[jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8313765: Invalid CEN header (invalid zip64 extra data field size)

[Andrew John Hughes]

On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 17:53:23 GMT, Ben Taylor <btaylor at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Checked out this branch locally on an amazon linux 2 x64 host:
> 
> ```
> ====================================================
> A new configuration has been successfully created in
> /home/benty/workspace/github/jdk17u-dev/build/linux-x86_64-server-release
> using configure arguments '--with-jtreg=/home/benty/jtreg/7.3.1/jtreg/'.
> 
> Configuration summary:
> * Name:           linux-x86_64-server-release
> * Debug level:    release
> * HS debug level: product
> * JVM variants:   server
> * JVM features:   server: 'cds compiler1 compiler2 epsilongc g1gc jfr jni-check jvmci jvmti management nmt parallelgc serialgc services shenandoahgc vm-structs zgc'
> * OpenJDK target: OS: linux, CPU architecture: x86, address length: 64
> * Version string: 17.0.9-internal+0-adhoc.benty.jdk17u-dev (17.0.9-internal)
> 
> Tools summary:
> * Boot JDK:       openjdk version "17.0.8" 2023-07-18 LTS OpenJDK Runtime Environment Corretto-17.0.8.7.1 (build 17.0.8+7-LTS) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM Corretto-17.0.8.7.1 (build 17.0.8+7-LTS, mixed mode, sharing) (at /usr/lib/jvm/java-17-amazon-corretto.x86_64)
> * Toolchain:      gcc (GNU Compiler Collection)
> * C Compiler:     Version 7.3.1 (at /usr/bin/gcc)
> * C++ Compiler:   Version 7.3.1 (at /usr/bin/g++)
> 
> Build performance summary:
> * Cores to use:   16
> * Memory limit:   122745 MB
> ```
> 
> `${HOME}/jtreg/7.3.1/jtreg/bin/jtreg -agentvm -a -ea -esa -conc:7 -ignore:quiet -J-Xmx1024m -v:summary,fail,error -timeoutFactor:8 -vmoption:-Xmx1024m -jdk:build/linux-x86_64-server-release/jdk -dir:. test/jdk/java/util/zip` produced
> 
> ```
> <snip>
> Passed: java/util/zip/ZipFile/ReadNonStandardExtraHeadersTest.java
> <snip>
> Test results: passed: 70
> ```
> 
> I can share the jtr if it would be helpful.

Thanks, it would be. I think the issue may be the version of JTreg & junit used by GHA. I'll take a look at that now.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/1670#issuecomment-1682736189