[jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8310513: [s390x] Intrinsify recursive ObjectMonitor locking
Amit Kumar
amitkumar at openjdk.org
Mon Apr 29 15:29:05 UTC 2024
On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 16:34:25 GMT, Amit Kumar <amitkumar at openjdk.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [47df1459](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/47df14590c003ccb1607ec0edfe999fcf2aebd86) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
>
> The commit being backported was authored by Amit Kumar on 10 Apr 2024 and was reviewed by Lutz Schmidt and Martin Doerr.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Benchmarking:
>
> ./build/linux-s390x-server-release/jdk/bin/java -Xms4g -Xmx4g -jar dacapo-9.12-MR1-bach.jar h2 -s huge -t 1 -n 1
>
> Without the patch:
>
> ===== DaCapo 9.12-MR1 h2 PASSED in 209768 msec =====
> ===== DaCapo 9.12-MR1 h2 PASSED in 197472 msec =====
> ===== DaCapo 9.12-MR1 h2 PASSED in 222872 msec =====
> ===== DaCapo 9.12-MR1 h2 PASSED in 215725 msec =====
>
>
> with patch:
> ===== DaCapo 9.12-MR1 h2 PASSED in 171055 msec =====
> ===== DaCapo 9.12-MR1 h2 PASSED in 169696 msec =====
> ===== DaCapo 9.12-MR1 h2 PASSED in 174032 msec =====
> ===== DaCapo 9.12-MR1 h2 PASSED in 167271 msec =====
There were conflicts in the copyright header.
diff --cc src/hotspot/cpu/s390/macroAssembler_s390.cpp
index 8a56f3e4c2b,fd04a66a843..00000000000
--- a/src/hotspot/cpu/s390/macroAssembler_s390.cpp
+++ b/src/hotspot/cpu/s390/macroAssembler_s390.cpp
@@@ -1,6 -1,6 +1,11 @@@
/*
++<<<<<<< HEAD
+ * Copyright (c) 2016, 2023, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
+ * Copyright (c) 2016, 2023 SAP SE. All rights reserved.
++=======
+ * Copyright (c) 2016, 2024, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
+ * Copyright (c) 2016, 2024 SAP SE. All rights reserved.
++>>>>>>> 47df14590c0 (8310513: [s390x] Intrinsify recursive ObjectMonitor locking)
* DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER.
*
* This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/537#issuecomment-2083036456
More information about the jdk-updates-dev
mailing list