[jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8302800: Augment NaN handling tests of FDLIBM methods
Goetz Lindenmaier
goetz at openjdk.org
Wed Aug 21 08:30:17 UTC 2024
On Sat, 3 Aug 2024 00:04:48 GMT, Amos Shi <ashi at openjdk.org> wrote:
> Backport of [JDK-8302800](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8302800)
> - This PR contains two PR
> - `commit 1` is made by the `git apply` which is `clean`
> - `commit 2` adds the missing file `test/jdk/java/lang/Math/InverseTrigTests.java` currently does not exist in `jdk17u-dev`, it was originally added by [JDK-8302026](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8302026) via [commit](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/3ba156082b73c4a8e9d890a57a42fb68df2bf98f)
>
> Testing
> - Local: Test passed on `MacOS 14.5` on Apple M1 Max
> - `CubeRootTests.java`: Test results: passed: 1
> - `Expm1Tests.java`: Test results: passed: 1
> - `HyperbolicTests.java`: Test results: passed: 1
> - `Log10Tests.java`: Test results: passed: 1
> - `Log1pTests.java`: Test results: passed: 1
> - `Tests.java`: Not applicable: not a test
> - `InverseTrigTests.java`: Test results: passed: 1
> - Pipeline:
> - Linux, Windows - Passed
> - MacOS - Skipped (`This request was automatically failed because there were no enabled runners online to process the request for more than 1 days.`)
> - Testing Machine: SAP nightlies Passed on `2024-08-07`
> - Automated jtreg test: jtreg_jdk_tier1, Started at 2024-08-06 20:35:20+01:00
> - java/lang/Math/CubeRootTests.java: SUCCESSFUL GitHub 📊 - [20:41:53.428 -> 166 msec]
> - java/lang/Math/Expm1Tests.java: SUCCESSFUL GitHub 📊 - [20:41:54.175 -> 253 msec]
> - java/lang/Math/HyperbolicTests.java: SUCCESSFUL GitHub 📊 - [20:41:54.428 -> 307 msec]
> - java/lang/Math/Log10Tests.java: SUCCESSFUL GitHub 📊 - [20:41:55.238 -> 196 msec]
> - java/lang/Math/Log1pTests.java: SUCCESSFUL GitHub 📊 - [20:41:55.434 -> 202 msec]
> - java/lang/Math/InverseTrigTests.java: SUCCESSFUL GitHub 📊 - [20:41:55.038 -> 199 msec]
There are red tests, what is wrong?
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/2779#issuecomment-2301462947
More information about the jdk-updates-dev
mailing list