[jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8304976: Optimize DateTimeFormatterBuilder.ZoneTextPrinterParser.getTree() [v2]
Oli Gillespie
ogillespie at openjdk.org
Mon Jun 5 11:09:19 UTC 2023
On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 13:01:31 GMT, Oli Gillespie <ogillespie at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This pull request contains a backport of commit [438c969b](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/438c969b7b07eeef0158b089e5a168849e04bf56) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
>>
>> The commit being backported was authored by Sergey Tsypanov on 29 Mar 2023 and was reviewed by Naoto Sato.
>>
>> Since the original uses the new `newHashMap` and `newHashSet` methods from https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8284780 which are not here in 17, I've not included those changes in the backport. They are not a significant part of the original fix, the main point of the change is kept which is avoiding the creation of 2 new hash sets on the cached path. Running the included benchmark confirms the performance improvement even with the omissions:
>>
>> Base:
>>
>> Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units
>> ZonedDateTimeFormatterBenchmark.parse avgt 20 18248.082 ? 166.440 ns/op
>> ZonedDateTimeFormatterBenchmark.parse:?gc.alloc.rate avgt 20 1274.964 ? 11.448 MB/sec
>> ZonedDateTimeFormatterBenchmark.parse:?gc.alloc.rate.norm avgt 20 24400.418 ? 1.591 B/op
>> ZonedDateTimeFormatterBenchmark.parse:?gc.count avgt 20 44.000 counts
>> ZonedDateTimeFormatterBenchmark.parse:?gc.time avgt 20 35.000 ms
>>
>>
>> Patch:
>>
>> Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units
>> ZonedDateTimeFormatterBenchmark.parse avgt 20 923.943 ? 8.737 ns/op
>> ZonedDateTimeFormatterBenchmark.parse:?gc.alloc.rate avgt 20 883.450 ? 8.163 MB/sec
>> ZonedDateTimeFormatterBenchmark.parse:?gc.alloc.rate.norm avgt 20 856.021 ? 0.079 B/op
>> ZonedDateTimeFormatterBenchmark.parse:?gc.count avgt 20 32.000 counts
>> ZonedDateTimeFormatterBenchmark.parse:?gc.time avgt 20 27.000 ms
>
> Oli Gillespie has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Set initial capacity for maps
@stsypanov - would you mind reviewing this backport of your change?
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/1414#issuecomment-1576586054
More information about the jdk-updates-dev
mailing list