[jdk11u-dev] RFR: JDK-8302000: [11u] A subtle race condition during jdk11u build

[Langer, Christoph]

Hi,

looks like you removed that comment, right?

As I see it, taking all the changes from JDK-8218460 would not require more from JDK-8215445, or am I wrong?

Cheers
Christoph

> -----Original Message-----
> From: jdk-updates-dev <jdk-updates-dev-retn at openjdk.org> On Behalf Of
> Kumar Srinivasan
> Sent: Samstag, 25. Februar 2023 18:28
> To: jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.org
> Subject: Re: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: JDK-8302000: [11u] A subtle race condition
> during jdk11u build
> 
> On Sat, 25 Feb 2023 06:49:05 GMT, Christoph Langer <clanger at openjdk.org>
> wrote:
> 
> >> Hi @kusrinivasan,
> >> thanks for contributing this fix. I'm wondering whether you could add the
> patch for JDK-8218460 completely in all its details and we could then also
> mark this PR as backporting JDK-8218460?
> >
> >> Hi @RealCLanger yes it is possible to apply JDK-8218460, I am assuming
> once that is added you want me to add all the other changes to Spp.java on
> top of the back-port of JDK-8218460 ?
> >
> > No, not necessarily. I just want to see JDK-8218460 backported as a whole,
> if we anyway take the gist of it. Or are there any follow ups that must be
> taken then? Not sure whether [JDK-
> 8218461](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8218461) and [JDK-
> 8218471](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8218471) are nice-to-haves
> or they get mandatory after your fix.
> 
> @RealCLanger if we decide to back-port JDK-8218460, then we definitely
> need fixes to Spp.java  from JDK-8215445!, **without which the back-port
> will fail**.
> 
> Also If we decide to go  the back-port route, does it mean this PR and JBS is
> closed and file a new back-port issue for JDK-8218460 ?
> 
> -------------
> 
> PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/1774