not related to JDK-8259319, and does not apply to 11u.
> Manually fixed the conflict adding the export line on top of existing
> java.base module exports.
>
> * src/jdk.crypto.cryptoki/share/classes/sun/security/pkcs11/P11Util.java
> * Copyright date conflict. In 11u, date range ends in 2014. This is
> because 11u does not have JDK-8233884. Manually fixed the conflict with
> the right date (2021).
>
> No regressions found in jdk/sun/security/pkcs11.
>
> Thanks,
> Martin.-
>
> --
> [1] - https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8259319
> [2] - https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8225054
> [3] - https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8233884
>
More information about the jdk-updates-dev
mailing list