[15u] RFR 8202343: Disable TLS 1.0 and 1.1

[Alvarez, David]

Sorry, my bad, I though you were talking about the prerrequisites that
made the patch not apply cleanly, but you were talking about the follow
ups. Yes, I absolutely intend to backport those follow ups

David

On 3/11/21 8:45 AM, Alvarez, David wrote:
> Hi Yan,
> 
> I did consider JDK-8257083 and JDK-8256682, but I didn't backport them
> because I thought this would need to go as critical (and I was not sure
> those two would). I'll try to grab them, but if you don't see the
> request in the next few days, feel free to pick this for the release (if
> JDK-8257083 and JDK-8256682 are picked, I expect this one to apply cleanly).
> 
> David
> 
> On 3/11/21 8:37 AM, Yuri Nesterenko wrote:
>> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe.
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> do you plan also to backport JDK-8257083 and JDK-8256682 (that on the surface)?
>> I hope we have a week or so for that.
>> This patch looks OK to me.
>> And as there was no clear rampdown declared, a simple jdk15u-fix-request should be enough.
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>> --yan
>>
>> On 11.03.2021 18:56, Alvarez, David wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I would like to request a review for JDK-8202343
>>>
>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8202343
>>> Webrev:
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alvdavi/webrevs/8202343/webrev.8202343.15u.00/
>>>
>>> Patch applies almost cleanly, only minor changes were needed to the
>>> java.security and DisabledCurve.java files to account for JDK-8235710
>>> [1] missing in 15u.
>>>
>>> Patch passes the tests under sun/security/ssl.
>>>
>>> I intend to mark this patch as critical request to make sure 15u is
>>> aligned with other versions, so I would appreciate if the patch gets
>>> reviewed soon. 13u also needs this backport.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>> ------
>>> [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8235710
>>>
>>
>