[jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8305995: Footprint regression from JDK-8224957
Goetz Lindenmaier
goetz at openjdk.org
Fri May 5 06:15:30 UTC 2023
On Wed, 3 May 2023 14:21:50 GMT, Kirill A. Korinsky <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:
>>> @tstuefe actions are enabled. You may read discussion and motivation for that changes here: [openjdk/jdk#13453](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/13453)
>>
>> @catap I don't see any checks: https://github.com/openjdk/jdk17u-dev/pull/1262/checks
>>
>> We need tests in the backport release. Checks in backport releases are important since we are a lot closer to customer installations than we are in head, so backports are arguably more dangerous than patches in head.
>>
>> Please see https://wiki.openjdk.org/display/JDKUpdates/How+to+contribute+or+backport+a+fix, especially section 3.
>
> @tstuefe force push triggers checks
Hi @catap, you may not integrate before you have jdk17u-fix-yes on the JBS issue.
Please
* tell what testing you did in addition to GHA. GHA is only a very basic sanity test.
* Reason why you want to have it in 17.0.8. We usually push to the same release as Oracle.
(both this should go into the JBS issue, but I will look here as you don't have access to JBS)
I'm removing the tag in the meantime. Add it again after supplying the information.
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/1262#issuecomment-1535762638
More information about the jdk-updates-dev
mailing list