[jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8179502: Enhance OCSP, CRL and Certificate Fetch Timeouts [v3]
Alexey Bakhtin
abakhtin at openjdk.org
Tue Nov 19 20:12:20 UTC 2024
On Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:20:49 GMT, Francisco Ferrari Bihurriet <fferrari at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> @franferrax , @HempushpaSahu, Thank you!
>> I do not think it is possible to add other bug fixes to this PR, so I submitted dependent backport PRs for the mentioned test fixes:
>>
>> - [JDK-8309740](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8309740), https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/5ca4cdd2caceba9dad8025e5a8851740a3961921
>> - [JDK-8310629](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8310629), https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/b20dc1e9cda1ea3a76b3f14c778c6816e5cc1c0c
>> - [JDK-8325024](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8325024), https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/432756b6e51c903e2bff8b9c3028a4f2ea8973f4
>> - [JDK-8337826](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8337826), https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/9b11bd7f4a511ddadf9f02e82aab6ba78beb6763
>>
>> Backports are clean, so no review is required
>
> Hi @alexeybakhtin, thank you for the additional time and effort put into this! My intention is to help move things faster, because I've been made aware about customers waiting for this.
>
> However, as @GoeLin [explained](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8179502?focusedId=14720853&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14720853), if Oracle doesn't include this backport in 17.0.14, the documentation won't be updated, so we'll need to wait for them to proceed. Apparently, Oracle's reason for not doing the backport is its low priority. Customers are now trying to get it prioritized through Oracle support, but it looks like we won't make it for the 17.0.14 rampdown date ([_December 3_](https://wiki.openjdk.org/display/JDKUpdates/JDK+17u#JDK17u-Timelines)).
>
> NOTE: FYI, AFAIK, you can add multiple backports to a pull requiest with the [`/issue add <id>[,<id>,...]` command](https://wiki.openjdk.org/display/SKARA/Pull+Request+Commands#PullRequestCommands-/issue).
Hi @franferrax,
Thank you for your support.
We also have customers who are waiting for this enhancement.
About `/issue` command - I do not like this approach much. It will bring a much more difference between the backport and the original fix. Right now, all test fixes are applied cleanly. But, if it would help to integrate this enhancement, I can combine all follow-up backports into this one.
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/2747#issuecomment-2486652268
More information about the jdk-updates-dev
mailing list