[jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8310513: [s390x] Intrinsify recursive ObjectMonitor locking
Amit Kumar
amitkumar at openjdk.org
Mon Apr 29 14:26:13 UTC 2024
On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 16:34:25 GMT, Amit Kumar <amitkumar at openjdk.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [47df1459](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/47df14590c003ccb1607ec0edfe999fcf2aebd86) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
>
> The commit being backported was authored by Amit Kumar on 10 Apr 2024 and was reviewed by Lutz Schmidt and Martin Doerr.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Benchmarking:
>
> ./build/linux-s390x-server-release/jdk/bin/java -Xms4g -Xmx4g -jar dacapo-9.12-MR1-bach.jar h2 -s huge -t 1 -n 1
>
> Without the patch:
>
> ===== DaCapo 9.12-MR1 h2 PASSED in 209768 msec =====
> ===== DaCapo 9.12-MR1 h2 PASSED in 197472 msec =====
> ===== DaCapo 9.12-MR1 h2 PASSED in 222872 msec =====
> ===== DaCapo 9.12-MR1 h2 PASSED in 215725 msec =====
>
>
> with patch:
> ===== DaCapo 9.12-MR1 h2 PASSED in 171055 msec =====
> ===== DaCapo 9.12-MR1 h2 PASSED in 169696 msec =====
> ===== DaCapo 9.12-MR1 h2 PASSED in 174032 msec =====
> ===== DaCapo 9.12-MR1 h2 PASSED in 167271 msec =====
I have done tier1 testing and no new failure appeared in JDK-21 as well.
one of the failing test case `TestSigInfoInHsErrFile.java` will be fixed by https://github.com/openjdk/jdk21u-dev/pull/541
@RealLucy would you please review this backport as well. Testing & Benchmark result I have already added.
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/537#issuecomment-2082889363
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/537#issuecomment-2082891647
More information about the jdk-updates-dev
mailing list