[External] : Re: [11u] RFR 8218458: [TESTBUG] runtime/NMT/CheckForProperDetailStackTrace.java fails with Expected stack trace missing from output

[Harold Seigel]

Hi Zhengyu,

I think this line should also be changed to locked_create_entry_or_null.

    83 private static String expectedSymbol = "locked_create_entry";

Thanks, Harold

On 5/10/2021 9:07 AM, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
> Thanks Harold for catching this.
>
> Updated and retested.
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/JDK-8218458-11u/webrev.01/
>
> -Zhengyu
>
> On 5/4/21 8:55 AM, Harold Seigel wrote:
>> Hi Zhengyu,
>>
>> Should "locked_create_entry" be changed to 
>> "locked_create_entry_or_null" in the below change?
>>
>>     + private static String stackTraceAlternate =
>>     + ".*Hashtable.*allocate_new_entry.*\n" +
>>     + ".*ModuleEntryTable.*locked_create_entry.*\n" +
>>
>> Thanks, Harold
>>
>> On 5/3/2021 5:03 PM, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
>>> I would like to backport this patch to 11u for parity with Oracle 
>>> 11.0.13.
>>>
>>> The original bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8218458
>>> The original patch: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/b02d1d829b09
>>>
>>> The original patch does not apply cleanly to 11u.
>>>
>>> 1) CheckForProperDetailStackTrace.java is not in 11u's ProblemList.txt
>>> 2) 11u does not have JDK-8217660. Therefore, context is bit off in
>>>   CheckForProperDetailStackTrace.java, resolved manually.
>>>
>>> 11u webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/JDK-8218458-11u/webrev.00/
>>>
>>>
>>> Test:
>>>  The test passed on Linux x86_64.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> -Zhengyu
>>>
>>
>