[jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8248238: Implementation: JEP 388: Windows AArch64 Support [v6]

[Bernhard Urban-Forster]

On Sat, 16 Oct 2021 09:09:36 GMT, Andrew Haley <aph at openjdk.org> wrote:

>>> _Mailing list message from [Vladimir Kempik](mailto:vkempik at azul.com) on [jdk-updates-dev](mailto:jdk-updates-dev at mail.openjdk.java.net):_
>>> 
>>> On one side - we should be as close to original commit in jdk/jdk as possible on another side - r18_tls sounds windows-aarch64 only, r18_reserved sounds more general ( works for both macos/win).
>> 
>> Thanks @VladimirKempik, that's the reason why I assumed `r18_reserved` was the newer one. Which one do you prefer @theRealAph?
>
>> > _Mailing list message from [Vladimir Kempik](mailto:vkempik at azul.com) on [jdk-updates-dev](mailto:jdk-updates-dev at mail.openjdk.java.net):_
>> > On one side - we should be as close to original commit in jdk/jdk as possible on another side - r18_tls sounds windows-aarch64 only, r18_reserved sounds more general ( works for both macos/win).
>> 
>> Thanks @VladimirKempik, that's the reason why I assumed `r18_reserved` was the newer one. Which one do you prefer @theRealAph?
> 
> `r18_tls`. It's not very important, but Idon't think the name is inaccurate: as far as I know both platforms use r18 for thread-local storage. It' could just have been `r18_do_not_use`.

@theRealAph ping again.  Of course everybody else is welcome to review as well :-)

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk11u-dev/pull/301