Heads-up: default configuration name change in jdk11u-dev?

[Aleksey Shipilev]

On 9/19/22 21:48, Langer, Christoph wrote:
> Regarding JDK-8210962, I see two options. Either back it out or mark it as backported. I
> wouldthink we could go with the latter, though, as I would hope "only" some CI scripts could be
> affected.
Yeah, I think we should mention in JDK-8210962 that it was accidentally backported to 11u. Maybe 
even creating the ad-hoc backport issue for it with appropriate Fix Versions?

-- 
Thanks,
-Aleksey