[External] : RE: [Updates Communication] 16.0.2 security changes pushed

[Robert Mckenna]

16.0.2 has been merged into master.

    -Rob

________________________________________
From: Langer, Christoph <christoph.langer at sap.com>
Sent: Thursday 22 July 2021 14:37
To: Robert Mckenna
Cc: jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net
Subject: RE: [External] : RE: [Updates Communication] 16.0.2 security changes pushed

OK, perfect.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Mckenna <rob.mckenna at oracle.com>
> Sent: Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2021 15:36
> To: Langer, Christoph <christoph.langer at sap.com>
> Cc: jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: [External] : RE: [Updates Communication] 16.0.2 security
> changes pushed
>
> Yep!
>
>     -Rob
>
> > On 22 Jul 2021, at 14:34, Langer, Christoph <christoph.langer at sap.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Rob.
> >
> > So, can I assume for the future that tags will be merged into master (as
> always) and you'll additionally provide branches for individual update
> releases?
> >
> > Cheers
> > Christoph
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Robert Mckenna <rob.mckenna at oracle.com>
> >> Sent: Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2021 15:15
> >> To: Langer, Christoph <christoph.langer at sap.com>
> >> Cc: jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net
> >> Subject: Re: [External] : RE: [Updates Communication] 16.0.2 security
> >> changes pushed
> >>
> >> Apologies, that is an oversight. The merge should be pushed with the
> branch
> >> (as per 16.0.1) - I’ll rectify this shortly.
> >>
> >>    -Rob
> >>
> >>
> >>> On 22 Jul 2021, at 10:57, Langer, Christoph <christoph.langer at sap.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Rob,
> >>>
> >>> thanks for pushing the changes.
> >>>
> >>> However, the concept with using branches seems quite new... Was this
> >> somehow announced or documented? Can we expect this in the future?
> I'm
> >> asking because the contract between the jdk16u repository and our
> >> downstream automation is broken by this. We currently pull branch
> 'master'
> >> and check the contained tags.
> >>>
> >>> The problem is that tag jdk-16.0.2-ga has not been merged into 'master'.
> >> The master branch only contains jdk-16.0.2+3. Also a "git diff master jdk-
> >> 16.0.2-ga" is not empty.
> >>>
> >>> So, can you please merge jdk-16.0.2-ga into master?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks & Best regards
> >>> Christoph
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: jdk-updates-dev <jdk-updates-dev-retn at openjdk.java.net> On
> >>>> Behalf Of Robert Mckenna
> >>>> Sent: Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2021 01:23
> >>>> To: jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net
> >>>> Subject: [SUSPECTED SPAM] [Updates Communication] 16.0.2 security
> >>>> changes pushed
> >>>>
> >>>> (along with the 16.0.2 branch)
> >>>>
> >>>>   -Rob