[jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8310923: Refactor Currency tests to use JUnit

Andrew John Hughes andrew at openjdk.org
Thu Feb 15 10:20:03 UTC 2024


On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 23:39:15 GMT, Andrew John Hughes <andrew at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> The github actions tests fail, because the junit code used in this change depends on a recent junit.  GHA of 11 use old jtreg 6.1.. With 7.3.1, which contains a more recent junit, the tests would work.
>
>> The github actions tests fail, because the junit code used in this change depends on a recent junit. GHA of 11 use old jtreg 6.1.. With 7.3.1, which contains a more recent junit, the tests would work.
> 
> Do we plan to transition 11u to jtreg 7? Doing so has quite a long tail of dependencies: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8289798
> 
> I think this is being backported for [8321480: ISO 4217 Amendment 176 Update](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk17u-dev/commit/223018a3aabc319992d9790fa1d6c88b02fcca9f) because it contains some follow-on unrelated test changes from this patch.  You could do 8321480 without this patch - I think we'll have to in 8u as jtreg 7 needs JDK 11 - but I don't want to do that if we are going to bring this change in, as it will make this change unclean and risk missing the post-8310923 changes in 8321480.
> 
> Incidentally, this one is in 11.0.24-oracle, not 11.0.23-oracle.

> Hi @gnu-andrew, Yes, we backport this because [8321480: ISO 4217 Amendment 176 Update](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk17u-dev/commit/223018a3aabc319992d9790fa1d6c88b02fcca9f) depends on it. But it is also easy to resolve 8321480 without this change, which is what Oracle did. I have been looking at raising the jtreg version. As a first step, I wanted to explore backporting the required test fixes you mention above. Actually, there are some more prerequisites. But I don't think we will achieve this by Feb 27th. So maybe we should proceed with the ISO 4217 Amendment.

Yes, I'm starting to think it would be better not to try and rush the jtreg bump and instead do that in the July cycle. I have a backport of the ISO amendment without the test change almost ready and can submit a PR later today. Let me know if I can be of any help with the jtreg bump.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/2503#issuecomment-1945768110


More information about the jdk-updates-dev mailing list