From syan at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 02:17:54 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 02:17:54 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u] Integrated: 8370649: Add intermittent tag for
 gc/shenandoah/generational/TestOldGrowthTriggers.java
In-Reply-To: <bTOhoW5er7sTEJ5tQ5cplau--cop-bDLV7cGGrwARbs=.5a6d27fd-664b-4249-b02c-a7a9158b19b1@github.com>
References: <bTOhoW5er7sTEJ5tQ5cplau--cop-bDLV7cGGrwARbs=.5a6d27fd-664b-4249-b02c-a7a9158b19b1@github.com>
Message-ID: <ZtCfMfIW7jCZULjDhNz8_6ltaSezcwPkl_nSKrjE2Ek=.02f007ec-c1fb-4a6a-8879-30ad8866e8df@github.com>

On Tue, 28 Oct 2025 01:32:55 GMT, SendaoYan <syan at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [b3e63aea](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/b3e63aeab304016b9b479a05f44ed1c8dfb0b9bb) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by SendaoYan on 28 Oct 2025 and was reviewed by William Kemper.
> 
> Thanks!

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: cdbdbdce
Author:    SendaoYan <syan at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u/commit/cdbdbdce40b80aa70eba904ad8c038d12f389980
Stats:     1 line in 1 file changed: 1 ins; 0 del; 0 mod

8370649: Add intermittent tag for gc/shenandoah/generational/TestOldGrowthTriggers.java

Backport-of: b3e63aeab304016b9b479a05f44ed1c8dfb0b9bb

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u/pull/343

From syan at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 02:17:53 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 02:17:53 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u] RFR: 8370649: Add intermittent tag for
 gc/shenandoah/generational/TestOldGrowthTriggers.java
In-Reply-To: <bTOhoW5er7sTEJ5tQ5cplau--cop-bDLV7cGGrwARbs=.5a6d27fd-664b-4249-b02c-a7a9158b19b1@github.com>
References: <bTOhoW5er7sTEJ5tQ5cplau--cop-bDLV7cGGrwARbs=.5a6d27fd-664b-4249-b02c-a7a9158b19b1@github.com>
Message-ID: <YSbm1X064PiWahL5D22iGtAC8MSTfodGpCTZL4yG47o=.78b3329c-5957-4161-a34f-4d3b49ebfb05@github.com>

On Tue, 28 Oct 2025 01:32:55 GMT, SendaoYan <syan at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [b3e63aea](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/b3e63aeab304016b9b479a05f44ed1c8dfb0b9bb) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by SendaoYan on 28 Oct 2025 and was reviewed by William Kemper.
> 
> Thanks!

Thanks for the approved.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u/pull/343#issuecomment-3594236430

From syan at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 02:19:54 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 02:19:54 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8370636: com/sun/jdi/TwoThreadsTest.java should
 wait for completion of all threads
In-Reply-To: <r9dyTe6-YbmamP6F8h6bXEdNXNOsbKPpqF01Gg6H2JU=.b4b69847-56d9-4550-8588-ceb6d14f3685@github.com>
References: <r9dyTe6-YbmamP6F8h6bXEdNXNOsbKPpqF01Gg6H2JU=.b4b69847-56d9-4550-8588-ceb6d14f3685@github.com>
Message-ID: <yDMJzFesD_BqWsJelG4-P7yaTHuca48y6IBjCv-JoXs=.34f7897e-702b-4c17-b81b-28f10132b799@github.com>

On Wed, 26 Nov 2025 12:28:19 GMT, SendaoYan <syan at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [d1860370](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/d1860370635e1c96a9b6c497861e5573c23dd281) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Leonid Mesnik on 28 Oct 2025 and was reviewed by Chris Plummer, SendaoYan and Serguei Spitsyn.
> 
> Thanks!

Thanks for the approved.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/14#issuecomment-3594238393

From syan at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 02:19:55 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 02:19:55 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] Integrated: 8370636: com/sun/jdi/TwoThreadsTest.java
 should wait for completion of all threads
In-Reply-To: <r9dyTe6-YbmamP6F8h6bXEdNXNOsbKPpqF01Gg6H2JU=.b4b69847-56d9-4550-8588-ceb6d14f3685@github.com>
References: <r9dyTe6-YbmamP6F8h6bXEdNXNOsbKPpqF01Gg6H2JU=.b4b69847-56d9-4550-8588-ceb6d14f3685@github.com>
Message-ID: <0a3_HB9Uaru5kjzmEgZ_8cqyGk5VvvAh8kDhgaeGe7E=.7a14a0a4-dcb4-401c-ba15-5745651e8895@github.com>

On Wed, 26 Nov 2025 12:28:19 GMT, SendaoYan <syan at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [d1860370](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/d1860370635e1c96a9b6c497861e5573c23dd281) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Leonid Mesnik on 28 Oct 2025 and was reviewed by Chris Plummer, SendaoYan and Serguei Spitsyn.
> 
> Thanks!

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: e33a4593
Author:    SendaoYan <syan at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/commit/e33a4593c37d87b284c58173409133fc22507917
Stats:     8 lines in 1 file changed: 7 ins; 0 del; 1 mod

8370636: com/sun/jdi/TwoThreadsTest.java should wait for completion of all threads

Backport-of: d1860370635e1c96a9b6c497861e5573c23dd281

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/14

From syan at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 02:22:56 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 02:22:56 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u] RFR: 8370649: Add intermittent tag for
 gc/shenandoah/generational/TestOldGrowthTriggers.java
In-Reply-To: <bTOhoW5er7sTEJ5tQ5cplau--cop-bDLV7cGGrwARbs=.5a6d27fd-664b-4249-b02c-a7a9158b19b1@github.com>
References: <bTOhoW5er7sTEJ5tQ5cplau--cop-bDLV7cGGrwARbs=.5a6d27fd-664b-4249-b02c-a7a9158b19b1@github.com>
Message-ID: <PVXor_S_acMzDTP3E1uFlt0Ne1oiWEbydY_IBhR49no=.db2a59ee-bcda-4c7a-aa8e-522ffc499353@github.com>

On Tue, 28 Oct 2025 01:32:55 GMT, SendaoYan <syan at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [b3e63aea](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/b3e63aeab304016b9b479a05f44ed1c8dfb0b9bb) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by SendaoYan on 28 Oct 2025 and was reviewed by William Kemper.
> 
> Thanks!

Thanks for the approved.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u/pull/343#issuecomment-3594249339

From syan at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 02:25:41 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 02:25:41 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8271396: Spelling errors [v2]
In-Reply-To: <KahDifhZmxAUytaBGqWAS21IVpFymV-DhCmphsN0w8E=.1654fb64-398f-4484-9068-843d5c33772b@github.com>
References: <KahDifhZmxAUytaBGqWAS21IVpFymV-DhCmphsN0w8E=.1654fb64-398f-4484-9068-843d5c33772b@github.com>
Message-ID: <zA_Rnt2gVH5-utQjbcVMe96XoiztEm-BptPgE4vPiP8=.ff1e5cbf-57b8-4d79-aac6-52a82ab7f008@github.com>

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [d09b0284](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/d09b028407ff9d0e8c2dfd9cc5d0dca19c4497e3) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Emmanuel Bourg on 29 Jul 2021 and was reviewed by Thomas Schatzl, Chris Hegarty, Iris Clark, Prasanta Sadhukhan and Chris Plummer.
> 
> I want to backport this since this will make later backport([JDK-8370732](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8370732)) cleanly
> 
> Thanks!

SendaoYan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains two additional commits since the last revision:

 - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into backport-sendaoYan-d09b0284-master
 - Backport d09b028407ff9d0e8c2dfd9cc5d0dca19c4497e3

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4148/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4148/files/0381f0e6..80414558

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk17u-dev&pr=4148&range=01
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk17u-dev&pr=4148&range=00-01

  Stats: 6085 lines in 108 files changed: 4664 ins; 1059 del; 362 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4148.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/4148/head:pull/4148

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4148

From syan at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 02:27:38 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 02:27:38 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8366694: Test
 JdbStopInNotificationThreadTest.java timed out after 60 second [v2]
In-Reply-To: <4b4lH9MRXd0NaHSYpix5i6kYW3XejtCD6Yx5-Zbzbsc=.6441772b-282f-428f-aec1-fbb3dc35ab69@github.com>
References: <4b4lH9MRXd0NaHSYpix5i6kYW3XejtCD6Yx5-Zbzbsc=.6441772b-282f-428f-aec1-fbb3dc35ab69@github.com>
Message-ID: <J5rdfo0YYLPpUx9C-5AUvYrDDSSW--HTugw3cBLIFgw=.2d555cf4-7e5f-4212-8543-b43d74f12a5e@github.com>

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [89c5659a](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk25u/commit/89c5659aa88acd1e9624aa14e5b9757255e55916) from the [openjdk/jdk25u](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by SendaoYan on 31 Oct 2025 and was reviewed by Paul Hohensee.
> 
> Thanks!

SendaoYan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains two additional commits since the last revision:

 - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into backport-sendaoYan-89c5659a-master
 - Backport 89c5659aa88acd1e9624aa14e5b9757255e55916

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2436/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2436/files/03153004..fd4ed7dc

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk21u-dev&pr=2436&range=01
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk21u-dev&pr=2436&range=00-01

  Stats: 18040 lines in 175 files changed: 7197 ins; 2242 del; 8601 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2436.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/2436/head:pull/2436

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2436

From syan at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 02:39:43 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 02:39:43 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8346962: Test CRLReadTimeout.java fails with
 -Xcomp on a fastdebug build [v2]
In-Reply-To: <8mPQbcZB1jgnCNvPi2vAPtZPVFRABZhhRBAmCXu7sFk=.c4bd04e5-36a1-4112-9bfc-2e7a676c1c9f@github.com>
References: <8mPQbcZB1jgnCNvPi2vAPtZPVFRABZhhRBAmCXu7sFk=.c4bd04e5-36a1-4112-9bfc-2e7a676c1c9f@github.com>
Message-ID: <eR3Jjw2UIW4zu2ug7Ryt5LDuBVxnrOAzcs_FFsBfI7Q=.4450422a-47f0-41a6-bce2-610710395e05@github.com>

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [e18e95ed](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/e18e95ed11c1df7eeb162c2303f027564ed6f6aa) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> Clean backport to make test more robustness, change has been verified locally on linux-x64. Test-fix only, no risk.
> 
> Thanks!

SendaoYan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains two additional commits since the last revision:

 - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into backport-sendaoYan-e18e95ed-master
 - Backport e18e95ed11c1df7eeb162c2303f027564ed6f6aa

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4194/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4194/files/796ecd7b..c2009ad4

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk17u-dev&pr=4194&range=01
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk17u-dev&pr=4194&range=00-01

  Stats: 790 lines in 19 files changed: 729 ins; 10 del; 51 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4194.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/4194/head:pull/4194

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4194

From syan at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 02:39:48 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 02:39:48 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8346962: Test CRLReadTimeout.java fails with
 -Xcomp on a fastdebug build [v2]
In-Reply-To: <O5JZoiitsmmYSSilTfzaT80-MZmAxVViXT7fIMEGM9I=.0187e36c-ef75-47d9-9beb-e3bbfe484944@github.com>
References: <O5JZoiitsmmYSSilTfzaT80-MZmAxVViXT7fIMEGM9I=.0187e36c-ef75-47d9-9beb-e3bbfe484944@github.com>
Message-ID: <94plJZ_rja4KqRS7fNxRmcxo14SfPMlTphMIJ2waP8I=.6e224a97-f684-4f35-9ec5-7e268e89f8e0@github.com>

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [e18e95ed](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/e18e95ed11c1df7eeb162c2303f027564ed6f6aa) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> Clean backport to make test more robustness, change has been verified locally on linux-x64. Test-fix only, no risk.
> 
> Thanks!

SendaoYan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains two additional commits since the last revision:

 - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into backport-sendaoYan-e18e95ed-master
 - Backport e18e95ed11c1df7eeb162c2303f027564ed6f6aa

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2487/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2487/files/1e2e15a4..4807998a

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk21u-dev&pr=2487&range=01
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk21u-dev&pr=2487&range=00-01

  Stats: 1498 lines in 28 files changed: 975 ins; 485 del; 38 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2487.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/2487/head:pull/2487

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2487

From syan at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 02:39:56 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 02:39:56 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8366694: Test
 JdbStopInNotificationThreadTest.java timed out after 60 second [v2]
In-Reply-To: <tozB4eIHanz8G2bEgleNjgcB8zKgj-L-kpxiVCSSNVk=.6d4812cc-b090-43c3-aea5-76973c9e0db6@github.com>
References: <tozB4eIHanz8G2bEgleNjgcB8zKgj-L-kpxiVCSSNVk=.6d4812cc-b090-43c3-aea5-76973c9e0db6@github.com>
Message-ID: <M93oxQeQ9eFH6UBFFudd9WYXyag6RjlrA7KQY4TDxzo=.3997ddfa-89c0-4c07-b656-242f0b79a422@github.com>

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [89c5659a](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk25u/commit/89c5659aa88acd1e9624aa14e5b9757255e55916) from the [openjdk/jdk25u](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by SendaoYan on 31 Oct 2025 and was reviewed by Paul Hohensee.
> 
> Thanks!

SendaoYan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains two additional commits since the last revision:

 - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into backport-sendaoYan-89c5659a-master
 - Backport 89c5659aa88acd1e9624aa14e5b9757255e55916

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4144/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4144/files/58a671c8..a2638a64

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk17u-dev&pr=4144&range=01
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk17u-dev&pr=4144&range=00-01

  Stats: 7922 lines in 133 files changed: 5870 ins; 1619 del; 433 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4144.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/4144/head:pull/4144

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4144

From syan at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 02:39:55 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 02:39:55 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8368668: Several vmTestbase/vm/gc/compact tests
 timed out on large memory machine
In-Reply-To: <dogDsf9AXuvySwfmUoS7XJUldUJFDqjZAcRJ2k8SICo=.d30b8a01-19d5-428b-a70e-8a11001257c5@github.com>
References: <PKvSicv8ueaXifkO57WvD22RkAEq4V_jS9NYXL4unUU=.55dd9820-2fff-4993-9eae-0d80f8249f67@github.com>
 <dogDsf9AXuvySwfmUoS7XJUldUJFDqjZAcRJ2k8SICo=.d30b8a01-19d5-428b-a70e-8a11001257c5@github.com>
Message-ID: <X9DLYai604LaJJIwknTJHTKPNTtA8tRSFxDfeMPOEPg=.d108bce9-41a4-4670-9462-2e0c8c767d18@github.com>

On Fri, 28 Nov 2025 13:21:34 GMT, Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi @sendaoYan is there an issue with this? Else I would appreciate if you push this before Tuesday, Dec 3rd. Thanks!

I think there is no issue with this clean backport PR. Sorry for the delay response.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4096#issuecomment-3594279084

From syan at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 02:39:58 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 02:39:58 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] Integrated: 8368668: Several vmTestbase/vm/gc/compact
 tests timed out on large memory machine
In-Reply-To: <PKvSicv8ueaXifkO57WvD22RkAEq4V_jS9NYXL4unUU=.55dd9820-2fff-4993-9eae-0d80f8249f67@github.com>
References: <PKvSicv8ueaXifkO57WvD22RkAEq4V_jS9NYXL4unUU=.55dd9820-2fff-4993-9eae-0d80f8249f67@github.com>
Message-ID: <8Gumpo7uJMroY7IZSwZN0PIZ2jrJ1ME2e0SieMaeZN8=.f59b643d-5acc-4ada-9650-40da38f16ef8@github.com>

On Thu, 23 Oct 2025 14:18:56 GMT, SendaoYan <syan at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [9093d3a0](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/9093d3a04cd2b66425cefb44de2990cb5362a29f) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by SendaoYan on 27 Sep 2025 and was reviewed by Leonid Mesnik.
> 
> Thanks!

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 3065c22c
Author:    SendaoYan <syan at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/commit/3065c22ca6ffb81e7cce8e1add1346de982e3c28
Stats:     20 lines in 10 files changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 20 mod

8368668: Several vmTestbase/vm/gc/compact tests timed out on large memory machine

Backport-of: 9093d3a04cd2b66425cefb44de2990cb5362a29f

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4096

From syan at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 02:43:02 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 02:43:02 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8365623: test/jdk/sun/security/pkcs11/tls/ tests
 skipped without skip exception
Message-ID: <Lr5J_x4MhBHfXcf0IuwNiIdcHhjvnjYu1hA2i8vOG04=.7e013881-4d8e-48eb-8552-38d1768abefd@github.com>

Hi all,

This pull request contains a backport of commit [da8e41a3](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/da8e41a368bd98a7a35f5706302ecb9475b58363) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.

The commit being backported was authored by Mikhail Yankelevich on 27 Nov 2025 and was reviewed by SendaoYan and Rajan Halade.

Thanks!

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport da8e41a368bd98a7a35f5706302ecb9475b58363

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/37/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk25u-dev&pr=37&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8365623
  Stats: 37 lines in 6 files changed: 11 ins; 11 del; 15 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/37.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev.git pull/37/head:pull/37

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/37

From syan at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 02:53:15 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 02:53:15 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8298783:
 java/lang/ref/FinalizerHistogramTest.java failed with
 "RuntimeException: MyObject is not found in test output" [v8]
In-Reply-To: <yfxRpHGoR72XohYa9e1i1h3DVLyq3ViQRCVhEbjbIoM=.129548c0-09f9-410f-96ea-97252f95a70c@github.com>
References: <yfxRpHGoR72XohYa9e1i1h3DVLyq3ViQRCVhEbjbIoM=.129548c0-09f9-410f-96ea-97252f95a70c@github.com>
Message-ID: <DWFE_ByU4IJfmWZh59WN-_iCWi9K3JKFqFhlF89pTn4=.50f7a48a-4527-4ff4-b5d5-44a6e426101e@github.com>

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [fe29cad5](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/fe29cad5e0b10cd088fc39967599f5a8dcaa445c) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Brent Christian on 6 May 2025 and was reviewed by Kim Barrett and Jaikiran Pai.
> 
> Thanks!

SendaoYan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains eight additional commits since the last revision:

 - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into backport-sendaoYan-fe29cad5-master
 - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into backport-sendaoYan-fe29cad5-master
 - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into backport-sendaoYan-fe29cad5-master
 - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into backport-sendaoYan-fe29cad5-master
 - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into backport-sendaoYan-fe29cad5-master
 - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into backport-sendaoYan-fe29cad5-master
 - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into backport-sendaoYan-fe29cad5-master
 - Backport fe29cad5e0b10cd088fc39967599f5a8dcaa445c

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3869/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3869/files/44af9bda..c983df0d

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk17u-dev&pr=3869&range=07
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk17u-dev&pr=3869&range=06-07

  Stats: 112 lines in 14 files changed: 80 ins; 6 del; 26 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3869.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/3869/head:pull/3869

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3869

From syan at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 02:53:48 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 02:53:48 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8298783:
 java/lang/ref/FinalizerHistogramTest.java failed with
 "RuntimeException: MyObject is not found in test output" [v8]
In-Reply-To: <QZjHTXTEnUvlfVs8BqcaRQDnwRn2YRHNtZi_vvJ38jw=.7b57ec2a-0cbf-44fb-97b3-4a7cdb49a9a5@github.com>
References: <QZjHTXTEnUvlfVs8BqcaRQDnwRn2YRHNtZi_vvJ38jw=.7b57ec2a-0cbf-44fb-97b3-4a7cdb49a9a5@github.com>
Message-ID: <v2i0SJRckfVwuvmRVG6iHKLwF_RKBcfY2EyYkDqKuiI=.7d4f9913-c623-4431-be61-819e4ef5f55d@github.com>

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [fe29cad5](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/fe29cad5e0b10cd088fc39967599f5a8dcaa445c) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Brent Christian on 6 May 2025 and was reviewed by Kim Barrett and Jaikiran Pai.
> 
> Thanks!

SendaoYan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains eight additional commits since the last revision:

 - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into backport-sendaoYan-fe29cad5-master
 - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into backport-sendaoYan-fe29cad5-master
 - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into backport-sendaoYan-fe29cad5-master
 - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into backport-sendaoYan-fe29cad5-master
 - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into backport-sendaoYan-fe29cad5-master
 - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into backport-sendaoYan-fe29cad5-master
 - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into backport-sendaoYan-fe29cad5-master
 - Backport fe29cad5e0b10cd088fc39967599f5a8dcaa445c

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2118/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2118/files/d68bb25d..063bc763

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk21u-dev&pr=2118&range=07
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk21u-dev&pr=2118&range=06-07

  Stats: 1037 lines in 17 files changed: 525 ins; 485 del; 27 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2118.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/2118/head:pull/2118

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2118

From syan at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 02:54:04 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 02:54:04 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8368982: Test
 sun/security/tools/jarsigner/EC.java completed and timed out [v2]
In-Reply-To: <D5xlB9mkuhqn1W8F6mAINzoj88RK9KW8ln_nphqptpA=.4e3c9215-feb3-41bd-bc0b-64b1e4054abc@github.com>
References: <2I9b7m3VPHFLdPoMNt61vXnAWGCXJ67jEPoXMoyefQ4=.8b344258-81c4-4f26-bd34-4bef715dd619@github.com>
 <D5xlB9mkuhqn1W8F6mAINzoj88RK9KW8ln_nphqptpA=.4e3c9215-feb3-41bd-bc0b-64b1e4054abc@github.com>
Message-ID: <4epfMAjhahBW6vSvTYn1k_2zxaSNXlIbUIMAqcDfCrU=.08139e2a-ed80-41ec-b974-d55eb91ac0c9@github.com>

On Fri, 21 Nov 2025 08:32:48 GMT, SendaoYan <syan at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Hi all,
>> 
>> This pull request contains a backport of commit [b0721e28](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/b0721e28591f2ee19fd5cb6581747df0b1efed48) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
>> 
>> The commit being backported was authored by Mikhail Yankelevich on 23 Oct 2025 and was reviewed by Rajan Halade.
>> 
>> Change has been verified locally on linux-x64. Test-fix only, no risk.
>> 
>> Thanks!
>
> SendaoYan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains two additional commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into backport-sendaoYan-b0721e28-master
>  - Backport b0721e28591f2ee19fd5cb6581747df0b1efed48

Thanks for the approved.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2387#issuecomment-3594308185

From syan at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 02:54:59 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 02:54:59 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8313770:
 jdk/internal/platform/docker/TestSystemMetrics.java fails on Ubuntu
In-Reply-To: <qAMpYf0vAJiC62wld1KEu3ecqC5ELNTAeMEOVjV0LwE=.362b63e5-28da-432e-9ef5-17d1709a9574@github.com>
References: <qAMpYf0vAJiC62wld1KEu3ecqC5ELNTAeMEOVjV0LwE=.362b63e5-28da-432e-9ef5-17d1709a9574@github.com>
Message-ID: <lTpC-1Urn0Z2N8zFL09SjhehzvVuHN4KyfakTiWaoak=.ede8226a-c5e5-463d-aa72-cdeebd3912e2@github.com>

On Thu, 23 Oct 2025 09:50:02 GMT, SendaoYan <syan at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [aec13888](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/aec138886ec2dff765ed810059a1c7b9905c43ca) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Casper Norrbin on 23 Oct 2025 and was reviewed by Severin Gehwolf, Matthias Baesken and SendaoYan.
> 
> Thanks!

jdk25u has been integrated.

Thanks for the approved.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4092#issuecomment-3594310025

From syan at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 02:56:03 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 02:56:03 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8313770:
 jdk/internal/platform/docker/TestSystemMetrics.java fails on Ubuntu
In-Reply-To: <Yp__ChLqIvk6NQOZ92wphLxutgBHIZ9Us3aNAb-dVso=.42e4fedc-4ca1-4730-9975-c9a58b1087f4@github.com>
References: <Yp__ChLqIvk6NQOZ92wphLxutgBHIZ9Us3aNAb-dVso=.42e4fedc-4ca1-4730-9975-c9a58b1087f4@github.com>
Message-ID: <WQIAz_2BqOnC_CBU3jWe-Z4xNpQhi2YCug8H7e3OcYE=.ed28ecdd-1b80-4780-96c7-c8d08d9ef96f@github.com>

On Thu, 23 Oct 2025 09:50:06 GMT, SendaoYan <syan at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [aec13888](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/aec138886ec2dff765ed810059a1c7b9905c43ca) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Casper Norrbin on 23 Oct 2025 and was reviewed by Severin Gehwolf, Matthias Baesken and SendaoYan.
> 
> Thanks!

jdk25u has been integrated.

Thanks for the approved.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2382#issuecomment-3594309445

From syan at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 02:56:05 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 02:56:05 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8368982: Test
 sun/security/tools/jarsigner/EC.java completed and timed out [v2]
In-Reply-To: <Ly9RPW032Bv9kgToHD30CK8DSTZTM0CIWlKEq4k_UDw=.702a8e3a-2da8-4491-a7d1-698496de412b@github.com>
References: <npFRfszkw1Cq_Moul4bICJswqrsbpnQzKKsPr2ifu7A=.c562562d-af2e-4010-8530-a2a31ed1c6b9@github.com>
 <Ly9RPW032Bv9kgToHD30CK8DSTZTM0CIWlKEq4k_UDw=.702a8e3a-2da8-4491-a7d1-698496de412b@github.com>
Message-ID: <oJmAicz-_2QjJ3ObZFPyaxlN1-7Wzjbap9VIIJqlAlc=.29a82ed9-4834-48fb-973e-b64026caaf5a@github.com>

On Fri, 21 Nov 2025 08:33:44 GMT, SendaoYan <syan at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Hi all,
>> 
>> This pull request contains a backport of commit [b0721e28](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/b0721e28591f2ee19fd5cb6581747df0b1efed48) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
>> 
>> The commit being backported was authored by Mikhail Yankelevich on 23 Oct 2025 and was reviewed by Rajan Halade.
>> 
>> Change has been verified locally on linux-x64. Test-fix only, no risk.
>> 
>> Thanks!
>
> SendaoYan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains two additional commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into backport-sendaoYan-b0721e28-master
>  - Backport b0721e28591f2ee19fd5cb6581747df0b1efed48

Thanks for the approved.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4099#issuecomment-3594308030

From syan at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 02:56:04 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 02:56:04 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] Integrated: 8313770:
 jdk/internal/platform/docker/TestSystemMetrics.java fails on Ubuntu
In-Reply-To: <Yp__ChLqIvk6NQOZ92wphLxutgBHIZ9Us3aNAb-dVso=.42e4fedc-4ca1-4730-9975-c9a58b1087f4@github.com>
References: <Yp__ChLqIvk6NQOZ92wphLxutgBHIZ9Us3aNAb-dVso=.42e4fedc-4ca1-4730-9975-c9a58b1087f4@github.com>
Message-ID: <OtcK9yzO5xbK8QtSSicshvERZj7jmSeJJyEjX0dP744=.7f0b9867-f72c-4044-b894-5a664cb497a5@github.com>

On Thu, 23 Oct 2025 09:50:06 GMT, SendaoYan <syan at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [aec13888](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/aec138886ec2dff765ed810059a1c7b9905c43ca) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Casper Norrbin on 23 Oct 2025 and was reviewed by Severin Gehwolf, Matthias Baesken and SendaoYan.
> 
> Thanks!

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 928ac3a1
Author:    SendaoYan <syan at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/commit/928ac3a12e60e30e88c9067b45c6292acfdd0eee
Stats:     3 lines in 1 file changed: 1 ins; 0 del; 2 mod

8313770: jdk/internal/platform/docker/TestSystemMetrics.java fails on Ubuntu

Backport-of: aec138886ec2dff765ed810059a1c7b9905c43ca

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2382

From syan at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 02:56:06 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 02:56:06 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] Integrated: 8368982: Test
 sun/security/tools/jarsigner/EC.java completed and timed out
In-Reply-To: <npFRfszkw1Cq_Moul4bICJswqrsbpnQzKKsPr2ifu7A=.c562562d-af2e-4010-8530-a2a31ed1c6b9@github.com>
References: <npFRfszkw1Cq_Moul4bICJswqrsbpnQzKKsPr2ifu7A=.c562562d-af2e-4010-8530-a2a31ed1c6b9@github.com>
Message-ID: <-upISQxsgzaiSOLw2b76aNScddRakW5glxaQ88uUtuI=.7d0a4ced-8338-471c-a552-1026a6b1fdbd@github.com>

On Fri, 24 Oct 2025 02:54:03 GMT, SendaoYan <syan at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [b0721e28](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/b0721e28591f2ee19fd5cb6581747df0b1efed48) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Mikhail Yankelevich on 23 Oct 2025 and was reviewed by Rajan Halade.
> 
> Change has been verified locally on linux-x64. Test-fix only, no risk.
> 
> Thanks!

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: d039e3b8
Author:    SendaoYan <syan at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/commit/d039e3b867d23648979067bc3e2f0e300a40d27b
Stats:     2 lines in 1 file changed: 1 ins; 0 del; 1 mod

8368982: Test sun/security/tools/jarsigner/EC.java completed and timed out

Backport-of: b0721e28591f2ee19fd5cb6581747df0b1efed48

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4099

From syan at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 02:57:00 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 02:57:00 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] Integrated: 8368982: Test
 sun/security/tools/jarsigner/EC.java completed and timed out
In-Reply-To: <2I9b7m3VPHFLdPoMNt61vXnAWGCXJ67jEPoXMoyefQ4=.8b344258-81c4-4f26-bd34-4bef715dd619@github.com>
References: <2I9b7m3VPHFLdPoMNt61vXnAWGCXJ67jEPoXMoyefQ4=.8b344258-81c4-4f26-bd34-4bef715dd619@github.com>
Message-ID: <zQsQwVftAZH5FL-bQ66E_Hb6HhhkoavjuH1NVZpFZvc=.886d03d4-9cd6-4cf8-976b-309e8e6a0540@github.com>

On Fri, 24 Oct 2025 02:54:02 GMT, SendaoYan <syan at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [b0721e28](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/b0721e28591f2ee19fd5cb6581747df0b1efed48) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Mikhail Yankelevich on 23 Oct 2025 and was reviewed by Rajan Halade.
> 
> Change has been verified locally on linux-x64. Test-fix only, no risk.
> 
> Thanks!

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: ccf3cb9e
Author:    SendaoYan <syan at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/commit/ccf3cb9e74d51310a7ef53bd09833ca367e7a4bc
Stats:     2 lines in 1 file changed: 1 ins; 0 del; 1 mod

8368982: Test sun/security/tools/jarsigner/EC.java completed and timed out

Backport-of: b0721e28591f2ee19fd5cb6581747df0b1efed48

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2387

From syan at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 02:57:54 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 02:57:54 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8341131: Some jdk/jfr/event/compiler tests
 shouldn't be executed with Xcomp
In-Reply-To: <-XyAy8f7zIPF8TDg8fTVe_ItsF9HREwAenrmhWrcjbM=.eb39f904-af86-47bb-ac9f-9b988fd3a0c4@github.com>
References: <-XyAy8f7zIPF8TDg8fTVe_ItsF9HREwAenrmhWrcjbM=.eb39f904-af86-47bb-ac9f-9b988fd3a0c4@github.com>
Message-ID: <W2GGDxD2axw6298_GJC8hnBpMRTpkYgPkkiM-iMJsIk=.037e32ba-5348-47db-9b48-ee754acf03ae@github.com>

On Mon, 20 Oct 2025 09:32:45 GMT, SendaoYan <syan at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [7312eea3](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/7312eea382eed048b6abdb6409c006fc8e8f45b4) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Leonid Mesnik on 8 Oct 2024 and was reviewed by Christian Hagedorn.
> 
> Thanks!

Thanks for the approved.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2361#issuecomment-3594310784

From syan at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 02:58:01 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 02:58:01 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8341131: Some jdk/jfr/event/compiler tests
 shouldn't be executed with Xcomp [v2]
In-Reply-To: <W6e4LrxQdX0bXXavmjZWvL8K8-AFyqP6oFGvLSpKzGw=.d0d28d96-2330-4def-9e69-1d3e2eec8636@github.com>
References: <bv0DrROoBocVxND03bdfevlR4acz64UWJ3O5ixjPNvM=.9619d738-7e6d-434f-98f1-5bd5ba7dde63@github.com>
 <W6e4LrxQdX0bXXavmjZWvL8K8-AFyqP6oFGvLSpKzGw=.d0d28d96-2330-4def-9e69-1d3e2eec8636@github.com>
Message-ID: <CKZJ8SR1OvIzcv2dFORlIu-v7vywUcmtsR0FjRyfmZE=.407affa7-7a0d-49b0-93c1-632b4b0de9d8@github.com>

On Mon, 17 Nov 2025 13:56:44 GMT, SendaoYan <syan at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Hi all,
>> 
>> This pull request contains a backport of commit [7312eea3](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/7312eea382eed048b6abdb6409c006fc8e8f45b4) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
>> 
>> The commit being backported was authored by Leonid Mesnik on 8 Oct 2024 and was reviewed by Christian Hagedorn.
>> 
>> Thanks!
>
> SendaoYan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains two additional commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into backport-sendaoYan-7312eea3-master
>  - Backport 7312eea382eed048b6abdb6409c006fc8e8f45b4

Thanks for the approved.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4074#issuecomment-3594310568

From syan at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 02:57:55 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 02:57:55 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] Integrated: 8341131: Some jdk/jfr/event/compiler tests
 shouldn't be executed with Xcomp
In-Reply-To: <-XyAy8f7zIPF8TDg8fTVe_ItsF9HREwAenrmhWrcjbM=.eb39f904-af86-47bb-ac9f-9b988fd3a0c4@github.com>
References: <-XyAy8f7zIPF8TDg8fTVe_ItsF9HREwAenrmhWrcjbM=.eb39f904-af86-47bb-ac9f-9b988fd3a0c4@github.com>
Message-ID: <9h9nBZwU_HFxMuYtm-PHTzAQqtLxc14R0mEiAOCR5ho=.836d6115-5371-459d-8ca4-a9b85a5ffa39@github.com>

On Mon, 20 Oct 2025 09:32:45 GMT, SendaoYan <syan at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [7312eea3](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/7312eea382eed048b6abdb6409c006fc8e8f45b4) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Leonid Mesnik on 8 Oct 2024 and was reviewed by Christian Hagedorn.
> 
> Thanks!

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 13f76d71
Author:    SendaoYan <syan at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/commit/13f76d71bb49274732ff15fd6928c3e7bebf4278
Stats:     5 lines in 3 files changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 5 mod

8341131: Some jdk/jfr/event/compiler tests shouldn't be executed with Xcomp

Backport-of: 7312eea382eed048b6abdb6409c006fc8e8f45b4

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2361

From syan at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 02:58:03 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 02:58:03 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] Integrated: 8341131: Some jdk/jfr/event/compiler tests
 shouldn't be executed with Xcomp
In-Reply-To: <bv0DrROoBocVxND03bdfevlR4acz64UWJ3O5ixjPNvM=.9619d738-7e6d-434f-98f1-5bd5ba7dde63@github.com>
References: <bv0DrROoBocVxND03bdfevlR4acz64UWJ3O5ixjPNvM=.9619d738-7e6d-434f-98f1-5bd5ba7dde63@github.com>
Message-ID: <Fm6wSqlN5B4egiOLpeDuv1OpNdFRbI_4S-r5380Jk0A=.56a5843b-5b97-4b8c-b894-77bbbeb30613@github.com>

On Mon, 20 Oct 2025 09:32:48 GMT, SendaoYan <syan at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [7312eea3](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/7312eea382eed048b6abdb6409c006fc8e8f45b4) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Leonid Mesnik on 8 Oct 2024 and was reviewed by Christian Hagedorn.
> 
> Thanks!

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: d8469f60
Author:    SendaoYan <syan at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/commit/d8469f60386ce3f61cb01fbe1b60937b118c9cb5
Stats:     5 lines in 3 files changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 5 mod

8341131: Some jdk/jfr/event/compiler tests shouldn't be executed with Xcomp

Backport-of: 7312eea382eed048b6abdb6409c006fc8e8f45b4

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4074

From syan at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 02:57:57 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 02:57:57 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] Integrated: 8313770:
 jdk/internal/platform/docker/TestSystemMetrics.java fails on Ubuntu
In-Reply-To: <qAMpYf0vAJiC62wld1KEu3ecqC5ELNTAeMEOVjV0LwE=.362b63e5-28da-432e-9ef5-17d1709a9574@github.com>
References: <qAMpYf0vAJiC62wld1KEu3ecqC5ELNTAeMEOVjV0LwE=.362b63e5-28da-432e-9ef5-17d1709a9574@github.com>
Message-ID: <fClFzNHj8oyYGK8LFv51k2XXCCPVCGgQlJGuopw9fV0=.41416d07-5028-42e1-952d-9e2842baf49c@github.com>

On Thu, 23 Oct 2025 09:50:02 GMT, SendaoYan <syan at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [aec13888](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/aec138886ec2dff765ed810059a1c7b9905c43ca) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Casper Norrbin on 23 Oct 2025 and was reviewed by Severin Gehwolf, Matthias Baesken and SendaoYan.
> 
> Thanks!

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 3dd3913c
Author:    SendaoYan <syan at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/commit/3dd3913cc9be9f78de986d3ccf577d6908f8861e
Stats:     3 lines in 1 file changed: 1 ins; 0 del; 2 mod

8313770: jdk/internal/platform/docker/TestSystemMetrics.java fails on Ubuntu

Backport-of: aec138886ec2dff765ed810059a1c7b9905c43ca

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4092

From swen at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 03:11:53 2025
From: swen at openjdk.org (Shaojin Wen)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 03:11:53 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u] RFR: 8357289: Break down the String constructor into
 smaller methods [v2]
In-Reply-To: <c_TlGkh7AZrojg13KkMsTg5aeCO20uZn48AXbplXZhk=.2894ff57-366c-4471-9888-b74038fc5c89@github.com>
References: <rZoaewDI_3C8KZ9HplfEv8AuTaX1-lPzrpyH3bfRhbg=.3342ecff-b42c-408d-ae15-f7d17c7c9f1d@github.com>
 <TJx30m7hTm689QuFmzKPw0laHYWRS8jBmYD7s03kuCQ=.1b00bc47-2a7a-43fe-a6d7-0c0b7383ac68@github.com>
 <c_TlGkh7AZrojg13KkMsTg5aeCO20uZn48AXbplXZhk=.2894ff57-366c-4471-9888-b74038fc5c89@github.com>
Message-ID: <vw1abQiN5EGjZd0iymPokmdIF0l8wHYYe_CV-9h7Ts4=.7a6147d1-0b18-43ca-a374-6a151d6439e8@github.com>

On Wed, 26 Nov 2025 17:26:04 GMT, Chen Liang <liach at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Now that Oracle stops maintaining 25u, I believe you should open backport PRs should be in https://github.com/openjdk/jdk25u-dev repository instead.

Thanks @liach, I resubmitted the PR https://github.com/openjdk/jdk25u-dev/pull/32

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u/pull/351#issuecomment-3594339044

From syan at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 07:29:52 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 07:29:52 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u] RFR: 8370646: TestLargeUTF8Length.java needs lots of
 memory [v2]
In-Reply-To: <KZvMYSxnRoY7xH3o1OqBgvTbpbch4khJ4cyKaxEvAq8=.67cfb9ff-286b-4a19-b361-dc2462552f0b@github.com>
References: <KZvMYSxnRoY7xH3o1OqBgvTbpbch4khJ4cyKaxEvAq8=.67cfb9ff-286b-4a19-b361-dc2462552f0b@github.com>
Message-ID: <Dn0KsMoC-vX_nHwg-cDE36cO3bt_ca20q8bwNxWv6ZQ=.90f0dc1a-62c4-4bc4-85b7-76d10995980d@github.com>

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [3c1010b5](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/3c1010b57f2f8258a2ccf59b9f86fc8debd71918) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Kelvin Nilsen on 31 Oct 2025 and was reviewed by Paul Hohensee, William Kemper and Y. Srinivas Ramakrishna.
> 
> Thanks!

SendaoYan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains two additional commits since the last revision:

 - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into backport-sendaoYan-3c1010b5-master
 - Backport 3c1010b57f2f8258a2ccf59b9f86fc8debd71918

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u/pull/354/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u/pull/354/files/c796143d..3c565ad1

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk25u&pr=354&range=01
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk25u&pr=354&range=00-01

  Stats: 1056 lines in 50 files changed: 877 ins; 46 del; 133 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u/pull/354.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u.git pull/354/head:pull/354

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u/pull/354

From duke at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 07:30:55 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Kent Dong)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 07:30:55 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8370887: DelayScheduler.replace method may break
 the 4-ary heap in certain scenarios
In-Reply-To: <vFueVM9vN3eJOXkWb1y3ZZePxLINaaGhbh5hJnsbQaE=.42900070-aab1-464d-b629-03a2ce53c8a0@github.com>
References: <vFueVM9vN3eJOXkWb1y3ZZePxLINaaGhbh5hJnsbQaE=.42900070-aab1-464d-b629-03a2ce53c8a0@github.com>
Message-ID: <MQh9kc6OtJo80eUb9_ENRfq6PZPIKteyNYboLhrz87Q=.7e2f1826-31d7-4a51-b300-284c94aa48f7@github.com>

On Thu, 27 Nov 2025 16:02:30 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev <shade at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backporting to fix the regression in JDK 25 feature, and to match 25.0.3-oracle.
> 
> Additional testing:
>  - [x] macos-aarch64-server-fastdebug, new regression test fails without the test, passes with it

Is it possible to have this fix released in 25.0.2? We are eagerly looking forward to it in order to use virtual threads in the production environment.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/27#issuecomment-3594253587

From shade at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 07:57:04 2025
From: shade at openjdk.org (Aleksey Shipilev)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 07:57:04 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8370887: DelayScheduler.replace method may break
 the 4-ary heap in certain scenarios
In-Reply-To: <MQh9kc6OtJo80eUb9_ENRfq6PZPIKteyNYboLhrz87Q=.7e2f1826-31d7-4a51-b300-284c94aa48f7@github.com>
References: <vFueVM9vN3eJOXkWb1y3ZZePxLINaaGhbh5hJnsbQaE=.42900070-aab1-464d-b629-03a2ce53c8a0@github.com>
 <MQh9kc6OtJo80eUb9_ENRfq6PZPIKteyNYboLhrz87Q=.7e2f1826-31d7-4a51-b300-284c94aa48f7@github.com>
Message-ID: <_Tr_etYbik_pN_1iFI2XKHyi3b34CeXQlYcu7F4xj4I=.3c40eb6c-bb50-44e8-aef2-a44ab6fc2379@github.com>

On Mon, 1 Dec 2025 02:22:10 GMT, Kent Dong <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Is it possible to have this fix released in 25.0.2? 

Unfortunately, 25.0.2 is already under freeze. So this would come into 25.0.3. We can think about picking it up in some downstreams (e.g. Corretto) early, if risk-benefit is strong for earlier inclusion.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/27#issuecomment-3595093168

From shade at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 07:57:07 2025
From: shade at openjdk.org (Aleksey Shipilev)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 07:57:07 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] Integrated: 8370887: DelayScheduler.replace method may
 break the 4-ary heap in certain scenarios
In-Reply-To: <vFueVM9vN3eJOXkWb1y3ZZePxLINaaGhbh5hJnsbQaE=.42900070-aab1-464d-b629-03a2ce53c8a0@github.com>
References: <vFueVM9vN3eJOXkWb1y3ZZePxLINaaGhbh5hJnsbQaE=.42900070-aab1-464d-b629-03a2ce53c8a0@github.com>
Message-ID: <BdIY4KVpT915-qkMbhWg574JD8Ti2snnB6IgkF-Z56o=.31b6e0a2-89f5-4f70-a9a7-b92f44c47dd0@github.com>

On Thu, 27 Nov 2025 16:02:30 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev <shade at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backporting to fix the regression in JDK 25 feature, and to match 25.0.3-oracle.
> 
> Additional testing:
>  - [x] macos-aarch64-server-fastdebug, new regression test fails without the test, passes with it

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: af080e10
Author:    Aleksey Shipilev <shade at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/commit/af080e104fcb45626cdcb845014c31c4abaf33ac
Stats:     199 lines in 2 files changed: 181 ins; 8 del; 10 mod

8370887: DelayScheduler.replace method may break the 4-ary heap in certain scenarios

Backport-of: cc5b35bf69dcf9e7e8037642c94e8d7e5847952d

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/27

From duke at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 08:10:56 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Kent Dong)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 08:10:56 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8370887: DelayScheduler.replace method may break
 the 4-ary heap in certain scenarios
In-Reply-To: <_Tr_etYbik_pN_1iFI2XKHyi3b34CeXQlYcu7F4xj4I=.3c40eb6c-bb50-44e8-aef2-a44ab6fc2379@github.com>
References: <vFueVM9vN3eJOXkWb1y3ZZePxLINaaGhbh5hJnsbQaE=.42900070-aab1-464d-b629-03a2ce53c8a0@github.com>
 <MQh9kc6OtJo80eUb9_ENRfq6PZPIKteyNYboLhrz87Q=.7e2f1826-31d7-4a51-b300-284c94aa48f7@github.com>
 <_Tr_etYbik_pN_1iFI2XKHyi3b34CeXQlYcu7F4xj4I=.3c40eb6c-bb50-44e8-aef2-a44ab6fc2379@github.com>
Message-ID: <8PBJQVV5qzSOYqgrHe_ntFJQLbP2eFyexu91S9JEQ_E=.9b80c39b-f92d-4d37-9def-43276e1463b6@github.com>

On Mon, 1 Dec 2025 07:52:19 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev <shade at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Unfortunately, 25.0.2 is already under freeze. So this would come into 25.0.3. We can think about picking it up in some downstreams (e.g. Corretto) early, if risk-benefit is strong for earlier inclusion.

Thanks for your response.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/27#issuecomment-3595164986

From goetz at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 09:17:39 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 09:17:39 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8357277: Update OpenSSL library for interop
 tests
In-Reply-To: <cFY-By3kBV3Bkp5n3MKhvKkM9p9iDfVSMBn6fZcT3Us=.e21980ec-3d0c-400d-a1cc-0d42df6f69a0@github.com>
References: <cFY-By3kBV3Bkp5n3MKhvKkM9p9iDfVSMBn6fZcT3Us=.e21980ec-3d0c-400d-a1cc-0d42df6f69a0@github.com>
Message-ID: <sAnJ_ZU0la8CQViS-t3EIid-V4SK30BbokzZQoRPqpk=.15abdecd-672c-4218-8628-ca747d58f6de@github.com>

On Fri, 28 Nov 2025 16:04:20 GMT, Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org> wrote:

> I backport this for parity with 25.0.3-oracle.

GHA failure: unstable test, see https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/CODETOOLS-7904109
unrelated.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/36#issuecomment-3595428408

From goetz at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 09:21:47 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 09:21:47 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] Integrated: 8327980: Convert
 javax/swing/JToggleButton/4128979/bug4128979.java applet test to main
In-Reply-To: <GOXZlQIQLsy7hbMaZyx9_A4VfZRwDBApmfTVLhfXAfw=.ca0c30de-8f65-4af3-9333-fcbdbec59439@github.com>
References: <GOXZlQIQLsy7hbMaZyx9_A4VfZRwDBApmfTVLhfXAfw=.ca0c30de-8f65-4af3-9333-fcbdbec59439@github.com>
Message-ID: <ET0F9pnum_f9fMouICV2t3iqL7VaBv4NVKa8MulkFCQ=.1be8aa51-6fad-430f-b0b5-29f3a346fb40@github.com>

On Fri, 28 Nov 2025 12:24:22 GMT, Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org> wrote:

> I backport this for parity with 21.0.9-oracle.

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: b4482036
Author:    Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/commit/b448203662a05a94b44921cdcf1c4433fdd1e32a
Stats:     333 lines in 3 files changed: 149 ins; 184 del; 0 mod

8327980: Convert javax/swing/JToggleButton/4128979/bug4128979.java applet test to main

Backport-of: 256d48b19694e86bb26d67ed56de8ac94a31f4ff

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2493

From vklang at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 09:23:16 2025
From: vklang at openjdk.org (Viktor Klang)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 09:23:16 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u] RFR: 8371740 : LinkedTransferQueue.poll() returns null even
 though queue is not empty
Message-ID: <sJNBjRDkk1tRaiLut7Lx4yNCrr6eZTwhQs079sXNqX8=.e1a584eb-b9ae-45f4-aa7e-668e73d983b5@github.com>

This fixes a situation where LinkedTransferQueue.poll() may return `null` when the queue is provably non-empty.

This PR is a backport of https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8371740 commit [d350158e](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/d350158e060c01acf49759dcbdd1f4d72530111b) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.

The commit being backported was authored by Viktor Klang on 27 Nov 2025 and was reviewed by Alan Bateman.

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport d350158e060c01acf49759dcbdd1f4d72530111b

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u/pull/396/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk25u&pr=396&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8371740
  Stats: 87 lines in 2 files changed: 80 ins; 0 del; 7 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u/pull/396.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u.git pull/396/head:pull/396

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u/pull/396

From goetz at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 09:23:58 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 09:23:58 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] Integrated: 8327980: Convert
 javax/swing/JToggleButton/4128979/bug4128979.java applet test to main
In-Reply-To: <YnGmeEUwAw1C2zk-oZtUQPEd2LzFhBXPXy6GQn6V1-E=.ba36eff8-13d9-4a9c-95e7-88a9ad8cceda@github.com>
References: <YnGmeEUwAw1C2zk-oZtUQPEd2LzFhBXPXy6GQn6V1-E=.ba36eff8-13d9-4a9c-95e7-88a9ad8cceda@github.com>
Message-ID: <mT1J3j08VPTmdcK6a-GV4XYBYu5iJJ9x-MRSEJycBbg=.80043c21-cc6f-440a-be63-4b01a2ec08e5@github.com>

On Fri, 28 Nov 2025 12:24:34 GMT, Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org> wrote:

> I backport this for parity with 17.0.17-oracle

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 41990f84
Author:    Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/commit/41990f84e4a2760d20c12283330672f433451ba0
Stats:     333 lines in 3 files changed: 149 ins; 184 del; 0 mod

8327980: Convert javax/swing/JToggleButton/4128979/bug4128979.java applet test to main

Backport-of: 256d48b19694e86bb26d67ed56de8ac94a31f4ff

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4197

From vklang at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 09:56:54 2025
From: vklang at openjdk.org (Viktor Klang)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 09:56:54 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u] Withdrawn: 8371740 : LinkedTransferQueue.poll() returns null
 even though queue is not empty
In-Reply-To: <sJNBjRDkk1tRaiLut7Lx4yNCrr6eZTwhQs079sXNqX8=.e1a584eb-b9ae-45f4-aa7e-668e73d983b5@github.com>
References: <sJNBjRDkk1tRaiLut7Lx4yNCrr6eZTwhQs079sXNqX8=.e1a584eb-b9ae-45f4-aa7e-668e73d983b5@github.com>
Message-ID: <enFJNUC0XkMLL86QV2-uipbeh8NvZn7eYB_JuJbPYTI=.6780ab29-3ea0-4dbf-8263-99bf35bd35ad@github.com>

On Mon, 1 Dec 2025 09:17:26 GMT, Viktor Klang <vklang at openjdk.org> wrote:

> This fixes a situation where LinkedTransferQueue.poll() may return `null` when the queue is provably non-empty.
> 
> This PR is a backport of https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8371740 commit [d350158e](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/d350158e060c01acf49759dcbdd1f4d72530111b) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Viktor Klang on 27 Nov 2025 and was reviewed by Alan Bateman.

This pull request has been closed without being integrated.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u/pull/396

From goetz at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 10:36:20 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 10:36:20 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] Withdrawn: 8363949: Incorrect jtreg header in
 MonitorWithDeadObjectTest.java
In-Reply-To: <H32Nbu_G9iDHhIgJFAbM3IREzrjyulC_RnA6hjAJWpQ=.4119cf34-9495-4356-bc96-677072d107c3@github.com>
References: <H32Nbu_G9iDHhIgJFAbM3IREzrjyulC_RnA6hjAJWpQ=.4119cf34-9495-4356-bc96-677072d107c3@github.com>
Message-ID: <KT2gT5lGA7Jz01tAd2PKH9ZS-3ZSyv3M2jT3-jBMQm4=.6a4e52e9-66ae-4fb1-abb9-c55974f88fe3@github.com>

On Fri, 28 Nov 2025 15:56:37 GMT, Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org> wrote:

> I backport this for parity with 25.0.3-oracle.

This pull request has been closed without being integrated.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/35

From goetz at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 10:36:30 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 10:36:30 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] Withdrawn: 8363949: Incorrect jtreg header in
 MonitorWithDeadObjectTest.java
In-Reply-To: <INQFfvYqDYptC4WUIweALQSL1yhj1Ldcw5xuvX-BeVE=.99868b0b-8a34-4828-b823-7b6b52688995@github.com>
References: <INQFfvYqDYptC4WUIweALQSL1yhj1Ldcw5xuvX-BeVE=.99868b0b-8a34-4828-b823-7b6b52688995@github.com>
Message-ID: <E4dB7WJEsSRqcCjBl9msgcTl7ofsiETZuYljYczAc4w=.e57de7fd-f15d-4004-864d-1bc3d9a64097@github.com>

On Fri, 28 Nov 2025 15:56:47 GMT, Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org> wrote:

> I backport this for parity with 21.0.11-oracle.

This pull request has been closed without being integrated.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2495

From sroy at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 12:45:04 2025
From: sroy at openjdk.org (Suchismith Roy)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 12:45:04 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8030957: AIX: Implement
 OperatingSystemMXBean.getSystemCpuLoad() and .getProcessCpuLoad() on AIX
In-Reply-To: <3_wCfoSrsJ26RGDvMFALw7XfARYeJFBpR9TkC_mRg_Y=.1fe1cc1a-f383-4866-b993-9c0a707042d2@github.com>
References: <oYKNyChhDAfvNK4a7KhwR8j5L4G31o3K6Vc2EepmJnY=.f7730723-b9b0-4165-912f-8467be1cb976@github.com>
 <3_wCfoSrsJ26RGDvMFALw7XfARYeJFBpR9TkC_mRg_Y=.1fe1cc1a-f383-4866-b993-9c0a707042d2@github.com>
Message-ID: <EbQMXaYFWJ82KFZT9vFCtzToYSHbx_I_N2tfOyq7Ioc=.9c664739-2f18-4a3a-8c95-b46bafaff2cd@github.com>

On Thu, 30 Oct 2025 13:06:48 GMT, Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Hi all,
>> 
>> This pull request contains a backport of commit [d45e65ba](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/d45e65bab45f78f9f378cdc53837fe33190b7801) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
>> 
>> The commit being backported was authored by Suchismith Roy on 8 Oct 2025 and was reviewed by Joachim Kern, Martin Doerr and Matthias Baesken.
>> 
>> Thanks!
>
> Hi @suchismith1993 , please label again for approval once it is approved for 25.  Also, please state risk and testing in your approval request.

Hi @GoeLin  Changes made it to jdk25u. Can we get this integrated now ?

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2403#issuecomment-3596363595

From sroy at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 12:45:09 2025
From: sroy at openjdk.org (Suchismith Roy)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 12:45:09 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8030957: AIX: Implement
 OperatingSystemMXBean.getSystemCpuLoad() and .getProcessCpuLoad() on AIX [v2]
In-Reply-To: <c8QD2PHPm_jrOmiu5LMm5ommZgPDC-PCw7UqcPOVvik=.5c12d01c-b9f2-4c1d-9ba6-f7b474b7d120@github.com>
References: <uNSuufl0gz-HQ5YuD2PsKRMsoedIqgbd6Mvvy3Jnuv8=.f5eec69f-7d78-475d-987c-1510ff496af5@github.com>
 <c8QD2PHPm_jrOmiu5LMm5ommZgPDC-PCw7UqcPOVvik=.5c12d01c-b9f2-4c1d-9ba6-f7b474b7d120@github.com>
Message-ID: <xmwvsswXXn0i9BctWbUfvpYSXyjQv0pVV-rQm80AfHQ=.26f4c2c0-edc6-407f-9837-5e1cdb44a15f@github.com>

On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 16:46:49 GMT, Suchismith Roy <sroy at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Hi all,
>> 
>> This pull request contains a backport of commit [d45e65ba](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/d45e65bab45f78f9f378cdc53837fe33190b7801) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
>> 
>> The commit being backported was authored by Suchismith Roy on 8 Oct 2025 and was reviewed by Joachim Kern, Martin Doerr and Matthias Baesken.
>> 
>> Thanks!
>
> Suchismith Roy has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - Revert ProblemList
>  - Revert ProblemList

Hi @GoeLin  Changes made it to jdk25u. Can we get this integrated now ?

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4113#issuecomment-3596362693

From goetz at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 12:50:55 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 12:50:55 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u] RFR: 8366278: Form control element <select> has no
 associated label
In-Reply-To: <dEbDWV33ieW0KFnLAobsZztHJOW8hJQxZN6N5PFST4c=.974dc2e8-38ca-407b-a40b-ad3ef474d6d5@github.com>
References: <gF2iJt1Mxi8Wh5mBLT6Zjg0i71Oo1HhECeErFwA0KeI=.9cb0eb67-3842-4d4c-a82e-e31ef1285a86@github.com>
 <GuDFcxP3W-5xypyPamT80QOUIetbAfLa81Y9Vdj6g9o=.607cd4a7-784a-438b-8d32-8a68608f043d@github.com>
 <l_4dxkbkVZ0wuy_BinULNhS0Y9oGlQh3wFpF1mZWbfM=.b932914e-8aab-447d-b2dd-3e8b67ac6c64@github.com>
 <SasYhpCT-AID8dWbuPDcftbdGxrHn-HkZdLVG2mXHs8=.f065916b-e150-4733-a8ea-789194fec935@github.com>
 <dEbDWV33ieW0KFnLAobsZztHJOW8hJQxZN6N5PFST4c=.974dc2e8-38ca-407b-a40b-ad3ef474d6d5@github.com>
Message-ID: <upddR3o3UspEbpROIGnsYI4sYeovPRApeWyoChmjmt0=.b22aa195-70b1-45aa-ade1-e27335f842d1@github.com>

On Thu, 27 Nov 2025 13:12:42 GMT, Pasam Soujanya <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Hi @psoujany 
>> the fact that this is clean is not an indication of a low risk.
>> You must consider the effects on an existing application that get's an update of its jdk with your change.
>> What is the risk for this application?  Imagine a clean backport of a change that changes the default GC. This can have a huge impact on an application.
>
> Hi @GoeLin , the fix is related to accessibility. We tested the fix with JDK25 and didn't find any regressions, so this could be of low risk. Could you please let me know if anything needs to be validated for this backport. Thank you.

Hi @psoujany,
tests are green now. 
Please issue the approval command again, giving a more comprehensive comment including the risk assessment. It will update the comment in the JBS issue.
Similar for the other backport.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u/pull/375#issuecomment-3596386391

From goetz at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 12:53:53 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 12:53:53 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u] RFR: 8367302: New test
 jdk/jfr/event/profiling/TestCPUTimeSampleQueueAutoSizes.java from JDK-8366082
 is failing
In-Reply-To: <LWU0QF_1irRmRIHxBwNgKRG1o_2N799fkHAXIhZqUXU=.228752fb-4982-4662-a809-38271fbe8edf@github.com>
References: <LWU0QF_1irRmRIHxBwNgKRG1o_2N799fkHAXIhZqUXU=.228752fb-4982-4662-a809-38271fbe8edf@github.com>
Message-ID: <brkhqKzMPD7cjts9Dp6apq0a7aLB0i3oN7xqGX3DVI8=.c83a74c7-b396-46b2-b987-e1bbfba8e937@github.com>

On Fri, 10 Oct 2025 16:18:59 GMT, Johannes Bechberger <jbechberger at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [d27649fe](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/d27649fe22a5bed9db72ac6c2595ac91f1fa28f8) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Johannes Bechberger on 8 Oct 2025 and was reviewed by David Holmes and Andrei Pangin.
> 
> Thanks!

Hi @parttimenerd 
please enable github actions on this repo.
Also, please describe what you have changed wrt. the originl change in the main PR comment.

@parttimenerd 
Well, maybe it will be recognized clean if you trigger the bots somehow.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u/pull/292#issuecomment-3596399834
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u/pull/292#issuecomment-3596402399

From shade at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 13:58:55 2025
From: shade at openjdk.org (Aleksey Shipilev)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 13:58:55 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8357570: [macOS] os::Bsd::available_memory()
 might return too low values
In-Reply-To: <4B0lU8TnAB9xkzWc1rDDdQzPjfkYFQM1L6qoa0bSiyc=.cb726f54-faa7-4514-82e7-c2a8dd7dc879@github.com>
References: <4B0lU8TnAB9xkzWc1rDDdQzPjfkYFQM1L6qoa0bSiyc=.cb726f54-faa7-4514-82e7-c2a8dd7dc879@github.com>
Message-ID: <ONnqzcBqTGxADIJUkpwtgQaEVHNBnE2hQAZxCJiIO5w=.180d0671-e32b-4a3e-a928-076cb560cf61@github.com>

On Fri, 28 Nov 2025 10:57:13 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev <shade at openjdk.org> wrote:

> This bugfix improves MacOS reporting, *and* makes further backports in container code cleaner. Notably, it is on the way to [JDK-8370572](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8370572) backport. The full stack looks like this:
> 
> 
>     Clean JDK-8370966: Create regression test for the hierarchical memory limit fix in JDK-8370572
> (!) Clean JDK-8370572: Cgroups hierarchical memory limit is not honored after JDK-8322420
>     Clean JDK-8292984: Refactor internal container-related interfaces for clarity
>     Clean JDK-8356868: Not all cgroup parameters are made available
>     Clean JDK-8367485: os::physical_memory is broken in 32-bit JVMs when running on 64-bit OSes
>     Clean JDK-8357086: os::xxx functions returning memory size should return size_t
>>>> Clean JDK-8357570: [macOS] os::Bsd::available_memory() might return too low values
>     Clean JDK-8364248: Separate commit and reservation limit detection
> 
> 
> I looked where this code is used, and I think only management and reporting code realistically depends on it.
> 
> Additional testing:
>  - [x] GHA
>  - [x] MacOS AArch64 server fastdebug, `jdk_management`

Push approval granted.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/31#issuecomment-3596686595

From shade at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 13:58:56 2025
From: shade at openjdk.org (Aleksey Shipilev)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 13:58:56 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] Integrated: 8357570: [macOS] os::Bsd::available_memory()
 might return too low values
In-Reply-To: <4B0lU8TnAB9xkzWc1rDDdQzPjfkYFQM1L6qoa0bSiyc=.cb726f54-faa7-4514-82e7-c2a8dd7dc879@github.com>
References: <4B0lU8TnAB9xkzWc1rDDdQzPjfkYFQM1L6qoa0bSiyc=.cb726f54-faa7-4514-82e7-c2a8dd7dc879@github.com>
Message-ID: <obXXa55fKLmWvMyL2jVYM5LbEbJOBKi7NQsmU-e5XJo=.1157e27e-76de-4203-b0c8-d2833e1905e0@github.com>

On Fri, 28 Nov 2025 10:57:13 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev <shade at openjdk.org> wrote:

> This bugfix improves MacOS reporting, *and* makes further backports in container code cleaner. Notably, it is on the way to [JDK-8370572](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8370572) backport. The full stack looks like this:
> 
> 
>     Clean JDK-8370966: Create regression test for the hierarchical memory limit fix in JDK-8370572
> (!) Clean JDK-8370572: Cgroups hierarchical memory limit is not honored after JDK-8322420
>     Clean JDK-8292984: Refactor internal container-related interfaces for clarity
>     Clean JDK-8356868: Not all cgroup parameters are made available
>     Clean JDK-8367485: os::physical_memory is broken in 32-bit JVMs when running on 64-bit OSes
>     Clean JDK-8357086: os::xxx functions returning memory size should return size_t
>>>> Clean JDK-8357570: [macOS] os::Bsd::available_memory() might return too low values
>     Clean JDK-8364248: Separate commit and reservation limit detection
> 
> 
> I looked where this code is used, and I think only management and reporting code realistically depends on it.
> 
> Additional testing:
>  - [x] GHA
>  - [x] MacOS AArch64 server fastdebug, `jdk_management`

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 3da62237
Author:    Aleksey Shipilev <shade at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/commit/3da62237a766510d9efbde9400092c61b2a53ba0
Stats:     2 lines in 1 file changed: 1 ins; 0 del; 1 mod

8357570: [macOS] os::Bsd::available_memory() might return too low values

Backport-of: 7d7fc69355e6f5421cf09f93290270bb16d13182

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/31

From fyang at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 14:38:46 2025
From: fyang at openjdk.org (Fei Yang)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 14:38:46 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8366747: RISC-V: Improve VerifyMethodHandles for
 method handle linkers
Message-ID: <BlT5tf61iq7QPBAJg9MzdreTpxw9U5gK5l-Ioo7jPeo=.e0a73e25-07d2-4469-b0c1-c8354d170ad3@github.com>

Hi all,

This pull request contains a backport of commit [0d7f8f83](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/0d7f8f83c7a674f5da4b93d66a24f9ce5ba46011) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.

The commit being backported was authored by Anjian Wen on 5 Sep 2025 and was reviewed by Fei Yang and Dingli Zhang.

Thanks!

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport 0d7f8f83c7a674f5da4b93d66a24f9ce5ba46011

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/38/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk25u-dev&pr=38&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8366747
  Stats: 54 lines in 2 files changed: 48 ins; 1 del; 5 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/38.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev.git pull/38/head:pull/38

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/38

From jbechberger at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 14:39:18 2025
From: jbechberger at openjdk.org (Johannes Bechberger)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 14:39:18 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u] Withdrawn: 8367302: New test
 jdk/jfr/event/profiling/TestCPUTimeSampleQueueAutoSizes.java from JDK-8366082
 is failing
In-Reply-To: <LWU0QF_1irRmRIHxBwNgKRG1o_2N799fkHAXIhZqUXU=.228752fb-4982-4662-a809-38271fbe8edf@github.com>
References: <LWU0QF_1irRmRIHxBwNgKRG1o_2N799fkHAXIhZqUXU=.228752fb-4982-4662-a809-38271fbe8edf@github.com>
Message-ID: <lZYrEo9Uboc1T4zrqINchiqvlYOl8CX1BCydNKb36Fs=.d7eb27b6-05fc-46be-8e58-2f16697387af@github.com>

On Fri, 10 Oct 2025 16:18:59 GMT, Johannes Bechberger <jbechberger at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [d27649fe](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/d27649fe22a5bed9db72ac6c2595ac91f1fa28f8) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Johannes Bechberger on 8 Oct 2025 and was reviewed by David Holmes and Andrei Pangin.
> 
> Thanks!

This pull request has been closed without being integrated.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u/pull/292

From jbechberger at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 14:46:06 2025
From: jbechberger at openjdk.org (Johannes Bechberger)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 14:46:06 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u] RFR: 8367302: New test
 jdk/jfr/event/profiling/TestCPUTimeSampleQueueAutoSizes.java from JDK-8366082
 is failing
Message-ID: <QRF0PHz_1Zgu7YfIuC5ASVMJY83nfIzQVWWCrayNH_4=.09a5cdfc-16bf-4806-ad9c-01a6f42e8867@github.com>

Hi all,

This pull request contains a backport of commit [d27649fe](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/d27649fe22a5bed9db72ac6c2595ac91f1fa28f8) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.

The commit being backported was authored by Johannes Bechberger on 8 Oct 2025 and was reviewed by David Holmes and Andrei Pangin.

The backported is clean, although git had slight problems.

Thanks!

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport d27649fe22a5bed9db72ac6c2595ac91f1fa28f8

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u/pull/397/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk25u&pr=397&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8367302
  Stats: 240 lines in 5 files changed: 236 ins; 0 del; 4 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u/pull/397.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u.git pull/397/head:pull/397

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u/pull/397

From jbechberger at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 15:42:51 2025
From: jbechberger at openjdk.org (Johannes Bechberger)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 15:42:51 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u] RFR: 8367302: New test
 jdk/jfr/event/profiling/TestCPUTimeSampleQueueAutoSizes.java from JDK-8366082
 is failing [v2]
In-Reply-To: <QRF0PHz_1Zgu7YfIuC5ASVMJY83nfIzQVWWCrayNH_4=.09a5cdfc-16bf-4806-ad9c-01a6f42e8867@github.com>
References: <QRF0PHz_1Zgu7YfIuC5ASVMJY83nfIzQVWWCrayNH_4=.09a5cdfc-16bf-4806-ad9c-01a6f42e8867@github.com>
Message-ID: <XXUXa_qlNotLm2N3mYEAb6kn-wIFDOeT1Gzs4msgEr8=.fa774193-a8c7-417a-8274-32853392b565@github.com>

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [d27649fe](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/d27649fe22a5bed9db72ac6c2595ac91f1fa28f8) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Johannes Bechberger on 8 Oct 2025 and was reviewed by David Holmes and Andrei Pangin.
> 
> The backported is clean, although git had slight problems.
> 
> Thanks!

Johannes Bechberger has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:

  Fix

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u/pull/397/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u/pull/397/files/b150eba4..e689ef45

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk25u&pr=397&range=01
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk25u&pr=397&range=00-01

  Stats: 6 lines in 2 files changed: 0 ins; 3 del; 3 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u/pull/397.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u.git pull/397/head:pull/397

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u/pull/397

From duke at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 15:47:32 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (duke)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 15:47:32 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8369050: DecimalFormat Rounding Errors for
 Fractional Ties Near Zero
In-Reply-To: <9s0qrlhYCrnOsG2BXYTf5OzF2EeJzlKsAfunve745wc=.5228d708-063a-4354-bd0e-a07b2b95c0d5@github.com>
References: <9s0qrlhYCrnOsG2BXYTf5OzF2EeJzlKsAfunve745wc=.5228d708-063a-4354-bd0e-a07b2b95c0d5@github.com>
Message-ID: <uFd3dMTMqanN61yiKt-y0AIKGwF0iI4IskGB8IzMUcg=.093fd6bf-c36e-4521-8da9-60f428104b1a@github.com>

On Tue, 25 Nov 2025 21:06:36 GMT, Roland Mesde <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backporting JDK-8369050: DecimalFormat Rounding Errors for Fractional Ties Near Zero. Fixes rounding logic, updates a test and adds a test. Merge issue was related to the bug list. Only the current issue (8369050) was added as part of the PR. Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed), jtreg tier1 tests (passed) and related tests (passed) on linux-x64, linux-aarch64, macos-aarch64 and windows-x64:
> 
> (Passed) - make test-tier1
> (Passed) - make test TEST=test/jdk/java/text/Format
> 
> Results are attached.
> 
> [linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23776407/linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [linux-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23776408/linux-aarch64-specific-test.log)
> [linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23776409/linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [linux-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23776410/linux-x64-specific-test.log)
> [macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23776411/macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [macos-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23776412/macos-aarch64-specific-test.log)
> [windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23776413/windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [windows-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23776414/windows-x64-specific-test.log)

@rm-gh-8 
Your change (at version 747dc58e9f6a0f6226508518ad812a55d99c4462) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/4#issuecomment-3597289837

From wkemper at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 16:23:22 2025
From: wkemper at openjdk.org (William Kemper)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 16:23:22 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u] Withdrawn: 8359947: GenShen: use smaller TLABs by default
In-Reply-To: <oJdvNc2yNczokJAhLCic57XD37E6xmsZ-HzLyefH5FU=.a65f0229-5cf0-46e8-813c-24c3ab46a7e6@github.com>
References: <oJdvNc2yNczokJAhLCic57XD37E6xmsZ-HzLyefH5FU=.a65f0229-5cf0-46e8-813c-24c3ab46a7e6@github.com>
Message-ID: <1Mmf_uf9gWLV7A9-ahSLELU1PxMzB9Xe5oPj7rS6O5g=.b7dc5e5e-ae5c-4c8e-8da9-a9f304fd30f4@github.com>

On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 20:59:53 GMT, William Kemper <wkemper at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Clean backport. This is a performance improvement for the generational mode of Shenandoah.

This pull request has been closed without being integrated.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u/pull/99

From duke at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 17:20:42 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Roland Mesde)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 17:20:42 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] Integrated: 8369050: DecimalFormat Rounding Errors for
 Fractional Ties Near Zero
In-Reply-To: <9s0qrlhYCrnOsG2BXYTf5OzF2EeJzlKsAfunve745wc=.5228d708-063a-4354-bd0e-a07b2b95c0d5@github.com>
References: <9s0qrlhYCrnOsG2BXYTf5OzF2EeJzlKsAfunve745wc=.5228d708-063a-4354-bd0e-a07b2b95c0d5@github.com>
Message-ID: <YwYTdO-Z2ZFLtSyzyujaL_hQL2J8ACTY6euOr2iXFiA=.563bf57e-5572-43d0-bf1b-f977ceed5347@github.com>

On Tue, 25 Nov 2025 21:06:36 GMT, Roland Mesde <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backporting JDK-8369050: DecimalFormat Rounding Errors for Fractional Ties Near Zero. Fixes rounding logic, updates a test and adds a test. Merge issue was related to the bug list. Only the current issue (8369050) was added as part of the PR. Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed), jtreg tier1 tests (passed) and related tests (passed) on linux-x64, linux-aarch64, macos-aarch64 and windows-x64:
> 
> (Passed) - make test-tier1
> (Passed) - make test TEST=test/jdk/java/text/Format
> 
> Results are attached.
> 
> [linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23776407/linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [linux-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23776408/linux-aarch64-specific-test.log)
> [linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23776409/linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [linux-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23776410/linux-x64-specific-test.log)
> [macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23776411/macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [macos-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23776412/macos-aarch64-specific-test.log)
> [windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23776413/windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [windows-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23776414/windows-x64-specific-test.log)

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: c0391481
Author:    Roland Mesde <mesde at amazon.com>
Committer: Volker Simonis <simonis at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/commit/c03914817da13ae0bab37a35d94b3569a19964b1
Stats:     95 lines in 3 files changed: 88 ins; 5 del; 2 mod

8369050: DecimalFormat Rounding Errors for Fractional Ties Near Zero

Backport-of: 376d77e8a71478f456af5baaf47f446eebd79e36

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/4

From asemenyuk at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 19:21:49 2025
From: asemenyuk at openjdk.org (Alexey Semenyuk)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 19:21:49 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u] RFR: 8372753: jpackage ignores --file-associations option
 with predefined app image [v2]
In-Reply-To: <w1vzgnWUSm5CC0YyKknSeRcUFLma9lzLlzMZG4ab2QM=.9f6be3b2-5e56-4f96-9b27-ede1fafe824f@github.com>
References: <FMsCbI4AlHf8fYtfSM2v35cX-ySdb96GHiSB_MCN71o=.ce776358-3a74-42f2-8dc3-4a43236dd6d1@github.com>
 <w1vzgnWUSm5CC0YyKknSeRcUFLma9lzLlzMZG4ab2QM=.9f6be3b2-5e56-4f96-9b27-ede1fafe824f@github.com>
Message-ID: <1CNYDu9gLsVv8_bEyshgw2TmQTaVqU1n76n3uW8PBR8=.78a77b12-b9ba-427e-8052-52bf85f624bd@github.com>

On Sat, 29 Nov 2025 01:09:31 GMT, Alexey Semenyuk <asemenyuk at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Fix handling of the `--file-associations` option when bundling from the predefined app image. Add relevant tests.
>
> Alexey Semenyuk has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and previous commits have been removed. The incremental views will show differences compared to the previous content of the PR. The pull request contains one new commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Add tests

@aivanov-jdk please review

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u/pull/395#issuecomment-3598463934

From asemenyuk at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 19:26:57 2025
From: asemenyuk at openjdk.org (Alexey Semenyuk)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 19:26:57 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u] RFR: 8372753: jpackage ignores --file-associations option
 with predefined app image [v2]
In-Reply-To: <w1vzgnWUSm5CC0YyKknSeRcUFLma9lzLlzMZG4ab2QM=.9f6be3b2-5e56-4f96-9b27-ede1fafe824f@github.com>
References: <FMsCbI4AlHf8fYtfSM2v35cX-ySdb96GHiSB_MCN71o=.ce776358-3a74-42f2-8dc3-4a43236dd6d1@github.com>
 <w1vzgnWUSm5CC0YyKknSeRcUFLma9lzLlzMZG4ab2QM=.9f6be3b2-5e56-4f96-9b27-ede1fafe824f@github.com>
Message-ID: <t0lqsR-tRQLCsiMrZO0Xq9Gbmrl2QK6z6JSik2s8T3Y=.1697014f-1f32-4842-9241-2cdcc4beec90@github.com>

On Sat, 29 Nov 2025 01:09:31 GMT, Alexey Semenyuk <asemenyuk at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Fix handling of the `--file-associations` option when bundling from the predefined app image. Add relevant tests.
>
> Alexey Semenyuk has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and previous commits have been removed. The incremental views will show differences compared to the previous content of the PR. The pull request contains one new commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Add tests

@sashamatveev please review

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u/pull/395#issuecomment-3598480245

From duke at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 19:36:09 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Roland Mesde)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 19:36:09 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8370197: Add missing @Override annotations in
 com.sun.beans package
Message-ID: <WkBTzjX2ScTBxDl54Y9L2x3L4L144LlVfPQaEFGhg7U=.f6a8c2fa-ab29-443b-95c2-0fbb0f51c475@github.com>

Backporting JDK-8370197: Add missing @Override annotations in com.sun.beans package. PR adds missing @Override annotations to methods in com.sun.beans package that override superclass or interface methods. Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed), jtreg tier1 tests (passed) and related tests (passed) on linux-x64, linux-aarch64, macos-aarch64 and windows-x64:

(Passed) - make test-tier1
(Passed) - make test TEST=test/jdk/java/beans

Results are attached.

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport e7c7892b9f0fcee37495cce312fdd67dc800f9c9

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2498/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk21u-dev&pr=2498&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8370197
  Stats: 97 lines in 17 files changed: 80 ins; 0 del; 17 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2498.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/2498/head:pull/2498

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2498

From serb at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 19:50:55 2025
From: serb at openjdk.org (Sergey Bylokhov)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 19:50:55 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] Integrated: 8370197: Add missing @Override annotations in
 com.sun.beans package
In-Reply-To: <8FdAA_nnQjBahjSG238TbLGQcrNmHcz11BDM_rH3BOw=.335fd9fa-0b5f-4dfa-9889-0b18b2729a0c@github.com>
References: <8FdAA_nnQjBahjSG238TbLGQcrNmHcz11BDM_rH3BOw=.335fd9fa-0b5f-4dfa-9889-0b18b2729a0c@github.com>
Message-ID: <06BKsJkNEYLswJFrvDaTVBFmeOBnTB3OWZWUOps9kag=.8afe06e0-7580-4328-b03c-1af32da89283@github.com>

On Thu, 27 Nov 2025 02:09:45 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov <serb at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [e7c7892b](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/e7c7892b9f0fcee37495cce312fdd67dc800f9c9) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Sergey Bylokhov on 26 Oct 2025 and was reviewed by Phil Race.
> 
> Thanks!

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 78317c6a
Author:    Sergey Bylokhov <serb at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/commit/78317c6ad0b512dd27c8166242bf64ea68918b10
Stats:     97 lines in 17 files changed: 80 ins; 0 del; 17 mod

8370197: Add missing @Override annotations in com.sun.beans package

Backport-of: e7c7892b9f0fcee37495cce312fdd67dc800f9c9

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/21

From phh at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 19:59:03 2025
From: phh at openjdk.org (Paul Hohensee)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 19:59:03 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8354145: G1: UseCompressedOops boundary is
 calculated on maximum heap region size instead of maxiumum ergonomic heap
 region size
In-Reply-To: <KarQGa_RxEEcpTGJJ5u8bjDfVcjSPaOY_ckNuiikugs=.c426d23d-0bdc-4396-8442-0db62b00d03f@github.com>
References: <KarQGa_RxEEcpTGJJ5u8bjDfVcjSPaOY_ckNuiikugs=.c426d23d-0bdc-4396-8442-0db62b00d03f@github.com>
Message-ID: <QcHucbxnf0uAmsonsf8fCnAxpofDFZOPm76Ko2AOEr4=.a0c9700e-807c-4ab7-9837-2da3969e998f@github.com>

On Fri, 28 Nov 2025 18:48:13 GMT, Daniel Hu <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Fixes UseCompressedOops ergonomics to use original limits for G1 GC; prior to JDK18, `-Xmx32736m` by default enables UseCompressedOops but in JDK21 `-Xmx32736m` default sets UseCompressedOops to false. New test passes with change, fails without. Change passes GHA. Backport not clean due to [JDK-8330694](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8330694) renaming `HeapRegion` to `G1HeapRegion`; modifications to the change are minimal as only had to "un-rename" the refactor.

What other testing have you done? We usually like to see at least jdk tier1, and tier2 if possible.

-------------

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2497#pullrequestreview-3526714511

From almatvee at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  1 23:30:56 2025
From: almatvee at openjdk.org (Alexander Matveev)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 23:30:56 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u] RFR: 8372753: jpackage ignores --file-associations option
 with predefined app image [v2]
In-Reply-To: <w1vzgnWUSm5CC0YyKknSeRcUFLma9lzLlzMZG4ab2QM=.9f6be3b2-5e56-4f96-9b27-ede1fafe824f@github.com>
References: <FMsCbI4AlHf8fYtfSM2v35cX-ySdb96GHiSB_MCN71o=.ce776358-3a74-42f2-8dc3-4a43236dd6d1@github.com>
 <w1vzgnWUSm5CC0YyKknSeRcUFLma9lzLlzMZG4ab2QM=.9f6be3b2-5e56-4f96-9b27-ede1fafe824f@github.com>
Message-ID: <cTAlGG9NUDzU2vOrwLvHOeZPv-7SGQg7gfnNUp7XIGw=.f7ae2d91-a4d3-4cd2-a311-5255611b9f9c@github.com>

On Sat, 29 Nov 2025 01:09:31 GMT, Alexey Semenyuk <asemenyuk at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Fix handling of the `--file-associations` option when bundling from the predefined app image. Add relevant tests.
>
> Alexey Semenyuk has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and previous commits have been removed. The incremental views will show differences compared to the previous content of the PR. The pull request contains one new commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Add tests

Looks good.

-------------

Marked as reviewed by almatvee (no project role).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u/pull/395#pullrequestreview-3527531718

From serb at openjdk.org  Tue Dec  2 04:52:12 2025
From: serb at openjdk.org (Sergey Bylokhov)
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 04:52:12 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8371759: Add missing @Override annotations in
 com.sun.imageio package
Message-ID: <upZRBqa6iVSXxTa8w-p_d0RVpbj_bU63PAmazEAXPAc=.446cd24d-0b30-4c43-8a65-3036488976a0@github.com>

Hi all,

This pull request contains a backport of commit [0c6d1b9c](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/0c6d1b9c8bfd7f4e39a6621c7a8f7bdcd044a05f) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.

The commit being backported was authored by Sergey Bylokhov on 28 Nov 2025 and was reviewed by Tejesh R, Jayathirth D V and Alexander Zvegintsev.

Thanks!

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport 0c6d1b9c8bfd7f4e39a6621c7a8f7bdcd044a05f

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/39/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk25u-dev&pr=39&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8371759
  Stats: 491 lines in 93 files changed: 401 ins; 0 del; 90 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/39.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev.git pull/39/head:pull/39

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/39

From fyang at openjdk.org  Tue Dec  2 07:39:35 2025
From: fyang at openjdk.org (Fei Yang)
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 07:39:35 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8362284: RISC-V: cleanup NativeMovRegMem
Message-ID: <3zAy1kqc_fOm82GRdy4hTbpNPIzTxGWeldSK6kLVDj0=.157e4eec-13e0-41e1-a223-73dcada0e35e@github.com>

Hi all,

This pull request contains a backport of commit [3fd89be6](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/3fd89be6d1a51b6fc99f4c0b5daba7a4bd64a08e) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.

The commit being backported was authored by Hamlin Li on 17 Jul 2025 and was reviewed by Fei Yang and Ludovic Henry.

Thanks!

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport 3fd89be6d1a51b6fc99f4c0b5daba7a4bd64a08e

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/41/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk25u-dev&pr=41&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8362284
  Stats: 40 lines in 2 files changed: 0 ins; 33 del; 7 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/41.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev.git pull/41/head:pull/41

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/41

From sgehwolf at openjdk.org  Tue Dec  2 10:01:42 2025
From: sgehwolf at openjdk.org (Severin Gehwolf)
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 10:01:42 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8353175: Eliminate double iteration of stream in
 FieldDescriptor reinitialization
In-Reply-To: <m1GKmBW16TV36RDTomY4jlkb7jgT85xu6BnL0HoWyV4=.332d751a-5497-4252-a5c3-ba99cf563acb@github.com>
References: <Nx_chyOkYb9KqBNBCtdmvP4dZ27hhbOMWPQe04rjKSM=.4a6920e6-4ab5-4a1b-b2c3-a5e603b538ea@github.com>
 <0keu1qjslFyfp894vMY-nYn8kib8LHWGtHwd5xLRatM=.9999de7f-c56c-466c-9810-d23edcf58e2f@github.com>
 <m1GKmBW16TV36RDTomY4jlkb7jgT85xu6BnL0HoWyV4=.332d751a-5497-4252-a5c3-ba99cf563acb@github.com>
Message-ID: <tS9rG3CGELzS8UPR-qk_GdAR4BYnTJTw66sXcGI3168=.565ec8de-5cf5-4de6-a7bd-e2bf0f75ad18@github.com>

On Mon, 3 Nov 2025 14:06:29 GMT, Radim Vansa <rvansa at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> HI @rvansa 
>> What is the state of this?  In case you want to integrate, please at least rerun GHA by merging head.
>
> @GoeLin Thanks for the ping - yes, I'd still like to integrate this, merged head and the GHA checks are passing. Is the change mature enough in 25 to admit this into 21?

@rvansa This is ready for integration. If you plan to integrate, please do so ASAP.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2010#issuecomment-3601194565

From goetz at openjdk.org  Tue Dec  2 10:29:32 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 10:29:32 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u] RFR: 8359064: Expose reason for marking nmethod
 non-entrant to JVMCI client
In-Reply-To: <DwlMMh0-K8WSud4BXcATdJwqQCViUxCrc7YOJxdIGqs=.913c5820-3e5e-4ce4-8679-c981de4ad61b@github.com>
References: <-zbGZQ4CrP-CAz-AwfawsUhI8vxwTq4GC3uXOEfNVcw=.ebc76743-bcd7-40bc-8178-c0f6990c38cf@github.com>
 <qwxnKD6UjYUroX94OdCO20TiZ2ZyF-SJr-KJLI3bg-Y=.4e7de639-8f1a-4837-be81-c627992f580c@github.com>
 <VnzSgIoiej4O91ndDqUymqifPyar5IHozeauRWvutNc=.e6f099a0-219f-4d7f-87b6-2f18b4749be8@github.com>
 <DwlMMh0-K8WSud4BXcATdJwqQCViUxCrc7YOJxdIGqs=.913c5820-3e5e-4ce4-8679-c981de4ad61b@github.com>
Message-ID: <wNxXtc5iPBpNyj2kqVa5DtyibTiGmmUl_5zCOTXx3pY=.c0df083b-1883-426e-b893-3a1800917ed5@github.com>

On Fri, 28 Nov 2025 19:50:45 GMT, Cesar Soares Lucas <cslucas at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Hi @JohnTortugo , I'll approve this, but can you please mention the two JBS bugids in your pull request comment?
>> Expecially in the context of the follow-up issue the text is quite misleading as-is.  Besides that the text is helpful. Thanks!
>
> Hi @GoeLin , I updated the PR description with more details. Please, let me know if anything else is missing.

HI @JohnTortugo 
I was not talking about the PR description.  I miss the information in the approval comment in the JBS issue.
Re-issue the /approval command and add the two bug ids saying that you include follow-up x in y, please.
Re-issuing the /approval command will replace the existing comment in the JBS issues.
Have a look at https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8360049, the current comment makes no sense in this JBS issue.
If you have JBS access you can also edit the corresponding comments...
Thanks!

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u/pull/335#issuecomment-3601316360

From goetz at openjdk.org  Tue Dec  2 10:31:53 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 10:31:53 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u] RFR: 8367302: New test
 jdk/jfr/event/profiling/TestCPUTimeSampleQueueAutoSizes.java from JDK-8366082
 is failing [v2]
In-Reply-To: <XXUXa_qlNotLm2N3mYEAb6kn-wIFDOeT1Gzs4msgEr8=.fa774193-a8c7-417a-8274-32853392b565@github.com>
References: <QRF0PHz_1Zgu7YfIuC5ASVMJY83nfIzQVWWCrayNH_4=.09a5cdfc-16bf-4806-ad9c-01a6f42e8867@github.com>
 <XXUXa_qlNotLm2N3mYEAb6kn-wIFDOeT1Gzs4msgEr8=.fa774193-a8c7-417a-8274-32853392b565@github.com>
Message-ID: <VqZ4aC2AeN7bQelMCLSt8mG84ssVI0i1fCs3OML3b6U=.4ba04201-09a2-417f-a5c3-33d8c7d17c67@github.com>

On Mon, 1 Dec 2025 15:42:51 GMT, Johannes Bechberger <jbechberger at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Hi all,
>> 
>> This pull request contains a backport of commit [d27649fe](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/d27649fe22a5bed9db72ac6c2595ac91f1fa28f8) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
>> 
>> The commit being backported was authored by Johannes Bechberger on 8 Oct 2025 and was reviewed by David Holmes and Andrei Pangin.
>> 
>> The backported is clean, although git had slight problems.
>> 
>> Thanks!
>
> Johannes Bechberger has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Fix

Hi @parttimenerd 
This repo is closed for normal backports. Please redo your backport against jdk25u-dev.
Thanks.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u/pull/397#issuecomment-3601325591

From goetz at openjdk.org  Tue Dec  2 10:50:56 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 10:50:56 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8371759: Add missing @Override annotations in
 com.sun.imageio package
In-Reply-To: <upZRBqa6iVSXxTa8w-p_d0RVpbj_bU63PAmazEAXPAc=.446cd24d-0b30-4c43-8a65-3036488976a0@github.com>
References: <upZRBqa6iVSXxTa8w-p_d0RVpbj_bU63PAmazEAXPAc=.446cd24d-0b30-4c43-8a65-3036488976a0@github.com>
Message-ID: <Y5cghBilolwhr6vebhlJtbJ89mX5ah7g6CQfAYvRgv0=.08bba3e3-afe5-49df-a11d-6397a9bd59f6@github.com>

On Mon, 1 Dec 2025 23:01:11 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov <serb at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [0c6d1b9c](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/0c6d1b9c8bfd7f4e39a6621c7a8f7bdcd044a05f) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Sergey Bylokhov on 28 Nov 2025 and was reviewed by Tejesh R, Jayathirth D V and Alexander Zvegintsev.
> 
> Thanks!

Hi @mrserb 
you have failing GHA tests.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/39#issuecomment-3601397570

From serb at openjdk.org  Tue Dec  2 11:24:30 2025
From: serb at openjdk.org (Sergey Bylokhov)
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 11:24:30 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8371759: Add missing @Override annotations in
 com.sun.imageio package
In-Reply-To: <Y5cghBilolwhr6vebhlJtbJ89mX5ah7g6CQfAYvRgv0=.08bba3e3-afe5-49df-a11d-6397a9bd59f6@github.com>
References: <upZRBqa6iVSXxTa8w-p_d0RVpbj_bU63PAmazEAXPAc=.446cd24d-0b30-4c43-8a65-3036488976a0@github.com>
 <Y5cghBilolwhr6vebhlJtbJ89mX5ah7g6CQfAYvRgv0=.08bba3e3-afe5-49df-a11d-6397a9bd59f6@github.com>
Message-ID: <IySaDofsVzWUIu1iarzG6WDAHK5YR6SAewKacfW1dBM=.1a64fa26-c30d-491f-baa4-7e84fbce8551@github.com>

On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 10:47:58 GMT, Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi @mrserb you have failing GHA tests.

That is the intermittent test issues, similar failures here: https://github.com/openjdk/jdk25u-dev/pull/36

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/39#issuecomment-3601533376

From jbechberger at openjdk.org  Tue Dec  2 11:44:55 2025
From: jbechberger at openjdk.org (Johannes Bechberger)
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 11:44:55 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u] Withdrawn: 8367302: New test
 jdk/jfr/event/profiling/TestCPUTimeSampleQueueAutoSizes.java from JDK-8366082
 is failing
In-Reply-To: <QRF0PHz_1Zgu7YfIuC5ASVMJY83nfIzQVWWCrayNH_4=.09a5cdfc-16bf-4806-ad9c-01a6f42e8867@github.com>
References: <QRF0PHz_1Zgu7YfIuC5ASVMJY83nfIzQVWWCrayNH_4=.09a5cdfc-16bf-4806-ad9c-01a6f42e8867@github.com>
Message-ID: <ZpPDqn3A8ZJOpP_CDaxiBINPDYYh_rIMHgZmbr7KADY=.e6294c16-a943-46cc-923f-69b962e8e840@github.com>

On Mon, 1 Dec 2025 14:40:33 GMT, Johannes Bechberger <jbechberger at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [d27649fe](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/d27649fe22a5bed9db72ac6c2595ac91f1fa28f8) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Johannes Bechberger on 8 Oct 2025 and was reviewed by David Holmes and Andrei Pangin.
> 
> The backported is clean, although git had slight problems.
> 
> Thanks!

This pull request has been closed without being integrated.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u/pull/397

From jbechberger at openjdk.org  Tue Dec  2 11:53:37 2025
From: jbechberger at openjdk.org (Johannes Bechberger)
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 11:53:37 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8367302: New test
 jdk/jfr/event/profiling/TestCPUTimeSampleQueueAutoSizes.java from JDK-8366082
 is failing
Message-ID: <kUNNg4yff1qUZX5jJ_sDn8VfLDTbZTVQEkF3L69pu2E=.7cc2ba0c-7b33-46b2-8ebf-61ea174d9822@github.com>

Hi all,

This pull request contains a backport of commit [d27649fe](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/d27649fe22a5bed9db72ac6c2595ac91f1fa28f8) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.

The commit being backported was authored by Johannes Bechberger on 8 Oct 2025 and was reviewed by David Holmes and Andrei Pangin.

The backported is clean, although git had slight problems.

Thanks!

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport d27649fe22a5bed9db72ac6c2595ac91f1fa28f8

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/42/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk25u-dev&pr=42&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8367302
  Stats: 237 lines in 5 files changed: 233 ins; 0 del; 4 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/42.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev.git pull/42/head:pull/42

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/42

From goetz at openjdk.org  Tue Dec  2 12:54:29 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 12:54:29 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8357591: Re-enable CDS test cases for jvmci after
 JDK-8345826
Message-ID: <z376F9bmTsBckEUCvwOxGLahY834nGmr9h-Fv1VH4ac=.dbe9456a-a2bf-432e-a049-a3601aa986f5@github.com>

I backport this for parity with 25.0.3-oracle.

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport d186dacdb7b91dc9a28b703ce3c8ea007fc450b6

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/43/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk25u-dev&pr=43&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8357591
  Stats: 72 lines in 34 files changed: 0 ins; 72 del; 0 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/43.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev.git pull/43/head:pull/43

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/43

From duke at openjdk.org  Tue Dec  2 13:00:02 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (duke)
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 13:00:02 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8353175: Eliminate double iteration of stream in
 FieldDescriptor reinitialization [v2]
In-Reply-To: <YmN92iMEx9AJ3UkNeEIkf6hYceUBf3Bn-2T0a-8QHLs=.ebebdaf2-3ce8-48ab-8075-11dbb1de0f06@github.com>
References: <Nx_chyOkYb9KqBNBCtdmvP4dZ27hhbOMWPQe04rjKSM=.4a6920e6-4ab5-4a1b-b2c3-a5e603b538ea@github.com>
 <YmN92iMEx9AJ3UkNeEIkf6hYceUBf3Bn-2T0a-8QHLs=.ebebdaf2-3ce8-48ab-8075-11dbb1de0f06@github.com>
Message-ID: <SEW3LS2t1ZAAKf3rgvN-gVVwwozSFa77wnH9APl49H4=.fed53735-03b3-497c-9181-d0cdf6fb43a1@github.com>

On Mon, 3 Nov 2025 12:15:53 GMT, Radim Vansa <rvansa at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> This backport is a partial fix for a performance regression and prerequisite for backport of https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/24847 (will be done through https://github.com/rvansa/jdk21u-dev/tree/refs/heads/rvansa/backport-8352075)
>> 
>> The backport was not clean; a notable new change is in `reflectionUtils.hpp` (later JDK versions remove the affected class) - I am adding `friend class FieldStream` to `InstanceKlass` to accomodate for this.
>> 
>> Backport-of: f169fc5a99ee2b485e156c043134ab76b7e5ebd9
>
> Radim Vansa has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains two additional commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into backport-8353175
>  - Backport f169fc5a99ee2b485e156c043134ab76b7e5ebd9

@rvansa 
Your change (at version bd71655aa5f4a39cf7c79e82f4455e2ce2dc12e0) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2010#issuecomment-3601903487

From rvansa at openjdk.org  Tue Dec  2 13:41:28 2025
From: rvansa at openjdk.org (Radim Vansa)
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 13:41:28 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] Integrated: 8353175: Eliminate double iteration of stream
 in FieldDescriptor reinitialization
In-Reply-To: <Nx_chyOkYb9KqBNBCtdmvP4dZ27hhbOMWPQe04rjKSM=.4a6920e6-4ab5-4a1b-b2c3-a5e603b538ea@github.com>
References: <Nx_chyOkYb9KqBNBCtdmvP4dZ27hhbOMWPQe04rjKSM=.4a6920e6-4ab5-4a1b-b2c3-a5e603b538ea@github.com>
Message-ID: <85GDJnxmC2iz1hEooV1X3zgi5uqe3r-w7uW9wW9gXpM=.3cdb4222-2917-4af9-af05-813a6fe5b94b@github.com>

On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 15:15:13 GMT, Radim Vansa <rvansa at openjdk.org> wrote:

> This backport is a partial fix for a performance regression and prerequisite for backport of https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/24847 (will be done through https://github.com/rvansa/jdk21u-dev/tree/refs/heads/rvansa/backport-8352075)
> 
> The backport was not clean; a notable new change is in `reflectionUtils.hpp` (later JDK versions remove the affected class) - I am adding `friend class FieldStream` to `InstanceKlass` to accomodate for this.
> 
> Backport-of: f169fc5a99ee2b485e156c043134ab76b7e5ebd9

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 39fbe38e
Author:    Radim Vansa <rvansa at openjdk.org>
Committer: Severin Gehwolf <sgehwolf at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/commit/39fbe38e2266712da782c16943f633bc66381713
Stats:     33 lines in 7 files changed: 2 ins; 11 del; 20 mod

8353175: Eliminate double iteration of stream in FieldDescriptor reinitialization

Reviewed-by: shade
Backport-of: f169fc5a99ee2b485e156c043134ab76b7e5ebd9

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2010

From fyang at openjdk.org  Tue Dec  2 14:18:02 2025
From: fyang at openjdk.org (Fei Yang)
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 14:18:02 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] Integrated: 8366747: RISC-V: Improve VerifyMethodHandles
 for method handle linkers
In-Reply-To: <BlT5tf61iq7QPBAJg9MzdreTpxw9U5gK5l-Ioo7jPeo=.e0a73e25-07d2-4469-b0c1-c8354d170ad3@github.com>
References: <BlT5tf61iq7QPBAJg9MzdreTpxw9U5gK5l-Ioo7jPeo=.e0a73e25-07d2-4469-b0c1-c8354d170ad3@github.com>
Message-ID: <zXj_S8QZ-llSJN1xvKO6EAEFv-YlVhpo9eZXiWWWWkw=.8ac7d6ff-11f0-459a-9938-50859702d0a4@github.com>

On Mon, 1 Dec 2025 08:56:54 GMT, Fei Yang <fyang at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [0d7f8f83](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/0d7f8f83c7a674f5da4b93d66a24f9ce5ba46011) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Anjian Wen on 5 Sep 2025 and was reviewed by Fei Yang and Dingli Zhang.
> 
> Thanks!

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 6e169f61
Author:    Fei Yang <fyang at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/commit/6e169f61faec079d0582db401f6c175a94a316fe
Stats:     54 lines in 2 files changed: 48 ins; 1 del; 5 mod

8366747: RISC-V: Improve VerifyMethodHandles for method handle linkers

Backport-of: 0d7f8f83c7a674f5da4b93d66a24f9ce5ba46011

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/38

From fyang at openjdk.org  Tue Dec  2 14:23:18 2025
From: fyang at openjdk.org (Fei Yang)
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 14:23:18 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] Integrated: 8362284: RISC-V: cleanup NativeMovRegMem
In-Reply-To: <3zAy1kqc_fOm82GRdy4hTbpNPIzTxGWeldSK6kLVDj0=.157e4eec-13e0-41e1-a223-73dcada0e35e@github.com>
References: <3zAy1kqc_fOm82GRdy4hTbpNPIzTxGWeldSK6kLVDj0=.157e4eec-13e0-41e1-a223-73dcada0e35e@github.com>
Message-ID: <Khx2yV7Q5kUXKmNWdQtH5vsdqYBnSOEU6fUtkt4z0XQ=.96238359-b56b-47d9-9c6e-be4f4565da61@github.com>

On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 03:31:50 GMT, Fei Yang <fyang at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [3fd89be6](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/3fd89be6d1a51b6fc99f4c0b5daba7a4bd64a08e) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Hamlin Li on 17 Jul 2025 and was reviewed by Fei Yang and Ludovic Henry.
> 
> Thanks!

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: f7eec4f7
Author:    Fei Yang <fyang at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/commit/f7eec4f7e77791d744209d01339467422a562e63
Stats:     40 lines in 2 files changed: 0 ins; 33 del; 7 mod

8362284: RISC-V: cleanup NativeMovRegMem

Backport-of: 3fd89be6d1a51b6fc99f4c0b5daba7a4bd64a08e

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/41

From rvansa at openjdk.org  Tue Dec  2 14:24:35 2025
From: rvansa at openjdk.org (Radim Vansa)
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 14:24:35 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8353175: Eliminate double iteration of stream in
 FieldDescriptor reinitialization
In-Reply-To: <tS9rG3CGELzS8UPR-qk_GdAR4BYnTJTw66sXcGI3168=.565ec8de-5cf5-4de6-a7bd-e2bf0f75ad18@github.com>
References: <Nx_chyOkYb9KqBNBCtdmvP4dZ27hhbOMWPQe04rjKSM=.4a6920e6-4ab5-4a1b-b2c3-a5e603b538ea@github.com>
 <0keu1qjslFyfp894vMY-nYn8kib8LHWGtHwd5xLRatM=.9999de7f-c56c-466c-9810-d23edcf58e2f@github.com>
 <m1GKmBW16TV36RDTomY4jlkb7jgT85xu6BnL0HoWyV4=.332d751a-5497-4252-a5c3-ba99cf563acb@github.com>
 <tS9rG3CGELzS8UPR-qk_GdAR4BYnTJTw66sXcGI3168=.565ec8de-5cf5-4de6-a7bd-e2bf0f75ad18@github.com>
Message-ID: <uMh2KbFwgTB5bPhf0LYziMhLbxVnqa4lTRO_ufYtP6I=.ebfc06b0-9262-4dff-9431-dd42e412b659@github.com>

On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 09:59:22 GMT, Severin Gehwolf <sgehwolf at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> @GoeLin Thanks for the ping - yes, I'd still like to integrate this, merged head and the GHA checks are passing. Is the change mature enough in 25 to admit this into 21?
>
> @rvansa This is ready for integration. If you plan to integrate, please do so ASAP.

@jerboaa Thank you, I haven't noticed this was already approved.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2010#issuecomment-3602305411

From goetz at openjdk.org  Tue Dec  2 15:06:58 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 15:06:58 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8114830: (fs) Files.copy fails due to interference
 from something else changing the file system
Message-ID: <3QS_tiB6jbeYVugNVdwnkXLpmVeN4p00txBixpgFAWQ=.7dff4c21-5dcb-4ec8-95a6-88d9cee48deb@github.com>

I backport this for parity with 21.0.11-oracle.

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport c132176b932dd136d5c4314e08ac97d0fee7ba4d

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2500/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk21u-dev&pr=2500&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8114830
  Stats: 159 lines in 2 files changed: 159 ins; 0 del; 0 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2500.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/2500/head:pull/2500

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2500

From goetz at openjdk.org  Tue Dec  2 15:59:28 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 15:59:28 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8367302: New test
 jdk/jfr/event/profiling/TestCPUTimeSampleQueueAutoSizes.java from JDK-8366082
 is failing
In-Reply-To: <kUNNg4yff1qUZX5jJ_sDn8VfLDTbZTVQEkF3L69pu2E=.7cc2ba0c-7b33-46b2-8ebf-61ea174d9822@github.com>
References: <kUNNg4yff1qUZX5jJ_sDn8VfLDTbZTVQEkF3L69pu2E=.7cc2ba0c-7b33-46b2-8ebf-61ea174d9822@github.com>
Message-ID: <lwjEx_TMhSyO0nX7Q02BRZmpY7aRHUIhfGeovL0QpBE=.5058db15-7f1d-47f5-931e-68da73f325a4@github.com>

On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 11:42:22 GMT, Johannes Bechberger <jbechberger at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [d27649fe](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/d27649fe22a5bed9db72ac6c2595ac91f1fa28f8) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Johannes Bechberger on 8 Oct 2025 and was reviewed by David Holmes and Andrei Pangin.
> 
> The backported is clean, although git had slight problems.
> 
> Thanks!

Hi @parttimenerd 
the backport is not clean. It is only clean if Skara recognizes it as such. Please correct your PR message.  Also describe the differences to the original change in the PR message.
Alternatively, correct the change so that Skara recognizes it as clean.
Thanks.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/42#issuecomment-3602752475

From jbechberger at openjdk.org  Tue Dec  2 16:14:02 2025
From: jbechberger at openjdk.org (Johannes Bechberger)
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 16:14:02 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8367302: New test
 jdk/jfr/event/profiling/TestCPUTimeSampleQueueAutoSizes.java from JDK-8366082
 is failing
In-Reply-To: <kUNNg4yff1qUZX5jJ_sDn8VfLDTbZTVQEkF3L69pu2E=.7cc2ba0c-7b33-46b2-8ebf-61ea174d9822@github.com>
References: <kUNNg4yff1qUZX5jJ_sDn8VfLDTbZTVQEkF3L69pu2E=.7cc2ba0c-7b33-46b2-8ebf-61ea174d9822@github.com>
Message-ID: <l851tdOiuCHl1jAiYhnlgf3iUcQxSWIM7gTrZ_7iOdQ=.39075798-ba5d-4005-b473-14c7fea10970@github.com>

On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 11:42:22 GMT, Johannes Bechberger <jbechberger at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [d27649fe](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/d27649fe22a5bed9db72ac6c2595ac91f1fa28f8) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Johannes Bechberger on 8 Oct 2025 and was reviewed by David Holmes and Andrei Pangin.
> 
> The backported is clean, although git had slight problems.
> 
> Thanks!

I'm confused by the backport. There must be changes that are not backported to JDK25.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/42#issuecomment-3602832915

From jbechberger at openjdk.org  Tue Dec  2 16:29:27 2025
From: jbechberger at openjdk.org (Johannes Bechberger)
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 16:29:27 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8366082: Improve queue size computation in CPU-time
 sampler
Message-ID: <N0NweVutNIPORUDKE0LVlloGgGeEEhQ4ziXIom950Ac=.63bd2a7a-d391-4594-90c1-fa741a7ec348@github.com>

Backport of code that improves the queue sizing of the CPU time sampler (dynamic vs the previous static approach).

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport 002f936ef21943ff1c8c03618091793768e756ac

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/44/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk25u-dev&pr=44&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8366082
  Stats: 299 lines in 7 files changed: 276 ins; 7 del; 16 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/44.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev.git pull/44/head:pull/44

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/44

From duke at openjdk.org  Tue Dec  2 16:56:10 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Roland Mesde)
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 16:56:10 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8321156: Improve the handling of invalid UTF-8
 byte sequences for ZipInputStream::getNextEntry and
 ZipFile::getComment [v2]
In-Reply-To: <EdTkTvW7Z3u8e70bZQ7InRn3QWb1hJkcsLCqF11pYFo=.3062532a-ab4c-446b-aee4-ab3682bbfdc7@github.com>
References: <ItxAiHFSw2bPV2UvtaqZkx4m-_b5773zqXrdkCTmyho=.4e76f070-fbde-4ea9-b4bd-a51fb14550c3@github.com>
 <EdTkTvW7Z3u8e70bZQ7InRn3QWb1hJkcsLCqF11pYFo=.3062532a-ab4c-446b-aee4-ab3682bbfdc7@github.com>
Message-ID: <T22UGJVRHQLBSgOVOdSR8oTlWl6TNM6__Jxpt5lo_iQ=.18511f00-fb8c-428a-a536-9c3fe766873f@github.com>

On Thu, 20 Nov 2025 16:24:42 GMT, Roland Mesde <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Backporting JDK-8321156: Improve the handling of invalid UTF-8 byte sequences for ZipInputStream::getNextEntry and ZipFile::getComment.
>> 
>> Fixes invalid UTF-8 byte sequence handling in:
>> - ZIP entry names within LOC file headers
>> - ZIP file comments accessed through ZipFile::getComment
>> 
>> Behavior change: ZipFile::getComment now returns null when invalid UTF-8 sequences are detected during byte-to-String conversion.
>> 
>> Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed) and related test (passed).
>
> Roland Mesde has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Revert Javadoc Changes

Withdrawing and cancelling PR.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2480#issuecomment-3603029022

From duke at openjdk.org  Tue Dec  2 16:56:15 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Roland Mesde)
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 16:56:15 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8306461: ObjectInputStream::readObject() should
 handle negative array sizes without throwing
 NegativeArraySizeExceptions
In-Reply-To: <QTn_oDwjqBHStPay7kdt-iF6r2_ThRozAj3U5zwU0rY=.9722d49a-089f-40d7-a5ad-4f3a7d4ac19b@github.com>
References: <QTn_oDwjqBHStPay7kdt-iF6r2_ThRozAj3U5zwU0rY=.9722d49a-089f-40d7-a5ad-4f3a7d4ac19b@github.com>
Message-ID: <Uk6KJyGn1f7TZJq07MvgDP79Mz9U7ueLZzm18QG5D3A=.2c7fe8a4-96c5-4420-bb1d-c14631b687da@github.com>

On Wed, 12 Nov 2025 18:20:34 GMT, Roland Mesde <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backporting JDK-8306461: ObjectInputStream::readObject() should handle negative array sizes without throwing NegativeArraySizeExceptions. Updates implementation to use a checked exception and adds a new test. Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed), related ObjectInputStream tests (passed). Patch is clean.

Withdrawing and cancelling PR.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4174#issuecomment-3603032179

From duke at openjdk.org  Tue Dec  2 16:56:11 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Roland Mesde)
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 16:56:11 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] Withdrawn: 8321156: Improve the handling of invalid UTF-8
 byte sequences for ZipInputStream::getNextEntry and ZipFile::getComment
In-Reply-To: <ItxAiHFSw2bPV2UvtaqZkx4m-_b5773zqXrdkCTmyho=.4e76f070-fbde-4ea9-b4bd-a51fb14550c3@github.com>
References: <ItxAiHFSw2bPV2UvtaqZkx4m-_b5773zqXrdkCTmyho=.4e76f070-fbde-4ea9-b4bd-a51fb14550c3@github.com>
Message-ID: <WJTkOP0l3w5q1hddzDNbPqkd0Q8lDkKPRa6uLDQ0yK0=.56aea9a5-701f-43f5-9d13-e8a8174bd227@github.com>

On Mon, 17 Nov 2025 17:46:08 GMT, Roland Mesde <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backporting JDK-8321156: Improve the handling of invalid UTF-8 byte sequences for ZipInputStream::getNextEntry and ZipFile::getComment.
> 
> Fixes invalid UTF-8 byte sequence handling in:
> - ZIP entry names within LOC file headers
> - ZIP file comments accessed through ZipFile::getComment
> 
> Behavior change: ZipFile::getComment now returns null when invalid UTF-8 sequences are detected during byte-to-String conversion.
> 
> Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed) and related test (passed).

This pull request has been closed without being integrated.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2480

From duke at openjdk.org  Tue Dec  2 16:56:16 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Roland Mesde)
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 16:56:16 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] Withdrawn: 8306461: ObjectInputStream::readObject()
 should handle negative array sizes without throwing
 NegativeArraySizeExceptions
In-Reply-To: <QTn_oDwjqBHStPay7kdt-iF6r2_ThRozAj3U5zwU0rY=.9722d49a-089f-40d7-a5ad-4f3a7d4ac19b@github.com>
References: <QTn_oDwjqBHStPay7kdt-iF6r2_ThRozAj3U5zwU0rY=.9722d49a-089f-40d7-a5ad-4f3a7d4ac19b@github.com>
Message-ID: <YZs733vyV9QY5ue084BFNE-fZdb6ooJ0tJFnrYoNkII=.3cae793e-91ca-4f03-8dc2-621cff090c20@github.com>

On Wed, 12 Nov 2025 18:20:34 GMT, Roland Mesde <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backporting JDK-8306461: ObjectInputStream::readObject() should handle negative array sizes without throwing NegativeArraySizeExceptions. Updates implementation to use a checked exception and adds a new test. Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed), related ObjectInputStream tests (passed). Patch is clean.

This pull request has been closed without being integrated.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4174

From duke at openjdk.org  Tue Dec  2 16:59:35 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Roland Mesde)
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 16:59:35 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8331485: Odd Results when Parsing Scientific
 Notation with Large Exponent [v2]
In-Reply-To: <edGAJMa7dgPdwJ-hUtG9sOSOpFZoLfZLyiCoPuGkR8s=.de5b7e24-ff41-4260-8689-30afa1a772c2@github.com>
References: <V_CBF0hvgW_OZqsJQ-pexSnah-jrK-OQzApcNmszHOg=.aa0d93a2-60c4-4e21-a445-64aaf1346f07@github.com>
 <edGAJMa7dgPdwJ-hUtG9sOSOpFZoLfZLyiCoPuGkR8s=.de5b7e24-ff41-4260-8689-30afa1a772c2@github.com>
Message-ID: <0_N_0GUdaEygOupmUAf59q6UvVT26Ix466afcsvj0R8=.f0557a3d-4c2d-42d3-ae7a-a20159e52c57@github.com>

On Tue, 18 Nov 2025 23:05:13 GMT, Roland Mesde <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Backporting JDK-8331485: Odd Results when Parsing Scientific Notation with Large Exponent.
>> 
>> Problem: DecimalFormat incorrectly parses strings with very large exponents:
>> 
>> - Exponents > Integer.MAX_VALUE return 0.0
>> - Exponents > Long.MAX_VALUE return the mantissa value
>> 
>> Fix: DecimalFormat.parse() now returns Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY for very large exponents, matching Double.parseDouble() behavior.
>> 
>> Impact: Eliminates edge case bug and provides consistent parsing behavior across Java's number parsing APIs.
>> 
>> Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed) and related test (passed).
>
> Roland Mesde has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Removed LenientParseTest.java that is part of JDK-8327640 (Large and Required CSR)

Withdrawing and cancelling PR.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2481#issuecomment-3603045529

From duke at openjdk.org  Tue Dec  2 16:59:33 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Roland Mesde)
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 16:59:33 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] Withdrawn: 8358496: Concurrent reading from Socket with
 timeout executes sequentially
In-Reply-To: <kXmVH5DxWWQeWb7GSr-Y_M-i9zOH2IVfWj0zMIMsCJM=.1a015db0-2cb3-4866-b671-5e28303c6677@github.com>
References: <kXmVH5DxWWQeWb7GSr-Y_M-i9zOH2IVfWj0zMIMsCJM=.1a015db0-2cb3-4866-b671-5e28303c6677@github.com>
Message-ID: <vwV1m_QTvdXlTZZBPgFZ6FYJDpRD99Tli96Vh1pG5fI=.3fc304cb-730a-4318-8ae9-e9ae12272f2a@github.com>

On Thu, 13 Nov 2025 20:53:15 GMT, Roland Mesde <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backporting JDK-8358496: Concurrent reading from Socket with timeout executes sequentially. Updated SocketImpl so that the timeout applies to the total time waiting to acquire and read. Adds a new test to the existing java/net/Socket/Timeouts test. The test was minimally modified from the original commit for JDK version compatibility.
> 
> Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed) and related test (passed).

This pull request has been closed without being integrated.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2470

From duke at openjdk.org  Tue Dec  2 16:59:37 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Roland Mesde)
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 16:59:37 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] Withdrawn: 8331485: Odd Results when Parsing Scientific
 Notation with Large Exponent
In-Reply-To: <V_CBF0hvgW_OZqsJQ-pexSnah-jrK-OQzApcNmszHOg=.aa0d93a2-60c4-4e21-a445-64aaf1346f07@github.com>
References: <V_CBF0hvgW_OZqsJQ-pexSnah-jrK-OQzApcNmszHOg=.aa0d93a2-60c4-4e21-a445-64aaf1346f07@github.com>
Message-ID: <nzYLaxbaEWjZa4Whl8qxIPexB33El9neHpYu-hmWRdo=.9fc64a23-de9e-4c18-b8fc-167dd71a5fbf@github.com>

On Mon, 17 Nov 2025 18:21:06 GMT, Roland Mesde <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backporting JDK-8331485: Odd Results when Parsing Scientific Notation with Large Exponent.
> 
> Problem: DecimalFormat incorrectly parses strings with very large exponents:
> 
> - Exponents > Integer.MAX_VALUE return 0.0
> - Exponents > Long.MAX_VALUE return the mantissa value
> 
> Fix: DecimalFormat.parse() now returns Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY for very large exponents, matching Double.parseDouble() behavior.
> 
> Impact: Eliminates edge case bug and provides consistent parsing behavior across Java's number parsing APIs.
> 
> Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed) and related test (passed).

This pull request has been closed without being integrated.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2481

From duke at openjdk.org  Tue Dec  2 16:59:31 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Roland Mesde)
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 16:59:31 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8358496: Concurrent reading from Socket with
 timeout executes sequentially
In-Reply-To: <kXmVH5DxWWQeWb7GSr-Y_M-i9zOH2IVfWj0zMIMsCJM=.1a015db0-2cb3-4866-b671-5e28303c6677@github.com>
References: <kXmVH5DxWWQeWb7GSr-Y_M-i9zOH2IVfWj0zMIMsCJM=.1a015db0-2cb3-4866-b671-5e28303c6677@github.com>
Message-ID: <m62ONTVBWw4fb5fjaMIN8HhGIJHR0HOj04ueVGYwDRE=.2db35794-75a2-4771-87f2-9d1896c850d8@github.com>

On Thu, 13 Nov 2025 20:53:15 GMT, Roland Mesde <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backporting JDK-8358496: Concurrent reading from Socket with timeout executes sequentially. Updated SocketImpl so that the timeout applies to the total time waiting to acquire and read. Adds a new test to the existing java/net/Socket/Timeouts test. The test was minimally modified from the original commit for JDK version compatibility.
> 
> Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed) and related test (passed).

Withdrawing and cancelling PR.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2470#issuecomment-3603050707

From duke at openjdk.org  Tue Dec  2 17:00:55 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Roland Mesde)
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 17:00:55 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8273369: Computing micros between two instants
 unexpectedly overflows for some cases [v2]
In-Reply-To: <QQ02g6dLtr22AkLvTp0DMlC3Y11ryEUwRAzFd-GKQLs=.7a92d397-cb04-43ed-9d2e-cb30b1479573@github.com>
References: <-0u27HhQjX-faqCn2nEl9hSHMTYGwbOX_AloY0iz-_M=.0cabd915-31d2-41df-9862-59c76097aa5d@github.com>
 <QQ02g6dLtr22AkLvTp0DMlC3Y11ryEUwRAzFd-GKQLs=.7a92d397-cb04-43ed-9d2e-cb30b1479573@github.com>
Message-ID: <l0c116QLrrdhk1Y3NWFXVg5kVUObr1OhjC_aTy7hYtk=.095836cd-3a45-49b0-9f60-355f40b082fc@github.com>

On Tue, 18 Nov 2025 21:49:25 GMT, Roland Mesde <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Backporting JDK-8273369: Computing micros between two instants unexpectedly overflows for some cases. Avoids overflow by not calling nanosUntil() directly, which will overflow beyond Long.MAX_VALUE difference in nano unit.
>> 
>> Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed) and related test (passed).
>
> Roland Mesde has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Reverted swtch statement (reviewer requested)

Withdrawing and cancelling PR.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4181#issuecomment-3603057588

From duke at openjdk.org  Tue Dec  2 17:00:57 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Roland Mesde)
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 17:00:57 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] Withdrawn: 8273369: Computing micros between two instants
 unexpectedly overflows for some cases
In-Reply-To: <-0u27HhQjX-faqCn2nEl9hSHMTYGwbOX_AloY0iz-_M=.0cabd915-31d2-41df-9862-59c76097aa5d@github.com>
References: <-0u27HhQjX-faqCn2nEl9hSHMTYGwbOX_AloY0iz-_M=.0cabd915-31d2-41df-9862-59c76097aa5d@github.com>
Message-ID: <swU_cNNq5gq4NQ7Ma9gHTLOMoGOOgBF0DjOD9vHGJzU=.4f9701dc-346e-4ffd-b5fd-c15d618a177c@github.com>

On Thu, 13 Nov 2025 17:37:21 GMT, Roland Mesde <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backporting JDK-8273369: Computing micros between two instants unexpectedly overflows for some cases. Avoids overflow by not calling nanosUntil() directly, which will overflow beyond Long.MAX_VALUE difference in nano unit.
> 
> Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed) and related test (passed).

This pull request has been closed without being integrated.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4181

From duke at openjdk.org  Tue Dec  2 17:00:56 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Roland Mesde)
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 17:00:56 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] Withdrawn: 8333456: CompactNumberFormat integer parsing
 fails when string has no suffix
In-Reply-To: <qHfSne1gOs8R8OclYehvVKJgORCeSCytN6ac8AFRkOs=.624220f7-cd9b-4a63-a886-934f1a3a17c3@github.com>
References: <qHfSne1gOs8R8OclYehvVKJgORCeSCytN6ac8AFRkOs=.624220f7-cd9b-4a63-a886-934f1a3a17c3@github.com>
Message-ID: <vJ5XTlhf_lh8I9-B1r27odPPcL7rD3i6xZcn5ELpeZM=.fe6f3b13-450a-4a0c-961d-8910979f632d@github.com>

On Thu, 13 Nov 2025 18:52:51 GMT, Roland Mesde <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backporting JDK-8333456: CompactNumberFormat integer parsing fails when string has no suffix. Adds logic to check to make sure position does not exceed the string length before deciding to check for a decimal symbol.
> 
> Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed) and related test (passed).

This pull request has been closed without being integrated.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2468

From duke at openjdk.org  Tue Dec  2 17:00:54 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Roland Mesde)
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 17:00:54 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8333456: CompactNumberFormat integer parsing
 fails when string has no suffix [v3]
In-Reply-To: <RKsejJOC-x9IOynh2r7mxQaLg__fYGzISMNGwJJtTNQ=.51fd7a44-6d7b-4173-ade5-de71b3044dd6@github.com>
References: <qHfSne1gOs8R8OclYehvVKJgORCeSCytN6ac8AFRkOs=.624220f7-cd9b-4a63-a886-934f1a3a17c3@github.com>
 <RKsejJOC-x9IOynh2r7mxQaLg__fYGzISMNGwJJtTNQ=.51fd7a44-6d7b-4173-ade5-de71b3044dd6@github.com>
Message-ID: <PGlcd19lsgGTf3RZdXdJTWycX5fafzxoDr6iFIFGKNk=.69febe5c-ac21-4f6e-8a77-b6d9486b4e3f@github.com>

On Tue, 18 Nov 2025 22:12:41 GMT, Roland Mesde <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Backporting JDK-8333456: CompactNumberFormat integer parsing fails when string has no suffix. Adds logic to check to make sure position does not exceed the string length before deciding to check for a decimal symbol.
>> 
>> Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed) and related test (passed).
>
> Roland Mesde has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Fix formatting

Withdrawing and cancelling PR.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2468#issuecomment-3603054379

From duke at openjdk.org  Tue Dec  2 17:02:46 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Roland Mesde)
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 17:02:46 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8317678: Fix up hashCode() for
 ZipFile.Source.Key [v3]
In-Reply-To: <KFuiF-1Fzi3FIJ13K_wnPdLQjD-ENvXWlJbt4v2c96k=.4754e833-1c7a-4c73-9d78-1bf74f4f5fd6@github.com>
References: <jCfVkeAbT9zkKsrRzqyb83WjnhyWlS8C1TOYslHRp7o=.af43e200-8347-41c9-b28d-dc10811116df@github.com>
 <KFuiF-1Fzi3FIJ13K_wnPdLQjD-ENvXWlJbt4v2c96k=.4754e833-1c7a-4c73-9d78-1bf74f4f5fd6@github.com>
Message-ID: <ug6_SzvxLw8JYZeMdJX7Yj2wZNg1D_l8gsT9w_sd0Mg=.91b357b8-21aa-4b61-abae-ace3ddb1a1c3@github.com>

On Tue, 18 Nov 2025 22:45:00 GMT, Roland Mesde <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Backporting JDK-8317678: Fix up hashCode() for ZipFile.Source.Key. Fixes the hashCode() implementation and adds a new benchmark test. Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed), related zip tests (passed) and the new benchmark test  (executed properly). The merge conflict was due to the missing benchmark test file, which is in this PR.
>
> Roland Mesde has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Trigger GHA build

Withdrawing and cancelling PR.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4169#issuecomment-3603063405

From duke at openjdk.org  Tue Dec  2 17:02:48 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Roland Mesde)
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 17:02:48 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] Withdrawn: 8317678: Fix up hashCode() for
 ZipFile.Source.Key
In-Reply-To: <jCfVkeAbT9zkKsrRzqyb83WjnhyWlS8C1TOYslHRp7o=.af43e200-8347-41c9-b28d-dc10811116df@github.com>
References: <jCfVkeAbT9zkKsrRzqyb83WjnhyWlS8C1TOYslHRp7o=.af43e200-8347-41c9-b28d-dc10811116df@github.com>
Message-ID: <6v16wskAKP5XmuL8rsI1G7lrPH9WjoTEbnQo4_MJvFc=.aef9ae0c-ebf3-4728-9085-73e4bd2eb08a@github.com>

On Tue, 11 Nov 2025 19:55:59 GMT, Roland Mesde <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backporting JDK-8317678: Fix up hashCode() for ZipFile.Source.Key. Fixes the hashCode() implementation and adds a new benchmark test. Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed), related zip tests (passed) and the new benchmark test  (executed properly). The merge conflict was due to the missing benchmark test file, which is in this PR.

This pull request has been closed without being integrated.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4169

From duke at openjdk.org  Tue Dec  2 17:20:59 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Roland Mesde)
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 17:20:59 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8341778: Some javac tests ignore the result of
 JavacTask::call
Message-ID: <9JZClzUaZUYJvLHQUqp7XkoTJq-LUZi7AMz_pBZ9eF4=.1017df7c-08f1-4b80-8fa3-1ff7dd770f21@github.com>

Backporting JDK-8341778: Some javac tests ignore the result of JavacTask::call. 

Multiple tests ignore the Boolean return value from JavacTask.call(), causing silent failures where tests appear to pass despite actual compilation errors. This fix adds result validation to all affected test cases.. Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed), jtreg tier1 tests (passed) and related tests (passed) on linux-x64, linux-aarch64, macos-aarch64 and windows-x64:

(Passed) - make test-tier1
(Passed) - make test TEST=test/jdk/java/beans
(Passed) - make test TEST=test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/gc/g1/unloading

Results are attached.

[linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23886979/linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
[linux-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23886980/linux-aarch64-specific-test.log)
[linux-aarch64-specific-2-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23886981/linux-aarch64-specific-2-test.log)
[linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23886982/linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
[linux-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23886983/linux-x64-specific-test.log)
[linux-x64-specific-2-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23886984/linux-x64-specific-2-test.log)
[macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23886985/macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
[macos-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23886986/macos-aarch64-specific-test.log)
[macos-aarch64-specific-2-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23886987/macos-aarch64-specific-2-test.log)
[windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23886988/windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
[windows-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23886989/windows-x64-specific-test.log)
[windows-x64-specific-2-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23886990/windows-x64-specific-2-test.log)

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport 8adb052b46f90e8a0605cfc5ddc667acb7c61952

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/40/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk25u-dev&pr=40&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8341778
  Stats: 136 lines in 33 files changed: 88 ins; 1 del; 47 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/40.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev.git pull/40/head:pull/40

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/40

From ysr at openjdk.org  Tue Dec  2 19:13:28 2025
From: ysr at openjdk.org (Y. Srinivas Ramakrishna)
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 19:13:28 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8358735: GenShen: block_start() may be incorrect
 after class unloading [v2]
In-Reply-To: <0D9PV8gEv2xRYX7PjVbUTtiUqPEqf1bLiFqscT8mahc=.088eeb91-680e-4473-9744-424a36f51176@github.com>
References: <aIUq8r5VSg1rl4ZOqPmYG7SN-6eFsgOwH2ehniQxypk=.86f5a710-4cc4-4922-8fbf-bb1ff1547098@github.com>
 <0D9PV8gEv2xRYX7PjVbUTtiUqPEqf1bLiFqscT8mahc=.088eeb91-680e-4473-9744-424a36f51176@github.com>
Message-ID: <uEmetxvsC5nOsMHJaVimC0YkvKV4EIqI7_8D_a1xeRE=.06854675-84a4-4f94-9e9b-3f960f5c5403@github.com>

On Wed, 26 Nov 2025 19:30:06 GMT, Rui Li <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Backport of JDK-8358735 and its two follow up fixes: JDK-8372110 and JDK-8371854.
>> 
>> The backport of the original issue (JDK-8358735) is almost clean except that atomic.hpp was renamed to atomicAccess.hpp in the later versions, and I had to resolve the conflict by retaining atomic.hpp import.
>> 
>> The two follow up backports are clean.
>> 
>> Our internal application crashed and we identified JDK-8358735 was the root cause. Backporting it for the fix.
>> 
>> Testing: all GHA tests passed.
>
> Rui Li has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - 8371854: Shenandoah: Simplify WALK_FORWARD_IN_BLOCK_START use
>    
>    Backport 713de231a61234632e2f9858b222b5f7fd0bdaf1
>  - 8372110: GenShen: Fix erroneous assert
>    
>    Backport aa7718d1d2008c240c197383c493955d8b654bf3

Thanks for a good description of the backport & conflicts.

LGTM! ?

-------------

Marked as reviewed by ysr (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/19#pullrequestreview-3531742077

From cslucas at openjdk.org  Tue Dec  2 20:04:34 2025
From: cslucas at openjdk.org (Cesar Soares Lucas)
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 20:04:34 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u] RFR: 8359064: Expose reason for marking nmethod
 non-entrant to JVMCI client
In-Reply-To: <wNxXtc5iPBpNyj2kqVa5DtyibTiGmmUl_5zCOTXx3pY=.c0df083b-1883-426e-b893-3a1800917ed5@github.com>
References: <-zbGZQ4CrP-CAz-AwfawsUhI8vxwTq4GC3uXOEfNVcw=.ebc76743-bcd7-40bc-8178-c0f6990c38cf@github.com>
 <qwxnKD6UjYUroX94OdCO20TiZ2ZyF-SJr-KJLI3bg-Y=.4e7de639-8f1a-4837-be81-c627992f580c@github.com>
 <VnzSgIoiej4O91ndDqUymqifPyar5IHozeauRWvutNc=.e6f099a0-219f-4d7f-87b6-2f18b4749be8@github.com>
 <DwlMMh0-K8WSud4BXcATdJwqQCViUxCrc7YOJxdIGqs=.913c5820-3e5e-4ce4-8679-c981de4ad61b@github.com>
 <wNxXtc5iPBpNyj2kqVa5DtyibTiGmmUl_5zCOTXx3pY=.c0df083b-1883-426e-b893-3a1800917ed5@github.com>
Message-ID: <4CoE2HbRItyyAf-99pF10JwKP2fMLVPMYRMYFrfdCxY=.274f76ca-c635-4bf9-810a-7abd3fbc2807@github.com>

On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 10:26:53 GMT, Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Hi @GoeLin , I updated the PR description with more details. Please, let me know if anything else is missing.
>
> HI @JohnTortugo 
> I was not talking about the PR description.  I miss the information in the approval comment in the JBS issue.
> Re-issue the /approval command and add the two bug ids saying that you include follow-up x in y, please.
> Re-issuing the /approval command will replace the existing comment in the JBS issues.
> Have a look at https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8360049, the current comment makes no sense in this JBS issue.
> If you have JBS access you can also edit the corresponding comments...
> Thanks!

@GoeLin - I issued a new request as you suggested. However, the request message for https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8360049 wasn't updated because the backport request for that ticket was already approved. I have a JBS account but I don't have permission to edit Robo Duke comments.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u/pull/335#issuecomment-3603745513

From kizune at openjdk.org  Tue Dec  2 20:04:35 2025
From: kizune at openjdk.org (Alexander Zuev)
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 20:04:35 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u] RFR: 8372753: jpackage ignores --file-associations option
 with predefined app image [v2]
In-Reply-To: <w1vzgnWUSm5CC0YyKknSeRcUFLma9lzLlzMZG4ab2QM=.9f6be3b2-5e56-4f96-9b27-ede1fafe824f@github.com>
References: <FMsCbI4AlHf8fYtfSM2v35cX-ySdb96GHiSB_MCN71o=.ce776358-3a74-42f2-8dc3-4a43236dd6d1@github.com>
 <w1vzgnWUSm5CC0YyKknSeRcUFLma9lzLlzMZG4ab2QM=.9f6be3b2-5e56-4f96-9b27-ede1fafe824f@github.com>
Message-ID: <arVi9eCLbuETq2zxRyPXT6RQOO-xy4KtN23oMZwSlKU=.decc99bc-4d28-4539-b5eb-df408fd9a540@github.com>

On Sat, 29 Nov 2025 01:09:31 GMT, Alexey Semenyuk <asemenyuk at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Fix handling of the `--file-associations` option when bundling from the predefined app image. Add relevant tests.
>> 
>> This is a regression from [JDK-8333664](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8333664). It is JDK25-specific and doesn't affect JDK26, as it handles command line options differently due to the [JDK-8333727](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8333727) fix.
>
> Alexey Semenyuk has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and previous commits have been removed. The incremental views will show differences compared to the previous content of the PR. The pull request contains one new commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Add tests

LGTM

-------------

Marked as reviewed by kizune (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u/pull/395#pullrequestreview-3531901785

From duke at openjdk.org  Tue Dec  2 21:15:32 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (duke)
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 21:15:32 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u] RFR: 8372753: jpackage ignores --file-associations option
 with predefined app image [v2]
In-Reply-To: <w1vzgnWUSm5CC0YyKknSeRcUFLma9lzLlzMZG4ab2QM=.9f6be3b2-5e56-4f96-9b27-ede1fafe824f@github.com>
References: <FMsCbI4AlHf8fYtfSM2v35cX-ySdb96GHiSB_MCN71o=.ce776358-3a74-42f2-8dc3-4a43236dd6d1@github.com>
 <w1vzgnWUSm5CC0YyKknSeRcUFLma9lzLlzMZG4ab2QM=.9f6be3b2-5e56-4f96-9b27-ede1fafe824f@github.com>
Message-ID: <SRtPA4rnaj_oCnfBQhBLsMHca1EPHs-2qpM30eEBSgM=.ac150d8d-afc3-4d8d-941f-acba97f4b5b6@github.com>

On Sat, 29 Nov 2025 01:09:31 GMT, Alexey Semenyuk <asemenyuk at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Fix handling of the `--file-associations` option when bundling from the predefined app image. Add relevant tests.
>> 
>> This is a regression from [JDK-8333664](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8333664). It is JDK25-specific and doesn't affect JDK26, as it handles command line options differently due to the [JDK-8333727](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8333727) fix.
>
> Alexey Semenyuk has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and previous commits have been removed. The incremental views will show differences compared to the previous content of the PR. The pull request contains one new commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Add tests

@alexeysemenyukoracle 
Your change (at version 29d60963491a20e9db9f9e7fccc1822291f09478) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u/pull/395#issuecomment-3603986721

From asemenyuk at openjdk.org  Tue Dec  2 22:14:36 2025
From: asemenyuk at openjdk.org (Alexey Semenyuk)
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 22:14:36 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u] Integrated: 8372753: jpackage ignores --file-associations
 option with predefined app image
In-Reply-To: <FMsCbI4AlHf8fYtfSM2v35cX-ySdb96GHiSB_MCN71o=.ce776358-3a74-42f2-8dc3-4a43236dd6d1@github.com>
References: <FMsCbI4AlHf8fYtfSM2v35cX-ySdb96GHiSB_MCN71o=.ce776358-3a74-42f2-8dc3-4a43236dd6d1@github.com>
Message-ID: <AUty2kIxYd_wADYB1ARoeGKOEmOVLEJe8Uxds1TfdnQ=.a9b69fe6-69a0-431f-9229-38f97e542cff@github.com>

On Sat, 29 Nov 2025 00:52:52 GMT, Alexey Semenyuk <asemenyuk at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Fix handling of the `--file-associations` option when bundling from the predefined app image. Add relevant tests.
> 
> This is a regression from [JDK-8333664](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8333664). It is JDK25-specific and doesn't affect JDK26, as it handles command line options differently due to the [JDK-8333727](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8333727) fix.

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: d306ab95
Author:    Alexey Semenyuk <asemenyuk at openjdk.org>
Committer: Alexander Zuev <kizune at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u/commit/d306ab95729416ac20829f109f3df73fba7cf77c
Stats:     44 lines in 3 files changed: 37 ins; 3 del; 4 mod

8372753: jpackage ignores --file-associations option with predefined app image

Reviewed-by: almatvee, kizune

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u/pull/395

From phh at openjdk.org  Tue Dec  2 23:05:29 2025
From: phh at openjdk.org (Paul Hohensee)
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 23:05:29 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8354145: G1: UseCompressedOops boundary is
 calculated on maximum heap region size instead of maxiumum ergonomic heap
 region size
In-Reply-To: <KarQGa_RxEEcpTGJJ5u8bjDfVcjSPaOY_ckNuiikugs=.c426d23d-0bdc-4396-8442-0db62b00d03f@github.com>
References: <KarQGa_RxEEcpTGJJ5u8bjDfVcjSPaOY_ckNuiikugs=.c426d23d-0bdc-4396-8442-0db62b00d03f@github.com>
Message-ID: <s0FK8teJHkDOZ1lXMMHscqghQBgbE4WK3jHcDSNSmUc=.197774cd-2423-49a6-8185-969255fc8c58@github.com>

On Fri, 28 Nov 2025 18:48:13 GMT, Daniel Hu <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Fixes UseCompressedOops ergonomics to use original limits for G1 GC; prior to JDK18, `-Xmx32736m` by default enables UseCompressedOops but in JDK21 `-Xmx32736m` default sets UseCompressedOops to false. New test passes with change, fails without. Change passes GHA. Backport not clean due to [JDK-8330694](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8330694) renaming `HeapRegion` to `G1HeapRegion`; modifications to the change are minimal as only had to "un-rename" the refactor.

Looks good. Thanks!

-------------

Marked as reviewed by phh (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2497#pullrequestreview-3532425616

From duke at openjdk.org  Tue Dec  2 23:05:31 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Daniel Hu)
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 23:05:31 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8354145: G1: UseCompressedOops boundary is
 calculated on maximum heap region size instead of maxiumum ergonomic heap
 region size
In-Reply-To: <QcHucbxnf0uAmsonsf8fCnAxpofDFZOPm76Ko2AOEr4=.a0c9700e-807c-4ab7-9837-2da3969e998f@github.com>
References: <KarQGa_RxEEcpTGJJ5u8bjDfVcjSPaOY_ckNuiikugs=.c426d23d-0bdc-4396-8442-0db62b00d03f@github.com>
 <QcHucbxnf0uAmsonsf8fCnAxpofDFZOPm76Ko2AOEr4=.a0c9700e-807c-4ab7-9837-2da3969e998f@github.com>
Message-ID: <ElVMIisNK7STkVbt6l9e3e0jh3iYWS-z8NsRc5CYwKQ=.b4645bf6-15ee-4e5f-9fcd-46cb3f213146@github.com>

On Mon, 1 Dec 2025 19:55:55 GMT, Paul Hohensee <phh at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Fixes UseCompressedOops ergonomics to use original limits for G1 GC; prior to JDK18, `-Xmx32736m` by default enables UseCompressedOops but in JDK21 `-Xmx32736m` default sets UseCompressedOops to false. New test passes with change, fails without. Change passes GHA. Backport not clean due to [JDK-8330694](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8330694) renaming `HeapRegion` to `G1HeapRegion`; modifications to the change are minimal as only had to "un-rename" the refactor.
>
> What other testing have you done? We usually like to see at least jdk tier1, and tier2 if possible.

@phohensee Thanks for calling that out. I've updated the description, and since ran tests on internal pipelines confirming no regressions jtreg tier 1-4 for our supported platforms.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2497#issuecomment-3604268725

From andrew at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 01:01:34 2025
From: andrew at openjdk.org (Andrew John Hughes)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 01:01:34 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8245545: Disable TLS_RSA cipher suites [v4]
In-Reply-To: <cVJFcgM08OUwQ2lvLfyWN9AwqQtyNM9wM-Gsdpe6Q9g=.16cd2ecf-b4b4-4dbe-97b5-7fa636b8f24d@github.com>
References: <z5ADYL8HSsOozFj53j05GzW9s9bM0tqqZo5yCWQmw_8=.f90c6a49-0c50-4d80-9fe6-8777b3d71db3@github.com>
 <cVJFcgM08OUwQ2lvLfyWN9AwqQtyNM9wM-Gsdpe6Q9g=.16cd2ecf-b4b4-4dbe-97b5-7fa636b8f24d@github.com>
Message-ID: <8R0ATrbPQMTwduL81rCHefqhYct9uaxsoefdWqe3e-A=.a50fa8e4-5d86-40e6-b3c1-76f5a3f57073@github.com>

On Wed, 26 Nov 2025 12:08:21 GMT, David Sladk? <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Backport of [JDK-8245545](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8245545) - Disable TLS_RSA cipher suites
>> 
>> Some TLS suites do not preserve forward-secrecy and are not commonly used - and should not be used.
>> 
>> Not clean back port. This includes:
>> - Selection of disabled tests and some include that is in jdk11 but not in jdk17.
>> - Changed indentation of edited block of string defining disabled cipher suites.
>> - Bunch of copyright notices.
>> 
>> Tested on Fedora 43:
>> - gtests passed
>> - T1 have same fails before and after the back port -> not related to this.
>> - jtreg:test/jdk/sun/security passed.
>> - jtreg:test/jdk/javax/net/ssl passed.
>> - Github Actions passed.
>
> David Sladk? has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Fix incorrect resolution of conflit in javax/net/ssl/ciphersuites/DisabledAlgorithms.java

Most of this looks ok. I see three instances with changes that shouldn't be there:

1. `test/jdk/javax/net/ssl/SSLEngine/Basics.java` acquires some refactoring from [JDK-8298867](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8298867). This should just add the lines, as in other tests in 8245545, to re-enable TLS_RSA_* i.e.
~~~
+        // Re-enable TLSv1.1 and TLS_RSA_* since test depends on it.
+        SecurityUtils.removeFromDisabledTlsAlgs("TLS_RSA_*");
~~~

2. `test/jdk/javax/net/ssl/ciphersuites/DisabledAlgorithms.java` brings in a whole bunch of indentation changes from [JDK-8301379](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8301379). It should just add the additional algorithms as in 8245545.

3. `test/jdk/sun/security/pkcs11/fips/TestTLS12.java` alters the existing Red Hat copyright line for no apparent reason.

JDK-8298867 & JDK-8301379 are both test changes that are in Oracle's 11u and could be backported fully. Given we enter rampdown at the end of this week though, I would like to get this change in and those test changes can be done later if desired. We shouldn't be including chunks of them in this backport though.

-------------

Changes requested by andrew (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3124#pullrequestreview-3532711795

From andrew at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 01:10:45 2025
From: andrew at openjdk.org (Andrew John Hughes)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 01:10:45 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8213781: web page background renders blue in
 JEditorPane
In-Reply-To: <dZNVz4L2NoZFgEvhAgq24yIwFSVrZXABY-7NK8--aNw=.92aa7066-fd33-4010-83a4-ec4e79207ce9@github.com>
References: <dZNVz4L2NoZFgEvhAgq24yIwFSVrZXABY-7NK8--aNw=.92aa7066-fd33-4010-83a4-ec4e79207ce9@github.com>
Message-ID: <tSUlvDe8dlbK728k6H36hSLkdwlHjYCzPoNh7cQz3Bs=.9d8cad78-0484-4b1a-89ae-6dd71d4dae95@github.com>

On Wed, 12 Nov 2025 16:34:52 GMT, David Sladk? <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backport of [JDK-8213781](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8213781) - web page background renders blue in JEditorPane
>   
> Fixing JEditorPane that for some webpages renders the background blue instead white. E.g. http://www.google.com/
>   
> Clean backport.  
> Passed tier1 tests.  Existing failures are the same as on the unpatched code, they are unrelated.
> Passed gtests.  
>   
> GH Actions are passing.

Confirmed clean. Does the new test pass?

Do you intend to follow this with [JDK-8367348](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8367348)? It feels like this is a pre-requisite for that change.

-------------

Changes requested by andrew (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3118#pullrequestreview-3532731116
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3118#issuecomment-3604599520

From andrew at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 01:14:14 2025
From: andrew at openjdk.org (Andrew John Hughes)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 01:14:14 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8257709: C1: Double assignment in
 InstructionPrinter::print_stack
In-Reply-To: <kVV886mZlshrAr-DR5LTVrcemxjaGORYeP3qNQZ56XM=.3338c856-3f40-4f50-9e2c-610d29d32762@github.com>
References: <kVV886mZlshrAr-DR5LTVrcemxjaGORYeP3qNQZ56XM=.3338c856-3f40-4f50-9e2c-610d29d32762@github.com>
Message-ID: <I1aDsEL47qGN4Av24nACLCcUeEcZWUox3ECLIWF86Gc=.b9acaac6-6cf9-4148-8ea2-2b44024ead9c@github.com>

On Tue, 11 Nov 2025 22:44:16 GMT, Elif Aslan <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Clean backport. This double assignment causes undefined behavior.

Confirmed clean.

-------------

Marked as reviewed by andrew (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3115#pullrequestreview-3532746818

From andrew at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 01:17:43 2025
From: andrew at openjdk.org (Andrew John Hughes)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 01:17:43 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8368982: Test
 sun/security/tools/jarsigner/EC.java completed and timed out [v2]
In-Reply-To: <ZOMC7IYomBh9avNXUeKm5JGSvhEEl_NN3-ie3HxRi9Y=.3f409f11-6dd5-4a76-a478-c231a9a085f3@github.com>
References: <GgSDjrITzk-Hps8gQotpCp3JAcTAPA0n7QDv8vi83E0=.0dba883b-30ef-45d1-b1c1-7bcbe714250b@github.com>
 <ZOMC7IYomBh9avNXUeKm5JGSvhEEl_NN3-ie3HxRi9Y=.3f409f11-6dd5-4a76-a478-c231a9a085f3@github.com>
Message-ID: <mMW56fwSfw3niE8JWwU0hwLzRxLL4TvV-Dvwqt5-bXs=.485e1fb1-5bf8-4fd8-bd2c-ff7af05ec10f@github.com>

On Fri, 21 Nov 2025 03:15:43 GMT, SendaoYan <syan at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Hi all,
>> 
>> This pull request contains a backport of commit [b0721e28](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/b0721e28591f2ee19fd5cb6581747df0b1efed48) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
>> 
>> The commit being backported was authored by Mikhail Yankelevich on 23 Oct 2025 and was reviewed by Rajan Halade.
>> 
>> Change has been verified locally on linux-x64. Test-fix only, no risk.
>> 
>> Thanks!
>
> SendaoYan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains two additional commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into backport-sendaoYan-b0721e28-master
>  - Backport b0721e28591f2ee19fd5cb6581747df0b1efed48

Confirmed clean

-------------

Marked as reviewed by andrew (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3107#pullrequestreview-3532758156

From andrew at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 01:26:00 2025
From: andrew at openjdk.org (Andrew John Hughes)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 01:26:00 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8347381: Upgrade jQuery UI to version 1.14.1
In-Reply-To: <g7OkJc9t9LnfvDG8UjL5B4saLmAkI8K3FiTqM8gR0tc=.41b60fdb-095d-48c3-9b24-e38b50c51fef@github.com>
References: <g7OkJc9t9LnfvDG8UjL5B4saLmAkI8K3FiTqM8gR0tc=.41b60fdb-095d-48c3-9b24-e38b50c51fef@github.com>
Message-ID: <Vzs32_ZglyQtHTgyxPYyappgeg-oL5LgoXWe63piIzc=.a0cd1a93-21d9-49a3-abe5-8cd51626a335@github.com>

On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 14:01:12 GMT, Antonio Vieiro <avieiro at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Clean backport of [JDK-8347381](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8347381) that upgrades the jQueryUI library to v1.14.1, for parity with 11.0.29 and because it's always a good idea to keep these updated. 
> 
> [This is compatible](https://blog.jqueryui.com/2024/10/jquery-ui-1-14-1-released/) with the already bundled jQuery 3.7.1.

Looks clean to me, allowing for the patch change from [JDK-8221644](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8221644)

-------------

Marked as reviewed by andrew (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3076#pullrequestreview-3532786582

From syan at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 01:34:33 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 01:34:33 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8368982: Test
 sun/security/tools/jarsigner/EC.java completed and timed out [v2]
In-Reply-To: <mMW56fwSfw3niE8JWwU0hwLzRxLL4TvV-Dvwqt5-bXs=.485e1fb1-5bf8-4fd8-bd2c-ff7af05ec10f@github.com>
References: <GgSDjrITzk-Hps8gQotpCp3JAcTAPA0n7QDv8vi83E0=.0dba883b-30ef-45d1-b1c1-7bcbe714250b@github.com>
 <ZOMC7IYomBh9avNXUeKm5JGSvhEEl_NN3-ie3HxRi9Y=.3f409f11-6dd5-4a76-a478-c231a9a085f3@github.com>
 <mMW56fwSfw3niE8JWwU0hwLzRxLL4TvV-Dvwqt5-bXs=.485e1fb1-5bf8-4fd8-bd2c-ff7af05ec10f@github.com>
Message-ID: <V6HtdUTAnQp3MPZoi1L3gBlw1jd2J2nf0VMrF707Glg=.854e68b7-7718-49ae-b1c9-fd159d2c22bd@github.com>

On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 01:14:56 GMT, Andrew John Hughes <andrew at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> SendaoYan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains two additional commits since the last revision:
>> 
>>  - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into backport-sendaoYan-b0721e28-master
>>  - Backport b0721e28591f2ee19fd5cb6581747df0b1efed48
>
> Confirmed clean

Thanks for the reviews and approved @gnu-andrew

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3107#issuecomment-3604648595

From syan at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 01:34:34 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 01:34:34 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] Integrated: 8368982: Test
 sun/security/tools/jarsigner/EC.java completed and timed out
In-Reply-To: <GgSDjrITzk-Hps8gQotpCp3JAcTAPA0n7QDv8vi83E0=.0dba883b-30ef-45d1-b1c1-7bcbe714250b@github.com>
References: <GgSDjrITzk-Hps8gQotpCp3JAcTAPA0n7QDv8vi83E0=.0dba883b-30ef-45d1-b1c1-7bcbe714250b@github.com>
Message-ID: <-Wmk2f6L70olTiP0_9xf_zbLzKvlF0n-i022ST8dtkE=.fdfdc653-057c-4ebc-b1a4-f3ce45a474f0@github.com>

On Fri, 24 Oct 2025 02:54:05 GMT, SendaoYan <syan at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [b0721e28](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/b0721e28591f2ee19fd5cb6581747df0b1efed48) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Mikhail Yankelevich on 23 Oct 2025 and was reviewed by Rajan Halade.
> 
> Change has been verified locally on linux-x64. Test-fix only, no risk.
> 
> Thanks!

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 3cc55c33
Author:    SendaoYan <syan at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/commit/3cc55c33e05ccea38cc835af2a1240a1f410e1c4
Stats:     2 lines in 1 file changed: 1 ins; 0 del; 1 mod

8368982: Test sun/security/tools/jarsigner/EC.java completed and timed out

Reviewed-by: andrew
Backport-of: b0721e28591f2ee19fd5cb6581747df0b1efed48

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3107

From duke at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 01:50:00 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (duke)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 01:50:00 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8257709: C1: Double assignment in
 InstructionPrinter::print_stack
In-Reply-To: <kVV886mZlshrAr-DR5LTVrcemxjaGORYeP3qNQZ56XM=.3338c856-3f40-4f50-9e2c-610d29d32762@github.com>
References: <kVV886mZlshrAr-DR5LTVrcemxjaGORYeP3qNQZ56XM=.3338c856-3f40-4f50-9e2c-610d29d32762@github.com>
Message-ID: <aIHYzop6oG7Ta2ImrP3oKPMD_fiMRhzH_Z7qRcBajOc=.568dd101-d463-40c2-b7a1-f1d98509dac4@github.com>

On Tue, 11 Nov 2025 22:44:16 GMT, Elif Aslan <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Clean backport. This double assignment causes undefined behavior.

@elifaslan1 
Your change (at version 2a92fea18823f36b5be573d9b23e819dfc2b4880) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3115#issuecomment-3604681763

From syan at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 06:07:05 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 06:07:05 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u] RFR: 8366817:
 test/jdk/javax/net/ssl/TLSCommon/interop/JdkProcServer.java and
 JdkProcClient.java should not delete logs
In-Reply-To: <tIKNNPp40zS67fMiV81KJ7-ORHbnma5owQQH3yGj3k4=.64af0826-1818-4c30-a6b1-de7c1d6ad670@github.com>
References: <tIKNNPp40zS67fMiV81KJ7-ORHbnma5owQQH3yGj3k4=.64af0826-1818-4c30-a6b1-de7c1d6ad670@github.com>
Message-ID: <tA-CmC6hXKBSlAWryJEeISfXxwdgc1Y79Po26fXCHIE=.af9030d6-9138-401c-a536-df960f6802fd@github.com>

On Wed, 5 Nov 2025 02:04:19 GMT, SendaoYan <syan at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [c0c76703](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/c0c76703bc10d5caa1cda7e2820d0702df5b8008) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Fernando Guallini on 4 Nov 2025 and was reviewed by SendaoYan and Rajan Halade.
> 
> Change has been verified by run one of the test entry test/jdk/javax/net/ssl/compatibility/BasicConnectTest.java on linux-x64.
> 
> Thanks!

Created new PR in jdk25u-dev https://github.com/openjdk/jdk25u-dev/pull/50. Close this.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u/pull/358#issuecomment-3605237950

From syan at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 06:07:06 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 06:07:06 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u] Withdrawn: 8366817:
 test/jdk/javax/net/ssl/TLSCommon/interop/JdkProcServer.java and
 JdkProcClient.java should not delete logs
In-Reply-To: <tIKNNPp40zS67fMiV81KJ7-ORHbnma5owQQH3yGj3k4=.64af0826-1818-4c30-a6b1-de7c1d6ad670@github.com>
References: <tIKNNPp40zS67fMiV81KJ7-ORHbnma5owQQH3yGj3k4=.64af0826-1818-4c30-a6b1-de7c1d6ad670@github.com>
Message-ID: <daS5YqnPiKs2-3VPb1GY4zz02ryZ8dLH4Vzg_PETtNQ=.bd97bfa3-561f-4f52-ba83-1e982dbe8560@github.com>

On Wed, 5 Nov 2025 02:04:19 GMT, SendaoYan <syan at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [c0c76703](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/c0c76703bc10d5caa1cda7e2820d0702df5b8008) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Fernando Guallini on 4 Nov 2025 and was reviewed by SendaoYan and Rajan Halade.
> 
> Change has been verified by run one of the test entry test/jdk/javax/net/ssl/compatibility/BasicConnectTest.java on linux-x64.
> 
> Thanks!

This pull request has been closed without being integrated.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u/pull/358

From syan at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 06:08:29 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 06:08:29 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8366817:
 test/jdk/javax/net/ssl/TLSCommon/interop/JdkProcServer.java and
 JdkProcClient.java should not delete logs
Message-ID: <aZ4kwcCikgQtZjAAg0po0Yc9YscFTeIM0hkdLck5uaY=.e95eb79d-ff1c-4a1b-ba72-26baf08b9fe3@github.com>

Hi all,

This pull request contains a backport of commit [c0c76703](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/c0c76703bc10d5caa1cda7e2820d0702df5b8008) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.

The commit being backported was authored by Fernando Guallini on 4 Nov 2025 and was reviewed by SendaoYan and Rajan Halade.

Thanks!

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport c0c76703bc10d5caa1cda7e2820d0702df5b8008

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/50/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk25u-dev&pr=50&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8366817
  Stats: 12 lines in 3 files changed: 0 ins; 9 del; 3 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/50.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev.git pull/50/head:pull/50

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/50

From syan at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 06:09:24 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 06:09:24 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8366817:
 test/jdk/javax/net/ssl/TLSCommon/interop/JdkProcServer.java and
 JdkProcClient.java should not delete logs [v2]
In-Reply-To: <snUUluD4AB8P6Vm_MjFdScDmNcjLQqdwlWH5XGaGac8=.81447252-1724-4c3d-80dd-52c70c672df0@github.com>
References: <snUUluD4AB8P6Vm_MjFdScDmNcjLQqdwlWH5XGaGac8=.81447252-1724-4c3d-80dd-52c70c672df0@github.com>
Message-ID: <LoB0DyHVENcOhnNPEsm3NMyF5CF7XoobQ6H5sHoI93A=.02ba9820-1910-4527-909c-991accda23ff@github.com>

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [c0c76703](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/c0c76703bc10d5caa1cda7e2820d0702df5b8008) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Fernando Guallini on 4 Nov 2025 and was reviewed by SendaoYan and Rajan Halade.
> 
> Change has been verified by run one of the test entry test/jdk/javax/net/ssl/compatibility/BasicConnectTest.java on linux-x64.
> 
> Thanks!

SendaoYan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains two additional commits since the last revision:

 - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into backport-sendaoYan-c0c76703-master
 - Backport c0c76703bc10d5caa1cda7e2820d0702df5b8008

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4156/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4156/files/73e5f0e2..e7bb52c7

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk17u-dev&pr=4156&range=01
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk17u-dev&pr=4156&range=00-01

  Stats: 5298 lines in 105 files changed: 3735 ins; 1243 del; 320 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4156.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/4156/head:pull/4156

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4156

From syan at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 06:09:26 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 06:09:26 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8366817:
 test/jdk/javax/net/ssl/TLSCommon/interop/JdkProcServer.java and
 JdkProcClient.java should not delete logs
In-Reply-To: <snUUluD4AB8P6Vm_MjFdScDmNcjLQqdwlWH5XGaGac8=.81447252-1724-4c3d-80dd-52c70c672df0@github.com>
References: <snUUluD4AB8P6Vm_MjFdScDmNcjLQqdwlWH5XGaGac8=.81447252-1724-4c3d-80dd-52c70c672df0@github.com>
Message-ID: <MYazu0_ULJf_2jdNFrcFaF15ETi-H8fWVoIy0jItEOg=.90a88567-ec1e-4e79-a95a-1cebb3892633@github.com>

On Wed, 5 Nov 2025 02:04:24 GMT, SendaoYan <syan at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [c0c76703](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/c0c76703bc10d5caa1cda7e2820d0702df5b8008) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Fernando Guallini on 4 Nov 2025 and was reviewed by SendaoYan and Rajan Halade.
> 
> Change has been verified by run one of the test entry test/jdk/javax/net/ssl/compatibility/BasicConnectTest.java on linux-x64.
> 
> Thanks!

Waiting [jdk25u-dev](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk25u-dev/pull/50) integrated. Change has been verified locally by run the test entry test/jdk/javax/net/ssl/compatibility/BasicConnectTest.java.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4156#issuecomment-3605242700

From syan at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 06:09:35 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 06:09:35 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8366817:
 test/jdk/javax/net/ssl/TLSCommon/interop/JdkProcServer.java and
 JdkProcClient.java should not delete logs [v2]
In-Reply-To: <rGclg7S4fLnd6i3xLnj_NLKNqTZfYUTbgR4JIO1YaKM=.a0224cb4-7e5c-4611-8f31-84106de8d70d@github.com>
References: <rGclg7S4fLnd6i3xLnj_NLKNqTZfYUTbgR4JIO1YaKM=.a0224cb4-7e5c-4611-8f31-84106de8d70d@github.com>
Message-ID: <5m-bLvpu0fS9TSgWuzIvKHjKDHsgArl-jpmRjzewIQY=.2aff89f1-e93a-4e56-8771-1af8156fcd1f@github.com>

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [c0c76703](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/c0c76703bc10d5caa1cda7e2820d0702df5b8008) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Fernando Guallini on 4 Nov 2025 and was reviewed by SendaoYan and Rajan Halade.
> 
> Change has been verified by run one of the test entry test/jdk/javax/net/ssl/compatibility/BasicConnectTest.java on linux-x64.
> 
> Thanks!

SendaoYan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains two additional commits since the last revision:

 - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into backport-sendaoYan-c0c76703-master
 - Backport c0c76703bc10d5caa1cda7e2820d0702df5b8008

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2446/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2446/files/48937c0e..45030374

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk21u-dev&pr=2446&range=01
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk21u-dev&pr=2446&range=00-01

  Stats: 15591 lines in 159 files changed: 5448 ins; 1585 del; 8558 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2446.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/2446/head:pull/2446

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2446

From syan at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 06:09:36 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 06:09:36 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8366817:
 test/jdk/javax/net/ssl/TLSCommon/interop/JdkProcServer.java and
 JdkProcClient.java should not delete logs
In-Reply-To: <rGclg7S4fLnd6i3xLnj_NLKNqTZfYUTbgR4JIO1YaKM=.a0224cb4-7e5c-4611-8f31-84106de8d70d@github.com>
References: <rGclg7S4fLnd6i3xLnj_NLKNqTZfYUTbgR4JIO1YaKM=.a0224cb4-7e5c-4611-8f31-84106de8d70d@github.com>
Message-ID: <GRMpCYPNR-FHXh2GLu4PNWRcxUbGU1J6qkOr5B03ZCA=.9bd3bb6c-b0aa-44ba-b3c3-a47431fddcf2@github.com>

On Wed, 5 Nov 2025 02:04:20 GMT, SendaoYan <syan at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [c0c76703](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/c0c76703bc10d5caa1cda7e2820d0702df5b8008) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Fernando Guallini on 4 Nov 2025 and was reviewed by SendaoYan and Rajan Halade.
> 
> Change has been verified by run one of the test entry test/jdk/javax/net/ssl/compatibility/BasicConnectTest.java on linux-x64.
> 
> Thanks!

Waiting [jdk25u-dev](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk25u-dev/pull/50) integrated. Change has been verified locally by run the test entry test/jdk/javax/net/ssl/compatibility/BasicConnectTest.java.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2446#issuecomment-3605241296

From syan at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 06:12:09 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 06:12:09 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8366817:
 test/jdk/javax/net/ssl/TLSCommon/interop/JdkProcServer.java and
 JdkProcClient.java should not delete logs [v2]
In-Reply-To: <bFe7DHEBIIDwY1zl3S8gRQ9TNF4IWJuPl5a0fLf-ycs=.6e5ea2c4-26dc-4729-8f22-6e0d5057b324@github.com>
References: <bFe7DHEBIIDwY1zl3S8gRQ9TNF4IWJuPl5a0fLf-ycs=.6e5ea2c4-26dc-4729-8f22-6e0d5057b324@github.com>
Message-ID: <UQi3hKnt9FPWlVamrKHqCodO4lfVUuZ_tqx0iHO7EEY=.da9d3012-fa2f-4d58-ac04-d56cc337d5ad@github.com>

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [c0c76703](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/c0c76703bc10d5caa1cda7e2820d0702df5b8008) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Fernando Guallini on 4 Nov 2025 and was reviewed by SendaoYan and Rajan Halade.
> 
> Change has been verified by run one of the test entry test/jdk/javax/net/ssl/compatibility/BasicConnectTest.java on linux-x64.
> 
> Thanks!

SendaoYan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains two additional commits since the last revision:

 - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into backport-sendaoYan-c0c76703-master
 - Backport c0c76703bc10d5caa1cda7e2820d0702df5b8008

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3112/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3112/files/0578596e..381af354

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk11u-dev&pr=3112&range=01
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk11u-dev&pr=3112&range=00-01

  Stats: 1279 lines in 31 files changed: 924 ins; 300 del; 55 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3112.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev.git pull/3112/head:pull/3112

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3112

From syan at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 06:12:11 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 06:12:11 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8366817:
 test/jdk/javax/net/ssl/TLSCommon/interop/JdkProcServer.java and
 JdkProcClient.java should not delete logs
In-Reply-To: <bFe7DHEBIIDwY1zl3S8gRQ9TNF4IWJuPl5a0fLf-ycs=.6e5ea2c4-26dc-4729-8f22-6e0d5057b324@github.com>
References: <bFe7DHEBIIDwY1zl3S8gRQ9TNF4IWJuPl5a0fLf-ycs=.6e5ea2c4-26dc-4729-8f22-6e0d5057b324@github.com>
Message-ID: <zra-YeO9LRN9ONO8qYtLqtRLPJuBa5OEh9umWMUI13k=.7ccf1ae1-bc3d-4e36-b580-b7b7801620ca@github.com>

On Wed, 5 Nov 2025 02:04:22 GMT, SendaoYan <syan at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [c0c76703](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/c0c76703bc10d5caa1cda7e2820d0702df5b8008) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Fernando Guallini on 4 Nov 2025 and was reviewed by SendaoYan and Rajan Halade.
> 
> Change has been verified by run one of the test entry test/jdk/javax/net/ssl/compatibility/BasicConnectTest.java on linux-x64.
> 
> Thanks!

Waiting [jdk25u-dev](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk25u-dev/pull/50) integrated. Change has been verified locally by run the test entry test/jdk/javax/net/ssl/compatibility/BasicConnectTest.java.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3112#issuecomment-3605242292

From syan at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 06:14:05 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 06:14:05 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u] RFR: 8371114: Problemlist
 vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/events/EM02/em02t006/TestDescription.java
In-Reply-To: <OtJnSfdHPKK8ItwhdBKK2cgyWH8gKwObofd7TFi2P5w=.50a259a8-c614-455a-94b3-e4d3a44f8a3c@github.com>
References: <OtJnSfdHPKK8ItwhdBKK2cgyWH8gKwObofd7TFi2P5w=.50a259a8-c614-455a-94b3-e4d3a44f8a3c@github.com>
Message-ID: <po8d0OwH_2AIp35PXE0Acm08LiUQUvuX8EAqcl_96bo=.6bc1ba24-1ce1-4485-be8c-b28265bc867a@github.com>

On Wed, 5 Nov 2025 02:26:17 GMT, SendaoYan <syan at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [7d3c66f3](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/7d3c66f379fcb24d4505c2c12e20b24dce313e56) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Leonid Mesnik on 4 Nov 2025 and was reviewed by Alex Menkov, SendaoYan and Serguei Spitsyn.
> 
> Backport parity with JDK-8370732
> 
> Thanks!

Since [JDK-8370732](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8370732) do not backport to jdk25u-dev. So this backport seems not needed.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u/pull/359#issuecomment-3605254015

From syan at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 06:14:05 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 06:14:05 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u] Withdrawn: 8371114: Problemlist
 vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/events/EM02/em02t006/TestDescription.java
In-Reply-To: <OtJnSfdHPKK8ItwhdBKK2cgyWH8gKwObofd7TFi2P5w=.50a259a8-c614-455a-94b3-e4d3a44f8a3c@github.com>
References: <OtJnSfdHPKK8ItwhdBKK2cgyWH8gKwObofd7TFi2P5w=.50a259a8-c614-455a-94b3-e4d3a44f8a3c@github.com>
Message-ID: <D3ZBrRgI8El8zTI59MwrT9nQKehJ3hML1EbI18C8pyM=.8c1f747c-74e7-4f54-9155-c19dfedec7c4@github.com>

On Wed, 5 Nov 2025 02:26:17 GMT, SendaoYan <syan at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [7d3c66f3](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/7d3c66f379fcb24d4505c2c12e20b24dce313e56) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Leonid Mesnik on 4 Nov 2025 and was reviewed by Alex Menkov, SendaoYan and Serguei Spitsyn.
> 
> Backport parity with JDK-8370732
> 
> Thanks!

This pull request has been closed without being integrated.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u/pull/359

From syan at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 06:19:09 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 06:19:09 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u] RFR: 8370646: TestLargeUTF8Length.java needs lots of
 memory [v2]
In-Reply-To: <Dn0KsMoC-vX_nHwg-cDE36cO3bt_ca20q8bwNxWv6ZQ=.90f0dc1a-62c4-4bc4-85b7-76d10995980d@github.com>
References: <KZvMYSxnRoY7xH3o1OqBgvTbpbch4khJ4cyKaxEvAq8=.67cfb9ff-286b-4a19-b361-dc2462552f0b@github.com>
 <Dn0KsMoC-vX_nHwg-cDE36cO3bt_ca20q8bwNxWv6ZQ=.90f0dc1a-62c4-4bc4-85b7-76d10995980d@github.com>
Message-ID: <NgCQPgZYha6TaYkwqe32mY_fjKsz79chEo00HSkDwYY=.c5724d96-5888-4baf-8f77-0b38f12f828e@github.com>

On Mon, 1 Dec 2025 07:29:52 GMT, SendaoYan <syan at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Hi all,
>> 
>> This pull request contains a backport of commit [3c1010b5](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/3c1010b57f2f8258a2ccf59b9f86fc8debd71918) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
>> 
>> The commit being backported was authored by Kelvin Nilsen on 31 Oct 2025 and was reviewed by Paul Hohensee, William Kemper and Y. Srinivas Ramakrishna.
>> 
>> Thanks!
>
> SendaoYan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains two additional commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into backport-sendaoYan-3c1010b5-master
>  - Backport 3c1010b57f2f8258a2ccf59b9f86fc8debd71918

Close this and create new one in jdk25u-dev https://github.com/openjdk/jdk25u-dev/pull/51

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u/pull/354#issuecomment-3605268933

From syan at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 06:19:11 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 06:19:11 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u] Withdrawn: 8370646: TestLargeUTF8Length.java needs lots of
 memory
In-Reply-To: <KZvMYSxnRoY7xH3o1OqBgvTbpbch4khJ4cyKaxEvAq8=.67cfb9ff-286b-4a19-b361-dc2462552f0b@github.com>
References: <KZvMYSxnRoY7xH3o1OqBgvTbpbch4khJ4cyKaxEvAq8=.67cfb9ff-286b-4a19-b361-dc2462552f0b@github.com>
Message-ID: <2LGbyCsKAFhTN6es3-GhmYiUB-fIioeb-1G8Z4RQq5Y=.fefacfe9-c63b-4937-be24-07be111a7872@github.com>

On Sat, 1 Nov 2025 02:38:06 GMT, SendaoYan <syan at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [3c1010b5](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/3c1010b57f2f8258a2ccf59b9f86fc8debd71918) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Kelvin Nilsen on 31 Oct 2025 and was reviewed by Paul Hohensee, William Kemper and Y. Srinivas Ramakrishna.
> 
> Thanks!

This pull request has been closed without being integrated.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u/pull/354

From syan at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 06:20:47 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 06:20:47 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8370732: Use WhiteBox.getWhiteBox().fullGC() to
 provoking gc for nsk/jvmti tests [v2]
In-Reply-To: <B2TaoKbJ-NgOEih4SKJoRELWVJCyv5Oyx7KaqkT5sv4=.4a73e54f-157f-4c09-9c97-72de78a22f48@github.com>
References: <B2TaoKbJ-NgOEih4SKJoRELWVJCyv5Oyx7KaqkT5sv4=.4a73e54f-157f-4c09-9c97-72de78a22f48@github.com>
Message-ID: <bBXxU8JcbSuPZETuwtdXrkwOwnL8_crzQrUKUZdH5k8=.0ebb84b5-b7c0-4011-8b62-c5a2bc82a2bc@github.com>

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [54fe5021](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/54fe50210efe9ae6fad225b815cfdeb16c868115) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by SendaoYan on 1 Nov 2025 and was reviewed by Chris Plummer, Leonid Mesnik and Serguei Spitsyn.
> 
> Thanks!

SendaoYan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains two additional commits since the last revision:

 - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into backport-sendaoYan-54fe5021-master
 - Backport 54fe50210efe9ae6fad225b815cfdeb16c868115

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2440/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2440/files/314d77bc..71b04e52

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk21u-dev&pr=2440&range=01
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk21u-dev&pr=2440&range=00-01

  Stats: 16627 lines in 172 files changed: 6482 ins; 1585 del; 8560 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2440.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/2440/head:pull/2440

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2440

From syan at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 06:21:00 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 06:21:00 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u] RFR: 8370732: Use WhiteBox.getWhiteBox().fullGC() to
 provoking gc for nsk/jvmti tests [v2]
In-Reply-To: <zNZpzG8udA32GQQrDSccBdMx8nFgyS2pHlp9kCptpog=.a60dc09d-1bcf-4521-aec8-632da457b385@github.com>
References: <W8nVqKwy1bDepTajgpmo3IHNSgruFtj2UEgj8cMJKKg=.928a8289-a1eb-46f0-a630-18114d5705ef@github.com>
 <zNZpzG8udA32GQQrDSccBdMx8nFgyS2pHlp9kCptpog=.a60dc09d-1bcf-4521-aec8-632da457b385@github.com>
Message-ID: <TOIJkUO9Czv15NrDq891FAsTYH1uRb7VlpQE6bqjM9Q=.44e7e4ba-7a47-47b7-a72c-03a338df3eac@github.com>

On Tue, 25 Nov 2025 12:11:12 GMT, SendaoYan <syan at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Hi all,
>> 
>> This pull request contains a backport of commit [54fe5021](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/54fe50210efe9ae6fad225b815cfdeb16c868115) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
>> 
>> The commit being backported was authored by SendaoYan on 1 Nov 2025 and was reviewed by Chris Plummer, Leonid Mesnik and Serguei Spitsyn.
>> 
>> Thanks!
>
> SendaoYan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains two additional commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into backport-sendaoYan-54fe5021-master
>  - Backport 54fe50210efe9ae6fad225b815cfdeb16c868115

Close this and create new one in jdk25u-dev https://github.com/openjdk/jdk25u-dev/pull/52

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u/pull/353#issuecomment-3605272345

From syan at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 06:21:01 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 06:21:01 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u] Withdrawn: 8370732: Use WhiteBox.getWhiteBox().fullGC() to
 provoking gc for nsk/jvmti tests
In-Reply-To: <W8nVqKwy1bDepTajgpmo3IHNSgruFtj2UEgj8cMJKKg=.928a8289-a1eb-46f0-a630-18114d5705ef@github.com>
References: <W8nVqKwy1bDepTajgpmo3IHNSgruFtj2UEgj8cMJKKg=.928a8289-a1eb-46f0-a630-18114d5705ef@github.com>
Message-ID: <fpvixM5ZkrSmPAj_i_HHkK2vQ3Wet8HqlOgt-WXQKkk=.6bbd8055-9320-4132-86ac-7f83d8470afb@github.com>

On Sat, 1 Nov 2025 02:14:00 GMT, SendaoYan <syan at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [54fe5021](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/54fe50210efe9ae6fad225b815cfdeb16c868115) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by SendaoYan on 1 Nov 2025 and was reviewed by Chris Plummer, Leonid Mesnik and Serguei Spitsyn.
> 
> Thanks!

This pull request has been closed without being integrated.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u/pull/353

From syan at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 06:22:39 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 06:22:39 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8370646: TestLargeUTF8Length.java needs lots of
 memory
Message-ID: <XLkcDFwmwj2jKaPDgQge3f4kcrr2ZZYGjOge7KCaVFs=.6e518dfe-fbf1-47f9-a54b-bfa9941f0733@github.com>

Hi all,

This pull request contains a backport of commit [3c1010b5](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/3c1010b57f2f8258a2ccf59b9f86fc8debd71918) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.

The commit being backported was authored by Kelvin Nilsen on 31 Oct 2025 and was reviewed by Paul Hohensee, William Kemper and Y. Srinivas Ramakrishna.

Thanks!

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport 3c1010b57f2f8258a2ccf59b9f86fc8debd71918

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/51/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk25u-dev&pr=51&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8370646
  Stats: 1 line in 1 file changed: 1 ins; 0 del; 0 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/51.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev.git pull/51/head:pull/51

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/51

From syan at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 06:24:42 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 06:24:42 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8370732: Use WhiteBox.getWhiteBox().fullGC() to
 provoking gc for nsk/jvmti tests
Message-ID: <iY5DXLToTlFVfjIT5102_-YbYaAT_8jfJKMsKInS3FQ=.2ad2822b-7e63-4e13-b911-9c16587970ab@github.com>

Hi all,

This pull request contains a backport of commit [54fe5021](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/54fe50210efe9ae6fad225b815cfdeb16c868115) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.

The commit being backported was authored by SendaoYan on 1 Nov 2025 and was reviewed by Chris Plummer, Leonid Mesnik and Serguei Spitsyn.

Thanks!

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport 54fe50210efe9ae6fad225b815cfdeb16c868115

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/52/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk25u-dev&pr=52&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8370732
  Stats: 299 lines in 27 files changed: 33 ins; 234 del; 32 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/52.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev.git pull/52/head:pull/52

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/52

From goetz at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 07:44:42 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 07:44:42 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u] RFR: Merge jdk21u-dev:master
Message-ID: <gmg6bmMc-Pv_Ek8yf1fqzoVAE9u74O-dSEOFrcObfUQ=.1eafccd7-b40c-4993-ba7a-a3e5da8c822c@github.com>

Merge changes from jdk21u-dev to jdk21u for the next build tag

-------------

Commit messages:
 - 8353175: Eliminate double iteration of stream in FieldDescriptor reinitialization
 - 8327980: Convert javax/swing/JToggleButton/4128979/bug4128979.java applet test to main
 - 8341131: Some jdk/jfr/event/compiler tests shouldn't be executed with Xcomp
 - 8368982: Test sun/security/tools/jarsigner/EC.java completed and timed out
 - 8313770: jdk/internal/platform/docker/TestSystemMetrics.java fails on Ubuntu
 - 8368960: Adjust java UL logging in the build
 - 8369563: Gtest dll_address_to_function_and_library_name has issues with stripped pdb files
 - 8343340: Swapping checking do not work for MetricsMemoryTester failcount
 - 8369032: Add test to ensure serialized ICC_Profile stores only necessary optional data
 - 8364258: ThreadGroup constant pool serialization is not normalized

The merge commit only contains trivial merges, so no merge-specific webrevs have been generated.

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u/pull/476/files
  Stats: 1413 lines in 32 files changed: 678 ins; 680 del; 55 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u/pull/476.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u.git pull/476/head:pull/476

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u/pull/476

From goetz at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 07:44:42 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 07:44:42 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u] RFR: Merge jdk21u-dev:master
In-Reply-To: <gmg6bmMc-Pv_Ek8yf1fqzoVAE9u74O-dSEOFrcObfUQ=.1eafccd7-b40c-4993-ba7a-a3e5da8c822c@github.com>
References: <gmg6bmMc-Pv_Ek8yf1fqzoVAE9u74O-dSEOFrcObfUQ=.1eafccd7-b40c-4993-ba7a-a3e5da8c822c@github.com>
Message-ID: <M31nGzTjQFn-3AtSLbGRjTkEOfhO9Att_wDke5r_Plw=.ebd03b6b-2b30-46d3-8a56-a36d030362cc@github.com>

On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 07:39:15 GMT, Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Merge changes from jdk21u-dev to jdk21u for the next build tag

\integrate

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u/pull/476#issuecomment-3605495184

From shade at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 08:05:08 2025
From: shade at openjdk.org (Aleksey Shipilev)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 08:05:08 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8370405: C2: mismatched store from MergeStores
 wrongly scalarized in allocation elimination [v3]
In-Reply-To: <HN1RE1ZmiuHE79hW3zcdmGUxD_ifQ0FHO_VfQBlKw_o=.ed472345-ba7d-4472-ac6c-c6be4eacf1f0@github.com>
References: <LYeFIAEYp35GH11-PxpoSy8xEE-8nG3DB5GSGVoIx-U=.5b059e5f-aaf1-485b-8490-4ebed289216b@github.com>
 <HN1RE1ZmiuHE79hW3zcdmGUxD_ifQ0FHO_VfQBlKw_o=.ed472345-ba7d-4472-ac6c-c6be4eacf1f0@github.com>
Message-ID: <mcijQgby1VIJd4iQ32nt-Y9EP9iy1JQkPglrG4vtEWQ=.0791a02f-cd60-4b30-b2e0-e4421ccaae33@github.com>

On Thu, 27 Nov 2025 12:43:28 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev <shade at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Fixes JDK 21 -> JDK 25 regression in C2 that can lead to miscompilation. There is a regression test that captures the failure.
>> 
>> Additional testing:
>>  - [x] Linux x86_64 server fastdebug, new regression test fails without the fix, passes with it
>>  - [x] Linux x86_64 server fastdebug, `all`
>
> Aleksey Shipilev has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains one commit:
> 
>   Backport 09a047f00c88d14505c42a966dedbc87b9be5bdf

Push approval granted.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/10#issuecomment-3605537473

From shade at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 08:05:10 2025
From: shade at openjdk.org (Aleksey Shipilev)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 08:05:10 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] Integrated: 8370405: C2: mismatched store from
 MergeStores wrongly scalarized in allocation elimination
In-Reply-To: <LYeFIAEYp35GH11-PxpoSy8xEE-8nG3DB5GSGVoIx-U=.5b059e5f-aaf1-485b-8490-4ebed289216b@github.com>
References: <LYeFIAEYp35GH11-PxpoSy8xEE-8nG3DB5GSGVoIx-U=.5b059e5f-aaf1-485b-8490-4ebed289216b@github.com>
Message-ID: <eCWcrv5xD1fGZvRZfW7B6piWDuFFxYqYr1CXWv0cTKA=.5f5f957d-1a85-4083-9e9a-5a5b8550d71b@github.com>

On Wed, 26 Nov 2025 10:15:17 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev <shade at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Fixes JDK 21 -> JDK 25 regression in C2 that can lead to miscompilation. There is a regression test that captures the failure.
> 
> Additional testing:
>  - [x] Linux x86_64 server fastdebug, new regression test fails without the fix, passes with it
>  - [x] Linux x86_64 server fastdebug, `all`

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: d1b5b9a5
Author:    Aleksey Shipilev <shade at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/commit/d1b5b9a592520096139bbc2906132ac16434f9ca
Stats:     375 lines in 5 files changed: 375 ins; 0 del; 0 mod

8370405: C2: mismatched store from MergeStores wrongly scalarized in allocation elimination

Backport-of: 09a047f00c88d14505c42a966dedbc87b9be5bdf

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/10

From goetz at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 08:32:11 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 08:32:11 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] Integrated: 8372464: Bump update version for OpenJDK:
 jdk-21.0.11
In-Reply-To: <Ykyvtaz6mSWEeWmdMlvZXY-3Y2K3ufIFYYhn6WuUL2c=.bdfc3c30-75ed-46ab-ab42-4144bac14d25@github.com>
References: <Ykyvtaz6mSWEeWmdMlvZXY-3Y2K3ufIFYYhn6WuUL2c=.bdfc3c30-75ed-46ab-ab42-4144bac14d25@github.com>
Message-ID: <pC26ztAGcQr7GnQej-Zn-cPoEgPkPon0eG0IQAbq55E=.febf5dce-f884-4876-ace8-59334927bd15@github.com>

On Fri, 28 Nov 2025 10:47:49 GMT, Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Required version bump.

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 70b9fa26
Author:    Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/commit/70b9fa26c20793821e8a82aabb719f0761eb8a28
Stats:     3 lines in 2 files changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 3 mod

8372464: Bump update version for OpenJDK: jdk-21.0.11

Reviewed-by: sgehwolf

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2492

From goetz at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 08:32:18 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 08:32:18 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] Integrated: 8372465: Bump update version for OpenJDK:
 jdk-17.0.19
In-Reply-To: <MRf8qkAeUFcT0FjPM8tr2xkWP0RbOtCZGY3d_LHlWx4=.5366b1e0-581e-441f-958c-37b1a83f3dcf@github.com>
References: <MRf8qkAeUFcT0FjPM8tr2xkWP0RbOtCZGY3d_LHlWx4=.5366b1e0-581e-441f-958c-37b1a83f3dcf@github.com>
Message-ID: <9ZJ0TdYuxOF_h5F_t8vHxSnWOu01araRxOexPnt05pI=.3de29b79-d421-4794-9dde-6110c54a28e5@github.com>

On Fri, 28 Nov 2025 10:50:39 GMT, Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Required version bump

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 77bd7674
Author:    Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/commit/77bd76748e679a1b89490e501ee1835b9deedaad
Stats:     3 lines in 2 files changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 3 mod

8372465: Bump update version for OpenJDK: jdk-17.0.19

Reviewed-by: sgehwolf

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4196

From goetz at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 08:45:23 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 08:45:23 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u] RFR: 8359064: Expose reason for marking nmethod
 non-entrant to JVMCI client
In-Reply-To: <4CoE2HbRItyyAf-99pF10JwKP2fMLVPMYRMYFrfdCxY=.274f76ca-c635-4bf9-810a-7abd3fbc2807@github.com>
References: <-zbGZQ4CrP-CAz-AwfawsUhI8vxwTq4GC3uXOEfNVcw=.ebc76743-bcd7-40bc-8178-c0f6990c38cf@github.com>
 <qwxnKD6UjYUroX94OdCO20TiZ2ZyF-SJr-KJLI3bg-Y=.4e7de639-8f1a-4837-be81-c627992f580c@github.com>
 <VnzSgIoiej4O91ndDqUymqifPyar5IHozeauRWvutNc=.e6f099a0-219f-4d7f-87b6-2f18b4749be8@github.com>
 <DwlMMh0-K8WSud4BXcATdJwqQCViUxCrc7YOJxdIGqs=.913c5820-3e5e-4ce4-8679-c981de4ad61b@github.com>
 <wNxXtc5iPBpNyj2kqVa5DtyibTiGmmUl_5zCOTXx3pY=.c0df083b-1883-426e-b893-3a1800917ed5@github.com>
 <4CoE2HbRItyyAf-99pF10JwKP2fMLVPMYRMYFrfdCxY=.274f76ca-c635-4bf9-810a-7abd3fbc2807@github.com>
Message-ID: <1kqfht3W79Ug_1M2uzttH7LBByXcjU2GZBMMutLoWuo=.0f25f6a7-f674-4ada-b4e2-323249e4a5ae@github.com>

On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 20:01:26 GMT, Cesar Soares Lucas <cslucas at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> HI @JohnTortugo 
>> I was not talking about the PR description.  I miss the information in the approval comment in the JBS issue.
>> Re-issue the /approval command and add the two bug ids saying that you include follow-up x in y, please.
>> Re-issuing the /approval command will replace the existing comment in the JBS issues.
>> Have a look at https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8360049, the current comment makes no sense in this JBS issue.
>> If you have JBS access you can also edit the corresponding comments...
>> Thanks!
>
> @GoeLin - I issued a new request as you suggested. However, the request message for https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8360049 wasn't updated because the backport request for that ticket was already approved. I have a JBS account but I don't have permission to edit Robo Duke comments.

Hi @JohnTortugo 
Thanks for giving it another try. This is what I had asked for.  I give up now, let's not struggle with the duke :)
I approved it.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u/pull/335#issuecomment-3605692972

From duke at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 08:46:36 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Elif Aslan)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 08:46:36 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] Integrated: 8257709: C1: Double assignment in
 InstructionPrinter::print_stack
In-Reply-To: <kVV886mZlshrAr-DR5LTVrcemxjaGORYeP3qNQZ56XM=.3338c856-3f40-4f50-9e2c-610d29d32762@github.com>
References: <kVV886mZlshrAr-DR5LTVrcemxjaGORYeP3qNQZ56XM=.3338c856-3f40-4f50-9e2c-610d29d32762@github.com>
Message-ID: <C0Q53_WICvqvDp_PhYtM-bH4I3zk4mYX94CiB-yZJoE=.1de5da9b-ee52-4f08-8c26-ea1282c55b35@github.com>

On Tue, 11 Nov 2025 22:44:16 GMT, Elif Aslan <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Clean backport. This double assignment causes undefined behavior.

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: c5cef8c0
Author:    Elif Aslan <elifasln at amazon.com>
Committer: Andrew John Hughes <andrew at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/commit/c5cef8c0447b0822273b49b055c29b57ac4b0f02
Stats:     1 line in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 1 mod

8257709: C1: Double assignment in InstructionPrinter::print_stack

Reviewed-by: andrew
Backport-of: 563b268c8f23a1f9f5e70065419d4e8661d1d0b4

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3115

From goetz at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 08:49:23 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 08:49:23 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: Merge jdk25u:master
Message-ID: <JyMjikAqm-OM8FP32mQ-r38Zqppk9iHWvqjaVqaIQ3U=.e629d8cf-47a8-41c1-8e2c-643dd472f60c@github.com>

Merge the changes we pushed for developer convenience to jdk25u after close of 25.0.2 development.

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Merge
 - 8372753: jpackage ignores --file-associations option with predefined app image
 - 8370649: Add intermittent tag for gc/shenandoah/generational/TestOldGrowthTriggers.java
 - 8361381: GlyphLayout behavior differs on JDK 11+ compared to JDK 8
 - 8359472: JVM crashes when attaching a dynamic agent before JVMTI_PHASE_LIVE
 - 8359418: Test "javax/swing/text/GlyphView/bug4188841.java" failed because the phrase of text pane does not match the instructions
 - 8367901: Calendar.roll(hour, 24) returns wrong result
 - 8368328: CompactNumberFormat.clone does not produce independent instances
 - 8030957: AIX: Implement OperatingSystemMXBean.getSystemCpuLoad() and .getProcessCpuLoad() on AIX
 - 8366128: jdk/jdk/nio/zipfs/TestPosix.java::testJarFile uses wrong file
 - ... and 12 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/compare/56965318...e3d4cbf5

The merge commit only contains trivial merges, so no merge-specific webrevs have been generated.

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/53/files
  Stats: 1008 lines in 39 files changed: 844 ins; 43 del; 121 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/53.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev.git pull/53/head:pull/53

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/53

From duke at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 08:51:29 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (David =?UTF-8?B?U2xhZGvDvQ==?=)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 08:51:29 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8213781: web page background renders blue in
 JEditorPane
In-Reply-To: <tSUlvDe8dlbK728k6H36hSLkdwlHjYCzPoNh7cQz3Bs=.9d8cad78-0484-4b1a-89ae-6dd71d4dae95@github.com>
References: <dZNVz4L2NoZFgEvhAgq24yIwFSVrZXABY-7NK8--aNw=.92aa7066-fd33-4010-83a4-ec4e79207ce9@github.com>
 <tSUlvDe8dlbK728k6H36hSLkdwlHjYCzPoNh7cQz3Bs=.9d8cad78-0484-4b1a-89ae-6dd71d4dae95@github.com>
Message-ID: <YQcSRKjzKIAUPUCpKnnsjVwCjYUrvpy6HaqaCOSV8bw=.955e6057-1e2b-41ba-94f0-1aa26fc3ea5b@github.com>

On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 01:07:12 GMT, Andrew John Hughes <andrew at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Confirmed clean. Does the new test pass?

Yes, it does.


$ make run-test-only TEST="jtreg:test/jdk/javax/swing/JEditorPane/TestBrowserBGColor.java"
Building target 'run-test-only' in configuration 'linux-x86_64-normal-server-release'
Test selection 'jtreg:test/jdk/javax/swing/JEditorPane/TestBrowserBGColor.java', will run:
* jtreg:test/jdk/javax/swing/JEditorPane/TestBrowserBGColor.java

Running test 'jtreg:test/jdk/javax/swing/JEditorPane/TestBrowserBGColor.java'
Passed: javax/swing/JEditorPane/TestBrowserBGColor.java
Test results: passed: 1
Report written to /home/dsladky/dev/jdk11u-dev/build/linux-x86_64-normal-server-release/test-results/jtreg_test_jdk_javax_swing_JEditorPane_TestBrowserBGColor_java/html/report.html
Results written to /home/dsladky/dev/jdk11u-dev/build/linux-x86_64-normal-server-release/test-support/jtreg_test_jdk_javax_swing_JEditorPane_TestBrowserBGColor_java
Finished running test 'jtreg:test/jdk/javax/swing/JEditorPane/TestBrowserBGColor.java'
Test report is stored in build/linux-x86_64-normal-server-release/test-results/jtreg_test_jdk_javax_swing_JEditorPane_TestBrowserBGColor_java

==============================
Test summary
==============================
   TEST                                              TOTAL  PASS  FAIL ERROR
   jtreg:test/jdk/javax/swing/JEditorPane/TestBrowserBGColor.java
                                                         1     1     0     0
==============================
TEST SUCCESS

Finished building target 'run-test-only' in configuration 'linux-x86_64-normal-server-release'


> Do you intend to follow this with [JDK-8367348](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8367348)? It feels like this is a pre-requisite for that change.

Yes, that is the issue that led me to this one and I am planning to continue with the chain of backports.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3118#issuecomment-3605715758

From goetz at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 08:58:47 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 08:58:47 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: Merge jdk25u:master [v2]
In-Reply-To: <JyMjikAqm-OM8FP32mQ-r38Zqppk9iHWvqjaVqaIQ3U=.e629d8cf-47a8-41c1-8e2c-643dd472f60c@github.com>
References: <JyMjikAqm-OM8FP32mQ-r38Zqppk9iHWvqjaVqaIQ3U=.e629d8cf-47a8-41c1-8e2c-643dd472f60c@github.com>
Message-ID: <h4bmcCA0XC8PuCh6SP2984NtTqKrqdSiSHb0fQfmTPY=.d9dbe4fa-f0f3-4c8e-9263-ebbca59adcb0@github.com>

> Merge the changes we pushed for developer convenience to jdk25u after close of 25.0.2 development.

Goetz Lindenmaier has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 11 additional commits since the last revision:

 - Merge
 - 8343474: [updates] Customize README.md to specifics of update project
   
   Reviewed-by: sgehwolf
   Backport-of: 22d5e0d1f8849410abe40165b58f45f5e4293884
 - 8368787: Error reporting: hs_err files should show instructions when referencing code in nmethods
   
   Backport-of: b31bbfcf2f13fa5b16762f5384d95c2b5d9c5705
 - 8370244: [PPC64] Several vector tests fail on Power8
   
   Backport-of: cbd77fc9f3e6c8f1e996b30afe208c6a074cce3a
 - 8372046: compiler/floatingpoint/TestSubNodeFloatDoubleNegation.java fails IR verification
   
   Backport-of: a3b1affbfb23eeef32749164aae316e5d55fffaa
 - 8371966: RISC-V: Incorrect pointer dereference in TemplateInterpreterGenerator::generate_native_entry
   
   Backport-of: 695a4abd5f7e9edcea9f1a724a9ceb87340a8f25
 - 8370708: RISC-V: Add VerifyStackAtCalls
   
   Backport-of: 0737a5625269773dcf70b95f8b8ac90b3b6cc444
 - 8372412: Increase buffer size for ring-buffer events in CollectedHeap
   
   Backport-of: 81ea1442a86795dafbf96c875fbecc65210804be
 - 8364741: [asan] runtime/ErrorHandling/PrintVMInfoAtExitTest.java fails because output differs slightly
   
   Backport-of: a840dc22c575b5d2b5b6017a536a6541fc1f0a44
 - 8354937: Cleanup some sparc related coding in os_linux
   
   Backport-of: 1b3889a47092e018ab9ecb6aaa922046d8d0e916
 - ... and 1 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/compare/7c645309...e3d4cbf5

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/53/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/53/files/e3d4cbf5..e3d4cbf5

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk25u-dev&pr=53&range=01
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk25u-dev&pr=53&range=00-01

  Stats: 0 lines in 0 files changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 0 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/53.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev.git pull/53/head:pull/53

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/53

From goetz at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 08:58:50 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 08:58:50 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] Integrated: Merge jdk25u:master
In-Reply-To: <JyMjikAqm-OM8FP32mQ-r38Zqppk9iHWvqjaVqaIQ3U=.e629d8cf-47a8-41c1-8e2c-643dd472f60c@github.com>
References: <JyMjikAqm-OM8FP32mQ-r38Zqppk9iHWvqjaVqaIQ3U=.e629d8cf-47a8-41c1-8e2c-643dd472f60c@github.com>
Message-ID: <VZWugBpx2y1nnHjgl4zlzq8epKY2s9Rtx5xEP3pmczk=.2ee4f87d-592f-4446-a13d-cc6b412c9cf7@github.com>

On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 08:37:55 GMT, Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Merge the changes we pushed for developer convenience to jdk25u after close of 25.0.2 development.

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 228ff386
Author:    Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/commit/228ff3869013bf0dcc0baa3a86e16c34168772bc
Stats:     1008 lines in 39 files changed: 844 ins; 43 del; 121 mod

Merge

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/53

From andrew at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 09:09:03 2025
From: andrew at openjdk.org (Andrew John Hughes)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 09:09:03 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8337506: Disable "best-fit" mapping on Windows
 command line
In-Reply-To: <sCUElgyx4nn-2TSrOHKfy2Ed3oRZsRBC7PQSI6aICL0=.b6cdce96-0d51-4719-90a6-ed99be788525@github.com>
References: <sCUElgyx4nn-2TSrOHKfy2Ed3oRZsRBC7PQSI6aICL0=.b6cdce96-0d51-4719-90a6-ed99be788525@github.com>
Message-ID: <jLSzun5e-vvdM-OsfSOzis9zsc6bPXscnRfCWf3Q5KQ=.57bd6580-7c96-4c7d-8c2a-de9034beaf87@github.com>

On Mon, 14 Jul 2025 16:03:37 GMT, Ekaterina Vergizova <evergizova at openjdk.org> wrote:

> I'd like to backport this for parity with 11.0.29-oracle.
> CSR JDK-8349538 has been approved for 11u.
> 17u patch applies cleanly, but the test requires a few modifications to work properly:
> - replaced `native.encoding` property with `file.encoding`, as `native.encoding` is not present in 11u. 
> These two are identical unless `file.encoding` is overridden on the command line:
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk17u-dev/blob/master/src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/util/SystemProps.java#L72
> - replaced `"str".formatted(args)` with `String.format("str", args)`, as String::formatted() is not available in 11u. Both methods produce the same result.
> 
> The new test passes successfully after applying the patch.

Changes look good to me. Thanks for backporting.

-------------

Marked as reviewed by andrew (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3062#pullrequestreview-3533935624

From andrew at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 09:46:28 2025
From: andrew at openjdk.org (Andrew John Hughes)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 09:46:28 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8290368: Introduce LDAP and RMI
 protocol-specific object factory filters to JNDI implementation
In-Reply-To: <hQuCbBLupw0jeh1EBw7_ql6UotJLIwoPbxyASVUrhaQ=.917a8e05-3c88-41ff-8483-a0b9e1944e95@github.com>
References: <hQuCbBLupw0jeh1EBw7_ql6UotJLIwoPbxyASVUrhaQ=.917a8e05-3c88-41ff-8483-a0b9e1944e95@github.com>
Message-ID: <3kXNNaQfsD8s_mcU-AQyL7t71vLZyqLG9k8fuMdOFXU=.9bea4713-66ce-494f-b909-5f90b7ad399a@github.com>

On Mon, 3 Nov 2025 12:33:40 GMT, Pooja-DP <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> This pull request contains a backport of commit https://github.com/openjdk/jdk17u/commit/39a6bf2158c2f35399c6739e4b9578f13ea6b7e4 from the https://github.com/openjdk/jdk17u
> 
> Bug Ref: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8290368
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pooja.D.P1 <Pooja.D.P1 at ibm.com>

It seems that when 8244473 was backported to 11u, documentation changes were not included so I think it is correct to include them here, along with fixing the ordering in `java.security` caused by patches being applied in a different order as far as I can see.

There are still some conflict hunks present in `src/java.naming/share/classes/module-info.java` and a couple of bits from 8244473 still missing:

~~~
--- src/java.naming/share/classes/module-info.java      2025-12-03 09:33:23.798486609 +0000
+++ ../jdk/src/java.naming/share/classes/module-info.java       2025-12-03 01:34:51.274570322 +0000
@@ -29,11 +29,11 @@
  * Common standard JNDI environment properties that may be supported
  * by JNDI providers are defined and documented in
  * {@link javax.naming.Context}. Specific JNDI provider implementations
- * may also support other environment properties, which are specific
+ * may also support other environment or system properties, which are specific
  * to their implementation.
  *
  * @implNote
- * The following implementation specific properties are supported by the
+ * The following implementation specific environment properties are supported by the
  * default LDAP Naming Service Provider implementation in the JDK:
  * <ul>
  *     <li>{@code java.naming.ldap.factory.socket}:
@@ -86,8 +86,6 @@
  *         channel binding information to the server.
  *     </li>
  * </ul>
-<<<<<<< HEAD
-=======
  * <p>The following implementation specific system properties are supported by the
  * default LDAP Naming Service Provider implementation in the JDK:
  * <ul>
~~~

If you can fix this up, this should be ready to go.

What testing has been done with this change?

Also please go to https://github.com/Pooja-DP/jdk11u-dev/actions and enable GitHub Actions as you are not running the testing on this pull request.

-------------

Changes requested by andrew (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3111#pullrequestreview-3534105964
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3111#issuecomment-3605952705

From andrew at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 09:55:21 2025
From: andrew at openjdk.org (Andrew John Hughes)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 09:55:21 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8213781: web page background renders blue in
 JEditorPane
In-Reply-To: <dZNVz4L2NoZFgEvhAgq24yIwFSVrZXABY-7NK8--aNw=.92aa7066-fd33-4010-83a4-ec4e79207ce9@github.com>
References: <dZNVz4L2NoZFgEvhAgq24yIwFSVrZXABY-7NK8--aNw=.92aa7066-fd33-4010-83a4-ec4e79207ce9@github.com>
Message-ID: <_uzChBp7ZwkeW6se5tAKigNF1UIwD3vdHU2S9ccV0bg=.811155f1-1817-49d3-8618-e6091e57097c@github.com>

On Wed, 12 Nov 2025 16:34:52 GMT, David Sladk? <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backport of [JDK-8213781](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8213781) - web page background renders blue in JEditorPane
>   
> Fixing JEditorPane that for some webpages renders the background blue instead white. E.g. http://www.google.com/
>   
> Clean backport.  
> Passed tier1 tests.  Existing failures are the same as on the unpatched code, they are unrelated.
> Passed gtests.  
>   
> GH Actions are passing.

Thanks, I think this one is good to go.

-------------

Marked as reviewed by andrew (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3118#pullrequestreview-3534153700

From dbriemann at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 10:16:51 2025
From: dbriemann at openjdk.org (David Briemann)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 10:16:51 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8307495: Specialize atomic bitset functions for
 aix-ppc [v2]
In-Reply-To: <DSSZ4jToAfdqwpTyA88vIxZMgNZmWuJfwKs8-a7eHLs=.cab8d2c4-4862-42d9-b483-3fab3d4494ad@github.com>
References: <JqH4nK1RMFY2fmkmfV2twi0Vjy26plSG3ZGiUzEeqDM=.de9b4569-76b8-49a9-b08a-6be78e9fbab2@github.com>
 <DSSZ4jToAfdqwpTyA88vIxZMgNZmWuJfwKs8-a7eHLs=.cab8d2c4-4862-42d9-b483-3fab3d4494ad@github.com>
Message-ID: <9DbPoL3Cr7ni4CVbaCilmC7YhqGydoHCZsVuGZZneGk=.03f265a5-9208-43d4-bfc7-fdda40b1143f@github.com>

On Thu, 27 Nov 2025 14:00:12 GMT, David Briemann <dbriemann at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> This pull request contains a backport of commit [c9cbd31f](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/c9cbd31f8575a25c4decd68dc645378c5ba2bad0) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
>> 
>> The commit being backported was authored by David Briemann on 15 Oct 2025 and was reviewed by Martin Doerr and Richard Reingruber.
>> 
>> A merge conflict was resolved, that was created by renaming files: [JDK-8367486](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8367486)
>> 
>> Second commit resolves another renaming issue caused by [JDK-8367014](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8367014).
>> 
>> Otherwise the backport is clean.
>
> David Briemann has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   revert class name because of 8367014

Thank you for reviewing and starting the approval process!

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/24#issuecomment-3606070637

From duke at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 10:16:52 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (duke)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 10:16:52 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8307495: Specialize atomic bitset functions for
 aix-ppc [v2]
In-Reply-To: <DSSZ4jToAfdqwpTyA88vIxZMgNZmWuJfwKs8-a7eHLs=.cab8d2c4-4862-42d9-b483-3fab3d4494ad@github.com>
References: <JqH4nK1RMFY2fmkmfV2twi0Vjy26plSG3ZGiUzEeqDM=.de9b4569-76b8-49a9-b08a-6be78e9fbab2@github.com>
 <DSSZ4jToAfdqwpTyA88vIxZMgNZmWuJfwKs8-a7eHLs=.cab8d2c4-4862-42d9-b483-3fab3d4494ad@github.com>
Message-ID: <SaZcw9vggN6lQnjGYcp87TzbqDYPIuxZdZjB07pCTi8=.ddd6234c-ee71-45af-af8f-193920d44f03@github.com>

On Thu, 27 Nov 2025 14:00:12 GMT, David Briemann <dbriemann at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> This pull request contains a backport of commit [c9cbd31f](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/c9cbd31f8575a25c4decd68dc645378c5ba2bad0) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
>> 
>> The commit being backported was authored by David Briemann on 15 Oct 2025 and was reviewed by Martin Doerr and Richard Reingruber.
>> 
>> A merge conflict was resolved, that was created by renaming files: [JDK-8367486](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8367486)
>> 
>> Second commit resolves another renaming issue caused by [JDK-8367014](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8367014).
>> 
>> Otherwise the backport is clean.
>
> David Briemann has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   revert class name because of 8367014

@dbriemann 
Your change (at version 78d202ebb0520ffbacfd16d7355dba716ee43274) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/24#issuecomment-3606078270

From dbriemann at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 10:21:56 2025
From: dbriemann at openjdk.org (David Briemann)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 10:21:56 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] Integrated: 8307495: Specialize atomic bitset functions
 for aix-ppc
In-Reply-To: <JqH4nK1RMFY2fmkmfV2twi0Vjy26plSG3ZGiUzEeqDM=.de9b4569-76b8-49a9-b08a-6be78e9fbab2@github.com>
References: <JqH4nK1RMFY2fmkmfV2twi0Vjy26plSG3ZGiUzEeqDM=.de9b4569-76b8-49a9-b08a-6be78e9fbab2@github.com>
Message-ID: <cHjNKDjoeCVGp0CoI5bvKVGCNCdnk9Xicjl9qvYh9Eg=.f1d0563d-c4bc-42ed-adc0-db8aba431e88@github.com>

On Thu, 27 Nov 2025 13:07:19 GMT, David Briemann <dbriemann at openjdk.org> wrote:

> This pull request contains a backport of commit [c9cbd31f](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/c9cbd31f8575a25c4decd68dc645378c5ba2bad0) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by David Briemann on 15 Oct 2025 and was reviewed by Martin Doerr and Richard Reingruber.
> 
> A merge conflict was resolved, that was created by renaming files: [JDK-8367486](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8367486)
> 
> Second commit resolves another renaming issue caused by [JDK-8367014](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8367014).
> 
> Otherwise the backport is clean.

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: bf618f7c
Author:    David Briemann <dbriemann at openjdk.org>
Committer: Martin Doerr <mdoerr at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/commit/bf618f7c9ebf8d74ec7841d0062392f6f594d22f
Stats:     1548 lines in 6 files changed: 649 ins; 878 del; 21 mod

8307495: Specialize atomic bitset functions for aix-ppc

Reviewed-by: mdoerr
Backport-of: c9cbd31f8575a25c4decd68dc645378c5ba2bad0

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/24

From goetz at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 10:29:19 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 10:29:19 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] Integrated: 8359182: Use @requires instead of
 SkippedException for MaxPath.java
In-Reply-To: <UgM5KFfma1fIUa69kpJL4tyzeDAc4VJ0rz1e4eEOfLY=.44acd2cc-dc56-4b67-9f23-838e0ce274d3@github.com>
References: <UgM5KFfma1fIUa69kpJL4tyzeDAc4VJ0rz1e4eEOfLY=.44acd2cc-dc56-4b67-9f23-838e0ce274d3@github.com>
Message-ID: <otVM9llFpgN-vOMleF6ulItd7a91ScXovdB2AX8LWKc=.5c51d51e-9266-4aae-b2d9-17755e83731f@github.com>

On Fri, 28 Nov 2025 15:37:06 GMT, Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org> wrote:

> I backport this for parity with 25.0.3-oracle.

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: d93d93ab
Author:    Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/commit/d93d93ab84002f6c169e59856e6d855bb35dcfca
Stats:     8 lines in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 7 del; 1 mod

8359182: Use @requires instead of SkippedException for MaxPath.java

Backport-of: 5886ef728fc1efe43e90e056c03725c3ee982ad6

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/33

From goetz at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 10:30:42 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 10:30:42 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] Integrated: 8333857: Test
 sun/security/ssl/SSLSessionImpl/ResumeChecksServer.java failed: Existing
 session was used
In-Reply-To: <8hcf534BJkVPkiVaLjSAgF7cA8vYpFY5vTNFs6BCsNs=.cd5b5a86-bf04-4b7a-9349-0f5487e86cb0@github.com>
References: <8hcf534BJkVPkiVaLjSAgF7cA8vYpFY5vTNFs6BCsNs=.cd5b5a86-bf04-4b7a-9349-0f5487e86cb0@github.com>
Message-ID: <0bRjj3oSD0vw2nsYP239PSEWrfX32gL-KO2ytNJc0ec=.937449e4-e9dc-4570-9500-160ce6931ddf@github.com>

On Fri, 28 Nov 2025 15:47:06 GMT, Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org> wrote:

> I backport this for parity with 25.0.3-oracle.

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 410cf861
Author:    Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/commit/410cf861f2726bc03d530eb466a3b430f25c783d
Stats:     415 lines in 2 files changed: 118 ins; 154 del; 143 mod

8333857: Test sun/security/ssl/SSLSessionImpl/ResumeChecksServer.java failed: Existing session was used

Backport-of: e6ebefaa404daa4160bdc1c5d9c954c040e2c0c2

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/34

From goetz at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 10:34:11 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 10:34:11 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u] RFR: Merge jdk21u-dev:master [v2]
In-Reply-To: <gmg6bmMc-Pv_Ek8yf1fqzoVAE9u74O-dSEOFrcObfUQ=.1eafccd7-b40c-4993-ba7a-a3e5da8c822c@github.com>
References: <gmg6bmMc-Pv_Ek8yf1fqzoVAE9u74O-dSEOFrcObfUQ=.1eafccd7-b40c-4993-ba7a-a3e5da8c822c@github.com>
Message-ID: <XMAExZrTf5Ig-3DGhfZ5DBjE4Z-Gb8BIkZA5z_rBNyM=.58663a70-0e94-45e4-bd68-849914f5749f@github.com>

> Merge changes from jdk21u-dev to jdk21u for the next build tag

Goetz Lindenmaier has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase.

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u/pull/476/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u/pull/476/files/39fbe38e..39fbe38e

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk21u&pr=476&range=01
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk21u&pr=476&range=00-01

  Stats: 0 lines in 0 files changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 0 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u/pull/476.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u.git pull/476/head:pull/476

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u/pull/476

From goetz at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 10:34:14 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 10:34:14 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u] Integrated: Merge jdk21u-dev:master
In-Reply-To: <gmg6bmMc-Pv_Ek8yf1fqzoVAE9u74O-dSEOFrcObfUQ=.1eafccd7-b40c-4993-ba7a-a3e5da8c822c@github.com>
References: <gmg6bmMc-Pv_Ek8yf1fqzoVAE9u74O-dSEOFrcObfUQ=.1eafccd7-b40c-4993-ba7a-a3e5da8c822c@github.com>
Message-ID: <rvAbOa19sAHScUL-AoPo0vQV3qKjZc5MKySOWS_cX1E=.512d9613-653f-48df-a1ac-2484328a8af4@github.com>

On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 07:39:15 GMT, Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Merge changes from jdk21u-dev to jdk21u for the next build tag

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 3c0530fd
Author:    Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u/commit/3c0530fd5f9615941144d8ac89786ce699027b51
Stats:     1413 lines in 32 files changed: 678 ins; 680 del; 55 mod

Merge

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u/pull/476

From duke at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 10:36:05 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (David =?UTF-8?B?U2xhZGvDvQ==?=)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 10:36:05 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8245545: Disable TLS_RSA cipher suites [v5]
In-Reply-To: <z5ADYL8HSsOozFj53j05GzW9s9bM0tqqZo5yCWQmw_8=.f90c6a49-0c50-4d80-9fe6-8777b3d71db3@github.com>
References: <z5ADYL8HSsOozFj53j05GzW9s9bM0tqqZo5yCWQmw_8=.f90c6a49-0c50-4d80-9fe6-8777b3d71db3@github.com>
Message-ID: <N3ZGvk9YAd5bMCosfaxEwkLolOXebNCNS48yr-nKAq4=.6f70be94-d8b1-4ecf-af5e-939dd5ea32ce@github.com>

> Backport of [JDK-8245545](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8245545) - Disable TLS_RSA cipher suites
> 
> Some TLS suites do not preserve forward-secrecy and are not commonly used - and should not be used.
> 
> Not clean back port. This includes:
> - Selection of disabled tests and some include that is in jdk11 but not in jdk17.
> - Changed indentation of edited block of string defining disabled cipher suites.
> - Bunch of copyright notices.
> 
> Tested on Fedora 43:
> - gtests passed
> - T1 have same fails before and after the back port -> not related to this.
> - jtreg:test/jdk/sun/security passed.
> - jtreg:test/jdk/javax/net/ssl passed.
> - Github Actions passed.

David Sladk? has updated the pull request incrementally with three additional commits since the last revision:

 - Revert undesired copyright change
 - Remove undesired indentation
 - Remove undesired refactor

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3124/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3124/files/95da7d4c..f43f57ec

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk11u-dev&pr=3124&range=04
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk11u-dev&pr=3124&range=03-04

  Stats: 61 lines in 3 files changed: 0 ins; 8 del; 53 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3124.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev.git pull/3124/head:pull/3124

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3124

From duke at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 10:43:41 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (David =?UTF-8?B?U2xhZGvDvQ==?=)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 10:43:41 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8245545: Disable TLS_RSA cipher suites [v5]
In-Reply-To: <N3ZGvk9YAd5bMCosfaxEwkLolOXebNCNS48yr-nKAq4=.6f70be94-d8b1-4ecf-af5e-939dd5ea32ce@github.com>
References: <z5ADYL8HSsOozFj53j05GzW9s9bM0tqqZo5yCWQmw_8=.f90c6a49-0c50-4d80-9fe6-8777b3d71db3@github.com>
 <N3ZGvk9YAd5bMCosfaxEwkLolOXebNCNS48yr-nKAq4=.6f70be94-d8b1-4ecf-af5e-939dd5ea32ce@github.com>
Message-ID: <CrCo4AvdVHBDcH-GznyaBwMmt0pFmOQpLiWkMcb8Z3o=.dedc177b-19ae-4dd6-9ee5-3135742e593c@github.com>

On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 10:36:05 GMT, David Sladk? <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Backport of [JDK-8245545](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8245545) - Disable TLS_RSA cipher suites
>> 
>> Some TLS suites do not preserve forward-secrecy and are not commonly used - and should not be used.
>> 
>> Not clean back port. This includes:
>> - Selection of disabled tests and some include that is in jdk11 but not in jdk17.
>> - Changed indentation of edited block of string defining disabled cipher suites.
>> - Bunch of copyright notices.
>> 
>> Tested on Fedora 43:
>> - gtests passed
>> - T1 have same fails before and after the back port -> not related to this.
>> - jtreg:test/jdk/sun/security passed.
>> - jtreg:test/jdk/javax/net/ssl passed.
>> - Github Actions passed.
>
> David Sladk? has updated the pull request incrementally with three additional commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - Revert undesired copyright change
>  - Remove undesired indentation
>  - Remove undesired refactor

1. Refactor from different issue was removed.
2. Indentation from different issue was removed.
3. Change in copyright was reverted.

This should address all the points you raised. Please let me know if I missed something.

JDK-8298867 & JDK-830137 -> I will look into them later.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3124#issuecomment-3606199842

From shade at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 10:45:00 2025
From: shade at openjdk.org (Aleksey Shipilev)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 10:45:00 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8371864: GaloisCounterMode.implGCMCrypt0 AVX512/AVX2
 intrinsics stubs cause AES-GCM encryption failure for certain payload sizes
Message-ID: <D3DhZVQUonj4VFjPUmETa4ITITl7gLrdtYvwO5k-Tr4=.c874c544-f571-4785-b1cf-338af79a659c@github.com>

Fixes another JDK 25 regression in AES/GCM on x86_64.

Additional testing:
 - [x] Linux x86_64 server fastdebug, AVX2 machine, new regression test fails without the patch, passes with it
 - [x] Linux x86_64 server fastdebug, AVX2 machine, `jdk_security`
 - [x] Linux x86_64 server fastdebug, AVX-512 machine, new regression test fails without the patch, passes with it
 - [x] Linux x86_64 server fastdebug, AVX-512 machine, `jdk_security`
 - [ ] Linux x86_64 server fastdebug, AVX-512 machine, `all`

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport 6cb1c8f9cfcb797af788ca8fb490f388cc68f525

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/54/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk25u-dev&pr=54&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8371864
  Stats: 151 lines in 2 files changed: 149 ins; 1 del; 1 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/54.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev.git pull/54/head:pull/54

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/54

From shade at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 11:08:55 2025
From: shade at openjdk.org (Aleksey Shipilev)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 11:08:55 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8358686: CDS and AOT can cause buffer truncation
 warning even when logging is disabled
Message-ID: <2beDe_xncERyA7wx4HHk1dDds2e_Q1M6egz4HAuRMDQ=.cb045f82-c0ca-4c79-8dc7-db49b2f61252@github.com>

Fairly trivial omission in logging. I have seen -- briefly -- a message like this in local testing. So I would like to pick the fix to 25u.

Additional testing:
 - [ ] GHA

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport 2e3bdec9857c64b307737ac7afed58170125cca9

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/55/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk25u-dev&pr=55&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8358686
  Stats: 4 lines in 1 file changed: 4 ins; 0 del; 0 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/55.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev.git pull/55/head:pull/55

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/55

From goetz at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 11:13:54 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 11:13:54 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: Merge jdk21u:master
Message-ID: <c0W6SI2OYeaFR5t3gLdpN1aqQ1lOOtlZ2GQa2sbVED4=.b9667678-b72f-4377-b240-52f57cc3c265@github.com>

Merge build tag 21.0.10+5 from jdk21u to jdk21u-dev

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Merge
 - Merge

The merge commit only contains trivial merges, so no merge-specific webrevs have been generated.

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2501/files
  Stats: 0 lines in 0 files changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 0 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2501.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/2501/head:pull/2501

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2501

From andrew at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 11:17:53 2025
From: andrew at openjdk.org (Andrew John Hughes)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 11:17:53 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8245545: Disable TLS_RSA cipher suites [v5]
In-Reply-To: <CrCo4AvdVHBDcH-GznyaBwMmt0pFmOQpLiWkMcb8Z3o=.dedc177b-19ae-4dd6-9ee5-3135742e593c@github.com>
References: <z5ADYL8HSsOozFj53j05GzW9s9bM0tqqZo5yCWQmw_8=.f90c6a49-0c50-4d80-9fe6-8777b3d71db3@github.com>
 <N3ZGvk9YAd5bMCosfaxEwkLolOXebNCNS48yr-nKAq4=.6f70be94-d8b1-4ecf-af5e-939dd5ea32ce@github.com>
 <CrCo4AvdVHBDcH-GznyaBwMmt0pFmOQpLiWkMcb8Z3o=.dedc177b-19ae-4dd6-9ee5-3135742e593c@github.com>
Message-ID: <P3GKJ23FPwmEWx5cxnr_Lny4SkdEt8aSSAlPNSm35oQ=.cabb85ab-5e35-46d4-96d4-464d3aa5ce16@github.com>

On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 10:41:17 GMT, David Sladk? <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> 1. Refactor from different issue was removed.
> 
>     2. Indentation from different issue was removed.
> 
>     3. Change in copyright was reverted.
> 
> 
> This should address all the points you raised. Please let me know if I missed something.

Thanks for the changes. This version looks a lot better. The only thing I spotted was that `disabled_ciphersuites` is still being changed from `private` to `public` in `DisabledAlgorithms.java`. Other than that, this is good to go.

> JDK-8298867 & JDK-830137 -> I will look into them later.

No rush on these. I just thought that, if you wanted to bring over these changes, this is the way to do it.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3124#issuecomment-3606360309

From duke at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 11:27:06 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (duke)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 11:27:06 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8213781: web page background renders blue in
 JEditorPane
In-Reply-To: <dZNVz4L2NoZFgEvhAgq24yIwFSVrZXABY-7NK8--aNw=.92aa7066-fd33-4010-83a4-ec4e79207ce9@github.com>
References: <dZNVz4L2NoZFgEvhAgq24yIwFSVrZXABY-7NK8--aNw=.92aa7066-fd33-4010-83a4-ec4e79207ce9@github.com>
Message-ID: <fjBv0BHF0QpHod8z1hJvdgAhknUjIaWzUUBzeeyo2XY=.36c3f69b-31af-4072-8d0b-c08013716bb6@github.com>

On Wed, 12 Nov 2025 16:34:52 GMT, David Sladk? <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backport of [JDK-8213781](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8213781) - web page background renders blue in JEditorPane
>   
> Fixing JEditorPane that for some webpages renders the background blue instead white. E.g. http://www.google.com/
>   
> Clean backport.  
> Passed tier1 tests.  Existing failures are the same as on the unpatched code, they are unrelated.
> Passed gtests.  
>   
> GH Actions are passing.

@TheMangovnik 
Your change (at version 80da99739f17808a8bfc0561f551c32d44142da2) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3118#issuecomment-3606395826

From duke at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 11:42:23 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (David =?UTF-8?B?U2xhZGvDvQ==?=)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 11:42:23 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8245545: Disable TLS_RSA cipher suites [v6]
In-Reply-To: <z5ADYL8HSsOozFj53j05GzW9s9bM0tqqZo5yCWQmw_8=.f90c6a49-0c50-4d80-9fe6-8777b3d71db3@github.com>
References: <z5ADYL8HSsOozFj53j05GzW9s9bM0tqqZo5yCWQmw_8=.f90c6a49-0c50-4d80-9fe6-8777b3d71db3@github.com>
Message-ID: <uPaP0qiTKw5QkjC0bfBu_UXKUN6Q4P5WMUHBf0B2FFk=.66809767-0c13-48df-9af9-6557b55e1daa@github.com>

> Backport of [JDK-8245545](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8245545) - Disable TLS_RSA cipher suites
> 
> Some TLS suites do not preserve forward-secrecy and are not commonly used - and should not be used.
> 
> Not clean back port. This includes:
> - Selection of disabled tests and some include that is in jdk11 but not in jdk17.
> - Changed indentation of edited block of string defining disabled cipher suites.
> - Bunch of copyright notices.
> 
> Tested on Fedora 43:
> - gtests passed
> - T1 have same fails before and after the back port -> not related to this.
> - jtreg:test/jdk/sun/security passed.
> - jtreg:test/jdk/javax/net/ssl passed.
> - Github Actions passed.

David Sladk? has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:

  Revert undesired change in access modifier of disabled_ciphersuites

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3124/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3124/files/f43f57ec..a8c23aea

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk11u-dev&pr=3124&range=05
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk11u-dev&pr=3124&range=04-05

  Stats: 1 line in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 1 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3124.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev.git pull/3124/head:pull/3124

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3124

From duke at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 11:42:28 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (David =?UTF-8?B?U2xhZGvDvQ==?=)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 11:42:28 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8245545: Disable TLS_RSA cipher suites [v5]
In-Reply-To: <N3ZGvk9YAd5bMCosfaxEwkLolOXebNCNS48yr-nKAq4=.6f70be94-d8b1-4ecf-af5e-939dd5ea32ce@github.com>
References: <z5ADYL8HSsOozFj53j05GzW9s9bM0tqqZo5yCWQmw_8=.f90c6a49-0c50-4d80-9fe6-8777b3d71db3@github.com>
 <N3ZGvk9YAd5bMCosfaxEwkLolOXebNCNS48yr-nKAq4=.6f70be94-d8b1-4ecf-af5e-939dd5ea32ce@github.com>
Message-ID: <tI8dV9cYM7PwvCne_hX8RQRhHvS9z9a2MNIDegLaQi0=.dfeee5e0-64be-4319-9a5f-5f80b715a663@github.com>

On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 10:36:05 GMT, David Sladk? <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Backport of [JDK-8245545](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8245545) - Disable TLS_RSA cipher suites
>> 
>> Some TLS suites do not preserve forward-secrecy and are not commonly used - and should not be used.
>> 
>> Not clean back port. This includes:
>> - Selection of disabled tests and some include that is in jdk11 but not in jdk17.
>> - Changed indentation of edited block of string defining disabled cipher suites.
>> - Bunch of copyright notices.
>> 
>> Tested on Fedora 43:
>> - gtests passed
>> - T1 have same fails before and after the back port -> not related to this.
>> - jtreg:test/jdk/sun/security passed.
>> - jtreg:test/jdk/javax/net/ssl passed.
>> - Github Actions passed.
>
> David Sladk? has updated the pull request incrementally with three additional commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - Revert undesired copyright change
>  - Remove undesired indentation
>  - Remove undesired refactor

The undesired access modifier change was reverted.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3124#issuecomment-3606443385

From andrew at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 11:49:22 2025
From: andrew at openjdk.org (Andrew John Hughes)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 11:49:22 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8245545: Disable TLS_RSA cipher suites [v6]
In-Reply-To: <uPaP0qiTKw5QkjC0bfBu_UXKUN6Q4P5WMUHBf0B2FFk=.66809767-0c13-48df-9af9-6557b55e1daa@github.com>
References: <z5ADYL8HSsOozFj53j05GzW9s9bM0tqqZo5yCWQmw_8=.f90c6a49-0c50-4d80-9fe6-8777b3d71db3@github.com>
 <uPaP0qiTKw5QkjC0bfBu_UXKUN6Q4P5WMUHBf0B2FFk=.66809767-0c13-48df-9af9-6557b55e1daa@github.com>
Message-ID: <9_XpKsQzaiDeXjW4_vBjbWfxhmjLunhaQ98ugaRFbKE=.06265ffc-f1ac-44f5-acbd-8c76c572c9be@github.com>

On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 11:42:23 GMT, David Sladk? <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Backport of [JDK-8245545](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8245545) - Disable TLS_RSA cipher suites
>> 
>> Some TLS suites do not preserve forward-secrecy and are not commonly used - and should not be used.
>> 
>> Not clean back port. This includes:
>> - Selection of disabled tests and some include that is in jdk11 but not in jdk17.
>> - Changed indentation of edited block of string defining disabled cipher suites.
>> - Bunch of copyright notices.
>> 
>> Tested on Fedora 43:
>> - gtests passed
>> - T1 have same fails before and after the back port -> not related to this.
>> - jtreg:test/jdk/sun/security passed.
>> - jtreg:test/jdk/javax/net/ssl passed.
>> - Github Actions passed.
>
> David Sladk? has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Revert undesired change in access modifier of disabled_ciphersuites

Great, thanks.

-------------

Marked as reviewed by andrew (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3124#pullrequestreview-3534673822

From duke at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 11:49:24 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (David =?UTF-8?B?U2xhZGvDvQ==?=)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 11:49:24 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] Integrated: 8213781: web page background renders blue in
 JEditorPane
In-Reply-To: <dZNVz4L2NoZFgEvhAgq24yIwFSVrZXABY-7NK8--aNw=.92aa7066-fd33-4010-83a4-ec4e79207ce9@github.com>
References: <dZNVz4L2NoZFgEvhAgq24yIwFSVrZXABY-7NK8--aNw=.92aa7066-fd33-4010-83a4-ec4e79207ce9@github.com>
Message-ID: <yM-t2G04fjvuHlWvn8a3FlFSktfEId40PvacHjJUFJ4=.81411230-8208-4890-9f4c-7e8909de4325@github.com>

On Wed, 12 Nov 2025 16:34:52 GMT, David Sladk? <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backport of [JDK-8213781](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8213781) - web page background renders blue in JEditorPane
>   
> Fixing JEditorPane that for some webpages renders the background blue instead white. E.g. http://www.google.com/
>   
> Clean backport.  
> Passed tier1 tests.  Existing failures are the same as on the unpatched code, they are unrelated.
> Passed gtests.  
>   
> GH Actions are passing.

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 1939efcd
Author:    David Sladk? <sladky.david at proton.me>
Committer: Andrew John Hughes <andrew at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/commit/1939efcdbc2f646e3dd0549a9d43f8bea40258cc
Stats:     129 lines in 2 files changed: 129 ins; 0 del; 0 mod

8213781: web page background renders blue in JEditorPane
4895924: Strings in format #rgb not handled by Color.decode() (affects CSS / Swing)

Reviewed-by: andrew
Backport-of: f3c10c8049008a170af997d9f5bd70ab6805b243

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3118

From goetz at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 12:01:01 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 12:01:01 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8365065: cancelled ForkJoinPool tasks no longer
 throw CancellationException
In-Reply-To: <jr68T0yaqN7F1tCKIcIjFF_maC9HIuGP_4seak_XY4s=.15c4475c-3ad6-4604-aad6-0c8c4935bae7@github.com>
References: <jr68T0yaqN7F1tCKIcIjFF_maC9HIuGP_4seak_XY4s=.15c4475c-3ad6-4604-aad6-0c8c4935bae7@github.com>
Message-ID: <wQxZ0kQJLkSGKrwDEzTbN1OoJe1pPFKwayDXRsdbrDk=.d24efbb7-3820-45ad-b49c-4dc72af289b6@github.com>

On Tue, 25 Nov 2025 21:00:46 GMT, Roland Mesde <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backporting JDK-8365065: Cancelled ForkJoinPool tasks no longer throw CancellationException. Fixes the exception propagation and tests. Based on the original bug it is a regression and it last worked in version 17.0.16. Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed), jtreg tier1 tests (passed) and related tests (passed) on linux-x64, linux-aarch64, macos-aarch64 and windows-x64:
> 
> (Passed) - make test-tier1
> (Passed) - make test TEST=test/jdk/java/util/concurrent
> 
> Results are attached.
> 
> [linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23776572/linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [linux-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23776573/linux-aarch64-specific-test.log)
> [linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23776574/linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [linux-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23776575/linux-x64-specific-test.log)
> [macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23776576/macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [macos-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23776577/macos-aarch64-specific-test.log)
> [windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23776578/windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [windows-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23776579/windows-x64-specific-test.log)

Hi @rm-gh-8 
Please supply sufficient approval request comments.
Read https://wiki.openjdk.org/display/JDKUpdates/How+to+contribute+or+backport+a+fix thoroughly please! Expecially 6 ii)
You need to talk about:
*Why you backport.  Why should the change go to the update release (No, not because it fixes the bug!)
*The risk of breaking anything, especially running applications that obtain an update.
*Short description of how you backported (clean? trivial edit? other changes included?)
*Clean is only clean if Skara says so!
*Short test overview.
This goes to the JBS issue, it needs to make sense there.  If you repeat the title of the bug that's quite pointless.

I will silently remove the fix request labels if the approval comment does not help me to assess the backport. Later, I might just reject them.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/3#issuecomment-3606514225

From goetz at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 12:16:32 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 12:16:32 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8367901: Calendar.roll(hour,
 24) returns wrong result
In-Reply-To: <gG8xboQayoNx0l2XUpVB3uoVqEIsGrTQO6W6nmkFir0=.267aa58b-38d6-4049-abc6-b1b49234806a@github.com>
References: <gG8xboQayoNx0l2XUpVB3uoVqEIsGrTQO6W6nmkFir0=.267aa58b-38d6-4049-abc6-b1b49234806a@github.com>
Message-ID: <61oH8ZXA78_Q4weujNmd5GC5VZhXOImrRVN-KkvZyF4=.bcb962e1-7102-4f92-adeb-947807d4451f@github.com>

On Tue, 11 Nov 2025 17:46:49 GMT, Roland Mesde <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backporting JDK-8367901: Calendar.roll(hour, 24) returns wrong result. Fixes the roll implementation and adds a new test. Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed) and new test (passed). The merge conflict was just the copyright header which was updated to the newer one. The new test needed to be updated for compatibility with the older JDK.
> 
> Key changes for the new test:
> 
> 1.  @FieldSource ? @MethodSource: Changed to method source and created hours() method
> 2. List.of() ? Arrays.asList(): Used Arrays.asList for better compatibility
> 3. .toList() ? .collect(Collectors.toList()): Explicit collection instead of toList()
> 4. var ? explicit types: Replaced var declarations with explicit types
> 5. Enhanced for loops: Used traditional for-each syntax instead of var

@rm-gh-8 
Please request approval again after 21 has been approved.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4167#issuecomment-3606574769

From goetz at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 12:17:33 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 12:17:33 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8368328: CompactNumberFormat.clone does not
 produce independent instances
In-Reply-To: <14M0E96KFXT7PJRmQ_sWK8rjRbImGeHA9NRdWAsQWO8=.f724340a-8bc5-4c50-a0d4-395f484c8074@github.com>
References: <aC-qJRz0lpUYOOydpxTSXl-lbWAINj0OmGbtENUV1Xs=.11d12601-002b-4c2a-86bd-4b43396820ad@github.com>
 <14M0E96KFXT7PJRmQ_sWK8rjRbImGeHA9NRdWAsQWO8=.f724340a-8bc5-4c50-a0d4-395f484c8074@github.com>
Message-ID: <bAYydOYWheHAEovcFkC8Zy0YylNpWElb4NVbTjay6To=.0a9cc726-bb1f-41ff-a953-3511ce9d7790@github.com>

On Wed, 26 Nov 2025 18:07:26 GMT, Roland Mesde <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Backporting JDK-8368328: CompactNumberFormat.clone does not produce independent instances. Fixes clone method logic and adds a new test. Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed) and new test (passed). Patch is clean.
>
> Risk Level: LOW-MEDIUM
> 
> Mitigation Factors: 
> - Targeted fix - Only affects clone() method behavior
> - Defensive change - Improves thread safety without breaking existing functionality
> - Well-defined scope - Clear distinction between mutable/immutable objects
> - Backward compatible - No API signature changes
> - Addresses real bug - Fixes documented concurrency issues
> 
> Risk Factors:
> - Memory impact - Additional object allocation during cloning
> - Performance overhead - Cloning operations now more expensive
> - Behavioral change - Applications relying on previous behavior may break
> - Testing coverage - Older Java applications may have test scenarios dependent on behavior

Hi @rm-gh-8 
please requuest approval again after (and if) 21u has been approved.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4168#issuecomment-3606578759

From goetz at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 12:21:29 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 12:21:29 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8341779: [REDO BACKPORT] type annotations are
 not visible to javac plugins across compilation boundaries (JDK-8225377) [v2]
In-Reply-To: <Pi940KYdv1dAkMYSHR2n55FlZd1iN589zywLX3QDuN4=.8a81a9b9-fd32-4fab-8177-eccb497fca10@github.com>
References: <ZVdm0UETXeBGrogX9Ply_vTdr2k5kdOxX-02Kv6_oZ4=.f35501f5-7191-48be-87e8-cfb448b15525@github.com>
 <_HsaA6b19wzORy-vZqsAfyAd8gzjNJlHQOra_8mloq8=.6056a784-149a-41e8-be0c-bebf3e145b98@github.com>
 <JMNS1DKBgjklTI9o-wRTVE88ugFyGLeV5VQc5yiAbX4=.ed1744df-95ff-48b6-91e2-1d9b36b44835@github.com>
 <Pi940KYdv1dAkMYSHR2n55FlZd1iN589zywLX3QDuN4=.8a81a9b9-fd32-4fab-8177-eccb497fca10@github.com>
Message-ID: <YKMyx0VSckMv0Ji2yAWDFhqK98actXAI_a7M9n2fIlk=.9c94a966-83b1-4fa8-9daa-a93ef1f7df54@github.com>

On Mon, 24 Nov 2025 09:58:11 GMT, Liam Miller-Cushon <cushon at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Hi @cushon,
>> do we really need this in 17?
>> How far is the feature used in 21 by the community given the flag is needed?  Is there any adoption?
>> Why can't users just go to 25 or 21?
>> It is not very desireable to have kind of hidden features in an update release.
>
>> Hi @cushon, do we really need this in 17? How far is the feature used in 21 by the community given the flag is needed? Is there any adoption? Why can't users just go to 25 or 21? It is not very desireable to have kind of hidden features in an update release.
> 
> Hi @GoeLin, here's the background I have:
> 
> Spring Boot 4 has adopted type use annotations for nullness (see [this blog post](https://spring.io/blog/2025/11/12/null-safe-applications-with-spring-boot-4#null-safe-applications)). The post mentions using `-XDaddTypeAnnotationsToSymbol` with JDK 21. They also support JDK 17 as a baseline. So there are going to be some users of Spring Boot 4 who upgrade, but stay on JDK 17, and would benefit from the fix.
> 
> Another use-case is NullAway, which [recommends the `-XD` flag if it is available](https://github.com/uber/NullAway/pull/1317), and [supports JDK 17](https://github.com/uber/NullAway/issues/1170).
> 
> I appreciate the desire to not have hidden features. At the same time I think having this fix available even behind an `-XD` flag has some value to the ecosystem. There has been some additional recent usage of type annotations due to the [JSpecify annotations](https://jspecify.dev/), and if [Null-Restricted and Nullable Types](https://openjdk.org/jeps/8303099) happens in a future release then we may be in a window where type annotations are most useful. I would like to try to make this fix available to parts of the ecosystem that aren't able to upgrade from 17 to 21 yet.
> 
> What do you think?

Hi @cushon 
Thanks for the detailed explanation. I will approve it.
Please backport the follow-ups asap, especially the flag switching it off.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4124#issuecomment-3606589348

From snazarki at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 12:28:20 2025
From: snazarki at openjdk.org (Sergey Nazarkin)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 12:28:20 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] Integrated: 8368882: NPE during text drawing on machine
 with JP locale
In-Reply-To: <tbhxz1NB9zmZsBiKPcf7cB-kv9eGRfGE-dP7OGlfZKI=.d7646c7d-9ade-467d-86e0-94b5bf586cb1@github.com>
References: <tbhxz1NB9zmZsBiKPcf7cB-kv9eGRfGE-dP7OGlfZKI=.d7646c7d-9ade-467d-86e0-94b5bf586cb1@github.com>
Message-ID: <y27T91UACvO_UOxBdA1caCGfuFKBm4qM8a6OHyQvyhA=.0fb2d6fc-f32b-42b7-a29c-d67e29e0b0c4@github.com>

On Wed, 5 Nov 2025 11:12:29 GMT, Sergey Nazarkin <snazarki at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [4520983e](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/4520983e8e5fcfb22e04508d50676df6831fa636) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Sergey Nazarkin on 3 Nov 2025 and was reviewed by Sergey Bylokhov, Phil Race and Prasanta Sadhukhan.
> 
> Thanks!

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: e853a440
Author:    Sergey Nazarkin <snazarki at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/commit/e853a440562f067b851a449242d808e271817001
Stats:     4 lines in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 4 mod

8368882: NPE during text drawing on machine with JP locale

Backport-of: 4520983e8e5fcfb22e04508d50676df6831fa636

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4159

From snazarki at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 12:29:17 2025
From: snazarki at openjdk.org (Sergey Nazarkin)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 12:29:17 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] Integrated: 8368882: NPE during text drawing on machine
 with JP locale
In-Reply-To: <cUSdJ0QpiyLBYSxWqYlBRplQGmaPeKcmZmfEXOh8a1Q=.f8117179-894f-4a0a-813c-53736b3922f7@github.com>
References: <cUSdJ0QpiyLBYSxWqYlBRplQGmaPeKcmZmfEXOh8a1Q=.f8117179-894f-4a0a-813c-53736b3922f7@github.com>
Message-ID: <8v3RHlSx5DBLR5P0iH2HCaxsCDM1aHRE_tTsbQpj8qI=.2afaa07a-bfb7-4b76-be03-28378d44cd3b@github.com>

On Wed, 5 Nov 2025 10:43:11 GMT, Sergey Nazarkin <snazarki at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [4520983e](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/4520983e8e5fcfb22e04508d50676df6831fa636) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Sergey Nazarkin on 3 Nov 2025 and was reviewed by Sergey Bylokhov, Phil Race and Prasanta Sadhukhan.
> 
> Thanks!

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 70ba5d4b
Author:    Sergey Nazarkin <snazarki at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/commit/70ba5d4b2bd9cc8093a4a7d875948a311d3164a5
Stats:     4 lines in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 4 mod

8368882: NPE during text drawing on machine with JP locale

Backport-of: 4520983e8e5fcfb22e04508d50676df6831fa636

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2448

From cushon at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 12:38:08 2025
From: cushon at openjdk.org (Liam Miller-Cushon)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 12:38:08 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8341779: [REDO BACKPORT] type annotations are
 not visible to javac plugins across compilation boundaries (JDK-8225377) [v2]
In-Reply-To: <_HsaA6b19wzORy-vZqsAfyAd8gzjNJlHQOra_8mloq8=.6056a784-149a-41e8-be0c-bebf3e145b98@github.com>
References: <ZVdm0UETXeBGrogX9Ply_vTdr2k5kdOxX-02Kv6_oZ4=.f35501f5-7191-48be-87e8-cfb448b15525@github.com>
 <_HsaA6b19wzORy-vZqsAfyAd8gzjNJlHQOra_8mloq8=.6056a784-149a-41e8-be0c-bebf3e145b98@github.com>
Message-ID: <7cdXPmTNuL40pN-Tiy-jPgYKRA-YqKE7IWR30BO7uYY=.967a8a42-a222-4961-aacf-dfe3c8e674f0@github.com>

On Sat, 1 Nov 2025 21:30:52 GMT, Liam Miller-Cushon <cushon at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> [JDK-8341779](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8341779) is a redo of the backport of [JDK-8323093](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8323093), see also discussion in CSR [JDK-8346471](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8346471).
>> 
>> JDK-8341779 was backported to JDK 21u and released in 21.0.8, as discussed in the CSR this PR proposes integrating it into a future 17u release now that 21.0.8 has been released.
>> 
>> Similar to [JDK-8360406](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8360406) for 21u, a future backport will disable this logic for 17u by default, and optionally allow the fix to be enabled with `-XDaddTypeAnnotationsToSymbol`.
>> 
>> The patch did not apply cleanly, I resolved one merge conflict due to changes to the internal `TypeMetadata` API for JDK-8303820.
>
> Liam Miller-Cushon has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - Backport 67c4a0826babb55ce56acf2b3b289b51d9d5529e
>  - Resolve merge conflict
>    
>    due to changes to the internal TypeMetadata API for JDK-8303820

Thanks! I will aim to backport the the follow-ups close together with this change.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4124#issuecomment-3606657164

From duke at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 13:18:34 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (duke)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 13:18:34 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8245545: Disable TLS_RSA cipher suites [v6]
In-Reply-To: <uPaP0qiTKw5QkjC0bfBu_UXKUN6Q4P5WMUHBf0B2FFk=.66809767-0c13-48df-9af9-6557b55e1daa@github.com>
References: <z5ADYL8HSsOozFj53j05GzW9s9bM0tqqZo5yCWQmw_8=.f90c6a49-0c50-4d80-9fe6-8777b3d71db3@github.com>
 <uPaP0qiTKw5QkjC0bfBu_UXKUN6Q4P5WMUHBf0B2FFk=.66809767-0c13-48df-9af9-6557b55e1daa@github.com>
Message-ID: <ruY29qRurrJPAx71yqf_5kCXlVF6NShYhsf13jgXQ1A=.70674dc4-b51c-477a-9425-9aaf4eac871e@github.com>

On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 11:42:23 GMT, David Sladk? <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Backport of [JDK-8245545](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8245545) - Disable TLS_RSA cipher suites
>> 
>> Some TLS suites do not preserve forward-secrecy and are not commonly used - and should not be used.
>> 
>> Not clean back port. This includes:
>> - Selection of disabled tests and some include that is in jdk11 but not in jdk17.
>> - Changed indentation of edited block of string defining disabled cipher suites.
>> - Bunch of copyright notices.
>> 
>> Tested on Fedora 43:
>> - gtests passed
>> - T1 have same fails before and after the back port -> not related to this.
>> - jtreg:test/jdk/sun/security passed.
>> - jtreg:test/jdk/javax/net/ssl passed.
>> - Github Actions passed.
>
> David Sladk? has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Revert undesired change in access modifier of disabled_ciphersuites

@TheMangovnik 
Your change (at version a8c23aea8c5b7a9a8f2a3856bc288c2e2edb4f7b) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3124#issuecomment-3606808928

From goetz at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 13:23:38 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 13:23:38 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8303475: potential null pointer dereference in
 filemap.cpp
Message-ID: <tWub-jlsr0XmsuxhrLSf9svumOXl-Pm_lmrnOx4TTgM=.2b83b0b1-0ae7-493b-b3de-344ad5b7286a@github.com>

I backport this for parity with 17.0.18-oracle.

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport e1196584d5c61e3a6baa3eb96801a518cd5dca64

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4199/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk17u-dev&pr=4199&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8303475
  Stats: 1 line in 1 file changed: 1 ins; 0 del; 0 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4199.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/4199/head:pull/4199

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4199

From duke at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 13:31:04 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (David =?UTF-8?B?U2xhZGvDvQ==?=)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 13:31:04 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] Integrated: 8245545: Disable TLS_RSA cipher suites
In-Reply-To: <z5ADYL8HSsOozFj53j05GzW9s9bM0tqqZo5yCWQmw_8=.f90c6a49-0c50-4d80-9fe6-8777b3d71db3@github.com>
References: <z5ADYL8HSsOozFj53j05GzW9s9bM0tqqZo5yCWQmw_8=.f90c6a49-0c50-4d80-9fe6-8777b3d71db3@github.com>
Message-ID: <ymvzNAmm0EnLNR1PmLDsznefMG977c-2F5kZRJ0eYSM=.d0856fd9-3b99-44e6-9b66-414153cccd02@github.com>

On Thu, 20 Nov 2025 15:09:24 GMT, David Sladk? <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backport of [JDK-8245545](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8245545) - Disable TLS_RSA cipher suites
> 
> Some TLS suites do not preserve forward-secrecy and are not commonly used - and should not be used.
> 
> Not clean back port. This includes:
> - Selection of disabled tests and some include that is in jdk11 but not in jdk17.
> - Changed indentation of edited block of string defining disabled cipher suites.
> - Bunch of copyright notices.
> 
> Tested on Fedora 43:
> - gtests passed
> - T1 have same fails before and after the back port -> not related to this.
> - jtreg:test/jdk/sun/security passed.
> - jtreg:test/jdk/javax/net/ssl passed.
> - Github Actions passed.

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 463e25fb
Author:    David Sladk? <sladky.david at proton.me>
Committer: Andrew John Hughes <andrew at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/commit/463e25fb4c6ae3ba5f4d0ba6616cf92863831cff
Stats:     83 lines in 13 files changed: 36 ins; 18 del; 29 mod

8245545: Disable TLS_RSA cipher suites

Reviewed-by: andrew
Backport-of: b838ae0a7bbe34f345a4d56af21df4badce0caf2

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3124

From cushon at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 14:02:01 2025
From: cushon at openjdk.org (Liam Miller-Cushon)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 14:02:01 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8341779: [REDO BACKPORT] type annotations are
 not visible to javac plugins across compilation boundaries (JDK-8225377) [v3]
In-Reply-To: <ZVdm0UETXeBGrogX9Ply_vTdr2k5kdOxX-02Kv6_oZ4=.f35501f5-7191-48be-87e8-cfb448b15525@github.com>
References: <ZVdm0UETXeBGrogX9Ply_vTdr2k5kdOxX-02Kv6_oZ4=.f35501f5-7191-48be-87e8-cfb448b15525@github.com>
Message-ID: <e2Iip-RwBcuZsLwKeRdvdXlLuI5r9CZmS6pO2eKfdsg=.22978bbb-3f89-41da-9cab-a6abc611ee17@github.com>

> [JDK-8341779](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8341779) is a redo of the backport of [JDK-8323093](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8323093), see also discussion in CSR [JDK-8346471](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8346471).
> 
> JDK-8341779 was backported to JDK 21u and released in 21.0.8, as discussed in the CSR this PR proposes integrating it into a future 17u release now that 21.0.8 has been released.
> 
> Similar to [JDK-8360406](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8360406) for 21u, a future backport will disable this logic for 17u by default, and optionally allow the fix to be enabled with `-XDaddTypeAnnotationsToSymbol`.
> 
> The patch did not apply cleanly, I resolved one merge conflict due to changes to the internal `TypeMetadata` API for JDK-8303820.

Liam Miller-Cushon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains four additional commits since the last revision:

 - Merge branch 'master' into redo-JDK-8341779
 - Backport 67c4a0826babb55ce56acf2b3b289b51d9d5529e
 - Resolve merge conflict
   
   due to changes to the internal TypeMetadata API for JDK-8303820
 - Backport de6667cf11aa59d1bab78ae5fb235ea0b901d5c4

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4124/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4124/files/f4deb606..aaf1c53e

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk17u-dev&pr=4124&range=02
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk17u-dev&pr=4124&range=01-02

  Stats: 12394 lines in 219 files changed: 7964 ins; 3811 del; 619 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4124.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/4124/head:pull/4124

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4124

From andrew at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 14:18:48 2025
From: andrew at openjdk.org (Andrew John Hughes)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 14:18:48 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8372534: Update Libpng to 1.6.51
Message-ID: <kAVIczZIiOcu6y74lrFA3oCm3eMdTimC2uJwDADjS5M=.363f4368-6a93-426e-9a05-4229dbed3702@github.com>

Update to the latest version of libpng. Clean backport which built fine with GCC 11 on RHEL 8.

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport c7a489db9e4a7d696623fc2155a5504d9d2adb0d

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/56/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk25u-dev&pr=56&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8372534
  Stats: 638 lines in 21 files changed: 297 ins; 207 del; 134 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/56.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev.git pull/56/head:pull/56

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/56

From duke at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 14:19:20 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Radek Cap)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 14:19:20 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8298867: Basics.java fails with SSL handshake
 exception
Message-ID: <Bu2UJyFnRrHRuJn2nBzVm9Xsdr9S5SsiFRoi6_-85Nk=.9a97ffde-7bf7-4a7a-9ace-d62b14c91bb6@github.com>

Backport of JDK-8298867 - Basics.java fails with SSL handshake exception

I backport this for parity with 11.0.25-oracle.

Clean backport. 
Passed tier1 tests. 
Passed gtests.

GH Actions are passing


==============================
Test summary
==============================
   TEST                                              TOTAL  PASS  FAIL ERROR   
   jtreg:test/hotspot/jtreg:tier1                     1497  1497     0     0   
   jtreg:test/jdk:tier1                               1899  1899     0     0   
   jtreg:test/langtools:tier1                         3940  3940     0     0   
   jtreg:test/nashorn:tier1                              0     0     0     0   
   jtreg:test/jaxp:tier1                                 0     0     0     0   
==============================
TEST SUCCESS

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Fix formatting in Basics.java test cases
 - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8298867
 - Backport 4e99baf31707e692aaa8aa73c882c054eeccd1d8

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3127/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk11u-dev&pr=3127&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8298867
  Stats: 99 lines in 2 files changed: 33 ins; 9 del; 57 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3127.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev.git pull/3127/head:pull/3127

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3127

From vromero at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 14:51:09 2025
From: vromero at openjdk.org (Vicente Romero)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 14:51:09 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8341779: [REDO BACKPORT] type annotations are
 not visible to javac plugins across compilation boundaries (JDK-8225377) [v3]
In-Reply-To: <e2Iip-RwBcuZsLwKeRdvdXlLuI5r9CZmS6pO2eKfdsg=.22978bbb-3f89-41da-9cab-a6abc611ee17@github.com>
References: <ZVdm0UETXeBGrogX9Ply_vTdr2k5kdOxX-02Kv6_oZ4=.f35501f5-7191-48be-87e8-cfb448b15525@github.com>
 <e2Iip-RwBcuZsLwKeRdvdXlLuI5r9CZmS6pO2eKfdsg=.22978bbb-3f89-41da-9cab-a6abc611ee17@github.com>
Message-ID: <nEZseYZJPKPZOmfYVPPz1d9zUT4pykFpfTx2mrTzhEo=.b829836b-d92b-4f2a-b15f-2a1aaf160fc0@github.com>

On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 14:02:01 GMT, Liam Miller-Cushon <cushon at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> [JDK-8341779](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8341779) is a redo of the backport of [JDK-8323093](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8323093), see also discussion in CSR [JDK-8346471](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8346471).
>> 
>> JDK-8341779 was backported to JDK 21u and released in 21.0.8, as discussed in the CSR this PR proposes integrating it into a future 17u release now that 21.0.8 has been released.
>> 
>> Similar to [JDK-8360406](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8360406) for 21u, a future backport will disable this logic for 17u by default, and optionally allow the fix to be enabled with `-XDaddTypeAnnotationsToSymbol`.
>> 
>> The patch did not apply cleanly, I resolved one merge conflict due to changes to the internal `TypeMetadata` API for JDK-8303820.
>
> Liam Miller-Cushon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains four additional commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - Merge branch 'master' into redo-JDK-8341779
>  - Backport 67c4a0826babb55ce56acf2b3b289b51d9d5529e
>  - Resolve merge conflict
>    
>    due to changes to the internal TypeMetadata API for JDK-8303820
>  - Backport de6667cf11aa59d1bab78ae5fb235ea0b901d5c4

looks good

-------------

Marked as reviewed by vromero (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4124#pullrequestreview-3535432176

From shade at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 15:09:05 2025
From: shade at openjdk.org (Aleksey Shipilev)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 15:09:05 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8371864: GaloisCounterMode.implGCMCrypt0
 AVX512/AVX2 intrinsics stubs cause AES-GCM encryption failure for certain
 payload sizes
In-Reply-To: <D3DhZVQUonj4VFjPUmETa4ITITl7gLrdtYvwO5k-Tr4=.c874c544-f571-4785-b1cf-338af79a659c@github.com>
References: <D3DhZVQUonj4VFjPUmETa4ITITl7gLrdtYvwO5k-Tr4=.c874c544-f571-4785-b1cf-338af79a659c@github.com>
Message-ID: <osz9rpy4BkgyGSAtnxmvx1E5tkLn03TnbT8jdayV8So=.b611b3ab-8a33-4945-8822-7723a2cc10d3@github.com>

On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 10:36:45 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev <shade at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Fixes another JDK 25 regression in AES/GCM on x86_64.
> 
> Additional testing:
>  - [x] Linux x86_64 server fastdebug, AVX2 machine, new regression test fails without the patch, passes with it
>  - [x] Linux x86_64 server fastdebug, AVX2 machine, `jdk_security`
>  - [x] Linux x86_64 server fastdebug, AVX-512 machine, new regression test fails without the patch, passes with it
>  - [x] Linux x86_64 server fastdebug, AVX-512 machine, `jdk_security`
>  - [x] Linux x86_64 server fastdebug, AVX-512 machine, `all`

Tests are all passing. I am putting the stick in the ground here, and will request approval next week, seeing if we have any bugtail from the fix in mainline.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/54#issuecomment-3607308500

From duke at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 15:20:22 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Radek Cap)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 15:20:22 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8301379: Verify TLS_ECDH_* cipher suites cannot be
 negotiated
Message-ID: <--5hP-bNjh64S0-P_iXjzqybQrW_WHS35yPxikOiXug=.9b7bb688-169e-4674-b85a-e93894f52087@github.com>

Backport of JDK-8301379 - Verify TLS_ECDH_* cipher suites cannot be negotiated

Backporting for parity with 11.0.26-oracle.

More or less a clean backport, just adding merge with the current jdk11u-dev repo state.

Passed tier1 tests. 
Passed gtests.

GH Actions are passing

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport 5daf0666e9c0fc239d1ba8b63ecb494e367b06f2

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3128/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk11u-dev&pr=3128&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8301379
  Stats: 249 lines in 2 files changed: 179 ins; 51 del; 19 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3128.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev.git pull/3128/head:pull/3128

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3128

From duke at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 16:09:54 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Roland Mesde)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 16:09:54 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8365398: TEST_BUG:
 java/rmi/transport/checkLeaseInfoLeak/CheckLeaseLeak.java failing
 intermittently
Message-ID: <UZH4OO6OGKdDqrxDmWFVslqZN6ilFi2375VMjgi3SNg=.fe03f0db-ab04-4741-b518-1f23fcb51647@github.com>

Backporting JDK-8365398: TEST_BUG: java/rmi/transport/checkLeaseInfoLeak/CheckLeaseLeak.java failing intermittently.

For parity with Oracle JDK. Increased available object count threshold to 6 (half of total created objects) to fix intermittent macOS test failures caused by slower garbage collection. 

Merge conflict (resolved) was a change in class import ordering and the correction of a comment.

Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed), jtreg tier1 tests (passed) and related tests (passed) on linux-x64, linux-aarch64, macos-aarch64 and windows-x64:

(Passed) - make test-tier1
(Passed) - make test TEST=test/jdk/java/rmi/transport

Results are attached.

[linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911453/linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
[linux-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911454/linux-aarch64-specific-test.log)
[linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911455/linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
[linux-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911457/linux-x64-specific-test.log)
[macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911458/macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
[macos-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911459/macos-aarch64-specific-test.log)
[windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911460/windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
[windows-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911461/windows-x64-specific-test.log)

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8365398-V25-DEV-2
 - Backport 4b4d0cd35a32448e4b056109c502af2765766432

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/46/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk25u-dev&pr=46&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8365398
  Stats: 20 lines in 1 file changed: 14 ins; 1 del; 5 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/46.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev.git pull/46/head:pull/46

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/46

From duke at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 16:09:54 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Roland Mesde)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 16:09:54 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8365398: TEST_BUG:
 java/rmi/transport/checkLeaseInfoLeak/CheckLeaseLeak.java failing
 intermittently
In-Reply-To: <UZH4OO6OGKdDqrxDmWFVslqZN6ilFi2375VMjgi3SNg=.fe03f0db-ab04-4741-b518-1f23fcb51647@github.com>
References: <UZH4OO6OGKdDqrxDmWFVslqZN6ilFi2375VMjgi3SNg=.fe03f0db-ab04-4741-b518-1f23fcb51647@github.com>
Message-ID: <-ecowkQrpKwBRIUZBYnUEhIgBzvr6iCF_jGqLSGAElc=.69fb55bd-1949-42c8-ab43-a815b8ff62f5@github.com>

On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 19:52:25 GMT, Roland Mesde <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backporting JDK-8365398: TEST_BUG: java/rmi/transport/checkLeaseInfoLeak/CheckLeaseLeak.java failing intermittently.
> 
> For parity with Oracle JDK. Increased available object count threshold to 6 (half of total created objects) to fix intermittent macOS test failures caused by slower garbage collection. 
> 
> Merge conflict (resolved) was a change in class import ordering and the correction of a comment.
> 
> Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed), jtreg tier1 tests (passed) and related tests (passed) on linux-x64, linux-aarch64, macos-aarch64 and windows-x64:
> 
> (Passed) - make test-tier1
> (Passed) - make test TEST=test/jdk/java/rmi/transport
> 
> Results are attached.
> 
> [linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911453/linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [linux-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911454/linux-aarch64-specific-test.log)
> [linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911455/linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [linux-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911457/linux-x64-specific-test.log)
> [macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911458/macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [macos-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911459/macos-aarch64-specific-test.log)
> [windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911460/windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [windows-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911461/windows-x64-specific-test.log)

Checked history and performed merge based on the evolution of the code which involved.

1. The addition of the import statement (java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch).
2. The "(numLeft > 2)" condition which was changed to "(numLeft > 4)" then changed back to "(numLeft > 2)"

Source: https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commits/4b4d0cd35a32448e4b056109c502af2765766432/test/jdk/java/rmi/transport/checkLeaseInfoLeak/CheckLeaseLeak.java

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/46#issuecomment-3607579677

From goetz at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 16:10:56 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 16:10:56 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8301875: java.util.TimeZone.getSystemTimeZoneID uses
 C library default file mode
Message-ID: <thZzMX26V0NMbYLCGEm3kuktzoKG3mWFvAHLuQ89JoQ=.dd45f98f-f1b5-474e-86aa-f42a5d1b51de@github.com>

I backport this for parity with 17.0.18-oracle.

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport 2d6045a26f60fb36f69680e3a83b8303ab2c13e4

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4200/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk17u-dev&pr=4200&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8301875
  Stats: 2 lines in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 2 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4200.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/4200/head:pull/4200

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4200

From goetz at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 16:14:13 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 16:14:13 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8301875: java.util.TimeZone.getSystemTimeZoneID uses
 C library default file mode
Message-ID: <__mBG_sCit6_W7gWG12idsOXiVP_38cyuGYgiyYACpw=.f612632f-0124-4af0-9628-0916d70e5f68@github.com>

I backport this for parity with 21.0.10-oracle

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport 2d6045a26f60fb36f69680e3a83b8303ab2c13e4

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2502/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk21u-dev&pr=2502&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8301875
  Stats: 2 lines in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 2 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2502.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/2502/head:pull/2502

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2502

From shade at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 16:21:57 2025
From: shade at openjdk.org (Aleksey Shipilev)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 16:21:57 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8365398: TEST_BUG:
 java/rmi/transport/checkLeaseInfoLeak/CheckLeaseLeak.java failing
 intermittently
In-Reply-To: <UZH4OO6OGKdDqrxDmWFVslqZN6ilFi2375VMjgi3SNg=.fe03f0db-ab04-4741-b518-1f23fcb51647@github.com>
References: <UZH4OO6OGKdDqrxDmWFVslqZN6ilFi2375VMjgi3SNg=.fe03f0db-ab04-4741-b518-1f23fcb51647@github.com>
Message-ID: <ibwaVzBkPPLsxp1J6kVP_jn10o9qfUft4GCM0Hx0lwA=.56c09778-8e06-4993-9d3b-ce428e999a84@github.com>

On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 19:52:25 GMT, Roland Mesde <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backporting JDK-8365398: TEST_BUG: java/rmi/transport/checkLeaseInfoLeak/CheckLeaseLeak.java failing intermittently.
> 
> For parity with Oracle JDK. Increased available object count threshold to 6 (half of total created objects) to fix intermittent macOS test failures caused by slower garbage collection. 
> 
> Merge conflict (resolved) was a change in class import ordering and the correction of a comment.
> 
> Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed), jtreg tier1 tests (passed) and related tests (passed) on linux-x64, linux-aarch64, macos-aarch64 and windows-x64:
> 
> (Passed) - make test-tier1
> (Passed) - make test TEST=test/jdk/java/rmi/transport
> 
> Results are attached.
> 
> [linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911453/linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [linux-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911454/linux-aarch64-specific-test.log)
> [linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911455/linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [linux-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911457/linux-x64-specific-test.log)
> [macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911458/macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [macos-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911459/macos-aarch64-specific-test.log)
> [windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911460/windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [windows-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911461/windows-x64-specific-test.log)

test/jdk/java/rmi/transport/checkLeaseInfoLeak/CheckLeaseLeak.java line 61:

> 59: import java.lang.reflect.*;
> 60: import java.rmi.registry.*;
> 61: import java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch;

I can see why you would want to do this, as mainline change introduced this out-of-order. But for backports, you want to stay faithful to the original commit as much as possible. So refrain from making cosmetic changes as you go. If you still want to fix this, you can do a trivial PR against mainline, and backport the follow-up fix. But I think it does not worth the trouble.

test/jdk/java/rmi/transport/checkLeaseInfoLeak/CheckLeaseLeak.java line 141:

> 139: 
> 140:         /* numLeft should not be greater than 2 - if 11 there is a problem. */
> 141:         if (numLeft > 2) {

I don't understand your comment: "The "(numLeft > 2)" condition which was changed to "(numLeft > 4)" then changed back to "(numLeft > 2)". AFAICS, the original commit has this hunk exactly as you have written here?

https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/4b4d0cd35a32448e4b056109c502af2765766432#diff-9348ad66aa09ad1a3d437e736b0ec93f9f674ba91864fd15ca59375093386548L128-R141

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/46#discussion_r2585758765
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/46#discussion_r2585779669

From goetz at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 16:24:35 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 16:24:35 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 6899304:
 java.awt.Toolkit.getScreenInsets(GraphicsConfiguration) returns incorrect
 values
Message-ID: <4kBkWI1lpSR34D3qUDkDOG0VhmkwapXwDG8TjC0RJag=.4b6abb19-4ba0-4a4a-9d6a-3274db8857fa@github.com>

I backport this for parity with 17.0.18-oracle.

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport 651ac3cc0f2a8b3edf5cddb42df1d38d4aa0e1a6

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4201/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk17u-dev&pr=4201&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-6899304
  Stats: 73 lines in 2 files changed: 34 ins; 23 del; 16 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4201.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/4201/head:pull/4201

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4201

From goetz at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 16:24:56 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 16:24:56 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 6899304:
 java.awt.Toolkit.getScreenInsets(GraphicsConfiguration) returns incorrect
 values
Message-ID: <5WXa6twGBSqXopFZ-yklIvC3-w8N6ogPH5y6pkVD5yI=.1b025894-2181-40c4-a397-e252958da51b@github.com>

I backport this for parity with 21.0.10-oracle

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport 651ac3cc0f2a8b3edf5cddb42df1d38d4aa0e1a6

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2503/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk21u-dev&pr=2503&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-6899304
  Stats: 73 lines in 2 files changed: 34 ins; 23 del; 16 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2503.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/2503/head:pull/2503

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2503

From duke at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 16:42:58 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Roland Mesde)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 16:42:58 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8365398: TEST_BUG:
 java/rmi/transport/checkLeaseInfoLeak/CheckLeaseLeak.java failing
 intermittently
In-Reply-To: <ibwaVzBkPPLsxp1J6kVP_jn10o9qfUft4GCM0Hx0lwA=.56c09778-8e06-4993-9d3b-ce428e999a84@github.com>
References: <UZH4OO6OGKdDqrxDmWFVslqZN6ilFi2375VMjgi3SNg=.fe03f0db-ab04-4741-b518-1f23fcb51647@github.com>
 <ibwaVzBkPPLsxp1J6kVP_jn10o9qfUft4GCM0Hx0lwA=.56c09778-8e06-4993-9d3b-ce428e999a84@github.com>
Message-ID: <Ci0_Bc_yyonm25dGQYtu2lkvbkHW2tVT9e3WgjPlHLE=.f04597b4-494d-4028-b711-9d4d5beff554@github.com>

On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 16:18:39 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev <shade at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Backporting JDK-8365398: TEST_BUG: java/rmi/transport/checkLeaseInfoLeak/CheckLeaseLeak.java failing intermittently.
>> 
>> For parity with Oracle JDK. Increased available object count threshold to 6 (half of total created objects) to fix intermittent macOS test failures caused by slower garbage collection. 
>> 
>> Merge conflict (resolved) was a change in class import ordering and the correction of a comment.
>> 
>> Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed), jtreg tier1 tests (passed) and related tests (passed) on linux-x64, linux-aarch64, macos-aarch64 and windows-x64:
>> 
>> (Passed) - make test-tier1
>> (Passed) - make test TEST=test/jdk/java/rmi/transport
>> 
>> Results are attached.
>> 
>> [linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911453/linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
>> [linux-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911454/linux-aarch64-specific-test.log)
>> [linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911455/linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
>> [linux-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911457/linux-x64-specific-test.log)
>> [macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911458/macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
>> [macos-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911459/macos-aarch64-specific-test.log)
>> [windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911460/windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
>> [windows-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911461/windows-x64-specific-test.log)
>
> test/jdk/java/rmi/transport/checkLeaseInfoLeak/CheckLeaseLeak.java line 141:
> 
>> 139: 
>> 140:         /* numLeft should not be greater than 2 - if 11 there is a problem. */
>> 141:         if (numLeft > 2) {
> 
> I don't understand your comment: "The "(numLeft > 2)" condition which was changed to "(numLeft > 4)" then changed back to "(numLeft > 2)". AFAICS, the original commit has this hunk exactly as you have written here?
> 
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/4b4d0cd35a32448e4b056109c502af2765766432#diff-9348ad66aa09ad1a3d437e736b0ec93f9f674ba91864fd15ca59375093386548L128-R141

This commit changed the condition in line 132/129 of "CheckLeaseLeak.java" from "(numLeft > 2)" to "(numLeft > 4)"

https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/5a442197d21e1dfb89cdbf5f0ad5596869ab333a

Then the following commit  changed the condition in line 129/141 from "(numLeft > 4)" back to "(numLeft > 2)"

https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/4b4d0cd35a32448e4b056109c502af2765766432

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/46#discussion_r2585857566

From duke at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 16:43:09 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Roland Mesde)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 16:43:09 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8354894: java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java
 timeout on server with high CPUs
Message-ID: <MHkNSLut4L9a_pXdDeblCVSvJcIMp1rO-iPD0bZ9t0E=.a93cb0be-1c05-4147-a567-ec850ceec650@github.com>

Backporting JDK-8354894: java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timeout on server with high CPUs

For parity with Oracle JDK. Fix adjusts iteration count by dividing by CPU core count, and removed timeout=800 as default 120 timeout is now sufficient. 

Merge conflict (resolved) was the change in the timeout.

Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed), jtreg tier1 tests (passed) and related tests (passed) on linux-x64, linux-aarch64, macos-aarch64 and windows-x64. Also ran a test on an EC2 instance (linux-x64) with high cpu count (r5dn.24xlarge - 96 core) and it finished under 1s:

(Passed) - make test-tier1
(Passed) - make test TEST=test/jdk/java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java

Results are attached.

[linux-x64-96-core-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911957/linux-x64-96-core-test.log)

[linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911996/linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
[linux-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911997/linux-aarch64-specific-test.log)
[linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911998/linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
[linux-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911999/linux-x64-specific-test.log)
[macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912000/macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
[macos-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912001/macos-aarch64-specific-test.log)
[windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912002/windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
[windows-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912003/windows-x64-specific-test.log)

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport 0366d8823bc844225ca24964e352ce0a57d01683

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/49/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk25u-dev&pr=49&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8354894
  Stats: 10 lines in 1 file changed: 7 ins; 0 del; 3 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/49.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev.git pull/49/head:pull/49

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/49

From shade at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 16:43:09 2025
From: shade at openjdk.org (Aleksey Shipilev)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 16:43:09 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8354894:
 java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timeout on server with high CPUs
In-Reply-To: <MHkNSLut4L9a_pXdDeblCVSvJcIMp1rO-iPD0bZ9t0E=.a93cb0be-1c05-4147-a567-ec850ceec650@github.com>
References: <MHkNSLut4L9a_pXdDeblCVSvJcIMp1rO-iPD0bZ9t0E=.a93cb0be-1c05-4147-a567-ec850ceec650@github.com>
Message-ID: <krFWuhXUGVpv9obm7SQ4Oi4akxO5ruNRYAM0WpZqZYw=.5d00e43b-1016-4ecc-88a1-8066aabcba1b@github.com>

On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 21:26:37 GMT, Roland Mesde <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backporting JDK-8354894: java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timeout on server with high CPUs
> 
> For parity with Oracle JDK. Fix adjusts iteration count by dividing by CPU core count, and removed timeout=800 as default 120 timeout is now sufficient. 
> 
> Merge conflict (resolved) was the change in the timeout.
> 
> Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed), jtreg tier1 tests (passed) and related tests (passed) on linux-x64, linux-aarch64, macos-aarch64 and windows-x64. Also ran a test on an EC2 instance (linux-x64) with high cpu count (r5dn.24xlarge - 96 core) and it finished under 1s:
> 
> (Passed) - make test-tier1
> (Passed) - make test TEST=test/jdk/java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java
> 
> Results are attached.
> 
> [linux-x64-96-core-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911957/linux-x64-96-core-test.log)
> 
> [linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911996/linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [linux-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911997/linux-aarch64-specific-test.log)
> [linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911998/linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [linux-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911999/linux-x64-specific-test.log)
> [macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912000/macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [macos-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912001/macos-aarch64-specific-test.log)
> [windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912002/windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [windows-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912003/windows-x64-specific-test.log)

AFAICS, the `timeout=800` -> `timeout=200` change was part of  [JDK-8260555: Change the default TIMEOUT_FACTOR from 4 to 1](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8260555), which was reverted by [JDK-8369491](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8369491), but mainline just never needed to update the test back, because this fix landed.

-------------

Marked as reviewed by shade (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/49#pullrequestreview-3535921996

From duke at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 16:43:12 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Roland Mesde)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 16:43:12 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8354894:
 java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timeout on server with high CPUs
In-Reply-To: <krFWuhXUGVpv9obm7SQ4Oi4akxO5ruNRYAM0WpZqZYw=.5d00e43b-1016-4ecc-88a1-8066aabcba1b@github.com>
References: <MHkNSLut4L9a_pXdDeblCVSvJcIMp1rO-iPD0bZ9t0E=.a93cb0be-1c05-4147-a567-ec850ceec650@github.com>
 <krFWuhXUGVpv9obm7SQ4Oi4akxO5ruNRYAM0WpZqZYw=.5d00e43b-1016-4ecc-88a1-8066aabcba1b@github.com>
Message-ID: <spPLu1d67O1T2bqB9R-17C8nYnk0yNJl8vVHIIVRP-k=.a0082296-8dae-4a60-839f-058e420a73ba@github.com>

On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 16:28:05 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev <shade at openjdk.org> wrote:

> AFAICS, the `timeout=800` -> `timeout=200` change was part of [JDK-8260555: Change the default TIMEOUT_FACTOR from 4 to 1](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8260555), which was reverted by [JDK-8369491](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8369491), but mainline just never needed to update the test back, because this fix landed.

The original commit indicates that the default 120 timeout is sufficient, so the explicit timeout can be removed. This was also tested in a 96 core EC2 instance.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/49#issuecomment-3607743315

From duke at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 16:47:44 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Roland Mesde)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 16:47:44 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8365398: TEST_BUG:
 java/rmi/transport/checkLeaseInfoLeak/CheckLeaseLeak.java failing
 intermittently
In-Reply-To: <UZH4OO6OGKdDqrxDmWFVslqZN6ilFi2375VMjgi3SNg=.fe03f0db-ab04-4741-b518-1f23fcb51647@github.com>
References: <UZH4OO6OGKdDqrxDmWFVslqZN6ilFi2375VMjgi3SNg=.fe03f0db-ab04-4741-b518-1f23fcb51647@github.com>
Message-ID: <H94FIY1HUS_qcQMXOB1a1GMt0bClP7E4ZDoJvAGydAs=.c321f17a-3cec-408a-b888-2608e31133d0@github.com>

On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 19:52:25 GMT, Roland Mesde <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backporting JDK-8365398: TEST_BUG: java/rmi/transport/checkLeaseInfoLeak/CheckLeaseLeak.java failing intermittently.
> 
> For parity with Oracle JDK. Increased available object count threshold to 6 (half of total created objects) to fix intermittent macOS test failures caused by slower garbage collection. 
> 
> Merge conflict (resolved) was a change in class import ordering and the correction of a comment.
> 
> Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed), jtreg tier1 tests (passed) and related tests (passed) on linux-x64, linux-aarch64, macos-aarch64 and windows-x64:
> 
> (Passed) - make test-tier1
> (Passed) - make test TEST=test/jdk/java/rmi/transport
> 
> Results are attached.
> 
> [linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911453/linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [linux-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911454/linux-aarch64-specific-test.log)
> [linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911455/linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [linux-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911457/linux-x64-specific-test.log)
> [macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911458/macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [macos-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911459/macos-aarch64-specific-test.log)
> [windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911460/windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [windows-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911461/windows-x64-specific-test.log)

Cancelling this PR due to the out of order commits.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/46#issuecomment-3607788085

From shade at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 16:47:48 2025
From: shade at openjdk.org (Aleksey Shipilev)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 16:47:48 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8365398: TEST_BUG:
 java/rmi/transport/checkLeaseInfoLeak/CheckLeaseLeak.java failing
 intermittently
In-Reply-To: <Ci0_Bc_yyonm25dGQYtu2lkvbkHW2tVT9e3WgjPlHLE=.f04597b4-494d-4028-b711-9d4d5beff554@github.com>
References: <UZH4OO6OGKdDqrxDmWFVslqZN6ilFi2375VMjgi3SNg=.fe03f0db-ab04-4741-b518-1f23fcb51647@github.com>
 <ibwaVzBkPPLsxp1J6kVP_jn10o9qfUft4GCM0Hx0lwA=.56c09778-8e06-4993-9d3b-ce428e999a84@github.com>
 <Ci0_Bc_yyonm25dGQYtu2lkvbkHW2tVT9e3WgjPlHLE=.f04597b4-494d-4028-b711-9d4d5beff554@github.com>
Message-ID: <kjFZRQIRdrH-FmGR2R0s2WckgV9auvpHM6IVGzsRvzk=.4cd89d94-6181-4b7d-bcb7-0926a53c20e6@github.com>

On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 16:39:47 GMT, Roland Mesde <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> test/jdk/java/rmi/transport/checkLeaseInfoLeak/CheckLeaseLeak.java line 141:
>> 
>>> 139: 
>>> 140:         /* numLeft should not be greater than 2 - if 11 there is a problem. */
>>> 141:         if (numLeft > 2) {
>> 
>> I don't understand your comment: "The "(numLeft > 2)" condition which was changed to "(numLeft > 4)" then changed back to "(numLeft > 2)". AFAICS, the original commit has this hunk exactly as you have written here?
>> 
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/4b4d0cd35a32448e4b056109c502af2765766432#diff-9348ad66aa09ad1a3d437e736b0ec93f9f674ba91864fd15ca59375093386548L128-R141
>
> This commit changed the condition in line 132/129 of "CheckLeaseLeak.java" from "(numLeft > 2)" to "(numLeft > 4)"
> 
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/5a442197d21e1dfb89cdbf5f0ad5596869ab333a
> 
> Then the following commit  changed the condition in line 129/141 from "(numLeft > 4)" back to "(numLeft > 2)"
> 
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/4b4d0cd35a32448e4b056109c502af2765766432

Yes, but why does it matter for this backport? https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/5a442197d21e1dfb89cdbf5f0ad5596869ab333a is already in 25u. So https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/4b4d0cd35a32448e4b056109c502af2765766432 that you are backporting is clean addition on top of it? 

I am just confused why the merge was even required.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/46#discussion_r2585873293

From duke at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 16:47:50 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Roland Mesde)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 16:47:50 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] Withdrawn: 8365398: TEST_BUG:
 java/rmi/transport/checkLeaseInfoLeak/CheckLeaseLeak.java failing
 intermittently
In-Reply-To: <UZH4OO6OGKdDqrxDmWFVslqZN6ilFi2375VMjgi3SNg=.fe03f0db-ab04-4741-b518-1f23fcb51647@github.com>
References: <UZH4OO6OGKdDqrxDmWFVslqZN6ilFi2375VMjgi3SNg=.fe03f0db-ab04-4741-b518-1f23fcb51647@github.com>
Message-ID: <y9oyOTV873TZhKsIQiyhxT0jpF-vRHN6gMV57dfGK1s=.4488a9f3-e9f4-4bbf-9530-f52d314a52d1@github.com>

On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 19:52:25 GMT, Roland Mesde <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backporting JDK-8365398: TEST_BUG: java/rmi/transport/checkLeaseInfoLeak/CheckLeaseLeak.java failing intermittently.
> 
> For parity with Oracle JDK. Increased available object count threshold to 6 (half of total created objects) to fix intermittent macOS test failures caused by slower garbage collection. 
> 
> Merge conflict (resolved) was a change in class import ordering and the correction of a comment.
> 
> Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed), jtreg tier1 tests (passed) and related tests (passed) on linux-x64, linux-aarch64, macos-aarch64 and windows-x64:
> 
> (Passed) - make test-tier1
> (Passed) - make test TEST=test/jdk/java/rmi/transport
> 
> Results are attached.
> 
> [linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911453/linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [linux-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911454/linux-aarch64-specific-test.log)
> [linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911455/linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [linux-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911457/linux-x64-specific-test.log)
> [macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911458/macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [macos-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911459/macos-aarch64-specific-test.log)
> [windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911460/windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [windows-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911461/windows-x64-specific-test.log)

This pull request has been closed without being integrated.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/46

From goetz at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 17:17:35 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 17:17:35 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8336695: Update Commons BCEL to Version 6.10.0
Message-ID: <z0OoCS2pHzFFhebT4fAtE2GajLcZUdcQcyZ9sUGA5dM=.7d985cce-32e8-4fa3-a8b9-d184aaa7cf35@github.com>

One of the required updates of external libs.

src/java.xml/share/classes/jdk/xml/internal/Utils.java
Resolved Copyright and imports. See second commit.

-------------

Commit messages:
 - resolves
 - backport 3790965df3e7cba3b9792b8719d1e2ead046da15

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2504/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk21u-dev&pr=2504&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8336695
  Stats: 2125 lines in 115 files changed: 997 ins; 118 del; 1010 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2504.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/2504/head:pull/2504

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2504

From duke at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 17:23:26 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Roland Mesde)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 17:23:26 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8370646: TestLargeUTF8Length.java needs lots of
 memory
Message-ID: <mat49sUM6d71RJOaLrQBID1lZxkwDRIFq1gXwLaxuA8=.64b9df39-b938-4e1b-a369-d1d214c51436@github.com>

Backporting JDK-8370646: TestLargeUTF8Length.java needs lots of memory.

For parity with Oracle JDK. Fix adds minimum memory requirements for test. Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed), jtreg tier1 tests (passed) and related tests (passed) on linux-x64, linux-aarch64, macos-aarch64 and windows-x64. Also ran a test on an EC2 instance (linux-x64) with less than the required memory (t2.large - 8 GB) and the test was not executed:

(Passed) - make test-tier1
(Passed) - make test TEST=test/hotspot/jtreg/runtime/jni/checked/TestLargeUTF8Length,java

Results are attached.

[linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912736/linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
[linux-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912737/linux-aarch64-specific-test.log)
[linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912738/linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
[linux-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912739/linux-x64-specific-test.log)
[macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912740/macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
[macos-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912741/macos-aarch64-specific-test.log)
[windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912742/windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
[windows-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912743/windows-x64-specific-test.log)

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport 3c1010b57f2f8258a2ccf59b9f86fc8debd71918

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/48/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk25u-dev&pr=48&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8370646
  Stats: 1 line in 1 file changed: 1 ins; 0 del; 0 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/48.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev.git pull/48/head:pull/48

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/48

From duke at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 17:23:42 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Roland Mesde)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 17:23:42 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8368754: runtime/cds/appcds/SignedJar.java log regex
 is too strict
Message-ID: <-KsvbLMEqotgTlgUAUTk8Q5uRBkfAfVMGkRyub8TFyg=.fa3a156d-5192-491e-a116-ea64fdc6518a@github.com>

Backporting JDK-8368754: runtime/cds/appcds/SignedJar.java log regex is too strict.

For parity with Oracle JDK. Fix allows whitespace after log tags and before the message content. Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed), jtreg tier1 tests (passed) and related tests (passed) on linux-x64, linux-aarch64, macos-aarch64 and windows-x64:

(Passed) - make test-tier1
(Passed) - make test TEST=test/hotspot/jtreg/runtime/cds/appcds
(Passed) - make test TEST=test/hotspot/jtreg/runtime/cds/appcds/SignedJar.java JTREG="VM_OPTIONS=-verbose:class"

Results are attached.

[linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912663/linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
[linux-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912664/linux-aarch64-specific-test.log)
[linux-aarch64-specific-2-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912665/linux-aarch64-specific-2-test.log)
[linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912666/linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
[linux-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912667/linux-x64-specific-test.log)
[linux-x64-specific-2-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912668/linux-x64-specific-2-test.log)
[macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912669/macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
[macos-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912670/macos-aarch64-specific-test.log)
[macos-aarch64-specific-2-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912671/macos-aarch64-specific-2-test.log)
[windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912672/windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
[windows-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912673/windows-x64-specific-test.log)
[windows-x64-specific-2-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912674/windows-x64-specific-2-test.log)

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport e19ec6f785e889d254b15c5ef2e801152c59c948

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/47/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk25u-dev&pr=47&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8368754
  Stats: 2 lines in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 2 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/47.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev.git pull/47/head:pull/47

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/47

From cushon at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 17:41:29 2025
From: cushon at openjdk.org (Liam Miller-Cushon)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 17:41:29 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8341779: [REDO BACKPORT] type annotations are
 not visible to javac plugins across compilation boundaries (JDK-8225377) [v3]
In-Reply-To: <e2Iip-RwBcuZsLwKeRdvdXlLuI5r9CZmS6pO2eKfdsg=.22978bbb-3f89-41da-9cab-a6abc611ee17@github.com>
References: <ZVdm0UETXeBGrogX9Ply_vTdr2k5kdOxX-02Kv6_oZ4=.f35501f5-7191-48be-87e8-cfb448b15525@github.com>
 <e2Iip-RwBcuZsLwKeRdvdXlLuI5r9CZmS6pO2eKfdsg=.22978bbb-3f89-41da-9cab-a6abc611ee17@github.com>
Message-ID: <JaFJjI4KcNKEIV6CclyoC3mGrpMXQS-XnaVGHwLr6vo=.c4423b98-d106-4d2f-ba3f-cb52aec25d40@github.com>

On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 14:02:01 GMT, Liam Miller-Cushon <cushon at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> [JDK-8341779](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8341779) is a redo of the backport of [JDK-8323093](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8323093), see also discussion in CSR [JDK-8346471](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8346471).
>> 
>> JDK-8341779 was backported to JDK 21u and released in 21.0.8, as discussed in the CSR this PR proposes integrating it into a future 17u release now that 21.0.8 has been released.
>> 
>> Similar to [JDK-8360406](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8360406) for 21u, a future backport will disable this logic for 17u by default, and optionally allow the fix to be enabled with `-XDaddTypeAnnotationsToSymbol`.
>> 
>> The patch did not apply cleanly, I resolved one merge conflict due to changes to the internal `TypeMetadata` API for JDK-8303820.
>
> Liam Miller-Cushon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains four additional commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - Merge branch 'master' into redo-JDK-8341779
>  - Backport 67c4a0826babb55ce56acf2b3b289b51d9d5529e
>  - Resolve merge conflict
>    
>    due to changes to the internal TypeMetadata API for JDK-8303820
>  - Backport de6667cf11aa59d1bab78ae5fb235ea0b901d5c4

Thanks for the review!

> Please backport the follow-ups asap, especially the flag switching it off.

@GoeLin I have PRs ready for the follow-ups, should I wait for approvals and reviews on them before submitting this?

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4124#issuecomment-3608023400

From duke at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 17:57:44 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Roland Mesde)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 17:57:44 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8367901: Calendar.roll(hour,
 24) returns wrong result
In-Reply-To: <gG8xboQayoNx0l2XUpVB3uoVqEIsGrTQO6W6nmkFir0=.267aa58b-38d6-4049-abc6-b1b49234806a@github.com>
References: <gG8xboQayoNx0l2XUpVB3uoVqEIsGrTQO6W6nmkFir0=.267aa58b-38d6-4049-abc6-b1b49234806a@github.com>
Message-ID: <at_4QJuCAcThpxPC93Sy0fTs42pkfLjfEbwkbTCiiHc=.ae8b9a68-6494-496d-bf55-ba826a65afe6@github.com>

On Tue, 11 Nov 2025 17:46:49 GMT, Roland Mesde <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backporting JDK-8367901: Calendar.roll(hour, 24) returns wrong result. Fixes the roll implementation and adds a new test. Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed) and new test (passed). The merge conflict was just the copyright header which was updated to the newer one. The new test needed to be updated for compatibility with the older JDK.
> 
> Key changes for the new test:
> 
> 1.  @FieldSource ? @MethodSource: Changed to method source and created hours() method
> 2. List.of() ? Arrays.asList(): Used Arrays.asList for better compatibility
> 3. .toList() ? .collect(Collectors.toList()): Explicit collection instead of toList()
> 4. var ? explicit types: Replaced var declarations with explicit types
> 5. Enhanced for loops: Used traditional for-each syntax instead of var

Withdrawing this PR. Bug was labelled as [jdk17u-fix-no].

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4167#issuecomment-3608092146

From duke at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 17:57:44 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Roland Mesde)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 17:57:44 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] Withdrawn: 8367901: Calendar.roll(hour,
 24) returns wrong result
In-Reply-To: <gG8xboQayoNx0l2XUpVB3uoVqEIsGrTQO6W6nmkFir0=.267aa58b-38d6-4049-abc6-b1b49234806a@github.com>
References: <gG8xboQayoNx0l2XUpVB3uoVqEIsGrTQO6W6nmkFir0=.267aa58b-38d6-4049-abc6-b1b49234806a@github.com>
Message-ID: <vsBaS-7GVQ7f7KszKCVXqyEPBAdCdvgp9RI8_PzU94w=.9ae5de20-9fb7-475f-9b49-cfaf095b8af9@github.com>

On Tue, 11 Nov 2025 17:46:49 GMT, Roland Mesde <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backporting JDK-8367901: Calendar.roll(hour, 24) returns wrong result. Fixes the roll implementation and adds a new test. Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed) and new test (passed). The merge conflict was just the copyright header which was updated to the newer one. The new test needed to be updated for compatibility with the older JDK.
> 
> Key changes for the new test:
> 
> 1.  @FieldSource ? @MethodSource: Changed to method source and created hours() method
> 2. List.of() ? Arrays.asList(): Used Arrays.asList for better compatibility
> 3. .toList() ? .collect(Collectors.toList()): Explicit collection instead of toList()
> 4. var ? explicit types: Replaced var declarations with explicit types
> 5. Enhanced for loops: Used traditional for-each syntax instead of var

This pull request has been closed without being integrated.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4167

From duke at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 18:48:41 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (duke)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 18:48:41 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8341779: [REDO BACKPORT] type annotations are
 not visible to javac plugins across compilation boundaries (JDK-8225377) [v3]
In-Reply-To: <e2Iip-RwBcuZsLwKeRdvdXlLuI5r9CZmS6pO2eKfdsg=.22978bbb-3f89-41da-9cab-a6abc611ee17@github.com>
References: <ZVdm0UETXeBGrogX9Ply_vTdr2k5kdOxX-02Kv6_oZ4=.f35501f5-7191-48be-87e8-cfb448b15525@github.com>
 <e2Iip-RwBcuZsLwKeRdvdXlLuI5r9CZmS6pO2eKfdsg=.22978bbb-3f89-41da-9cab-a6abc611ee17@github.com>
Message-ID: <7nozt-XTt4i5XcNPe5baeiZpgbK2Tvzr2pVoEEY75cA=.5c3cf424-fe1d-4433-a782-6f76fd608f76@github.com>

On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 14:02:01 GMT, Liam Miller-Cushon <cushon at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> [JDK-8341779](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8341779) is a redo of the backport of [JDK-8323093](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8323093), see also discussion in CSR [JDK-8346471](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8346471).
>> 
>> JDK-8341779 was backported to JDK 21u and released in 21.0.8, as discussed in the CSR this PR proposes integrating it into a future 17u release now that 21.0.8 has been released.
>> 
>> Similar to [JDK-8360406](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8360406) for 21u, a future backport will disable this logic for 17u by default, and optionally allow the fix to be enabled with `-XDaddTypeAnnotationsToSymbol`.
>> 
>> The patch did not apply cleanly, I resolved one merge conflict due to changes to the internal `TypeMetadata` API for JDK-8303820.
>
> Liam Miller-Cushon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains four additional commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - Merge branch 'master' into redo-JDK-8341779
>  - Backport 67c4a0826babb55ce56acf2b3b289b51d9d5529e
>  - Resolve merge conflict
>    
>    due to changes to the internal TypeMetadata API for JDK-8303820
>  - Backport de6667cf11aa59d1bab78ae5fb235ea0b901d5c4

@cushon 
Your change (at version aaf1c53e53edbdf060c66a607f74289ae4c1135c) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4124#issuecomment-3608305493

From duke at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 18:54:03 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Roland Mesde)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 18:54:03 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8365065: cancelled ForkJoinPool tasks no longer
 throw CancellationException
In-Reply-To: <wQxZ0kQJLkSGKrwDEzTbN1OoJe1pPFKwayDXRsdbrDk=.d24efbb7-3820-45ad-b49c-4dc72af289b6@github.com>
References: <jr68T0yaqN7F1tCKIcIjFF_maC9HIuGP_4seak_XY4s=.15c4475c-3ad6-4604-aad6-0c8c4935bae7@github.com>
 <wQxZ0kQJLkSGKrwDEzTbN1OoJe1pPFKwayDXRsdbrDk=.d24efbb7-3820-45ad-b49c-4dc72af289b6@github.com>
Message-ID: <U1iVXFAO9CrKYob43uTQeHeLvs3dcqlHJeeKiQToVdM=.efcbb4aa-e761-4bac-a3bd-10b1f3661b93@github.com>

On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 11:57:54 GMT, Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Backporting JDK-8365065: Cancelled ForkJoinPool tasks no longer throw CancellationException. Fixes the exception propagation and tests. Based on the original bug it is a regression and it last worked in version 17.0.16. Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed), jtreg tier1 tests (passed) and related tests (passed) on linux-x64, linux-aarch64, macos-aarch64 and windows-x64:
>> 
>> (Passed) - make test-tier1
>> (Passed) - make test TEST=test/jdk/java/util/concurrent
>> 
>> Results are attached.
>> 
>> [linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23776572/linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
>> [linux-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23776573/linux-aarch64-specific-test.log)
>> [linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23776574/linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
>> [linux-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23776575/linux-x64-specific-test.log)
>> [macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23776576/macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
>> [macos-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23776577/macos-aarch64-specific-test.log)
>> [windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23776578/windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
>> [windows-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23776579/windows-x64-specific-test.log)
>
> Hi @rm-gh-8 
> Please supply sufficient approval request comments.
> Read https://wiki.openjdk.org/display/JDKUpdates/How+to+contribute+or+backport+a+fix thoroughly please! Expecially 6 ii)
> You need to talk about:
> *Why you backport.  Why should the change go to the update release (No, not because it fixes the bug!)
> *The risk of breaking anything, especially running applications that obtain an update.
> *Short description of how you backported (clean? trivial edit? other changes included?)
> *Clean is only clean if Skara says so!
> *Short test overview.
> This goes to the JBS issue, it needs to make sense there.  If you repeat the title of the bug that's quite pointless.
> 
> I will silently remove the fix request labels if the approval comment does not help me to assess the backport. Later, I might just reject them.

@GoeLin I edited the existing approval comments on the other PRs pending approval.

Before I proceed with this current PR. It is modifying the exception propagation back to be compliant with the specification, but it does make a modification in the javadoc. Is expectation to remove the javadoc comment changes from the backport so it just entails behavioral changes?

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/3#issuecomment-3608320852

From vromero at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 19:11:42 2025
From: vromero at openjdk.org (Vicente Romero)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 19:11:42 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8337795: Type annotation attached to incorrect
 type during class reading [v3]
In-Reply-To: <abjUbs1vL3PEfwctVsRjJWa1be972lYKHpMH3LwmQ-E=.b04f2653-3d1f-4923-b9b8-8ec1119521ec@github.com>
References: <DHyNPbuiFS7FKeIRaF_uILtvruJJIWBHsh7tKZbC8rY=.5451454f-8ec5-43a0-a768-1a640d05a688@github.com>
 <abjUbs1vL3PEfwctVsRjJWa1be972lYKHpMH3LwmQ-E=.b04f2653-3d1f-4923-b9b8-8ec1119521ec@github.com>
Message-ID: <cevJwNBj3V_kFpWmHtPIQK-rAimK1GDbm8pU7Y7JDzw=.b69af271-ed06-4ceb-9b20-41a403e419b1@github.com>

On Sat, 1 Nov 2025 21:26:41 GMT, Liam Miller-Cushon <cushon at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> This is a backport of [JDK-8337795](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8337795), which is a follow-up to [JDK-8341779](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8341779).
>
> Liam Miller-Cushon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains two commits:
> 
>  - Fix merge
>  - Backport 8d0831478338e9b084b2c47f46eba9faae3a5eb6

lgtm

-------------

Marked as reviewed by vromero (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4149#pullrequestreview-3536523639

From vromero at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 19:14:42 2025
From: vromero at openjdk.org (Vicente Romero)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 19:14:42 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8337998: CompletionFailure in getEnclosingType
 attaching type annotations [v2]
In-Reply-To: <kqFELuLPPCrgdB_SzVnmPpE5lhTWl83OCNTcvUE4xIA=.a4b049a1-8dbb-4c8f-9a3d-836221991121@github.com>
References: <o9w6smYHAvZ_YtCUS2aBJidNukziUkY9eiwNEo2GhTg=.f96c1cbd-f317-4352-bac0-3e59801a0030@github.com>
 <kqFELuLPPCrgdB_SzVnmPpE5lhTWl83OCNTcvUE4xIA=.a4b049a1-8dbb-4c8f-9a3d-836221991121@github.com>
Message-ID: <bg2M0xBPj4sp27D89ZgeqgboCIpyLNbKwKlRCsKDqNI=.d08ba36d-affe-4dc9-814e-29d08358f9ca@github.com>

On Sat, 1 Nov 2025 21:36:57 GMT, Liam Miller-Cushon <cushon at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> This is a backport of [JDK-8337998](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8337998), which is a follow-up to [JDK-8341779](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8341779).
>
> Liam Miller-Cushon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase.

lgtm

-------------

Marked as reviewed by vromero (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4150#pullrequestreview-3536538065

From vromero at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 19:19:40 2025
From: vromero at openjdk.org (Vicente Romero)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 19:19:40 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8354893: [REDO BACKPORT] javac crashes while
 adding type annotations to the return type of a constructor (JDK-8320001)
In-Reply-To: <W7_bRaIrSEaA5xuxM1dkABxlKM9kawkbBM_MIajjxws=.1488e4f9-1be8-46bf-b06b-026924a81f14@github.com>
References: <W7_bRaIrSEaA5xuxM1dkABxlKM9kawkbBM_MIajjxws=.1488e4f9-1be8-46bf-b06b-026924a81f14@github.com>
Message-ID: <W3o6vUt-PIXrKncm0KsFZKu8op2gX8lFuFjI3gvjgYQ=.8bbd5e8f-6529-40e9-8547-3179431747f0@github.com>

On Sat, 1 Nov 2025 21:38:56 GMT, Liam Miller-Cushon <cushon at openjdk.org> wrote:

> This is a backport of [JDK-8354893](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8354893), which is a follow-up to [JDK-8341779](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8341779).

lgtm

-------------

Marked as reviewed by vromero (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4151#pullrequestreview-3536561635

From vromero at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 19:21:37 2025
From: vromero at openjdk.org (Vicente Romero)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 19:21:37 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8360406: [21u] Disable logic for attaching type
 annotations to class files until 8359336 is fixed
In-Reply-To: <_2z4TMcc9XfKKYWLlEG-ZG3DsWtTqU9jB-8Ha8vxEQc=.58bae22b-4bae-4677-b899-5300e83c540b@github.com>
References: <_2z4TMcc9XfKKYWLlEG-ZG3DsWtTqU9jB-8Ha8vxEQc=.58bae22b-4bae-4677-b899-5300e83c540b@github.com>
Message-ID: <ycoBFNcmSR6GWLqoWBUvgTVEGWVLxB8lO-YjRlBp-nE=.8f586cfd-1322-4074-a9fc-07d854c92e1a@github.com>

On Sun, 2 Nov 2025 10:01:03 GMT, Liam Miller-Cushon <cushon at openjdk.org> wrote:

> This is a backport of [JDK-8360406](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8360406), which is a follow-up to [JDK-8341779](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8341779).

lgtm

-------------

Marked as reviewed by vromero (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4152#pullrequestreview-3536568632

From phh at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 19:26:34 2025
From: phh at openjdk.org (Paul Hohensee)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 19:26:34 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8301379: Verify TLS_ECDH_* cipher suites cannot
 be negotiated
In-Reply-To: <--5hP-bNjh64S0-P_iXjzqybQrW_WHS35yPxikOiXug=.9b7bb688-169e-4674-b85a-e93894f52087@github.com>
References: <--5hP-bNjh64S0-P_iXjzqybQrW_WHS35yPxikOiXug=.9b7bb688-169e-4674-b85a-e93894f52087@github.com>
Message-ID: <xNJE6XwaFGaUMrm9zpFjGE3CIE1QDa902IHpf248blk=.1e62db33-da77-453c-a608-8e37184986b4@github.com>

On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 15:10:30 GMT, Radek Cap <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backport of JDK-8301379 - Verify TLS_ECDH_* cipher suites cannot be negotiated
> 
> Backporting for parity with 11.0.26-oracle.
> 
> More or less a clean backport, just adding merge with the current jdk11u-dev repo state.
> 
> Passed tier1 tests. 
> Passed gtests.
> 
> GH Actions are passing

Marked as reviewed by phh (Reviewer).

-------------

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3128#pullrequestreview-3536583700

From andrew at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 19:28:13 2025
From: andrew at openjdk.org (Andrew John Hughes)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 19:28:13 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8292177: InitialSecurityProperty JFR event [v2]
In-Reply-To: <i03kWEhXTk7JXYB3koVNDbUcD3mb_a0NTCHyBmN3g20=.d306254b-bc4b-4270-af00-960952bbbd07@github.com>
References: <i03kWEhXTk7JXYB3koVNDbUcD3mb_a0NTCHyBmN3g20=.d306254b-bc4b-4270-af00-960952bbbd07@github.com>
Message-ID: <fchq_Ce9Dq-E8bkPXgn9ebQXHX3JJWtryfQJWnG9Lgo=.9d4e1ced-70ef-484c-add0-c1572b3df2ea@github.com>

> This backport introduces the JFR security event, `InitialSecurityProperty`, and along with it, the caching of the initial security properties which is also used by [JDK-8281658](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8281658) to show the security properties with `-XshowSettings`.
> 
> The change was backported to the Oracle fork of 11u in 11.0.20.
> 
> The following changes were necessary for the backport:
> 
> * `JavaSecurityPropertiesAccess` is moved to `jdk.internal.misc` where `SharedSecrets` lives in 11u
> * `ensureClassInitialized` in `SharedSecrets` is called from the `unsafe` instance in 11u, as with other `get*Access()` methods in that class
> * The patch to `module-info.java` is not needed as `jdk.jfr` already has access to `jdk.internal.misc` in 11u. The 17u addition is to `jdk.internal.access`.
> * There are context differences in `JDKEvents.java` due to events introduced in later JDK versions.
> * The `EventNames.java` test includes a huge unrelated change to reorganise the order of the variable modifiers. This was applied manually to the names in 11u, which differ slightly from those in 17u.
> 
> All `jdk.jfr.event` tests passed, including the new one, with the exception of `TestNative`, but that seems to be a setup issue rather than a regression caused by this patch (`Error. Use -nativepath to specify the location of native code`)

Andrew John Hughes has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains two additional commits since the last revision:

 - Merge remote-tracking branch 'jdk11u-dev/master' into JDK-8292177
 - Backport 95f23f7d82c0ebfd94c72b08695f9f415587a16a

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/2827/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/2827/files/3286f459..5ebb24de

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk11u-dev&pr=2827&range=01
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk11u-dev&pr=2827&range=00-01

  Stats: 94066 lines in 1591 files changed: 50829 ins; 27947 del; 15290 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/2827.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev.git pull/2827/head:pull/2827

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/2827

From andrew at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 19:28:15 2025
From: andrew at openjdk.org (Andrew John Hughes)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 19:28:15 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8292177: InitialSecurityProperty JFR event
In-Reply-To: <i03kWEhXTk7JXYB3koVNDbUcD3mb_a0NTCHyBmN3g20=.d306254b-bc4b-4270-af00-960952bbbd07@github.com>
References: <i03kWEhXTk7JXYB3koVNDbUcD3mb_a0NTCHyBmN3g20=.d306254b-bc4b-4270-af00-960952bbbd07@github.com>
Message-ID: <Lj7PWQKL16ZipoD99FO-sfulqo3_8bhogxWrnRcKk7s=.b0fe12a3-cc0f-4f12-9190-fd05cd3c8ce3@github.com>

On Sat, 29 Jun 2024 16:21:19 GMT, Andrew John Hughes <andrew at openjdk.org> wrote:

> This backport introduces the JFR security event, `InitialSecurityProperty`, and along with it, the caching of the initial security properties which is also used by [JDK-8281658](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8281658) to show the security properties with `-XshowSettings`.
> 
> The change was backported to the Oracle fork of 11u in 11.0.20.
> 
> The following changes were necessary for the backport:
> 
> * `JavaSecurityPropertiesAccess` is moved to `jdk.internal.misc` where `SharedSecrets` lives in 11u
> * `ensureClassInitialized` in `SharedSecrets` is called from the `unsafe` instance in 11u, as with other `get*Access()` methods in that class
> * The patch to `module-info.java` is not needed as `jdk.jfr` already has access to `jdk.internal.misc` in 11u. The 17u addition is to `jdk.internal.access`.
> * There are context differences in `JDKEvents.java` due to events introduced in later JDK versions.
> * The `EventNames.java` test includes a huge unrelated change to reorganise the order of the variable modifiers. This was applied manually to the names in 11u, which differ slightly from those in 17u.
> 
> All `jdk.jfr.event` tests passed, including the new one, with the exception of `TestNative`, but that seems to be a setup issue rather than a regression caused by this patch (`Error. Use -nativepath to specify the location of native code`)

Merge was clean.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/2827#issuecomment-3608478753

From phh at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 20:09:37 2025
From: phh at openjdk.org (Paul Hohensee)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 20:09:37 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8298783:
 java/lang/ref/FinalizerHistogramTest.java failed with
 "RuntimeException: MyObject is not found in test output" [v5]
In-Reply-To: <KzoUop2a1N_RaOx_kCHErg-r7hXa-R9SePkU7IZC8rs=.94d723eb-b352-4cd7-b700-1151424a632e@github.com>
References: <BVUOhDqiq0ed4UfA8GaajWtIotxx3IgIF3hPegBzG9g=.dd263152-4735-4c7e-99c9-a37031acbd68@github.com>
 <KzoUop2a1N_RaOx_kCHErg-r7hXa-R9SePkU7IZC8rs=.94d723eb-b352-4cd7-b700-1151424a632e@github.com>
Message-ID: <hsIh8J35gpV2ATGTV_adjjlJEHbLqxEiQsCgDCmbBus=.198968c1-cd2c-4862-b440-b3c37ca80685@github.com>

On Sat, 22 Nov 2025 00:16:12 GMT, SendaoYan <syan at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Hi all,
>> 
>> This pull request contains a backport of commit [fe29cad5](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/fe29cad5e0b10cd088fc39967599f5a8dcaa445c) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
>> 
>> The commit being backported was authored by Brent Christian on 6 May 2025 and was reviewed by Kim Barrett and Jaikiran Pai.
>> 
>> This PR is intend to fix the test bug which cause test intermittent fails. Backport not clean because the path of `sun.hotspot.WhiteBox` different to main-line, the path should adopt to jdk11u-dev when backport from main-line to jdk11u-dev, Other parts is cleanly.
>> 
>> I have verified this backport plus with https://github.com/openjdk/jdk11u-dev/pull/3105.
>> 
>> Thanks!
>
> SendaoYan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains five additional commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into backport-sendaoYan-fe29cad5-master
>  - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into backport-sendaoYan-fe29cad5-master
>  - Adopt to jdk11u-dev
>  - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into backport-sendaoYan-fe29cad5-master
>  - Backport fe29cad5e0b10cd088fc39967599f5a8dcaa445c

Marked as reviewed by phh (Reviewer).

-------------

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3074#pullrequestreview-3536721360

From serb at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 20:36:39 2025
From: serb at openjdk.org (Sergey Bylokhov)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 20:36:39 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] Integrated: 8371759: Add missing @Override annotations in
 com.sun.imageio package
In-Reply-To: <upZRBqa6iVSXxTa8w-p_d0RVpbj_bU63PAmazEAXPAc=.446cd24d-0b30-4c43-8a65-3036488976a0@github.com>
References: <upZRBqa6iVSXxTa8w-p_d0RVpbj_bU63PAmazEAXPAc=.446cd24d-0b30-4c43-8a65-3036488976a0@github.com>
Message-ID: <mdbo9vDcDZQ-11UenNLf8ZuMcG4VJiTA_3-ErA_zmeU=.b67fb062-3269-40b9-99cc-e8e732a9c88e@github.com>

On Mon, 1 Dec 2025 23:01:11 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov <serb at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [0c6d1b9c](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/0c6d1b9c8bfd7f4e39a6621c7a8f7bdcd044a05f) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Sergey Bylokhov on 28 Nov 2025 and was reviewed by Tejesh R, Jayathirth D V and Alexander Zvegintsev.
> 
> Thanks!

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 25e491bd
Author:    Sergey Bylokhov <serb at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/commit/25e491bde586c021f182c2891bd8658c7daee430
Stats:     491 lines in 93 files changed: 401 ins; 0 del; 90 mod

8371759: Add missing @Override annotations in com.sun.imageio package

Backport-of: 0c6d1b9c8bfd7f4e39a6621c7a8f7bdcd044a05f

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/39

From duke at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 22:26:54 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Roland Mesde)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 22:26:54 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8360562: sun/security/tools/keytool/i18n.java add an
 ability to add comment for failures
Message-ID: <Afrtb6OwPzSP-_pq7lWkOR1UWHxyJHU1cJrKV0m7vwc=.824d0d1e-dd76-4a57-9dc9-0f912e9ed62d@github.com>

Backporting JDK-8360562: sun/security/tools/keytool/i18n.java add an ability to add comment for failures.

For parity with Oracle JDK. The commit adds failure comment capability to sun/security/tools/keytool/i18n.java to enable faster verification and reporting.

Ran the manual test on macos-aarch64:

jtreg -jdk build/macosx-aarch64-server-release/images/jdk -vmoption:-Duser.language=en -m test/jdk/sun/security/tools/keytool/i18n.java

It generated the dialog box when the "fail" button is selected and the written text is reflected on the test report. Screenshots attached.

<img width="782" height="493" alt="DialogBox" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b1c10e7a-7d1e-488e-ac67-b3d61e26cbe4" />
<img width="538" height="213" alt="TestReport" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e4c64f00-b556-4a14-9073-0df3522603b1" />

Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed), and jtreg tier1 tests (passed) on linux-x64, linux-aarch64, macos-aarch64 and windows-x64:

(Passed) - make test-tier1

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport ebb6fd7d7865fd20ff2f90b4ef72c5ef6a3e5dea

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/57/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk25u-dev&pr=57&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8360562
  Stats: 44 lines in 1 file changed: 42 ins; 0 del; 2 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/57.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev.git pull/57/head:pull/57

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/57

From duke at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 22:29:29 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Roland Mesde)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 22:29:29 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8366182: Some PKCS11Tests are being skipped when
 they shouldn't
Message-ID: <VLnqIqI9wQqIjNyKQtEXIedFpIZdEtFQ24kyBQWda_w=.14be0e15-cda3-404a-838d-e55a64493926@github.com>

Backporting JDK-8366182: Some PKCS11Tests are being skipped when they shouldn't.

For parity with Oracle JDK. The commit fixes PKCS11 tests to correctly parse NSS version numbers by comparing major and minor versions separately instead of treating them as doubles, which incorrectly ordered versions like 3.111 between 3.11 and 3.12.

Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed), jtreg tier1 tests (passed) and related tests (passed) on linux-x64, linux-aarch64, macos-aarch64 and windows-x64:

(Passed) - make test-tier1
(Passed) - make test TEST=test/jdk/jdk/sun/security/pkcs11

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport cc9483b4da1a0f65f8773d0c7f35f2e6a7e1bd4f

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/59/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk25u-dev&pr=59&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8366182
  Stats: 92 lines in 6 files changed: 27 ins; 19 del; 46 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/59.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev.git pull/59/head:pull/59

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/59

From duke at openjdk.org  Wed Dec  3 22:29:35 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Roland Mesde)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 22:29:35 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8357470:
 src/java.base/share/classes/sun/security/util/Debug.java implement the test
 for args.toLowerCase
Message-ID: <lXGtGMy8sG3jc32yHWbJ5MHNfK2rQatJPtfEEIcr3iw=.2d973e0a-12a4-4b9c-9939-0b8b56ed5b39@github.com>

Backporting JDK-8357470: src/java.base/share/classes/sun/security/util/Debug.java implement the test for args.toLowerCase.

Enhanced sun/security/util/Debug.java test with:
- Implemented args.toLowerCase validation
- Added automated mixed-case option testing
- Converted to multi-threaded execution
- Added debug logging
- Added missing -Djava.security.auth.debug coverage

For parity with Oracle JDK. 

Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed), jtreg tier1 tests (passed) and related tests (passed) on linux-x64, linux-aarch64, macos-aarch64 and windows-x64:

(Passed) - make test-tier1
(Passed) - make test TEST=test/jdk/sun/security/util/Debug

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport 6d0bbc8a18fa555b5e8d132bef400097ef6ee5cb

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/58/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk25u-dev&pr=58&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8357470
  Stats: 131 lines in 1 file changed: 87 ins; 4 del; 40 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/58.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev.git pull/58/head:pull/58

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/58

From syan at openjdk.org  Thu Dec  4 02:54:21 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 02:54:21 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8372857: Improve debuggability of
 java/rmi/server/RemoteServer/AddrInUse.java test
Message-ID: <mk867aUpV-vHKhHiWZswdavXDvbrXVQZ72_NfbmahHk=.ba2fc83c-3cca-404d-a4d9-40d8647604b8@github.com>

Hi all,

This pull request contains a backport of commit [04c0f8d3](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/04c0f8d359a3f450ac2070c6d41834145d9c75f7) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.

The commit being backported was authored by Jaikiran Pai on 4 Dec 2025 and was reviewed by Mark Sheppard, Stuart Marks and SendaoYan.

Thanks!

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport 04c0f8d359a3f450ac2070c6d41834145d9c75f7

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4202/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk17u-dev&pr=4202&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8372857
  Stats: 76 lines in 1 file changed: 17 ins; 39 del; 20 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4202.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/4202/head:pull/4202

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4202

From syan at openjdk.org  Thu Dec  4 02:54:39 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 02:54:39 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8372857: Improve debuggability of
 java/rmi/server/RemoteServer/AddrInUse.java test
Message-ID: <0DH34KmhcMD1R1JqEFnhNvbUSBdTZi-SrFhbNO-bGf0=.2ddc4724-ec05-492f-828b-35a8547f19db@github.com>

Hi all,

This pull request contains a backport of commit [04c0f8d3](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/04c0f8d359a3f450ac2070c6d41834145d9c75f7) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.

The commit being backported was authored by Jaikiran Pai on 4 Dec 2025 and was reviewed by Mark Sheppard, Stuart Marks and SendaoYan.

Thanks!

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport 04c0f8d359a3f450ac2070c6d41834145d9c75f7

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3129/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk11u-dev&pr=3129&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8372857
  Stats: 76 lines in 1 file changed: 17 ins; 39 del; 20 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3129.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev.git pull/3129/head:pull/3129

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3129

From syan at openjdk.org  Thu Dec  4 02:56:46 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 02:56:46 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8372857: Improve debuggability of
 java/rmi/server/RemoteServer/AddrInUse.java test
Message-ID: <A85_KucGcri-jR5Q7TZa60cYwldK0YWgO2pL0MudsEw=.08b2d149-bde3-4b5a-9fce-c7fbbac976ed@github.com>

Hi all,

This pull request contains a backport of commit [04c0f8d3](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/04c0f8d359a3f450ac2070c6d41834145d9c75f7) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.

The commit being backported was authored by Jaikiran Pai on 4 Dec 2025 and was reviewed by Mark Sheppard, Stuart Marks and SendaoYan.

Thanks!

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport 04c0f8d359a3f450ac2070c6d41834145d9c75f7

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/60/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk25u-dev&pr=60&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8372857
  Stats: 76 lines in 1 file changed: 17 ins; 39 del; 20 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/60.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev.git pull/60/head:pull/60

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/60

From syan at openjdk.org  Thu Dec  4 02:58:14 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 02:58:14 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8372857: Improve debuggability of
 java/rmi/server/RemoteServer/AddrInUse.java test
In-Reply-To: <0DH34KmhcMD1R1JqEFnhNvbUSBdTZi-SrFhbNO-bGf0=.2ddc4724-ec05-492f-828b-35a8547f19db@github.com>
References: <0DH34KmhcMD1R1JqEFnhNvbUSBdTZi-SrFhbNO-bGf0=.2ddc4724-ec05-492f-828b-35a8547f19db@github.com>
Message-ID: <QtOQJdfUeLcjvkqhq1jG_GtIzaN-vvMkAfv5CYhPlCg=.eb03c44f-5d71-4b34-b103-2a32235089de@github.com>

On Thu, 4 Dec 2025 02:48:29 GMT, SendaoYan <syan at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [04c0f8d3](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/04c0f8d359a3f450ac2070c6d41834145d9c75f7) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Jaikiran Pai on 4 Dec 2025 and was reviewed by Mark Sheppard, Stuart Marks and SendaoYan.
> 
> Thanks!

Change has been verified locally on linux-x64 by run the test test/jdk/java/rmi/server/RemoteServer/AddrInUse.java manually.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3129#issuecomment-3609810570

From syan at openjdk.org  Thu Dec  4 02:58:15 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 02:58:15 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8372857: Improve debuggability of
 java/rmi/server/RemoteServer/AddrInUse.java test
In-Reply-To: <mk867aUpV-vHKhHiWZswdavXDvbrXVQZ72_NfbmahHk=.ba2fc83c-3cca-404d-a4d9-40d8647604b8@github.com>
References: <mk867aUpV-vHKhHiWZswdavXDvbrXVQZ72_NfbmahHk=.ba2fc83c-3cca-404d-a4d9-40d8647604b8@github.com>
Message-ID: <Mebd9WYF7bY6YG1MCoRONJo_npZvxok1-IPkNEKKCfg=.03bcd4cb-5442-4d43-9f5a-5ae152e5302c@github.com>

On Thu, 4 Dec 2025 02:48:26 GMT, SendaoYan <syan at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [04c0f8d3](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/04c0f8d359a3f450ac2070c6d41834145d9c75f7) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Jaikiran Pai on 4 Dec 2025 and was reviewed by Mark Sheppard, Stuart Marks and SendaoYan.
> 
> Thanks!

Change has been verified locally on linux-x64 by run the test test/jdk/java/rmi/server/RemoteServer/AddrInUse.java manually.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4202#issuecomment-3609810443

From syan at openjdk.org  Thu Dec  4 02:59:05 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 02:59:05 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8372857: Improve debuggability of
 java/rmi/server/RemoteServer/AddrInUse.java test
In-Reply-To: <A85_KucGcri-jR5Q7TZa60cYwldK0YWgO2pL0MudsEw=.08b2d149-bde3-4b5a-9fce-c7fbbac976ed@github.com>
References: <A85_KucGcri-jR5Q7TZa60cYwldK0YWgO2pL0MudsEw=.08b2d149-bde3-4b5a-9fce-c7fbbac976ed@github.com>
Message-ID: <lkLVhYu4vfP7hB1kn5ppcwfuIHyJCaBhvuP6Bdx4_I8=.bec43b3f-ccb1-4c19-845f-3487a249de17@github.com>

On Thu, 4 Dec 2025 02:48:17 GMT, SendaoYan <syan at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [04c0f8d3](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/04c0f8d359a3f450ac2070c6d41834145d9c75f7) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Jaikiran Pai on 4 Dec 2025 and was reviewed by Mark Sheppard, Stuart Marks and SendaoYan.
> 
> Thanks!

Change has been verified locally on linux-x64 by run the test test/jdk/java/rmi/server/RemoteServer/AddrInUse.java manually.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/60#issuecomment-3609809462

From syan at openjdk.org  Thu Dec  4 02:59:44 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 02:59:44 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8372857: Improve debuggability of
 java/rmi/server/RemoteServer/AddrInUse.java test
Message-ID: <nu8ri7loHeyBlRx9y7ArLRstFzwvbY44wNXCPVwNYs4=.7f43a305-c519-4315-bc22-81b45668424b@github.com>

Hi all,

This pull request contains a backport of commit [04c0f8d3](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/04c0f8d359a3f450ac2070c6d41834145d9c75f7) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.

The commit being backported was authored by Jaikiran Pai on 4 Dec 2025 and was reviewed by Mark Sheppard, Stuart Marks and SendaoYan.

Thanks!

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport 04c0f8d359a3f450ac2070c6d41834145d9c75f7

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2505/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk21u-dev&pr=2505&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8372857
  Stats: 76 lines in 1 file changed: 17 ins; 39 del; 20 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2505.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/2505/head:pull/2505

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2505

From syan at openjdk.org  Thu Dec  4 02:59:45 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 02:59:45 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8372857: Improve debuggability of
 java/rmi/server/RemoteServer/AddrInUse.java test
In-Reply-To: <nu8ri7loHeyBlRx9y7ArLRstFzwvbY44wNXCPVwNYs4=.7f43a305-c519-4315-bc22-81b45668424b@github.com>
References: <nu8ri7loHeyBlRx9y7ArLRstFzwvbY44wNXCPVwNYs4=.7f43a305-c519-4315-bc22-81b45668424b@github.com>
Message-ID: <En4hAJhKB0GKzQEQ5p6GzEI0zMK4mX9uRb49hL1RWUQ=.05678040-9bd5-45f7-a0cf-f2df38850e9c@github.com>

On Thu, 4 Dec 2025 02:48:20 GMT, SendaoYan <syan at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [04c0f8d3](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/04c0f8d359a3f450ac2070c6d41834145d9c75f7) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Jaikiran Pai on 4 Dec 2025 and was reviewed by Mark Sheppard, Stuart Marks and SendaoYan.
> 
> Thanks!

Change has been verified locally on linux-x64 by run the test test/jdk/java/rmi/server/RemoteServer/AddrInUse.java manually.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2505#issuecomment-3609809588

From syan at openjdk.org  Thu Dec  4 03:02:36 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 03:02:36 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8371114: Problemlist
 vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/events/EM02/em02t006/TestDescription.java [v2]
In-Reply-To: <D6Sy0XORTHudx1vzG7RnbUWK_Rdugp6P-JFr6H_BlIY=.b174a9f7-867c-4c9d-a9c0-41b733f14a2a@github.com>
References: <D6Sy0XORTHudx1vzG7RnbUWK_Rdugp6P-JFr6H_BlIY=.b174a9f7-867c-4c9d-a9c0-41b733f14a2a@github.com>
Message-ID: <GEqaURWZQiyZvg_qekY30_J5FoRgm71D6Yex-yeaS4A=.e5f9614f-c95d-4c12-9768-aac2abe5ebf8@github.com>

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [7d3c66f3](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/7d3c66f379fcb24d4505c2c12e20b24dce313e56) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Leonid Mesnik on 4 Nov 2025 and was reviewed by Alex Menkov, SendaoYan and Serguei Spitsyn.
> 
> Backport parity with JDK-8370732
> 
> Thanks!

SendaoYan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains two additional commits since the last revision:

 - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into jbs8371114
 - Backport 7d3c66f379fcb24d4505c2c12e20b24dce313e56

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2447/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2447/files/8c9ebc2f..949e4cef

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk21u-dev&pr=2447&range=01
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk21u-dev&pr=2447&range=00-01

  Stats: 15598 lines in 162 files changed: 5448 ins; 1585 del; 8565 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2447.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/2447/head:pull/2447

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2447

From syan at openjdk.org  Thu Dec  4 03:02:50 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 03:02:50 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8371114: Problemlist
 vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/events/EM02/em02t006/TestDescription.java [v2]
In-Reply-To: <gPAr6cQlrzbCA2tbbrXXGYswWcLX_orK1z2XL-YhKWQ=.373190b7-78a6-43da-b60b-6ad77aa226fc@github.com>
References: <gPAr6cQlrzbCA2tbbrXXGYswWcLX_orK1z2XL-YhKWQ=.373190b7-78a6-43da-b60b-6ad77aa226fc@github.com>
Message-ID: <siSIPjOAy6PeunTd0f_G3NnVQDU5vPfKCSLKMfTEdgA=.2ce7c1b5-2c1a-4732-9694-a00fca60f4b9@github.com>

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [7d3c66f3](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/7d3c66f379fcb24d4505c2c12e20b24dce313e56) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Leonid Mesnik on 4 Nov 2025 and was reviewed by Alex Menkov, SendaoYan and Serguei Spitsyn.
> 
> Backport parity with JDK-8370732
> 
> Thanks!

SendaoYan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains two additional commits since the last revision:

 - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into jbs8371114
 - Backport 7d3c66f379fcb24d4505c2c12e20b24dce313e56

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4157/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4157/files/dbfd9a9f..e94f21f1

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk17u-dev&pr=4157&range=01
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk17u-dev&pr=4157&range=00-01

  Stats: 5305 lines in 108 files changed: 3735 ins; 1243 del; 327 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4157.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/4157/head:pull/4157

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4157

From clanger at openjdk.org  Thu Dec  4 06:28:03 2025
From: clanger at openjdk.org (Christoph Langer)
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 06:28:03 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] Integrated: 8317838:
 java/nio/channels/Channels/SocketChannelStreams.java running into timeout
 (aix)
In-Reply-To: <rojjUz-pb8fA4tDq75oBOao6qvfxwXLyHJRAl0YulMI=.9431e723-9fbd-4bdc-96d7-037b6bb7c788@github.com>
References: <rojjUz-pb8fA4tDq75oBOao6qvfxwXLyHJRAl0YulMI=.9431e723-9fbd-4bdc-96d7-037b6bb7c788@github.com>
Message-ID: <4g-Pg7AlA8oRG_GfQJV_tADr93iy99O0yi9c-oKIzYI=.4ac45ffe-12b6-4a84-a143-c31aa0cdd60f@github.com>

On Fri, 28 Nov 2025 06:23:11 GMT, Christoph Langer <clanger at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Unclean problemlist removal.

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 6cf94cce
Author:    Christoph Langer <clanger at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/commit/6cf94cce29495f10947b3d73c1d1eed1031e04d9
Stats:     2 lines in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 2 del; 0 mod

8317838: java/nio/channels/Channels/SocketChannelStreams.java running into timeout (aix)

Reviewed-by: mbaesken
Backport-of: b2f97131d643ad7ebde137617999f1689a204975

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/30

From clanger at openjdk.org  Thu Dec  4 06:51:26 2025
From: clanger at openjdk.org (Christoph Langer)
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 06:51:26 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8317838:
 java/nio/channels/Channels/SocketChannelStreams.java running into timeout
 (aix)
Message-ID: <p2JiilaOlXKQfOob8b0-GLoRGKCsFLWsgb0PWPla_0c=.b49e26a6-4de6-45d4-a87c-fc44051afaa8@github.com>

Problemlist removal.

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport 6cf94cce29495f10947b3d73c1d1eed1031e04d9

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2506/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk21u-dev&pr=2506&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8317838
  Stats: 2 lines in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 2 del; 0 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2506.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/2506/head:pull/2506

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2506

From syan at openjdk.org  Thu Dec  4 07:46:28 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 07:46:28 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8371978: tools/jar/ReproducibleJar.java fails on XFS
Message-ID: <exrsI5b3jY-I2UyubvLYynxeA9SJmuZYF45H-ISP8cM=.32d58055-f5fe-4ea5-9211-6dd782cab68e@github.com>

Hi all,

This pull request contains a backport of commit [828498c5](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/828498c54b3b1089af9e076cb45f3cf3bea58e2f) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.

The commit being backported was authored by SendaoYan on 4 Dec 2025 and was reviewed by Jaikiran Pai.

Thanks!

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport 828498c54b3b1089af9e076cb45f3cf3bea58e2f

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/61/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk25u-dev&pr=61&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8371978
  Stats: 11 lines in 1 file changed: 5 ins; 0 del; 6 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/61.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev.git pull/61/head:pull/61

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/61

From syan at openjdk.org  Thu Dec  4 07:47:41 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 07:47:41 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8371978: tools/jar/ReproducibleJar.java fails on XFS
Message-ID: <yYbnHNUg4rDWiO7fkom6PTedKI3hGdj142bR1dqF_18=.51830604-7588-4cc0-a6a8-225c89e88749@github.com>

Hi all,

This pull request contains a backport of commit [828498c5](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/828498c54b3b1089af9e076cb45f3cf3bea58e2f) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.

The commit being backported was authored by SendaoYan on 4 Dec 2025 and was reviewed by Jaikiran Pai.

Thanks!

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport 828498c54b3b1089af9e076cb45f3cf3bea58e2f

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2507/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk21u-dev&pr=2507&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8371978
  Stats: 11 lines in 1 file changed: 5 ins; 0 del; 6 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2507.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/2507/head:pull/2507

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2507

From syan at openjdk.org  Thu Dec  4 08:08:03 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 08:08:03 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8371978: tools/jar/ReproducibleJar.java fails on XFS
Message-ID: <R9-00YKRODZYBRdVpvLqG9--7wsWP1shkYlj0sqq7vI=.788f3fe4-0fe9-40d8-b566-efdbfadcec58@github.com>

Hi all,

This backport PR fix the test bug which may cause test fails on XFS file system. Only the copyright year can not backport cleanly. Other parts are all clean.

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport 828498c54b3b1089af9e076cb45f3cf3bea58e2f

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4203/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk17u-dev&pr=4203&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8371978
  Stats: 11 lines in 1 file changed: 5 ins; 0 del; 6 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4203.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/4203/head:pull/4203

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4203

From mbaesken at openjdk.org  Thu Dec  4 08:23:05 2025
From: mbaesken at openjdk.org (Matthias Baesken)
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 08:23:05 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8317838:
 java/nio/channels/Channels/SocketChannelStreams.java running into timeout
 (aix)
In-Reply-To: <p2JiilaOlXKQfOob8b0-GLoRGKCsFLWsgb0PWPla_0c=.b49e26a6-4de6-45d4-a87c-fc44051afaa8@github.com>
References: <p2JiilaOlXKQfOob8b0-GLoRGKCsFLWsgb0PWPla_0c=.b49e26a6-4de6-45d4-a87c-fc44051afaa8@github.com>
Message-ID: <QRUdnBj0hJkB_3OjXskie_zQ3RF06Ma1Z8nGKfQiSrM=.1567d42c-24e4-42ff-971b-3e65cf584190@github.com>

On Thu, 4 Dec 2025 06:42:58 GMT, Christoph Langer <clanger at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Problemlist removal.

Marked as reviewed by mbaesken (Reviewer).

-------------

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2506#pullrequestreview-3538675495

From duke at openjdk.org  Thu Dec  4 08:28:05 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (duke)
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 08:28:05 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u] RFR: 8359064: Expose reason for marking nmethod
 non-entrant to JVMCI client
In-Reply-To: <-zbGZQ4CrP-CAz-AwfawsUhI8vxwTq4GC3uXOEfNVcw=.ebc76743-bcd7-40bc-8178-c0f6990c38cf@github.com>
References: <-zbGZQ4CrP-CAz-AwfawsUhI8vxwTq4GC3uXOEfNVcw=.ebc76743-bcd7-40bc-8178-c0f6990c38cf@github.com>
Message-ID: <KIl3BUQ7Vi3yMeSD28pYzEaEFMLLWQdw3TkfKvvEPvc=.71c3a2cb-33ec-4a4e-b67d-a79a2e07ec75@github.com>

On Thu, 23 Oct 2025 07:32:10 GMT, Cesar Soares Lucas <cslucas at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all, this pull request contains:
> 
> - A backport of commit [2fe12984](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/2fe12984474656a08c4525c04a351d85be73f658) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository - related to ticket [JDK-8359064](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8359064). This commit was authored by Cesar Soares on 19 Jun 2025 and was reviewed by Doug Simon and Tom Rodriguez.
> - A cherry-pick of commit [ff54a649](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/ff54a6493a63cfbcaab7ec90c7db0135e98a7f0c) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository - related to ticket [JDK-8360049](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8360049). This commit was authored by Doug Simon on 20 Jun 2025 and was reviewed by Andrew Haley and Aleksey Shipilev.
> 
> These changes updates JVMCI interface to receive/send to the external compiler the reason why a nmethod is being invalidated, which will let that compiler make better decisions about future recompilations of the method. Twelve of the files touched in this PR are just hit by collateral effect due to enum type/entries renaming. The remaining of the changes are in the JVMCI interface itself, which shouldn't affect HotSpot in anyway if not running with JVMCI enabled. A few changes are in tests.
> 
> Note that commit `ff54a64` was added to this PR to address a bug on the original patch. These original changes have been integrated in JDK mainline over 5 months ago. Besides GHA the current patch was also tested on my internal CI.
> 
> Thanks!

@JohnTortugo 
Your change (at version b56b49b68d6c23581c616c5478384c7fc32989c9) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u/pull/335#issuecomment-3610840917

From cslucas at openjdk.org  Thu Dec  4 08:35:22 2025
From: cslucas at openjdk.org (Cesar Soares Lucas)
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 08:35:22 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u] Integrated: 8359064: Expose reason for marking nmethod
 non-entrant to JVMCI client
In-Reply-To: <-zbGZQ4CrP-CAz-AwfawsUhI8vxwTq4GC3uXOEfNVcw=.ebc76743-bcd7-40bc-8178-c0f6990c38cf@github.com>
References: <-zbGZQ4CrP-CAz-AwfawsUhI8vxwTq4GC3uXOEfNVcw=.ebc76743-bcd7-40bc-8178-c0f6990c38cf@github.com>
Message-ID: <oBAR9qU3uXT3SyUUGiRrXTsVUFaTDZ6MnWJzXd6wGEU=.42e01c30-ef07-4baa-8b9f-2fa20e21feda@github.com>

On Thu, 23 Oct 2025 07:32:10 GMT, Cesar Soares Lucas <cslucas at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all, this pull request contains:
> 
> - A backport of commit [2fe12984](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/2fe12984474656a08c4525c04a351d85be73f658) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository - related to ticket [JDK-8359064](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8359064). This commit was authored by Cesar Soares on 19 Jun 2025 and was reviewed by Doug Simon and Tom Rodriguez.
> - A cherry-pick of commit [ff54a649](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/ff54a6493a63cfbcaab7ec90c7db0135e98a7f0c) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository - related to ticket [JDK-8360049](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8360049). This commit was authored by Doug Simon on 20 Jun 2025 and was reviewed by Andrew Haley and Aleksey Shipilev.
> 
> These changes updates JVMCI interface to receive/send to the external compiler the reason why a nmethod is being invalidated, which will let that compiler make better decisions about future recompilations of the method. Twelve of the files touched in this PR are just hit by collateral effect due to enum type/entries renaming. The remaining of the changes are in the JVMCI interface itself, which shouldn't affect HotSpot in anyway if not running with JVMCI enabled. A few changes are in tests.
> 
> Note that commit `ff54a64` was added to this PR to address a bug on the original patch. These original changes have been integrated in JDK mainline over 5 months ago. Besides GHA the current patch was also tested on my internal CI.
> 
> Thanks!

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 1bb9ea9c
Author:    Cesar Soares Lucas <cslucas at openjdk.org>
Committer: Aleksey Shipilev <shade at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u/commit/1bb9ea9c885796d8d32fe1a45e59267ef60840d1
Stats:     281 lines in 25 files changed: 178 ins; 7 del; 96 mod

8359064: Expose reason for marking nmethod non-entrant to JVMCI client
8360049: CodeInvalidationReasonTest.java fails with ZGC on AArch64

Reviewed-by: shade
Backport-of: 2fe12984474656a08c4525c04a351d85be73f658

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u/pull/335

From avieiro at openjdk.org  Thu Dec  4 10:15:51 2025
From: avieiro at openjdk.org (Antonio Vieiro)
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 10:15:51 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8263188: JSSE should fail fast if there isn't
 supported signature algorithm [v2]
In-Reply-To: <fV97MMraBRaTcdmMNLXRxidQCN9e-lhwDNOGy8xcASo=.e2d6bed9-e8ac-4e3d-8286-4a5ac136811a@github.com>
References: <fV97MMraBRaTcdmMNLXRxidQCN9e-lhwDNOGy8xcASo=.e2d6bed9-e8ac-4e3d-8286-4a5ac136811a@github.com>
Message-ID: <1_6tvc9FNsto3WffPd0W2Yv5FJ-CodHLtjURi8MglPA=.a3e72b64-ce51-4ec5-b320-529a659503c1@github.com>

> Clean backport of [JDK-8263188](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8263188) to JDK11. 
> 
> It will make it easier to backport and review  [JDK-8349583](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8349583) and [JDK-8340321](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8340321) , so OpenJDK 11 [follows the Oracle JRE and JDK Cryptographic Roadmap on 2026/01](https://www.java.com/en/jre-jdk-cryptoroadmap.html) by disabling SHA-1 in TLS/DTLS 1.2 handshake signatures.
> 
> Since JDK11 does not sport the `ByteBuffer.slice(int, int)` method in JDK17 (used in `test/jdk/sun/security/ssl/SignatureScheme/SigAlgosExtTestWithTLS12.java`), a second commit adds an equivalent and updates the test.
> 
> Tested on Linux with `tier1` tests:
> 
> 
> ==============================
> Test summary
> ==============================
>    TEST                                              TOTAL  PASS  FAIL ERROR   
>    jtreg:test/hotspot/jtreg:tier1                     1497  1497     0     0   
>    jtreg:test/jdk:tier1                               1899  1899     0     0   
>    jtreg:test/langtools:tier1                         3941  3941     0     0   
>    jtreg:test/nashorn:tier1                              0     0     0     0   
>    jtreg:test/jaxp:tier1                                 0     0     0     0   
> ==============================
> TEST SUCCESS
> 
> 
> Also security tests (including new ones) pass:
> 
> 
> ==============================
> Test summary
> ==============================
>    TEST                                              TOTAL  PASS  FAIL ERROR   
>    jtreg:test/jdk/sun/security                         664   664     0     0   
> ==============================
> TEST SUCCESS

Antonio Vieiro has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains two commits:

 - ByteBuffer.slice(int,int) for JDK11
 - Backport 99b4bab3

-------------

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3126/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk11u-dev&pr=3126&range=01
  Stats: 506 lines in 6 files changed: 493 ins; 0 del; 13 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3126.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev.git pull/3126/head:pull/3126

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3126

From avieiro at openjdk.org  Thu Dec  4 10:15:54 2025
From: avieiro at openjdk.org (Antonio Vieiro)
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 10:15:54 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8263188: JSSE should fail fast if there isn't
 supported signature algorithm
In-Reply-To: <fV97MMraBRaTcdmMNLXRxidQCN9e-lhwDNOGy8xcASo=.e2d6bed9-e8ac-4e3d-8286-4a5ac136811a@github.com>
References: <fV97MMraBRaTcdmMNLXRxidQCN9e-lhwDNOGy8xcASo=.e2d6bed9-e8ac-4e3d-8286-4a5ac136811a@github.com>
Message-ID: <S4S5cD8sIvtC7dVR9cRP18ILYdBz_Ete32BIIC3jtfg=.56e5b9f4-45d5-4dea-aa41-9ff0c448447e@github.com>

On Thu, 27 Nov 2025 10:16:56 GMT, Antonio Vieiro <avieiro at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Clean backport of [JDK-8263188](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8263188) to JDK11. 
> 
> It will make it easier to backport and review  [JDK-8349583](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8349583) and [JDK-8340321](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8340321) , so OpenJDK 11 [follows the Oracle JRE and JDK Cryptographic Roadmap on 2026/01](https://www.java.com/en/jre-jdk-cryptoroadmap.html) by disabling SHA-1 in TLS/DTLS 1.2 handshake signatures.
> 
> Since JDK11 does not sport the `ByteBuffer.slice(int, int)` method in JDK17 (used in `test/jdk/sun/security/ssl/SignatureScheme/SigAlgosExtTestWithTLS12.java`), a second commit adds an equivalent and updates the test.
> 
> Tested on Linux with `tier1` tests:
> 
> 
> ==============================
> Test summary
> ==============================
>    TEST                                              TOTAL  PASS  FAIL ERROR   
>    jtreg:test/hotspot/jtreg:tier1                     1497  1497     0     0   
>    jtreg:test/jdk:tier1                               1899  1899     0     0   
>    jtreg:test/langtools:tier1                         3941  3941     0     0   
>    jtreg:test/nashorn:tier1                              0     0     0     0   
>    jtreg:test/jaxp:tier1                                 0     0     0     0   
> ==============================
> TEST SUCCESS
> 
> 
> Also security tests (including new ones) pass:
> 
> 
> ==============================
> Test summary
> ==============================
>    TEST                                              TOTAL  PASS  FAIL ERROR   
>    jtreg:test/jdk/sun/security                         664   664     0     0   
> ==============================
> TEST SUCCESS

I've rebased on master to get the recently merged JDK-8341964 and JDK-8245545 on this branch.

And retested with `run-test-jdk_security`:


==============================
Test summary
==============================
   TEST                                              TOTAL  PASS  FAIL ERROR   
   jtreg:test/jdk:jdk_security                        1361  1361     0     0   
==============================
TEST SUCCESS

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3126#issuecomment-3611295749

From goetz at openjdk.org  Thu Dec  4 13:37:36 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 13:37:36 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8336695: Update Commons BCEL to Version 6.10.0
 [v2]
In-Reply-To: <z0OoCS2pHzFFhebT4fAtE2GajLcZUdcQcyZ9sUGA5dM=.7d985cce-32e8-4fa3-a8b9-d184aaa7cf35@github.com>
References: <z0OoCS2pHzFFhebT4fAtE2GajLcZUdcQcyZ9sUGA5dM=.7d985cce-32e8-4fa3-a8b9-d184aaa7cf35@github.com>
Message-ID: <QzUStv8_IRPXO9JPS_meIeEXGPDJ0axSUtxdeGZuOmg=.32b1ba30-2163-46df-a3a7-49f4c0958ba7@github.com>

> One of the required updates of external libs.
> 
> src/java.xml/share/classes/jdk/xml/internal/Utils.java
> Resolved Copyright and imports. See second commit.

Goetz Lindenmaier has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:

  new files

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2504/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2504/files/da02d69d..edacb7a4

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk21u-dev&pr=2504&range=01
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk21u-dev&pr=2504&range=00-01

  Stats: 454 lines in 7 files changed: 454 ins; 0 del; 0 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2504.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/2504/head:pull/2504

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2504

From goetz at openjdk.org  Thu Dec  4 13:40:03 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 13:40:03 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8336695: Update Commons BCEL to Version 6.10.0
Message-ID: <Ye98XuXmPs_blG436kB20dqGpvo9Q-K5qpMyTlGgn1o=.1601e936-033f-4bc0-830d-b0db8fb59794@github.com>

I backport this for parity with 25.0.3-oracle.

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport 3790965df3e7cba3b9792b8719d1e2ead046da15

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/62/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk25u-dev&pr=62&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8336695
  Stats: 2579 lines in 122 files changed: 1451 ins; 118 del; 1010 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/62.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev.git pull/62/head:pull/62

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/62

From goetz at openjdk.org  Thu Dec  4 14:05:59 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 14:05:59 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: Merge jdk21u:master [v2]
In-Reply-To: <c0W6SI2OYeaFR5t3gLdpN1aqQ1lOOtlZ2GQa2sbVED4=.b9667678-b72f-4377-b240-52f57cc3c265@github.com>
References: <c0W6SI2OYeaFR5t3gLdpN1aqQ1lOOtlZ2GQa2sbVED4=.b9667678-b72f-4377-b240-52f57cc3c265@github.com>
Message-ID: <1LoiQKEaKnz4yyzB2M4lbryBZ6aUAVh4hEey0_S49IY=.3ad43cb7-89e2-448b-9e0b-e39fa13fdf08@github.com>

> Merge build tag 21.0.10+5 from jdk21u to jdk21u-dev

Goetz Lindenmaier has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains two additional commits since the last revision:

 - Merge
 - 8372464: Bump update version for OpenJDK: jdk-21.0.11
   
   Reviewed-by: sgehwolf

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2501/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2501/files/85530fad..85530fad

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk21u-dev&pr=2501&range=01
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk21u-dev&pr=2501&range=00-01

  Stats: 0 lines in 0 files changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 0 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2501.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/2501/head:pull/2501

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2501

From goetz at openjdk.org  Thu Dec  4 14:06:01 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 14:06:01 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] Integrated: Merge jdk21u:master
In-Reply-To: <c0W6SI2OYeaFR5t3gLdpN1aqQ1lOOtlZ2GQa2sbVED4=.b9667678-b72f-4377-b240-52f57cc3c265@github.com>
References: <c0W6SI2OYeaFR5t3gLdpN1aqQ1lOOtlZ2GQa2sbVED4=.b9667678-b72f-4377-b240-52f57cc3c265@github.com>
Message-ID: <Gaelbm2uBS4JHs58xXldKDDVaR64Ct35RCqhw0Ksg74=.4798caa3-0115-443f-89ca-fc6433c6fed6@github.com>

On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 11:07:23 GMT, Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Merge build tag 21.0.10+5 from jdk21u to jdk21u-dev

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 05370439
Author:    Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/commit/05370439bd8f3ff03c6ff71d3ce475f968773d73
Stats:     0 lines in 0 files changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 0 mod

Merge

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2501

From goetz at openjdk.org  Thu Dec  4 14:08:47 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 14:08:47 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u] RFR: 8283544: HttpClient GET method adds Content-Length: 0
 header
Message-ID: <iy1BVn39lky1v4BIu4LNOUoBQMByUPF9Nt-PI2jcU4k=.ad5f5fa0-e794-4fc2-93a8-3a00193cf5ef@github.com>

I backport this for parity with 17.0.18-oracle.

Clean backport. Original change is in 19.

The test does not build as https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8276559 (httpclient) Consider adding an HttpRequest.Builder.HEAD method to build a HEAD request.
is not in 17.  It was only added in 18.  Subtest headWithNoBody() is the problem.

I could replace the call to HEAD() by the implementation of that simple method.
This does not work though. The test uses the  HttpRequestBuilderImpl.  There
HEAD() is implemented as return method0("HEAD", null);
But method0 is private, and method() rejects null.

Using the implementation of the default method in HttpRequest does not work with HttpRequestBuilderImpl.
In this case the test returns a Http error 400.

Thus I just omit the test. See second commit.

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Exclude HEAD() test as 8276996 is not in 17
 - backport  6a7709320d28d8e1593b113fdf39ab583fca3687

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u/pull/413/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk17u&pr=413&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8283544
  Stats: 250 lines in 2 files changed: 236 ins; 6 del; 8 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u/pull/413.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u.git pull/413/head:pull/413

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u/pull/413

From dbriemann at openjdk.org  Thu Dec  4 14:16:13 2025
From: dbriemann at openjdk.org (David Briemann)
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 14:16:13 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8369505: jhsdb jstack cannot handle continuation
 stub [v2]
In-Reply-To: <oWqdXAw6FGKpuMSE8qvIRzFMZxYeOzNvkN6GF2cxSFY=.096b4393-f9c4-40d2-a0f7-1d802126aca8@github.com>
References: <oWqdXAw6FGKpuMSE8qvIRzFMZxYeOzNvkN6GF2cxSFY=.096b4393-f9c4-40d2-a0f7-1d802126aca8@github.com>
Message-ID: <_k86aP7JA8wlR4AKMv7h6x-oJSZuZpXPphPGmRPaakI=.192aa00f-b134-43d9-bf6c-88f33aa12521@github.com>

> This pull request contains a backport of commit [16539998](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/1653999871c8d7b1e61b44f8525e09b2cd0bdb6b) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Yasumasa Suenaga on 16 Oct 2025 and was reviewed by Chris Plummer and Patricio Chilano Mateo.

David Briemann has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional commits since the last revision:

 - Backport 8370201
 - Backport 8370036

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/23/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/23/files/95eb7fd0..75c9d644

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk25u-dev&pr=23&range=01
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk25u-dev&pr=23&range=00-01

  Stats: 9 lines in 5 files changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 9 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/23.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev.git pull/23/head:pull/23

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/23

From dbriemann at openjdk.org  Thu Dec  4 14:24:05 2025
From: dbriemann at openjdk.org (David Briemann)
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 14:24:05 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8369505: jhsdb jstack cannot handle continuation
 stub [v3]
In-Reply-To: <oWqdXAw6FGKpuMSE8qvIRzFMZxYeOzNvkN6GF2cxSFY=.096b4393-f9c4-40d2-a0f7-1d802126aca8@github.com>
References: <oWqdXAw6FGKpuMSE8qvIRzFMZxYeOzNvkN6GF2cxSFY=.096b4393-f9c4-40d2-a0f7-1d802126aca8@github.com>
Message-ID: <IyRENVAcrGiSUXa254fh_sLKicJKeA4WZYspwzBrdoo=.a427682b-d712-4dd8-b739-a4420868a226@github.com>

> This pull request contains a backport of commit [16539998](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/1653999871c8d7b1e61b44f8525e09b2cd0bdb6b) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Yasumasa Suenaga on 16 Oct 2025 and was reviewed by Chris Plummer and Patricio Chilano Mateo.

David Briemann has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:

  Backport 8370240

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/23/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/23/files/75c9d644..6fb603c0

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk25u-dev&pr=23&range=02
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk25u-dev&pr=23&range=01-02

  Stats: 17 lines in 2 files changed: 15 ins; 1 del; 1 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/23.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev.git pull/23/head:pull/23

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/23

From mdoerr at openjdk.org  Thu Dec  4 15:14:32 2025
From: mdoerr at openjdk.org (Martin Doerr)
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 15:14:32 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8369505: jhsdb jstack cannot handle continuation
 stub [v3]
In-Reply-To: <IyRENVAcrGiSUXa254fh_sLKicJKeA4WZYspwzBrdoo=.a427682b-d712-4dd8-b739-a4420868a226@github.com>
References: <oWqdXAw6FGKpuMSE8qvIRzFMZxYeOzNvkN6GF2cxSFY=.096b4393-f9c4-40d2-a0f7-1d802126aca8@github.com>
 <IyRENVAcrGiSUXa254fh_sLKicJKeA4WZYspwzBrdoo=.a427682b-d712-4dd8-b739-a4420868a226@github.com>
Message-ID: <aueaT0PQlqCnHy13LQBAdc_24VWBi39Oh9m6sccjvBE=.0d86f9fa-bf1e-4aa4-934d-55afec02c18b@github.com>

On Thu, 4 Dec 2025 14:24:05 GMT, David Briemann <dbriemann at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> This pull request contains a backport of commit [16539998](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/1653999871c8d7b1e61b44f8525e09b2cd0bdb6b) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
>> 
>> The commit being backported was authored by Yasumasa Suenaga on 16 Oct 2025 and was reviewed by Chris Plummer and Patricio Chilano Mateo.
>> 
>> To make this backport work further commits needed to be backported:
>> [JDK-8370201](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8370201)
>> [JDK-8370036](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8370036)
>> Both contain fixes to the test introduced by the backported commit.
>> 
>> Also this backport includes another commit:
>> [JDK-8370240](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8370240)
>> This fixes the same issue as the original commit but for the PPC platform.
>
> David Briemann has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Backport 8370240

Verified that this is a clean backport of the 4 issues linked in this PR. I think packing them into 1 PR makes sense because they all belong together and further backports will also need all of the 4 parts.

-------------

Marked as reviewed by mdoerr (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/23#pullrequestreview-3540512068

From mbaesken at openjdk.org  Thu Dec  4 15:40:35 2025
From: mbaesken at openjdk.org (Matthias Baesken)
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 15:40:35 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8333857: Test
 sun/security/ssl/SSLSessionImpl/ResumeChecksServer.java failed: Existing
 session was used
In-Reply-To: <ao5BDyC_COM7FsGZxQEUIfVhjP0ZtWhYoea-XjBjmDQ=.5eb5f51a-aeda-4066-9573-9a0948c72da8@github.com>
References: <ao5BDyC_COM7FsGZxQEUIfVhjP0ZtWhYoea-XjBjmDQ=.5eb5f51a-aeda-4066-9573-9a0948c72da8@github.com>
Message-ID: <RlrroCPJO8s7ZVKsKntWd9PKXkJIyk_W5qHLEsi8Bao=.7c8a523d-89bc-4cfc-957f-361ddf5ffd48@github.com>

On Fri, 28 Nov 2025 15:44:14 GMT, Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org> wrote:

> I backport this for parity with 21.0.11-oracle.
> 
> Needed to resolve and adapt larger parts of ResumeChecksServer.java as https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8357033 is not in 21.

Looks mostly okay;  not 100% sure about the SIGNATURE_SCHEME constraints settings, do you want them here?

test/jdk/sun/security/ssl/SSLSessionImpl/ResumeChecksServer.java line 253:

> 251:                             params.setAlgorithmConstraints(new NoSig(
> 252:                                 first ? "ecdsa_secp521r1_sha512" :
> 253:                                     "ecdsa_secp384r1_sha384"));

Seems those constraints ecdsa_secp521r1_sha512 / ecdsa_secp384r1_sha384  came in with https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8357033 .
Have you checked if this is okay ?

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2494#issuecomment-3612848167
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2494#discussion_r2589564423

From goetz at openjdk.org  Thu Dec  4 15:47:07 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 15:47:07 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8372048: Performance improvement on Linux remote
 desktop
Message-ID: <qZcj8v1v5zwn9_aSkcuXgDHDc2V2CIgjBd4gVxuT37k=.3f7dd974-03c2-4b0c-9df6-d8efa1c43a5d@github.com>

I backport this for parity with 25.0.3-oracle.

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport 0b3df489e9d3b6d876a67793e082b930c17ade3e

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/63/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk25u-dev&pr=63&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8372048
  Stats: 32 lines in 2 files changed: 25 ins; 6 del; 1 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/63.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev.git pull/63/head:pull/63

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/63

From goetz at openjdk.org  Thu Dec  4 15:48:01 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 15:48:01 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8372048: Performance improvement on Linux remote
 desktop
Message-ID: <XpT5ZufntmyaEq_rEJaorqTch01fSebXjbZxmNe31Sk=.e610657b-892a-4dfb-b7c0-19fbaddc83bb@github.com>

I backport this for parity with 21.0.11-oracle.

I had to resolve due to context as 8344057: Remove doPrivileged calls from unix platform sources in the java.desktop module
is not in 21.

-------------

Commit messages:
 - backport 0b3df489e9d3b6d876a67793e082b930c17ade3e

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2508/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk21u-dev&pr=2508&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8372048
  Stats: 32 lines in 2 files changed: 25 ins; 6 del; 1 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2508.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/2508/head:pull/2508

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2508

From goetz at openjdk.org  Thu Dec  4 16:03:07 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 16:03:07 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8370325: G1: Disallow GC for TLAB allocation
Message-ID: <AP7jVFtuoHpsdFA3uYSFwKJCuY3awoFCYoSH-lizdXg=.903c42cd-3db4-4e7c-87e3-0a1035dbe319@github.com>

I backport this for parity with 25.0.3-oracle

Trivial resolve needed in [g1CollectedHeap.cpp](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/027aea9d2e0dff29fcd00fa7074ca955066929ec#diff-9de15630db460d66fdee5ec408be02b3275a2fbf32764f9fb2910b0d1bff7e3a)

-------------

Commit messages:
 - backport 027aea9d2e0dff29fcd00fa7074ca955066929ec

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/64/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk25u-dev&pr=64&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8370325
  Stats: 29 lines in 2 files changed: 9 ins; 5 del; 15 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/64.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev.git pull/64/head:pull/64

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/64

From mbaesken at openjdk.org  Thu Dec  4 16:11:04 2025
From: mbaesken at openjdk.org (Matthias Baesken)
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 16:11:04 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u] RFR: 8283544: HttpClient GET method adds Content-Length:
 0 header
In-Reply-To: <iy1BVn39lky1v4BIu4LNOUoBQMByUPF9Nt-PI2jcU4k=.ad5f5fa0-e794-4fc2-93a8-3a00193cf5ef@github.com>
References: <iy1BVn39lky1v4BIu4LNOUoBQMByUPF9Nt-PI2jcU4k=.ad5f5fa0-e794-4fc2-93a8-3a00193cf5ef@github.com>
Message-ID: <t4qdFb1oVY69RwzcCkWf1L__4ZUI3FN-Qar4eT3jJpY=.30778886-b69a-48e5-b621-0413b70027a2@github.com>

On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 11:24:10 GMT, Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org> wrote:

> I backport this for parity with 17.0.18-oracle.
> 
> Clean backport. Original change is in 19.
> 
> The test does not build as https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8276559 (httpclient) Consider adding an HttpRequest.Builder.HEAD method to build a HEAD request.
> is not in 17.  It was only added in 18.  Subtest headWithNoBody() is the problem.
> 
> I could replace the call to HEAD() by the implementation of that simple method.
> This does not work though. The test uses the  HttpRequestBuilderImpl.  There
> HEAD() is implemented as return method0("HEAD", null);
> But method0 is private, and method() rejects null.
> 
> Using the implementation of the default method in HttpRequest does not work with HttpRequestBuilderImpl.
> In this case the test returns a Http error 400.
> 
> Thus I just omit the test. See second commit.

Marked as reviewed by mbaesken (Reviewer).

-------------

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u/pull/413#pullrequestreview-3540786714

From sgehwolf at openjdk.org  Thu Dec  4 17:42:08 2025
From: sgehwolf at openjdk.org (Severin Gehwolf)
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 17:42:08 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8263188: JSSE should fail fast if there isn't
 supported signature algorithm [v2]
In-Reply-To: <1_6tvc9FNsto3WffPd0W2Yv5FJ-CodHLtjURi8MglPA=.a3e72b64-ce51-4ec5-b320-529a659503c1@github.com>
References: <fV97MMraBRaTcdmMNLXRxidQCN9e-lhwDNOGy8xcASo=.e2d6bed9-e8ac-4e3d-8286-4a5ac136811a@github.com>
 <1_6tvc9FNsto3WffPd0W2Yv5FJ-CodHLtjURi8MglPA=.a3e72b64-ce51-4ec5-b320-529a659503c1@github.com>
Message-ID: <QipIBVnOn7S3Caz87qwtkZAG2VQWoB-TFr3iKYq9m_M=.ae258ea4-1cda-4492-921b-391386f4e178@github.com>

On Thu, 4 Dec 2025 10:15:51 GMT, Antonio Vieiro <avieiro at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Clean backport of [JDK-8263188](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8263188) to JDK11. 
>> 
>> It will make it easier to backport and review  [JDK-8349583](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8349583) and [JDK-8340321](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8340321) , so OpenJDK 11 [follows the Oracle JRE and JDK Cryptographic Roadmap on 2026/01](https://www.java.com/en/jre-jdk-cryptoroadmap.html) by disabling SHA-1 in TLS/DTLS 1.2 handshake signatures.
>> 
>> Since JDK11 does not sport the `ByteBuffer.slice(int, int)` method in JDK17 (used in `test/jdk/sun/security/ssl/SignatureScheme/SigAlgosExtTestWithTLS12.java`), a second commit adds an equivalent and updates the test.
>> 
>> Tested on Linux with `tier1` tests:
>> 
>> 
>> ==============================
>> Test summary
>> ==============================
>>    TEST                                              TOTAL  PASS  FAIL ERROR   
>>    jtreg:test/hotspot/jtreg:tier1                     1497  1497     0     0   
>>    jtreg:test/jdk:tier1                               1899  1899     0     0   
>>    jtreg:test/langtools:tier1                         3941  3941     0     0   
>>    jtreg:test/nashorn:tier1                              0     0     0     0   
>>    jtreg:test/jaxp:tier1                                 0     0     0     0   
>> ==============================
>> TEST SUCCESS
>> 
>> 
>> Also security tests (including new ones) pass:
>> 
>> 
>> ==============================
>> Test summary
>> ==============================
>>    TEST                                              TOTAL  PASS  FAIL ERROR   
>>    jtreg:test/jdk/sun/security                         664   664     0     0   
>> ==============================
>> TEST SUCCESS
>
> Antonio Vieiro has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains two commits:
> 
>  - ByteBuffer.slice(int,int) for JDK11
>  - Backport 99b4bab3

Looks good. Please update the copyright since another change happend since and there is no `THL A29 Limited` in other copyright notices anymore.

test/jdk/sun/security/ssl/SignatureScheme/SigAlgosExtTestWithTLS12.java line 2:

> 1: /*
> 2:  * Copyright (C) 2021 THL A29 Limited, a Tencent company. All rights reserved.

Suggestion:

 * Copyright (C) 2021, Tencent. All rights reserved.


Note that [JDK-8364597](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8364597) has been brought to JDK 11 since. We should keep it aligned.

test/jdk/sun/security/ssl/SignatureScheme/SigAlgosExtTestWithTLS13.java line 2:

> 1: /*
> 2:  * Copyright (C) 2021 THL A29 Limited, a Tencent company. All rights reserved.

Suggestion:

 * Copyright (C) 2021, Tencent. All rights reserved.


Same here.

-------------

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3126#pullrequestreview-3540087195
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3126#discussion_r2589122931
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3126#discussion_r2589126377

From duke at openjdk.org  Thu Dec  4 19:20:17 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Roland Mesde)
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 19:20:17 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8368500: ContextClassLoader cannot be reset on
 threads in ForkJoinPool.commonPool()
Message-ID: <81FD_uuqt-S-P94aGSO1k4FMsN3xIAMVlxzzri1FVbY=.f3e4a1c7-2bca-4c38-a6f0-22dc5e3f982c@github.com>

Backporting JDK-8368500: ContextClassLoader cannot be reset on threads in ForkJoinPool.commonPool()

For parity with Oracle JDK.

With the Security Manager permanently disabled in JDK 24, setCCL allows setting a custom context class loader but prevents resetting it back to the system class loader before executing subsequent task code. This change relaxes the restriction to allow resetting to the system class loader.

Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed), jtreg tier1 tests (passed) and related tests (passed) on linux-x64, linux-aarch64, macos-aarch64 and windows-x64:

(Passed) - make test-tier1
(Passed) - make test TEST=test/jdk/java/util/concurrent/forkjoin/ContextClassLoaderTest.java

Results are attached.

[linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23941590/linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
[linux-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23941591/linux-aarch64-specific-test.log)
[linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23941592/linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
[linux-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23941594/linux-x64-specific-test.log)
[macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23941596/macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
[macos-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23941597/macos-aarch64-specific-test.log)
[windows-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23941598/windows-x64-specific-test.log)

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport 6f8d07ae21e49f87f64a5d4e10c930c4447ec8b6

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/65/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk25u-dev&pr=65&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8368500
  Stats: 60 lines in 2 files changed: 56 ins; 2 del; 2 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/65.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev.git pull/65/head:pull/65

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/65

From duke at openjdk.org  Fri Dec  5 01:19:10 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (duke)
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 01:19:10 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] Withdrawn: 8286562: GCC 12 reports some compiler warnings
In-Reply-To: <nlju7KR-xG8xiD2Z3rhlQMK5aGLt8bBXWJH48NxF23Q=.3b81ee56-ffe7-4ba2-9a01-998ac15c5d56@github.com>
References: <nlju7KR-xG8xiD2Z3rhlQMK5aGLt8bBXWJH48NxF23Q=.3b81ee56-ffe7-4ba2-9a01-998ac15c5d56@github.com>
Message-ID: <ichm-vi6cX8yclrkyMibnXPZe027et_IkGMUOjJOwo0=.c2273992-3353-4191-bfb6-28ae2ac29817@github.com>

On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 14:42:45 GMT, Zdenek Zambersky <zzambers at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backport fixes few warnings in newer gcc (12+), which I have seen some when doing test build for gcc15 (fedora 42) for another [backport](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk11u-dev/pull/3087#issuecomment-3266882552). Warning do not show in current GHA runs because it uses gcc 10. (Btw this change has also been backported to oracle jdk 11.)
> 
> Backport is not clear, there were some differences in surrounding context, copyright headers, location of gmk file etc. So part of it had to be done manually.  Changes to jfrTraceIdBits.inline.hpp are not present, because modified function is not present on jdk11.
> 
> I also included backport of followup change ([JDK-8293691](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8293691)), which fixes problem introduced by original backported change.
> 
> GHA tests: OK

This pull request has been closed without being integrated.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3091

From syan at openjdk.org  Fri Dec  5 02:00:33 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 02:00:33 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8367994: test/jdk/sun/security/pkcs11/Signature/
 tests pass when they should skip
Message-ID: <KQi_jrlnnD5IPYYK6bFbxQs2Lv-hDEbvw_SWDVJy18k=.567bf4a5-4460-4808-a398-10e47083aa37@github.com>

Hi all,

This pull request contains a backport of commit [ef7532e7](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/ef7532e7e625628d6181c65116804ebb65f18061) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.

The commit being backported was authored by Mikhail Yankelevich on 4 Dec 2025 and was reviewed by Rajan Halade.

Thanks!

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport ef7532e7e625628d6181c65116804ebb65f18061

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/66/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk25u-dev&pr=66&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8367994
  Stats: 175 lines in 7 files changed: 115 ins; 15 del; 45 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/66.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev.git pull/66/head:pull/66

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/66

From avieiro at openjdk.org  Fri Dec  5 08:23:47 2025
From: avieiro at openjdk.org (Antonio Vieiro)
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 08:23:47 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8263188: JSSE should fail fast if there isn't
 supported signature algorithm [v3]
In-Reply-To: <fV97MMraBRaTcdmMNLXRxidQCN9e-lhwDNOGy8xcASo=.e2d6bed9-e8ac-4e3d-8286-4a5ac136811a@github.com>
References: <fV97MMraBRaTcdmMNLXRxidQCN9e-lhwDNOGy8xcASo=.e2d6bed9-e8ac-4e3d-8286-4a5ac136811a@github.com>
Message-ID: <wcIEZxiUGsKjjiaY97oM6LRo_Okw0GBRFpM9JnogAu8=.8ded82dd-0d54-4567-8559-15a7f4282a1d@github.com>

> Clean backport of [JDK-8263188](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8263188) to JDK11. 
> 
> It will make it easier to backport and review  [JDK-8349583](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8349583) and [JDK-8340321](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8340321) , so OpenJDK 11 [follows the Oracle JRE and JDK Cryptographic Roadmap on 2026/01](https://www.java.com/en/jre-jdk-cryptoroadmap.html) by disabling SHA-1 in TLS/DTLS 1.2 handshake signatures.
> 
> Since JDK11 does not sport the `ByteBuffer.slice(int, int)` method in JDK17 (used in `test/jdk/sun/security/ssl/SignatureScheme/SigAlgosExtTestWithTLS12.java`), a second commit adds an equivalent and updates the test.
> 
> Tested on Linux with `tier1` tests:
> 
> 
> ==============================
> Test summary
> ==============================
>    TEST                                              TOTAL  PASS  FAIL ERROR   
>    jtreg:test/hotspot/jtreg:tier1                     1497  1497     0     0   
>    jtreg:test/jdk:tier1                               1899  1899     0     0   
>    jtreg:test/langtools:tier1                         3941  3941     0     0   
>    jtreg:test/nashorn:tier1                              0     0     0     0   
>    jtreg:test/jaxp:tier1                                 0     0     0     0   
> ==============================
> TEST SUCCESS
> 
> 
> Also security tests (including new ones) pass:
> 
> 
> ==============================
> Test summary
> ==============================
>    TEST                                              TOTAL  PASS  FAIL ERROR   
>    jtreg:test/jdk/sun/security                         664   664     0     0   
> ==============================
> TEST SUCCESS

Antonio Vieiro has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:

  8364597: Replace THL A29 Limited with Tencent

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3126/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3126/files/b17720dd..fbad3f56

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk11u-dev&pr=3126&range=02
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk11u-dev&pr=3126&range=01-02

  Stats: 2 lines in 2 files changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 2 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3126.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev.git pull/3126/head:pull/3126

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3126

From avieiro at openjdk.org  Fri Dec  5 08:23:52 2025
From: avieiro at openjdk.org (Antonio Vieiro)
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 08:23:52 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8263188: JSSE should fail fast if there isn't
 supported signature algorithm [v2]
In-Reply-To: <QipIBVnOn7S3Caz87qwtkZAG2VQWoB-TFr3iKYq9m_M=.ae258ea4-1cda-4492-921b-391386f4e178@github.com>
References: <fV97MMraBRaTcdmMNLXRxidQCN9e-lhwDNOGy8xcASo=.e2d6bed9-e8ac-4e3d-8286-4a5ac136811a@github.com>
 <1_6tvc9FNsto3WffPd0W2Yv5FJ-CodHLtjURi8MglPA=.a3e72b64-ce51-4ec5-b320-529a659503c1@github.com>
 <QipIBVnOn7S3Caz87qwtkZAG2VQWoB-TFr3iKYq9m_M=.ae258ea4-1cda-4492-921b-391386f4e178@github.com>
Message-ID: <IPjFPRQbT-ydBOvVt2DiGKNysuQQ-Yd3oK7SKeuxKHo=.87645a8f-92e1-4bca-bbd1-fc2716294f74@github.com>

On Thu, 4 Dec 2025 13:37:52 GMT, Severin Gehwolf <sgehwolf at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Antonio Vieiro has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains two additional commits since the last revision:
>> 
>>  - ByteBuffer.slice(int,int) for JDK11
>>  - Backport 99b4bab3
>
> test/jdk/sun/security/ssl/SignatureScheme/SigAlgosExtTestWithTLS12.java line 2:
> 
>> 1: /*
>> 2:  * Copyright (C) 2021 THL A29 Limited, a Tencent company. All rights reserved.
> 
> Suggestion:
> 
>  * Copyright (C) 2021, Tencent. All rights reserved.
> 
> 
> Note that [JDK-8364597](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8364597) has been brought to JDK 11 since. We should keep it aligned.

Updated in new commit.

> test/jdk/sun/security/ssl/SignatureScheme/SigAlgosExtTestWithTLS13.java line 2:
> 
>> 1: /*
>> 2:  * Copyright (C) 2021 THL A29 Limited, a Tencent company. All rights reserved.
> 
> Suggestion:
> 
>  * Copyright (C) 2021, Tencent. All rights reserved.
> 
> 
> Same here.

Updated in new commit.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3126#discussion_r2591794916
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3126#discussion_r2591795377

From sgehwolf at openjdk.org  Fri Dec  5 09:36:12 2025
From: sgehwolf at openjdk.org (Severin Gehwolf)
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 09:36:12 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8263188: JSSE should fail fast if there isn't
 supported signature algorithm [v3]
In-Reply-To: <wcIEZxiUGsKjjiaY97oM6LRo_Okw0GBRFpM9JnogAu8=.8ded82dd-0d54-4567-8559-15a7f4282a1d@github.com>
References: <fV97MMraBRaTcdmMNLXRxidQCN9e-lhwDNOGy8xcASo=.e2d6bed9-e8ac-4e3d-8286-4a5ac136811a@github.com>
 <wcIEZxiUGsKjjiaY97oM6LRo_Okw0GBRFpM9JnogAu8=.8ded82dd-0d54-4567-8559-15a7f4282a1d@github.com>
Message-ID: <RU2ZtP525keWyVoyU7DeSTXQYaCbJdPx3xBNCwLCaoU=.5c5f9eff-6f9f-4e08-be5a-e226a1773c59@github.com>

On Fri, 5 Dec 2025 08:23:47 GMT, Antonio Vieiro <avieiro at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Clean backport of [JDK-8263188](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8263188) to JDK11. 
>> 
>> It will make it easier to backport and review  [JDK-8349583](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8349583) and [JDK-8340321](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8340321) , so OpenJDK 11 [follows the Oracle JRE and JDK Cryptographic Roadmap on 2026/01](https://www.java.com/en/jre-jdk-cryptoroadmap.html) by disabling SHA-1 in TLS/DTLS 1.2 handshake signatures.
>> 
>> Since JDK11 does not sport the `ByteBuffer.slice(int, int)` method in JDK17 (used in `test/jdk/sun/security/ssl/SignatureScheme/SigAlgosExtTestWithTLS12.java`), a second commit adds an equivalent and updates the test.
>> 
>> Tested on Linux with `tier1` tests:
>> 
>> 
>> ==============================
>> Test summary
>> ==============================
>>    TEST                                              TOTAL  PASS  FAIL ERROR   
>>    jtreg:test/hotspot/jtreg:tier1                     1497  1497     0     0   
>>    jtreg:test/jdk:tier1                               1899  1899     0     0   
>>    jtreg:test/langtools:tier1                         3941  3941     0     0   
>>    jtreg:test/nashorn:tier1                              0     0     0     0   
>>    jtreg:test/jaxp:tier1                                 0     0     0     0   
>> ==============================
>> TEST SUCCESS
>> 
>> 
>> Also security tests (including new ones) pass:
>> 
>> 
>> ==============================
>> Test summary
>> ==============================
>>    TEST                                              TOTAL  PASS  FAIL ERROR   
>>    jtreg:test/jdk/sun/security                         664   664     0     0   
>> ==============================
>> TEST SUCCESS
>
> Antonio Vieiro has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   8364597: Replace THL A29 Limited with Tencent

Please don't add 8364597 to the issues list. It's already done for 11u. That's the business we are in when doing backports. Remember when to adjust a backport if they came in out-of-order.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3126#issuecomment-3616015758

From avieiro at openjdk.org  Fri Dec  5 09:39:18 2025
From: avieiro at openjdk.org (Antonio Vieiro)
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 09:39:18 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8263188: JSSE should fail fast if there isn't
 supported signature algorithm [v3]
In-Reply-To: <RU2ZtP525keWyVoyU7DeSTXQYaCbJdPx3xBNCwLCaoU=.5c5f9eff-6f9f-4e08-be5a-e226a1773c59@github.com>
References: <fV97MMraBRaTcdmMNLXRxidQCN9e-lhwDNOGy8xcASo=.e2d6bed9-e8ac-4e3d-8286-4a5ac136811a@github.com>
 <wcIEZxiUGsKjjiaY97oM6LRo_Okw0GBRFpM9JnogAu8=.8ded82dd-0d54-4567-8559-15a7f4282a1d@github.com>
 <RU2ZtP525keWyVoyU7DeSTXQYaCbJdPx3xBNCwLCaoU=.5c5f9eff-6f9f-4e08-be5a-e226a1773c59@github.com>
Message-ID: <DtD6Xpx8KS_DlmYtDmGV6kNZVUrC_17tEnbvQKWrcDc=.99d1da42-773e-4b8b-baf3-fe21d3a1d04f@github.com>

On Fri, 5 Dec 2025 09:33:32 GMT, Severin Gehwolf <sgehwolf at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Please don't add 8364597 to the issues list. It's already done for 11u. That's the business we are in when doing backports. Remember when to adjust a backport if they came in out-of-order.

Thanks for the tip!  I thought we wanted to keep track of related commits too. Good to know!

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3126#issuecomment-3616029091

From sgehwolf at openjdk.org  Fri Dec  5 09:50:12 2025
From: sgehwolf at openjdk.org (Severin Gehwolf)
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 09:50:12 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8263188: JSSE should fail fast if there isn't
 supported signature algorithm [v3]
In-Reply-To: <wcIEZxiUGsKjjiaY97oM6LRo_Okw0GBRFpM9JnogAu8=.8ded82dd-0d54-4567-8559-15a7f4282a1d@github.com>
References: <fV97MMraBRaTcdmMNLXRxidQCN9e-lhwDNOGy8xcASo=.e2d6bed9-e8ac-4e3d-8286-4a5ac136811a@github.com>
 <wcIEZxiUGsKjjiaY97oM6LRo_Okw0GBRFpM9JnogAu8=.8ded82dd-0d54-4567-8559-15a7f4282a1d@github.com>
Message-ID: <mah1qveZ-EcGGDWCgbrS6b9tEi6NZeW57BRlRq2kUGY=.17b3b1fd-7975-42bb-a3f8-456078df0048@github.com>

On Fri, 5 Dec 2025 08:23:47 GMT, Antonio Vieiro <avieiro at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Clean backport of [JDK-8263188](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8263188) to JDK11. 
>> 
>> It will make it easier to backport and review  [JDK-8349583](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8349583) and [JDK-8340321](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8340321) , so OpenJDK 11 [follows the Oracle JRE and JDK Cryptographic Roadmap on 2026/01](https://www.java.com/en/jre-jdk-cryptoroadmap.html) by disabling SHA-1 in TLS/DTLS 1.2 handshake signatures.
>> 
>> Since JDK11 does not sport the `ByteBuffer.slice(int, int)` method in JDK17 (used in `test/jdk/sun/security/ssl/SignatureScheme/SigAlgosExtTestWithTLS12.java`), a second commit adds an equivalent and updates the test.
>> 
>> Tested on Linux with `tier1` tests:
>> 
>> 
>> ==============================
>> Test summary
>> ==============================
>>    TEST                                              TOTAL  PASS  FAIL ERROR   
>>    jtreg:test/hotspot/jtreg:tier1                     1497  1497     0     0   
>>    jtreg:test/jdk:tier1                               1899  1899     0     0   
>>    jtreg:test/langtools:tier1                         3941  3941     0     0   
>>    jtreg:test/nashorn:tier1                              0     0     0     0   
>>    jtreg:test/jaxp:tier1                                 0     0     0     0   
>> ==============================
>> TEST SUCCESS
>> 
>> 
>> Also security tests (including new ones) pass:
>> 
>> 
>> ==============================
>> Test summary
>> ==============================
>>    TEST                                              TOTAL  PASS  FAIL ERROR   
>>    jtreg:test/jdk/sun/security                         664   664     0     0   
>> ==============================
>> TEST SUCCESS
>
> Antonio Vieiro has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   8364597: Replace THL A29 Limited with Tencent

Looks good.

-------------

Marked as reviewed by sgehwolf (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3126#pullrequestreview-3543910559

From sgehwolf at openjdk.org  Fri Dec  5 09:50:14 2025
From: sgehwolf at openjdk.org (Severin Gehwolf)
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 09:50:14 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8263188: JSSE should fail fast if there isn't
 supported signature algorithm [v3]
In-Reply-To: <DtD6Xpx8KS_DlmYtDmGV6kNZVUrC_17tEnbvQKWrcDc=.99d1da42-773e-4b8b-baf3-fe21d3a1d04f@github.com>
References: <fV97MMraBRaTcdmMNLXRxidQCN9e-lhwDNOGy8xcASo=.e2d6bed9-e8ac-4e3d-8286-4a5ac136811a@github.com>
 <wcIEZxiUGsKjjiaY97oM6LRo_Okw0GBRFpM9JnogAu8=.8ded82dd-0d54-4567-8559-15a7f4282a1d@github.com>
 <RU2ZtP525keWyVoyU7DeSTXQYaCbJdPx3xBNCwLCaoU=.5c5f9eff-6f9f-4e08-be5a-e226a1773c59@github.com>
 <DtD6Xpx8KS_DlmYtDmGV6kNZVUrC_17tEnbvQKWrcDc=.99d1da42-773e-4b8b-baf3-fe21d3a1d04f@github.com>
Message-ID: <uUAuIBPl8LbUvizHzmEIWHQp4jhn5p_i5-dQJqNGbWM=.29ecc8ee-5fa1-4912-8b73-acf374f2f956@github.com>

On Fri, 5 Dec 2025 09:36:45 GMT, Antonio Vieiro <avieiro at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Thanks for the tip! I thought we wanted to keep track of related commits too. Good to know!

Things like this are good candidates to mention in the approval comments.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3126#issuecomment-3616066173

From clanger at openjdk.org  Fri Dec  5 10:57:07 2025
From: clanger at openjdk.org (Christoph Langer)
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 10:57:07 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] Integrated: 8317838:
 java/nio/channels/Channels/SocketChannelStreams.java running into timeout
 (aix)
In-Reply-To: <p2JiilaOlXKQfOob8b0-GLoRGKCsFLWsgb0PWPla_0c=.b49e26a6-4de6-45d4-a87c-fc44051afaa8@github.com>
References: <p2JiilaOlXKQfOob8b0-GLoRGKCsFLWsgb0PWPla_0c=.b49e26a6-4de6-45d4-a87c-fc44051afaa8@github.com>
Message-ID: <8o6sJDpLuOPjX7dK7UvEoxiaM9LQDrcZLqkW85-9EIs=.261e98ed-eeb2-4208-a1e2-ffa56dbd0d12@github.com>

On Thu, 4 Dec 2025 06:42:58 GMT, Christoph Langer <clanger at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Problemlist removal.

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 53fdc2d6
Author:    Christoph Langer <clanger at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/commit/53fdc2d6657016b2219f88bd9060e836dbe00bfe
Stats:     2 lines in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 2 del; 0 mod

8317838: java/nio/channels/Channels/SocketChannelStreams.java running into timeout (aix)

Reviewed-by: mbaesken
Backport-of: 6cf94cce29495f10947b3d73c1d1eed1031e04d9

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2506

From avieiro at openjdk.org  Fri Dec  5 11:59:23 2025
From: avieiro at openjdk.org (Antonio Vieiro)
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 11:59:23 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8349583: Add mechanism to disable signature schemes
 based on their TLS scope
Message-ID: <_XhH0LkPB7bTooW9f4kWRkq1uURTyv5IDgo3Iv8VrnU=.64cad87d-fca7-4304-925d-2e3800a9b389@github.com>

Backport of [JDK-8349583](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8349583) from [JDK17](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk17u-dev/commit/fe850da38a3fc0c9ce6cf9348efca3c846e97143), a first step to [disable SHA-1 in TLS/DTLS 1.2 handshake signatures](https://www.java.com/en/configure_crypto.html#DisableSHA1_TLS_DTLS)  to comply with the [Oracle JRE Cryptographic Roadmap](https://www.java.com/en/jre-jdk-cryptoroadmap.html), to be followed with [JDK-8340321](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8340321).

Backport is not clean, as there're significant changes from JDK17. 

To ease review, three additional commits adapt the backport to JDK11, which is missing JDK-8284047 (2nd commit) and JDK-8288209 (3rd commit). Also JDK11 is missing `ByteBuffer.slice(byte[], int, int)` (4th commit).

Tested on Linux with `tier1` tests and with `run-test-jdk_security`:


==============================
Test summary
==============================
   TEST                                              TOTAL  PASS  FAIL ERROR   
   jtreg:test/jdk:jdk_security                        1365  1365     0     0   
==============================
TEST SUCCESS

-------------

Depends on: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3126

Commit messages:
 - Fix: JDK11 lacks ByteBuffer.slice(byte[], int, int)
 - Because JDK-8284047 is not backported to 11
 - Because JDK-8288209 is not backported to 11
 - Backport fe850da38a3fc0c9ce6cf9348efca3c846e97143

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3130/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk11u-dev&pr=3130&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8349583
  Stats: 1063 lines in 20 files changed: 931 ins; 19 del; 113 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3130.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev.git pull/3130/head:pull/3130

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3130

From avieiro at openjdk.org  Fri Dec  5 11:59:23 2025
From: avieiro at openjdk.org (Antonio Vieiro)
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 11:59:23 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8349583: Add mechanism to disable signature
 schemes based on their TLS scope
In-Reply-To: <_XhH0LkPB7bTooW9f4kWRkq1uURTyv5IDgo3Iv8VrnU=.64cad87d-fca7-4304-925d-2e3800a9b389@github.com>
References: <_XhH0LkPB7bTooW9f4kWRkq1uURTyv5IDgo3Iv8VrnU=.64cad87d-fca7-4304-925d-2e3800a9b389@github.com>
Message-ID: <vlOxaHc65Xjlr-uKbUvCef5Kmyh-BPsnzF7ApoWoBfs=.5001809d-e393-4971-89fa-f2de459258c6@github.com>

On Fri, 5 Dec 2025 11:51:55 GMT, Antonio Vieiro <avieiro at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backport of [JDK-8349583](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8349583) from [JDK17](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk17u-dev/commit/fe850da38a3fc0c9ce6cf9348efca3c846e97143), a first step to [disable SHA-1 in TLS/DTLS 1.2 handshake signatures](https://www.java.com/en/configure_crypto.html#DisableSHA1_TLS_DTLS)  to comply with the [Oracle JRE Cryptographic Roadmap](https://www.java.com/en/jre-jdk-cryptoroadmap.html), to be followed with [JDK-8340321](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8340321).
> 
> Backport is not clean, as there're significant changes from JDK17. 
> 
> To ease review, three additional commits adapt the backport to JDK11, which is missing JDK-8284047 (2nd commit) and JDK-8288209 (3rd commit). Also JDK11 is missing `ByteBuffer.slice(byte[], int, int)` (4th commit).
> 
> Tested on Linux with `tier1` tests and with `run-test-jdk_security`:
> 
> 
> ==============================
> Test summary
> ==============================
>    TEST                                              TOTAL  PASS  FAIL ERROR   
>    jtreg:test/jdk:jdk_security                        1365  1365     0     0   
> ==============================
> TEST SUCCESS

NOTE: This one on top of #3126 , which introduces some tests required in this backport.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3130#issuecomment-3616582174

From mdoerr at openjdk.org  Fri Dec  5 12:13:54 2025
From: mdoerr at openjdk.org (Martin Doerr)
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 12:13:54 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8361117: SIGSEGV in LShiftLNode::Ideal due to
 unexpected dead node
Message-ID: <21_-uoIo2Clw-KTWDkDmwbg4v231VfK8zOel65n88ps=.b012321c-56e9-43aa-83cb-8d2e12126a1e@github.com>

This is a new fix for [JDK-8361117](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8361117). I can't see the corresponding fix because it's not public.

This fix is taken from https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/05a0a710313917fe7124ff43fe9c9af1d649bcac.
The problem is described in https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/674cc3eeca77f1f2a6d937b1df5c5cd8a13c2d31/test/hotspot/jtreg/compiler/arraycopy/TestACSameSrcDst.java#L87 but that regression test didn't reproduce the issue in jdk17u.

I've taken the reproducer from the issue and put it into a new regression test. The VM crashes without the fix and the test passes with the fix.

-------------

Commit messages:
 - 8361117: SIGSEGV in LShiftLNode::Ideal due to unexpected dead node

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4204/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk17u-dev&pr=4204&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8361117
  Stats: 67 lines in 2 files changed: 67 ins; 0 del; 0 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4204.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/4204/head:pull/4204

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4204

From avieiro at openjdk.org  Fri Dec  5 12:16:36 2025
From: avieiro at openjdk.org (Antonio Vieiro)
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 12:16:36 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8340321: Disable SHA-1 in TLS/DTLS 1.2 handshake
 signatures
Message-ID: <EGOjEUyAbY5IUSvBz0mDE26vEGUUUiBQsm9FeJXsGSo=.02b06979-dab2-40c2-ad5e-047620a86379@github.com>

Backport of [JDK-8340321](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8340321) from [JDK17](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk17u-dev/commit/86765246d95c9e9586540c5f865ba093dff92ffe), that [disables SHA-1 in TLS/DTLS 1.2 handshake signatures](https://www.java.com/en/configure_crypto.html#DisableSHA1_TLS_DTLS) to comply with the [Oracle JRE Cryptographic Roadmap](https://www.java.com/en/jre-jdk-cryptoroadmap.html).

Backport is not clean, as there many differences in `java.security` from 17 to 11.

Tested with `tier1` tests on Linux and with `run-test-jdk_security`, that includes the new three new tests:


==============================
Test summary
==============================
   TEST                                              TOTAL  PASS  FAIL ERROR   
   jtreg:test/jdk:jdk_security                        1368  1368     0     0   
==============================
TEST SUCCESS


NOTE: This PR is on top of prerrequisite #3130 .

-------------

Depends on: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3130

Commit messages:
 - Backport 86765246d95c9e9586540c5f865ba093dff92ffe

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3131/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk11u-dev&pr=3131&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8340321
  Stats: 249 lines in 5 files changed: 246 ins; 0 del; 3 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3131.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev.git pull/3131/head:pull/3131

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3131

From evergizova at openjdk.org  Fri Dec  5 13:24:14 2025
From: evergizova at openjdk.org (Ekaterina Vergizova)
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 13:24:14 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] Integrated: 8337506: Disable "best-fit" mapping on
 Windows command line
In-Reply-To: <sCUElgyx4nn-2TSrOHKfy2Ed3oRZsRBC7PQSI6aICL0=.b6cdce96-0d51-4719-90a6-ed99be788525@github.com>
References: <sCUElgyx4nn-2TSrOHKfy2Ed3oRZsRBC7PQSI6aICL0=.b6cdce96-0d51-4719-90a6-ed99be788525@github.com>
Message-ID: <N8CcoZu4xK27lF-oX461cQRhWQCszEflrvtGhbT7jMg=.e2c9a60c-68c9-4c84-b9d0-ad28c503aaad@github.com>

On Mon, 14 Jul 2025 16:03:37 GMT, Ekaterina Vergizova <evergizova at openjdk.org> wrote:

> I'd like to backport this for parity with 11.0.29-oracle.
> CSR JDK-8349538 has been approved for 11u.
> 17u patch applies cleanly, but the test requires a few modifications to work properly:
> - replaced `native.encoding` property with `file.encoding`, as `native.encoding` is not present in 11u. 
> These two are identical unless `file.encoding` is overridden on the command line:
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk17u-dev/blob/master/src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/util/SystemProps.java#L72
> - replaced `"str".formatted(args)` with `String.format("str", args)`, as String::formatted() is not available in 11u. Both methods produce the same result.
> 
> The new test passes successfully after applying the patch.

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: b99b9890
Author:    Ekaterina Vergizova <evergizova at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/commit/b99b989046555a2f4d2dc3cd487055cb49b79f50
Stats:     104 lines in 2 files changed: 102 ins; 0 del; 2 mod

8337506: Disable "best-fit" mapping on Windows command line

Reviewed-by: andrew
Backport-of: 94f8a744e03d7cbe6527e35b0df6ffc33c29ff06

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3062

From mdoerr at openjdk.org  Fri Dec  5 13:53:43 2025
From: mdoerr at openjdk.org (Martin Doerr)
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 13:53:43 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8361117: SIGSEGV in LShiftLNode::Ideal due to
 unexpected dead node
In-Reply-To: <21_-uoIo2Clw-KTWDkDmwbg4v231VfK8zOel65n88ps=.b012321c-56e9-43aa-83cb-8d2e12126a1e@github.com>
References: <21_-uoIo2Clw-KTWDkDmwbg4v231VfK8zOel65n88ps=.b012321c-56e9-43aa-83cb-8d2e12126a1e@github.com>
Message-ID: <lt71EObtUFDNjgPBu_43TNf7DQ5hz3jrXTR0XU971uo=.cf3b20fb-cf67-4b18-82e3-27e3c9d746c4@github.com>

On Fri, 5 Dec 2025 12:07:37 GMT, Martin Doerr <mdoerr at openjdk.org> wrote:

> This is a new fix for [JDK-8361117](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8361117) for OpenJDK. I can't see the corresponding fix because it's not public.
> 
> This fix is taken from https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/05a0a710313917fe7124ff43fe9c9af1d649bcac.
> The problem is described in https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/674cc3eeca77f1f2a6d937b1df5c5cd8a13c2d31/test/hotspot/jtreg/compiler/arraycopy/TestACSameSrcDst.java#L87 but that regression test didn't reproduce the issue in jdk17u.
> 
> I've taken the reproducer from the issue and put it into a new regression test. The VM crashes without the fix and the test passes with the fix.

@rwestrel: Do you want to review?

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4204#issuecomment-3617009651

From duke at openjdk.org  Fri Dec  5 15:45:23 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (duke)
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 15:45:23 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8366182: Some PKCS11Tests are being skipped when
 they shouldn't
In-Reply-To: <VLnqIqI9wQqIjNyKQtEXIedFpIZdEtFQ24kyBQWda_w=.14be0e15-cda3-404a-838d-e55a64493926@github.com>
References: <VLnqIqI9wQqIjNyKQtEXIedFpIZdEtFQ24kyBQWda_w=.14be0e15-cda3-404a-838d-e55a64493926@github.com>
Message-ID: <Qawf8ZTfZNDBxI4zAwFI-8mmu0eZrIiXA8ATClt75Rk=.38535747-495c-4831-874d-5c7bcd6ab927@github.com>

On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 19:47:14 GMT, Roland Mesde <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backporting JDK-8366182: Some PKCS11Tests are being skipped when they shouldn't.
> 
> For parity with Oracle JDK. The commit fixes PKCS11 tests to correctly parse NSS version numbers by comparing major and minor versions separately instead of treating them as doubles, which incorrectly ordered versions like 3.111 between 3.11 and 3.12.
> 
> Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed), jtreg tier1 tests (passed) and related tests (passed) on linux-x64, linux-aarch64, macos-aarch64 and windows-x64:
> 
> (Passed) - make test-tier1
> (Passed) - make test TEST=test/jdk/jdk/sun/security/pkcs11
> 
> Results are attached.
> 
> [linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23938512/linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [linux-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23938515/linux-aarch64-specific-test.log)
> [linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23938516/linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [linux-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23938517/linux-x64-specific-test.log)
> [macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23938518/macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [macos-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23938519/macos-aarch64-specific-test.log)
> [windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23938520/windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [windows-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23938521/windows-x64-specific-test.log)

@rm-gh-8 
Your change (at version 209e26be200b79afc704e1884e493498639de4ec) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/59#issuecomment-3617431983

From duke at openjdk.org  Fri Dec  5 15:45:26 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (duke)
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 15:45:26 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8357470:
 src/java.base/share/classes/sun/security/util/Debug.java implement the test
 for args.toLowerCase
In-Reply-To: <lXGtGMy8sG3jc32yHWbJ5MHNfK2rQatJPtfEEIcr3iw=.2d973e0a-12a4-4b9c-9939-0b8b56ed5b39@github.com>
References: <lXGtGMy8sG3jc32yHWbJ5MHNfK2rQatJPtfEEIcr3iw=.2d973e0a-12a4-4b9c-9939-0b8b56ed5b39@github.com>
Message-ID: <vg_savXuh_Xvnc6k0fVkHlertE2XXYppc5FN5Pco83o=.6b63988e-aa74-4c68-955e-701513f9ad1a@github.com>

On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 19:43:21 GMT, Roland Mesde <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backporting JDK-8357470: src/java.base/share/classes/sun/security/util/Debug.java implement the test for args.toLowerCase.
> 
> Enhanced sun/security/util/Debug.java test with:
> - Implemented args.toLowerCase validation
> - Added automated mixed-case option testing
> - Converted to multi-threaded execution
> - Added debug logging
> - Added missing -Djava.security.auth.debug coverage
> 
> For parity with Oracle JDK. 
> 
> Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed), jtreg tier1 tests (passed) and related tests (passed) on linux-x64, linux-aarch64, macos-aarch64 and windows-x64:
> 
> (Passed) - make test-tier1
> (Passed) - make test TEST=test/jdk/sun/security/util/Debug
> 
> Results are attached.
> 
> [linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23939793/linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [linux-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23939794/linux-aarch64-specific-test.log)
> [linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23939795/linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [linux-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23939796/linux-x64-specific-test.log)
> [macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23939797/macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [macos-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23939798/macos-aarch64-specific-test.log)
> [windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23939799/windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [windows-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23939800/windows-x64-specific-test.log)

@rm-gh-8 
Your change (at version 69a35021a4fb2f1fddd2a2c461f06ee4b4f7bd32) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/58#issuecomment-3617433067

From duke at openjdk.org  Fri Dec  5 15:46:32 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (duke)
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 15:46:32 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8370646: TestLargeUTF8Length.java needs lots of
 memory
In-Reply-To: <mat49sUM6d71RJOaLrQBID1lZxkwDRIFq1gXwLaxuA8=.64b9df39-b938-4e1b-a369-d1d214c51436@github.com>
References: <mat49sUM6d71RJOaLrQBID1lZxkwDRIFq1gXwLaxuA8=.64b9df39-b938-4e1b-a369-d1d214c51436@github.com>
Message-ID: <LFw09-O2LWQjMZtqQ303thYPpmVXRJ182NZJ791Xq6Y=.17405497-8fc7-486c-b5ed-c2a956684627@github.com>

On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 20:41:43 GMT, Roland Mesde <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backporting JDK-8370646: TestLargeUTF8Length.java needs lots of memory.
> 
> For parity with Oracle JDK. Fix adds minimum memory requirements for test. Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed), jtreg tier1 tests (passed) and related tests (passed) on linux-x64, linux-aarch64, macos-aarch64 and windows-x64. Also ran a test on an EC2 instance (linux-x64) with less than the required memory (t2.large - 8 GB) and the test was not executed:
> 
> (Passed) - make test-tier1
> (Passed) - make test TEST=test/hotspot/jtreg/runtime/jni/checked/TestLargeUTF8Length,java
> 
> Results are attached.
> 
> [linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912736/linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [linux-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912737/linux-aarch64-specific-test.log)
> [linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912738/linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [linux-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912739/linux-x64-specific-test.log)
> [macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912740/macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [macos-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912741/macos-aarch64-specific-test.log)
> [windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912742/windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [windows-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912743/windows-x64-specific-test.log)

@rm-gh-8 
Your change (at version 76914619d118f09e5a46504387e29fb0f0010a2a) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/48#issuecomment-3617435504

From duke at openjdk.org  Fri Dec  5 15:46:36 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (duke)
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 15:46:36 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8360562: sun/security/tools/keytool/i18n.java
 add an ability to add comment for failures
In-Reply-To: <Afrtb6OwPzSP-_pq7lWkOR1UWHxyJHU1cJrKV0m7vwc=.824d0d1e-dd76-4a57-9dc9-0f912e9ed62d@github.com>
References: <Afrtb6OwPzSP-_pq7lWkOR1UWHxyJHU1cJrKV0m7vwc=.824d0d1e-dd76-4a57-9dc9-0f912e9ed62d@github.com>
Message-ID: <PwfW3Dw7SehzqBjOANQ91-s9nQZst6mgLWa4IClEcm4=.422d6792-9cda-4e64-9d6a-23008812958d@github.com>

On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 19:37:37 GMT, Roland Mesde <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backporting JDK-8360562: sun/security/tools/keytool/i18n.java add an ability to add comment for failures.
> 
> For parity with Oracle JDK. The commit adds failure comment capability to sun/security/tools/keytool/i18n.java to enable faster verification and reporting.
> 
> Ran the manual test on macos-aarch64:
> 
> jtreg -jdk build/macosx-aarch64-server-release/images/jdk -vmoption:-Duser.language=en -m test/jdk/sun/security/tools/keytool/i18n.java
> 
> It generated the dialog box when the "fail" button is selected and the written text is reflected on the test report. Screenshots attached.
> 
> <img width="782" height="493" alt="DialogBox" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b1c10e7a-7d1e-488e-ac67-b3d61e26cbe4" />
> <img width="538" height="213" alt="TestReport" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e4c64f00-b556-4a14-9073-0df3522603b1" />
> 
> Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed), and jtreg tier1 tests (passed) on linux-x64, linux-aarch64, macos-aarch64 and windows-x64:
> 
> (Passed) - make test-tier1
> 
> Results are attached.
> 
> [linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23938244/linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23938245/linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23938246/macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23938247/windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)

@rm-gh-8 
Your change (at version 7421a0630b7d5cae4fc56c0002ef92b32f66de5b) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/57#issuecomment-3617434033

From duke at openjdk.org  Fri Dec  5 15:46:33 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (duke)
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 15:46:33 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8354894:
 java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timeout on server with high CPUs
In-Reply-To: <MHkNSLut4L9a_pXdDeblCVSvJcIMp1rO-iPD0bZ9t0E=.a93cb0be-1c05-4147-a567-ec850ceec650@github.com>
References: <MHkNSLut4L9a_pXdDeblCVSvJcIMp1rO-iPD0bZ9t0E=.a93cb0be-1c05-4147-a567-ec850ceec650@github.com>
Message-ID: <Z4pq7nYIorv8ZLe_ySTDSkAsT8-RJ-3gz4ddZEsj1B4=.de418bbb-a3b1-4a09-9668-f736a0093c4b@github.com>

On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 21:26:37 GMT, Roland Mesde <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backporting JDK-8354894: java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timeout on server with high CPUs
> 
> For parity with Oracle JDK. Fix adjusts iteration count by dividing by CPU core count, and removed timeout=800 as default 120 timeout is now sufficient. 
> 
> Merge conflict (resolved) was the change in the timeout.
> 
> Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed), jtreg tier1 tests (passed) and related tests (passed) on linux-x64, linux-aarch64, macos-aarch64 and windows-x64. Also ran a test on an EC2 instance (linux-x64) with high cpu count (r5dn.24xlarge - 96 core) and it finished under 1s:
> 
> (Passed) - make test-tier1
> (Passed) - make test TEST=test/jdk/java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java
> 
> Results are attached.
> 
> [linux-x64-96-core-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911957/linux-x64-96-core-test.log)
> 
> [linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911996/linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [linux-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911997/linux-aarch64-specific-test.log)
> [linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911998/linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [linux-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911999/linux-x64-specific-test.log)
> [macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912000/macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [macos-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912001/macos-aarch64-specific-test.log)
> [windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912002/windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [windows-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912003/windows-x64-specific-test.log)

@rm-gh-8 
Your change (at version 84e75d12ad0a94fb2b346f069a64569f4c9191f6) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/49#issuecomment-3617436522

From duke at openjdk.org  Fri Dec  5 15:47:39 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (duke)
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 15:47:39 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8368754: runtime/cds/appcds/SignedJar.java log
 regex is too strict
In-Reply-To: <-KsvbLMEqotgTlgUAUTk8Q5uRBkfAfVMGkRyub8TFyg=.fa3a156d-5192-491e-a116-ea64fdc6518a@github.com>
References: <-KsvbLMEqotgTlgUAUTk8Q5uRBkfAfVMGkRyub8TFyg=.fa3a156d-5192-491e-a116-ea64fdc6518a@github.com>
Message-ID: <lxy8nGohcl6PN2CTw2QQYC2wJ7G1ro2oTy_uoon3HN8=.e0454101-163a-4cdf-872e-7b4775bbc783@github.com>

On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 20:19:06 GMT, Roland Mesde <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backporting JDK-8368754: runtime/cds/appcds/SignedJar.java log regex is too strict.
> 
> For parity with Oracle JDK. Fix allows whitespace after log tags and before the message content. Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed), jtreg tier1 tests (passed) and related tests (passed) on linux-x64, linux-aarch64, macos-aarch64 and windows-x64:
> 
> (Passed) - make test-tier1
> (Passed) - make test TEST=test/hotspot/jtreg/runtime/cds/appcds
> (Passed) - make test TEST=test/hotspot/jtreg/runtime/cds/appcds/SignedJar.java JTREG="VM_OPTIONS=-verbose:class"
> 
> Results are attached.
> 
> [linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912663/linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [linux-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912664/linux-aarch64-specific-test.log)
> [linux-aarch64-specific-2-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912665/linux-aarch64-specific-2-test.log)
> [linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912666/linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [linux-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912667/linux-x64-specific-test.log)
> [linux-x64-specific-2-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912668/linux-x64-specific-2-test.log)
> [macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912669/macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [macos-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912670/macos-aarch64-specific-test.log)
> [macos-aarch64-specific-2-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912671/macos-aarch64-specific-2-test.log)
> [windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912672/windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [windows-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912673/windows-x64-specific-test.log)
> [windows-x64-specific-2-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912674/windows-x64-specific-2-test.log)

@rm-gh-8 
Your change (at version b8b09bf3084054ae17db420a072773e3d083d88d) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/47#issuecomment-3617438066

From duke at openjdk.org  Fri Dec  5 16:59:41 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Roland Mesde)
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 16:59:41 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] Integrated: 8368754: runtime/cds/appcds/SignedJar.java
 log regex is too strict
In-Reply-To: <-KsvbLMEqotgTlgUAUTk8Q5uRBkfAfVMGkRyub8TFyg=.fa3a156d-5192-491e-a116-ea64fdc6518a@github.com>
References: <-KsvbLMEqotgTlgUAUTk8Q5uRBkfAfVMGkRyub8TFyg=.fa3a156d-5192-491e-a116-ea64fdc6518a@github.com>
Message-ID: <GzHNHTJdFi2upcs3jNgeYcSNbYCudZDvcNVJs63agQM=.24be74c6-3407-40c4-9ba7-dab1c59bd456@github.com>

On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 20:19:06 GMT, Roland Mesde <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backporting JDK-8368754: runtime/cds/appcds/SignedJar.java log regex is too strict.
> 
> For parity with Oracle JDK. Fix allows whitespace after log tags and before the message content. Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed), jtreg tier1 tests (passed) and related tests (passed) on linux-x64, linux-aarch64, macos-aarch64 and windows-x64:
> 
> (Passed) - make test-tier1
> (Passed) - make test TEST=test/hotspot/jtreg/runtime/cds/appcds
> (Passed) - make test TEST=test/hotspot/jtreg/runtime/cds/appcds/SignedJar.java JTREG="VM_OPTIONS=-verbose:class"
> 
> Results are attached.
> 
> [linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912663/linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [linux-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912664/linux-aarch64-specific-test.log)
> [linux-aarch64-specific-2-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912665/linux-aarch64-specific-2-test.log)
> [linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912666/linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [linux-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912667/linux-x64-specific-test.log)
> [linux-x64-specific-2-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912668/linux-x64-specific-2-test.log)
> [macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912669/macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [macos-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912670/macos-aarch64-specific-test.log)
> [macos-aarch64-specific-2-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912671/macos-aarch64-specific-2-test.log)
> [windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912672/windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [windows-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912673/windows-x64-specific-test.log)
> [windows-x64-specific-2-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912674/windows-x64-specific-2-test.log)

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 395b4c4f
Author:    Roland Mesde <mesde at amazon.com>
Committer: Paul Hohensee <phh at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/commit/395b4c4f5972ee25ece346e49c6aa73bfd100154
Stats:     2 lines in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 2 mod

8368754: runtime/cds/appcds/SignedJar.java log regex is too strict

Backport-of: e19ec6f785e889d254b15c5ef2e801152c59c948

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/47

From duke at openjdk.org  Fri Dec  5 16:59:52 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Roland Mesde)
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 16:59:52 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] Integrated: 8354894:
 java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timeout on server with high CPUs
In-Reply-To: <MHkNSLut4L9a_pXdDeblCVSvJcIMp1rO-iPD0bZ9t0E=.a93cb0be-1c05-4147-a567-ec850ceec650@github.com>
References: <MHkNSLut4L9a_pXdDeblCVSvJcIMp1rO-iPD0bZ9t0E=.a93cb0be-1c05-4147-a567-ec850ceec650@github.com>
Message-ID: <amRLk_A8g_cdzQL27JNbfkWcrGZps3_srtxIc1CNHZM=.e09cffd6-2d6f-4264-b114-53f4d6d100ff@github.com>

On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 21:26:37 GMT, Roland Mesde <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backporting JDK-8354894: java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timeout on server with high CPUs
> 
> For parity with Oracle JDK. Fix adjusts iteration count by dividing by CPU core count, and removed timeout=800 as default 120 timeout is now sufficient. 
> 
> Merge conflict (resolved) was the change in the timeout.
> 
> Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed), jtreg tier1 tests (passed) and related tests (passed) on linux-x64, linux-aarch64, macos-aarch64 and windows-x64. Also ran a test on an EC2 instance (linux-x64) with high cpu count (r5dn.24xlarge - 96 core) and it finished under 1s:
> 
> (Passed) - make test-tier1
> (Passed) - make test TEST=test/jdk/java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java
> 
> Results are attached.
> 
> [linux-x64-96-core-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911957/linux-x64-96-core-test.log)
> 
> [linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911996/linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [linux-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911997/linux-aarch64-specific-test.log)
> [linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911998/linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [linux-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23911999/linux-x64-specific-test.log)
> [macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912000/macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [macos-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912001/macos-aarch64-specific-test.log)
> [windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912002/windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [windows-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912003/windows-x64-specific-test.log)

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: b7b842e1
Author:    Roland Mesde <mesde at amazon.com>
Committer: Paul Hohensee <phh at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/commit/b7b842e1d4b03f26831e48507b43bf3e6762d78f
Stats:     10 lines in 1 file changed: 7 ins; 0 del; 3 mod

8354894: java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timeout on server with high CPUs

Reviewed-by: shade
Backport-of: 0366d8823bc844225ca24964e352ce0a57d01683

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/49

From duke at openjdk.org  Fri Dec  5 17:01:06 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Roland Mesde)
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 17:01:06 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] Integrated: 8370646: TestLargeUTF8Length.java needs lots
 of memory
In-Reply-To: <mat49sUM6d71RJOaLrQBID1lZxkwDRIFq1gXwLaxuA8=.64b9df39-b938-4e1b-a369-d1d214c51436@github.com>
References: <mat49sUM6d71RJOaLrQBID1lZxkwDRIFq1gXwLaxuA8=.64b9df39-b938-4e1b-a369-d1d214c51436@github.com>
Message-ID: <_OEKOQVL95unqOPgt509lu87c8j_6CqJy4usPSv_b5M=.b83d05d7-e444-48f5-885f-f0f99ee616d7@github.com>

On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 20:41:43 GMT, Roland Mesde <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backporting JDK-8370646: TestLargeUTF8Length.java needs lots of memory.
> 
> For parity with Oracle JDK. Fix adds minimum memory requirements for test. Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed), jtreg tier1 tests (passed) and related tests (passed) on linux-x64, linux-aarch64, macos-aarch64 and windows-x64. Also ran a test on an EC2 instance (linux-x64) with less than the required memory (t2.large - 8 GB) and the test was not executed:
> 
> (Passed) - make test-tier1
> (Passed) - make test TEST=test/hotspot/jtreg/runtime/jni/checked/TestLargeUTF8Length,java
> 
> Results are attached.
> 
> [linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912736/linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [linux-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912737/linux-aarch64-specific-test.log)
> [linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912738/linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [linux-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912739/linux-x64-specific-test.log)
> [macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912740/macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [macos-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912741/macos-aarch64-specific-test.log)
> [windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912742/windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [windows-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23912743/windows-x64-specific-test.log)

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 1894b6af
Author:    Roland Mesde <mesde at amazon.com>
Committer: Paul Hohensee <phh at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/commit/1894b6af2454a8fb5e66a7123099bbd100f4721f
Stats:     1 line in 1 file changed: 1 ins; 0 del; 0 mod

8370646: TestLargeUTF8Length.java needs lots of memory

Backport-of: 3c1010b57f2f8258a2ccf59b9f86fc8debd71918

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/48

From duke at openjdk.org  Fri Dec  5 17:01:11 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Roland Mesde)
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 17:01:11 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] Integrated: 8360562: sun/security/tools/keytool/i18n.java
 add an ability to add comment for failures
In-Reply-To: <Afrtb6OwPzSP-_pq7lWkOR1UWHxyJHU1cJrKV0m7vwc=.824d0d1e-dd76-4a57-9dc9-0f912e9ed62d@github.com>
References: <Afrtb6OwPzSP-_pq7lWkOR1UWHxyJHU1cJrKV0m7vwc=.824d0d1e-dd76-4a57-9dc9-0f912e9ed62d@github.com>
Message-ID: <mqSrBSI3aS8gxMR5vjckWp5ghYdnkme1AvHdKrrQnS0=.c00163c6-659d-4b65-b994-2e084919630a@github.com>

On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 19:37:37 GMT, Roland Mesde <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backporting JDK-8360562: sun/security/tools/keytool/i18n.java add an ability to add comment for failures.
> 
> For parity with Oracle JDK. The commit adds failure comment capability to sun/security/tools/keytool/i18n.java to enable faster verification and reporting.
> 
> Ran the manual test on macos-aarch64:
> 
> jtreg -jdk build/macosx-aarch64-server-release/images/jdk -vmoption:-Duser.language=en -m test/jdk/sun/security/tools/keytool/i18n.java
> 
> It generated the dialog box when the "fail" button is selected and the written text is reflected on the test report. Screenshots attached.
> 
> <img width="782" height="493" alt="DialogBox" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b1c10e7a-7d1e-488e-ac67-b3d61e26cbe4" />
> <img width="538" height="213" alt="TestReport" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e4c64f00-b556-4a14-9073-0df3522603b1" />
> 
> Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed), and jtreg tier1 tests (passed) on linux-x64, linux-aarch64, macos-aarch64 and windows-x64:
> 
> (Passed) - make test-tier1
> 
> Results are attached.
> 
> [linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23938244/linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23938245/linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23938246/macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23938247/windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: e9520b3e
Author:    Roland Mesde <mesde at amazon.com>
Committer: Paul Hohensee <phh at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/commit/e9520b3efaafd48a1537095afad356624f646a31
Stats:     44 lines in 1 file changed: 42 ins; 0 del; 2 mod

8360562: sun/security/tools/keytool/i18n.java add an ability to add comment for failures

Backport-of: ebb6fd7d7865fd20ff2f90b4ef72c5ef6a3e5dea

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/57

From duke at openjdk.org  Fri Dec  5 17:01:06 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Roland Mesde)
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 17:01:06 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] Integrated: 8357470:
 src/java.base/share/classes/sun/security/util/Debug.java implement the test
 for args.toLowerCase
In-Reply-To: <lXGtGMy8sG3jc32yHWbJ5MHNfK2rQatJPtfEEIcr3iw=.2d973e0a-12a4-4b9c-9939-0b8b56ed5b39@github.com>
References: <lXGtGMy8sG3jc32yHWbJ5MHNfK2rQatJPtfEEIcr3iw=.2d973e0a-12a4-4b9c-9939-0b8b56ed5b39@github.com>
Message-ID: <NS4MuLITdmMygdIyIBgf0KTKz0QQaxDvqm2yr3wedWY=.40bd6352-3db6-4a0a-928c-96e964b6bcd4@github.com>

On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 19:43:21 GMT, Roland Mesde <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backporting JDK-8357470: src/java.base/share/classes/sun/security/util/Debug.java implement the test for args.toLowerCase.
> 
> Enhanced sun/security/util/Debug.java test with:
> - Implemented args.toLowerCase validation
> - Added automated mixed-case option testing
> - Converted to multi-threaded execution
> - Added debug logging
> - Added missing -Djava.security.auth.debug coverage
> 
> For parity with Oracle JDK. 
> 
> Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed), jtreg tier1 tests (passed) and related tests (passed) on linux-x64, linux-aarch64, macos-aarch64 and windows-x64:
> 
> (Passed) - make test-tier1
> (Passed) - make test TEST=test/jdk/sun/security/util/Debug
> 
> Results are attached.
> 
> [linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23939793/linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [linux-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23939794/linux-aarch64-specific-test.log)
> [linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23939795/linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [linux-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23939796/linux-x64-specific-test.log)
> [macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23939797/macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [macos-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23939798/macos-aarch64-specific-test.log)
> [windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23939799/windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [windows-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23939800/windows-x64-specific-test.log)

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 2c31a381
Author:    Roland Mesde <mesde at amazon.com>
Committer: Paul Hohensee <phh at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/commit/2c31a381706e50a5448dcc55deee3067c3854733
Stats:     131 lines in 1 file changed: 87 ins; 4 del; 40 mod

8357470: src/java.base/share/classes/sun/security/util/Debug.java implement the test for args.toLowerCase

Backport-of: 6d0bbc8a18fa555b5e8d132bef400097ef6ee5cb

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/58

From duke at openjdk.org  Fri Dec  5 17:02:34 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Roland Mesde)
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 17:02:34 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] Integrated: 8366182: Some PKCS11Tests are being skipped
 when they shouldn't
In-Reply-To: <VLnqIqI9wQqIjNyKQtEXIedFpIZdEtFQ24kyBQWda_w=.14be0e15-cda3-404a-838d-e55a64493926@github.com>
References: <VLnqIqI9wQqIjNyKQtEXIedFpIZdEtFQ24kyBQWda_w=.14be0e15-cda3-404a-838d-e55a64493926@github.com>
Message-ID: <4uiyXxb8KoTz4myLoegMTvvlHtY1PTcyji73Cpvuaug=.3a80ef9b-7800-49cd-8bad-1ee9830f3d9c@github.com>

On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 19:47:14 GMT, Roland Mesde <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backporting JDK-8366182: Some PKCS11Tests are being skipped when they shouldn't.
> 
> For parity with Oracle JDK. The commit fixes PKCS11 tests to correctly parse NSS version numbers by comparing major and minor versions separately instead of treating them as doubles, which incorrectly ordered versions like 3.111 between 3.11 and 3.12.
> 
> Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed), jtreg tier1 tests (passed) and related tests (passed) on linux-x64, linux-aarch64, macos-aarch64 and windows-x64:
> 
> (Passed) - make test-tier1
> (Passed) - make test TEST=test/jdk/jdk/sun/security/pkcs11
> 
> Results are attached.
> 
> [linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23938512/linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [linux-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23938515/linux-aarch64-specific-test.log)
> [linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23938516/linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [linux-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23938517/linux-x64-specific-test.log)
> [macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23938518/macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [macos-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23938519/macos-aarch64-specific-test.log)
> [windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23938520/windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [windows-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23938521/windows-x64-specific-test.log)

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: e5781ca3
Author:    Roland Mesde <mesde at amazon.com>
Committer: Paul Hohensee <phh at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/commit/e5781ca38d8ae961d2c706ab591fe0f56115a46f
Stats:     92 lines in 6 files changed: 27 ins; 19 del; 46 mod

8366182: Some PKCS11Tests are being skipped when they shouldn't

Backport-of: cc9483b4da1a0f65f8773d0c7f35f2e6a7e1bd4f

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/59

From duke at openjdk.org  Fri Dec  5 17:55:07 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (duke)
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 17:55:07 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8337681: PNGImageWriter uses much more memory
 than necessary
In-Reply-To: <XudBs8U6K6JoxYyomOauujeGJLu3IGLOaU4lPLmwwAw=.0f71530a-1bbb-4162-9770-c2506167e829@github.com>
References: <XudBs8U6K6JoxYyomOauujeGJLu3IGLOaU4lPLmwwAw=.0f71530a-1bbb-4162-9770-c2506167e829@github.com>
Message-ID: <LPERy6auJVo0E0IP_0S9xfGw0PXauGwpXeniBGwNVt0=.c6866656-d9a5-468d-b2c4-19e0258276c0@github.com>

On Tue, 18 Nov 2025 00:52:28 GMT, Daniel Hu <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Clean backport. Fixes issue with the PNGImageWriter making unnecessary copies of raster and data buffers when PNG images are written. Passes GHA. Added test passes.

@cost0much 
Your change (at version f3971e28ec295df453ab3a523caa0225b854f37f) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4187#issuecomment-3617902821

From duke at openjdk.org  Fri Dec  5 18:08:10 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (duke)
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 18:08:10 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8283784:
 java_lang_String::as_platform_dependent_str stores to oop in native state
In-Reply-To: <4SR_a2DlKYJsAR2xLYGU4gdKZBRNrYwj3HgLZybSNxY=.2b22a616-4bed-4e23-af25-6963ac1988bb@github.com>
References: <4SR_a2DlKYJsAR2xLYGU4gdKZBRNrYwj3HgLZybSNxY=.2b22a616-4bed-4e23-af25-6963ac1988bb@github.com>
Message-ID: <HNzfVDBTlACSzd1lA07Kit-nsuyUSaggp3ikZ3kHiHU=.b120df19-5714-4afa-856d-ee37fbe8ea28@github.com>

On Tue, 23 Sep 2025 18:32:07 GMT, jyma22 <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [c9a469a](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/c9a469a4591002e7f51317a8494a2df902db5bfa) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by David Holmes on Mar 30 2022 and was reviewed by Kim Barrett, Aleksey Shipilev, and Stefan Karlsson.
> 
> Testing: jtreg tier 1-3 as sanity test
> 
> Thanks!

@jyma22 
Your change (at version 0e1af44d305d0d18e1527b31cbd0ccfb4e8b6455) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3988#issuecomment-3617946848

From duke at openjdk.org  Fri Dec  5 19:24:22 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (jyma22)
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 19:24:22 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8282484: G1: Predicted old time in log always
 zero [v3]
In-Reply-To: <8TRRRE24toR3QDFwvH2OhJtxg8jgnRxgy2AFRBCSZbk=.6ac74a28-e534-44ef-a0b3-7772cfb1abdd@github.com>
References: <8TRRRE24toR3QDFwvH2OhJtxg8jgnRxgy2AFRBCSZbk=.6ac74a28-e534-44ef-a0b3-7772cfb1abdd@github.com>
Message-ID: <b6D1w2DRhiqNde1wnqCVSwPM8UFPJkLkmrWK8OwJgTA=.9665c5b8-a342-4b4d-b435-755de34c3447@github.com>

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [d4d1fbc2](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/d4d1fbc27a2382d8d9545b7bf672cdcc81654404) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Thomas Schatzl on Mar 3, 2022 and was reviewed by Albert Mingkun Yang and Ivan Walulya.
> 
> This PR depends on [pr/3992](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk17u-dev/pull/3992), so the target would be changed from pr/3992 to master once pr/3992 is approved and merged.
> 
> Testing: jtreg 1-3 gha
> 
> Thanks!

jyma22 has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains one commit:

  Backport d4d1fbc27a2382d8d9545b7bf672cdcc81654404

-------------

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3993/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk17u-dev&pr=3993&range=02
  Stats: 4 lines in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 1 del; 3 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3993.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/3993/head:pull/3993

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3993

From duke at openjdk.org  Fri Dec  5 19:24:23 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (jyma22)
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 19:24:23 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] Withdrawn: 8282484: G1: Predicted old time in log always
 zero
In-Reply-To: <8TRRRE24toR3QDFwvH2OhJtxg8jgnRxgy2AFRBCSZbk=.6ac74a28-e534-44ef-a0b3-7772cfb1abdd@github.com>
References: <8TRRRE24toR3QDFwvH2OhJtxg8jgnRxgy2AFRBCSZbk=.6ac74a28-e534-44ef-a0b3-7772cfb1abdd@github.com>
Message-ID: <gsE8v8Mzf78pc_KFUY84hCyJFLWtBZjn73nfvaLMXbg=.bc1a625c-420c-45cf-896b-f0be1fe2fbc7@github.com>

On Thu, 25 Sep 2025 22:09:42 GMT, jyma22 <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [d4d1fbc2](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/d4d1fbc27a2382d8d9545b7bf672cdcc81654404) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Thomas Schatzl on Mar 3, 2022 and was reviewed by Albert Mingkun Yang and Ivan Walulya.
> 
> This PR depends on [pr/3992](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk17u-dev/pull/3992), so the target would be changed from pr/3992 to master once pr/3992 is approved and merged.
> 
> Testing: jtreg 1-3 gha
> 
> Thanks!

This pull request has been closed without being integrated.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3993

From andrew at openjdk.org  Fri Dec  5 19:26:16 2025
From: andrew at openjdk.org (Andrew John Hughes)
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 19:26:16 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8286562: GCC 12 reports some compiler warnings
In-Reply-To: <nlju7KR-xG8xiD2Z3rhlQMK5aGLt8bBXWJH48NxF23Q=.3b81ee56-ffe7-4ba2-9a01-998ac15c5d56@github.com>
References: <nlju7KR-xG8xiD2Z3rhlQMK5aGLt8bBXWJH48NxF23Q=.3b81ee56-ffe7-4ba2-9a01-998ac15c5d56@github.com>
Message-ID: <WNSAP30sgSeF7rgwLVSqn9w4gArumm6TbNTC8EA3j7g=.cbf1cd04-55e5-4fcb-bab2-0f79ad2391f0@github.com>

On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 14:42:45 GMT, Zdenek Zambersky <zzambers at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backport fixes few warnings in newer gcc (12+), which I have seen some when doing test build for gcc15 (fedora 42) for another [backport](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk11u-dev/pull/3087#issuecomment-3266882552). Warning do not show in current GHA runs because it uses gcc 10. (Btw this change has also been backported to oracle jdk 11.)
> 
> Backport is not clear, there were some differences in surrounding context, copyright headers, location of gmk file etc. So part of it had to be done manually.  Changes to jfrTraceIdBits.inline.hpp are not present, because modified function is not present on jdk11.
> 
> I also included backport of followup change ([JDK-8293691](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8293691)), which fixes problem introduced by original backported change.
> 
> GHA tests: OK

Are you still planning to backport this one?

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3091#issuecomment-3618256793

From duke at openjdk.org  Fri Dec  5 19:55:50 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (jyma22)
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 19:55:50 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8282484: G1: Predicted old time in log always zero
Message-ID: <-Am5V1MJbLp1XcDZGXglTzITE2HUbeQLXDATB2jTFs8=.5f994b63-5e0a-4984-87d1-5be126ebf7be@github.com>

Hi all,

This pull request contains a backport of commit [d4d1fbc2](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/d4d1fbc27a2382d8d9545b7bf672cdcc81654404) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.

The commit being backported was authored by Thomas Schatzl on Mar 3, 2022 and was reviewed by Albert Mingkun Yang and Ivan Walulya.

This PR depends on https://github.com/openjdk/jdk17u-dev/pull/3992, so the target would be changed from pr/3992 to master once pr/3992 is approved and merged.

Testing: jtreg 1-3 gha

Thanks!

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport d4d1fbc27a2382d8d9545b7bf672cdcc81654404

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4205/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk17u-dev&pr=4205&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8282484
  Stats: 4 lines in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 1 del; 3 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4205.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/4205/head:pull/4205

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4205

From duke at openjdk.org  Fri Dec  5 20:21:10 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (duke)
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 20:21:10 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8282484: G1: Predicted old time in log always
 zero
In-Reply-To: <-Am5V1MJbLp1XcDZGXglTzITE2HUbeQLXDATB2jTFs8=.5f994b63-5e0a-4984-87d1-5be126ebf7be@github.com>
References: <-Am5V1MJbLp1XcDZGXglTzITE2HUbeQLXDATB2jTFs8=.5f994b63-5e0a-4984-87d1-5be126ebf7be@github.com>
Message-ID: <6YJzmYtfsdPK7WxXOIEyY06ChXIWpOudqltRORrQQ7Q=.0caebdaf-62e3-449a-8fdb-56f64de6bc72@github.com>

On Fri, 5 Dec 2025 19:49:13 GMT, jyma22 <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [d4d1fbc2](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/d4d1fbc27a2382d8d9545b7bf672cdcc81654404) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Thomas Schatzl on Mar 3, 2022 and was reviewed by Albert Mingkun Yang and Ivan Walulya.
> 
> This PR depends on https://github.com/openjdk/jdk17u-dev/pull/3992, so the target would be changed from pr/3992 to master once pr/3992 is approved and merged.
> 
> Testing: jtreg 1-3 gha
> 
> Thanks!

@jyma22 
Your change (at version 6fbbf23fb1aa3877af6be82759904d9203fc89c1) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4205#issuecomment-3618455915

From avieiro at openjdk.org  Fri Dec  5 22:14:11 2025
From: avieiro at openjdk.org (Antonio Vieiro)
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 22:14:11 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] Integrated: 8347381: Upgrade jQuery UI to version 1.14.1
In-Reply-To: <g7OkJc9t9LnfvDG8UjL5B4saLmAkI8K3FiTqM8gR0tc=.41b60fdb-095d-48c3-9b24-e38b50c51fef@github.com>
References: <g7OkJc9t9LnfvDG8UjL5B4saLmAkI8K3FiTqM8gR0tc=.41b60fdb-095d-48c3-9b24-e38b50c51fef@github.com>
Message-ID: <v69jbK1qS_bILcLcleXca3iU0-ylaHc4CfAc0qbEJi8=.85ebedb5-d124-4c76-a848-b56dae942258@github.com>

On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 14:01:12 GMT, Antonio Vieiro <avieiro at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Clean backport of [JDK-8347381](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8347381) that upgrades the jQueryUI library to v1.14.1, for parity with 11.0.29 and because it's always a good idea to keep these updated. 
> 
> [This is compatible](https://blog.jqueryui.com/2024/10/jquery-ui-1-14-1-released/) with the already bundled jQuery 3.7.1.

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: b0347133
Author:    Antonio Vieiro <avieiro at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/commit/b0347133b7b342b970557d04466ebc62d4709550
Stats:     135 lines in 5 files changed: 3 ins; 70 del; 62 mod

8347381: Upgrade jQuery UI to version 1.14.1

Reviewed-by: andrew
Backport-of: eecdbf17828f2164e9af579c6dd3815da2ffc7d6

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3076

From duke at openjdk.org  Fri Dec  5 23:04:44 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Roland Mesde)
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 23:04:44 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8369804: TestGenerators.java fails with
 IllegalArgumentException: bound must be greater than origin
Message-ID: <Jx60QAFlR_iLCalRqouLSS20f7ATB50lpQVkG7cc7Ko=.a119a0f1-a95b-44cf-9ff2-598e0f030387@github.com>

Backporting JDK-8369804: TestGenerators.java fails with IllegalArgumentException: bound must be greater than origin.

For parity with Oracle JDK.

Fixed intermittent test failure caused by sampling two floats that occasionally produce identical values. Now retries sampling until distinct values are obtained. Also improved error reporting by throwing exceptions during generator construction instead of at sampling time.

Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed), and related compiler tests (passed) on linux-x64, linux-aarch64, macos-aarch64 and windows-x64:

(Passed) - make test TEST=test/hotspot/jtreg/compiler

Results are attached.

[linux-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23972146/linux-aarch64-specific-test.log)
[linux-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23972147/linux-x64-specific-test.log)
[macos-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23972148/macos-aarch64-specific-test.log)
[windows-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23972149/windows-x64-specific-test.log)

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport f2a998326a6bebd4a7d2d0a39f785b2e6dac68c4

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/67/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk25u-dev&pr=67&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8369804
  Stats: 22 lines in 3 files changed: 16 ins; 0 del; 6 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/67.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev.git pull/67/head:pull/67

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/67

From syan at openjdk.org  Sat Dec  6 10:09:59 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2025 10:09:59 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8370646: TestLargeUTF8Length.java needs lots of
 memory
In-Reply-To: <XLkcDFwmwj2jKaPDgQge3f4kcrr2ZZYGjOge7KCaVFs=.6e518dfe-fbf1-47f9-a54b-bfa9941f0733@github.com>
References: <XLkcDFwmwj2jKaPDgQge3f4kcrr2ZZYGjOge7KCaVFs=.6e518dfe-fbf1-47f9-a54b-bfa9941f0733@github.com>
Message-ID: <ZNEU9h5h9Ex2SS7TAr-JnZXHR42As8UoukQ2Y69nwH0=.fed987d8-7dcf-489e-882c-7e39ba86a11c@github.com>

On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 06:16:01 GMT, SendaoYan <syan at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [3c1010b5](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/3c1010b57f2f8258a2ccf59b9f86fc8debd71918) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Kelvin Nilsen on 31 Oct 2025 and was reviewed by Paul Hohensee, William Kemper and Y. Srinivas Ramakrishna.
> 
> Thanks!

Thanks for the approved.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/51#issuecomment-3619840034

From goetz at openjdk.org  Sat Dec  6 16:49:13 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2025 16:49:13 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8319376: ParallelGC: Forwarded objects found
 during heap inspection
In-Reply-To: <XzWdGbv0NvoMGkUMEL3M8fHfZj_3rU4skVHS2ssdXow=.038d2e6e-4203-4aa8-9a9c-63a0ddbb5f06@github.com>
References: <rAfcnYL7Pw3wjfHEXyf3QnWUJLN_tUAuqOycP-hoOUk=.db4dcdca-a5c3-4ff7-bed9-52fb9d5e3370@github.com>
 <dXZcKKVYHEymF2jpq5xEau2L4MZR11mhsrigSab1Xnk=.38a7feeb-11de-490d-9fb2-835d314dcf95@github.com>
 <XzWdGbv0NvoMGkUMEL3M8fHfZj_3rU4skVHS2ssdXow=.038d2e6e-4203-4aa8-9a9c-63a0ddbb5f06@github.com>
Message-ID: <DMPgipBUu611AEKYd-clxk3wZ4jLfevvN1VEMfbUDQY=.575c65ed-927e-46e7-a428-41eebdfd9a02@github.com>

On Fri, 28 Nov 2025 17:27:25 GMT, Daniel Hu <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Hi @cost0much 
>> why do we need to backport this now to a stable release as 17?
>
> @GoeLin I'll close if the risk isn't worth

Hi @cost0much 
Do you have access to JBS?  You can remove the jdk17u-fix-request label if you close an issue, then it's off my list for appovals.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4193#issuecomment-3620682141

From goetz at openjdk.org  Sat Dec  6 17:10:01 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2025 17:10:01 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] Integrated: 8357277: Update OpenSSL library for interop
 tests
In-Reply-To: <cFY-By3kBV3Bkp5n3MKhvKkM9p9iDfVSMBn6fZcT3Us=.e21980ec-3d0c-400d-a1cc-0d42df6f69a0@github.com>
References: <cFY-By3kBV3Bkp5n3MKhvKkM9p9iDfVSMBn6fZcT3Us=.e21980ec-3d0c-400d-a1cc-0d42df6f69a0@github.com>
Message-ID: <vayxxYt_B24b69aa-vgP2zZb-g-3W3L8QWZOgLfZtrQ=.3501a4b9-c040-4552-8aaf-3c101e8a12db@github.com>

On Fri, 28 Nov 2025 16:04:20 GMT, Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org> wrote:

> I backport this for parity with 25.0.3-oracle.

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: d3ca9062
Author:    Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/commit/d3ca90622454d0d22b45e2360b9172cc8ac90684
Stats:     1 line in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 1 mod

8357277: Update OpenSSL library for interop tests

Backport-of: c1198bba0e8cbdaa47c821263d122d0ba4dd6759

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/36

From goetz at openjdk.org  Sat Dec  6 17:11:01 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2025 17:11:01 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] Integrated: 8336695: Update Commons BCEL to Version
 6.10.0
In-Reply-To: <Ye98XuXmPs_blG436kB20dqGpvo9Q-K5qpMyTlGgn1o=.1601e936-033f-4bc0-830d-b0db8fb59794@github.com>
References: <Ye98XuXmPs_blG436kB20dqGpvo9Q-K5qpMyTlGgn1o=.1601e936-033f-4bc0-830d-b0db8fb59794@github.com>
Message-ID: <3HBtO2Tr3OfeSMFyiuFoHr5gP_KH9q8ax9o1ZJwKfY0=.dfffaa91-3c1f-4af9-b636-b20676f7353e@github.com>

On Thu, 4 Dec 2025 13:32:30 GMT, Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org> wrote:

> I backport this for parity with 25.0.3-oracle.

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 576ded9a
Author:    Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/commit/576ded9a22b4eeead6e47896dcd969f04f9c4f35
Stats:     2579 lines in 122 files changed: 1451 ins; 118 del; 1010 mod

8336695: Update Commons BCEL to Version 6.10.0

Backport-of: 3790965df3e7cba3b9792b8719d1e2ead046da15

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/62

From goetz at openjdk.org  Sat Dec  6 17:17:13 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2025 17:17:13 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] Integrated: 8114830: (fs) Files.copy fails due to
 interference from something else changing the file system
In-Reply-To: <3QS_tiB6jbeYVugNVdwnkXLpmVeN4p00txBixpgFAWQ=.7dff4c21-5dcb-4ec8-95a6-88d9cee48deb@github.com>
References: <3QS_tiB6jbeYVugNVdwnkXLpmVeN4p00txBixpgFAWQ=.7dff4c21-5dcb-4ec8-95a6-88d9cee48deb@github.com>
Message-ID: <QcuOWFBwRNuhpSFDNvgXfTVFghdhI6sLUOQv3JvmOMk=.822da863-d855-4e5a-8a78-eeadfce3e52a@github.com>

On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 15:00:46 GMT, Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org> wrote:

> I backport this for parity with 21.0.11-oracle.

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: d67317d6
Author:    Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/commit/d67317d68ed7555cc83894d68b9de0a62aa6c4a0
Stats:     159 lines in 2 files changed: 159 ins; 0 del; 0 mod

8114830: (fs) Files.copy fails due to interference from something else changing the file system

Backport-of: c132176b932dd136d5c4314e08ac97d0fee7ba4d

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2500

From goetz at openjdk.org  Sat Dec  6 17:19:02 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2025 17:19:02 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8372048: Performance improvement on Linux remote
 desktop
In-Reply-To: <qZcj8v1v5zwn9_aSkcuXgDHDc2V2CIgjBd4gVxuT37k=.3f7dd974-03c2-4b0c-9df6-d8efa1c43a5d@github.com>
References: <qZcj8v1v5zwn9_aSkcuXgDHDc2V2CIgjBd4gVxuT37k=.3f7dd974-03c2-4b0c-9df6-d8efa1c43a5d@github.com>
Message-ID: <ofkv22svDPS2MUWVJ77yE_7BPzAo37JkHm5qSZhu4Nk=.364f1a8b-e1ef-49ae-9135-7f7b98141462@github.com>

On Thu, 4 Dec 2025 15:40:47 GMT, Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org> wrote:

> I backport this for parity with 25.0.3-oracle.

GHA failure: [ClassVersionAfterRedefine](https://github.com/openjdk-bots/jdk25u-dev/actions/runs/19934596860/attempts/1#user-content-serviceability_jvmti_redefineclasses_classversionafterredefine) known to be unstable.
Unrelated.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/63#issuecomment-3620716487

From goetz at openjdk.org  Sat Dec  6 17:19:03 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2025 17:19:03 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] Integrated: 8372048: Performance improvement on Linux
 remote desktop
In-Reply-To: <qZcj8v1v5zwn9_aSkcuXgDHDc2V2CIgjBd4gVxuT37k=.3f7dd974-03c2-4b0c-9df6-d8efa1c43a5d@github.com>
References: <qZcj8v1v5zwn9_aSkcuXgDHDc2V2CIgjBd4gVxuT37k=.3f7dd974-03c2-4b0c-9df6-d8efa1c43a5d@github.com>
Message-ID: <rZjRvsIP2Eei9Bw6WzQkY5NMBCpDzJs8JnzO2rv1Ya0=.5b91d81d-171f-4f6d-b791-d09a28a76f7a@github.com>

On Thu, 4 Dec 2025 15:40:47 GMT, Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org> wrote:

> I backport this for parity with 25.0.3-oracle.

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 0354e244
Author:    Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/commit/0354e244a78382ef69c353926da4777e3a8c4c52
Stats:     32 lines in 2 files changed: 25 ins; 6 del; 1 mod

8372048: Performance improvement on Linux remote desktop

Backport-of: 0b3df489e9d3b6d876a67793e082b930c17ade3e

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/63

From goetz at openjdk.org  Sat Dec  6 17:20:14 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2025 17:20:14 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] Integrated: 8301875:
 java.util.TimeZone.getSystemTimeZoneID uses C library default file mode
In-Reply-To: <__mBG_sCit6_W7gWG12idsOXiVP_38cyuGYgiyYACpw=.f612632f-0124-4af0-9628-0916d70e5f68@github.com>
References: <__mBG_sCit6_W7gWG12idsOXiVP_38cyuGYgiyYACpw=.f612632f-0124-4af0-9628-0916d70e5f68@github.com>
Message-ID: <jR9yuOFn8znJLGjO37-Q2hWY5SbNSzAIEuBgbdnod6E=.b68c68a1-0e96-4103-96d7-2c5d89dc4f38@github.com>

On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 16:05:21 GMT, Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org> wrote:

> I backport this for parity with 21.0.10-oracle

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 5d8e48a5
Author:    Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/commit/5d8e48a51be756c552618fc9a0451a4b413e4bc9
Stats:     2 lines in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 2 mod

8301875: java.util.TimeZone.getSystemTimeZoneID uses C library default file mode

Backport-of: 2d6045a26f60fb36f69680e3a83b8303ab2c13e4

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2502

From goetz at openjdk.org  Sat Dec  6 17:22:01 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2025 17:22:01 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] Integrated: 6899304:
 java.awt.Toolkit.getScreenInsets(GraphicsConfiguration) returns incorrect
 values
In-Reply-To: <5WXa6twGBSqXopFZ-yklIvC3-w8N6ogPH5y6pkVD5yI=.1b025894-2181-40c4-a397-e252958da51b@github.com>
References: <5WXa6twGBSqXopFZ-yklIvC3-w8N6ogPH5y6pkVD5yI=.1b025894-2181-40c4-a397-e252958da51b@github.com>
Message-ID: <Ce16H_dKLNszgGShLYTYmBUAScCw92-f-PkLUAu844M=.08301aae-3ec6-45b2-8ef7-4f14d26a46a8@github.com>

On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 16:17:45 GMT, Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org> wrote:

> I backport this for parity with 21.0.10-oracle

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: d5dc4453
Author:    Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/commit/d5dc4453830d1d02fc8972d57eb7dae4475d7472
Stats:     73 lines in 2 files changed: 34 ins; 23 del; 16 mod

6899304: java.awt.Toolkit.getScreenInsets(GraphicsConfiguration) returns incorrect values

Backport-of: 651ac3cc0f2a8b3edf5cddb42df1d38d4aa0e1a6

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2503

From goetz at openjdk.org  Sat Dec  6 17:25:05 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2025 17:25:05 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] Integrated: 8303475: potential null pointer dereference
 in filemap.cpp
In-Reply-To: <tWub-jlsr0XmsuxhrLSf9svumOXl-Pm_lmrnOx4TTgM=.2b83b0b1-0ae7-493b-b3de-344ad5b7286a@github.com>
References: <tWub-jlsr0XmsuxhrLSf9svumOXl-Pm_lmrnOx4TTgM=.2b83b0b1-0ae7-493b-b3de-344ad5b7286a@github.com>
Message-ID: <FfkkVCPBvHQ9rwyIlwe-O-Tjh44bRjwbKgUp7uc4xS4=.cd806d4d-ec66-47e9-8348-c34a326d1b3b@github.com>

On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 13:17:54 GMT, Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org> wrote:

> I backport this for parity with 17.0.18-oracle.

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: b123440a
Author:    Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/commit/b123440a305b4bc2f536d830f9bcabd8c7c9adf9
Stats:     1 line in 1 file changed: 1 ins; 0 del; 0 mod

8303475: potential null pointer dereference in filemap.cpp

Backport-of: e1196584d5c61e3a6baa3eb96801a518cd5dca64

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4199

From goetz at openjdk.org  Sat Dec  6 17:26:09 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2025 17:26:09 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] Integrated: 8372048: Performance improvement on Linux
 remote desktop
In-Reply-To: <XpT5ZufntmyaEq_rEJaorqTch01fSebXjbZxmNe31Sk=.e610657b-892a-4dfb-b7c0-19fbaddc83bb@github.com>
References: <XpT5ZufntmyaEq_rEJaorqTch01fSebXjbZxmNe31Sk=.e610657b-892a-4dfb-b7c0-19fbaddc83bb@github.com>
Message-ID: <d5XuqmK5eSEf-39HtSqvijrREb9rhA5bigC0ua5vOTo=.7ff051a3-b97a-4ed7-aedc-31c9ae0c1c52@github.com>

On Thu, 4 Dec 2025 15:40:55 GMT, Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org> wrote:

> I backport this for parity with 21.0.11-oracle.
> 
> I had to resolve due to context as 8344057: Remove doPrivileged calls from unix platform sources in the java.desktop module
> is not in 21.

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 0982bdd7
Author:    Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/commit/0982bdd7dba58acf7f1c6206750df88950b08eef
Stats:     32 lines in 2 files changed: 25 ins; 6 del; 1 mod

8372048: Performance improvement on Linux remote desktop

Backport-of: 0b3df489e9d3b6d876a67793e082b930c17ade3e

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2508

From goetz at openjdk.org  Sat Dec  6 17:29:01 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2025 17:29:01 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] Integrated: 8357591: Re-enable CDS test cases for jvmci
 after JDK-8345826
In-Reply-To: <z376F9bmTsBckEUCvwOxGLahY834nGmr9h-Fv1VH4ac=.dbe9456a-a2bf-432e-a049-a3601aa986f5@github.com>
References: <z376F9bmTsBckEUCvwOxGLahY834nGmr9h-Fv1VH4ac=.dbe9456a-a2bf-432e-a049-a3601aa986f5@github.com>
Message-ID: <TcVELWBc6-ckoJIsmDoLClSEqJNyOJslldE-VkowV0s=.e5a08952-1fc1-4008-b1b1-676723a7c579@github.com>

On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 12:48:24 GMT, Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org> wrote:

> I backport this for parity with 25.0.3-oracle.

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: f31097e3
Author:    Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/commit/f31097e3ef2a5a240a0efb6640b73ea9f84fb49d
Stats:     72 lines in 34 files changed: 0 ins; 72 del; 0 mod

8357591: Re-enable CDS test cases for jvmci after JDK-8345826

Backport-of: d186dacdb7b91dc9a28b703ce3c8ea007fc450b6

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/43

From goetz at openjdk.org  Sat Dec  6 17:33:08 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2025 17:33:08 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] Integrated: 8301875:
 java.util.TimeZone.getSystemTimeZoneID uses C library default file mode
In-Reply-To: <thZzMX26V0NMbYLCGEm3kuktzoKG3mWFvAHLuQ89JoQ=.dd45f98f-f1b5-474e-86aa-f42a5d1b51de@github.com>
References: <thZzMX26V0NMbYLCGEm3kuktzoKG3mWFvAHLuQ89JoQ=.dd45f98f-f1b5-474e-86aa-f42a5d1b51de@github.com>
Message-ID: <1CSl-dnB3NuoqsTv_xS7TmdxGWdzgZQ1K0u-H6--PzI=.0fc3cf9c-2470-453d-87ff-8309d44c751a@github.com>

On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 16:05:32 GMT, Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org> wrote:

> I backport this for parity with 17.0.18-oracle.

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: e2c53d9b
Author:    Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/commit/e2c53d9b96cbd10ecbeb389006521e8beb9f2388
Stats:     2 lines in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 2 mod

8301875: java.util.TimeZone.getSystemTimeZoneID uses C library default file mode

Backport-of: 2d6045a26f60fb36f69680e3a83b8303ab2c13e4

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4200

From goetz at openjdk.org  Sat Dec  6 17:34:09 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2025 17:34:09 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] Integrated: 6899304:
 java.awt.Toolkit.getScreenInsets(GraphicsConfiguration) returns incorrect
 values
In-Reply-To: <4kBkWI1lpSR34D3qUDkDOG0VhmkwapXwDG8TjC0RJag=.4b6abb19-4ba0-4a4a-9d6a-3274db8857fa@github.com>
References: <4kBkWI1lpSR34D3qUDkDOG0VhmkwapXwDG8TjC0RJag=.4b6abb19-4ba0-4a4a-9d6a-3274db8857fa@github.com>
Message-ID: <GY4gTY8PR7OSa6sf_SBu_W8HyU65sWkB0KjMx2atoi0=.c58f1470-ef09-466d-8268-d992ea1c1a66@github.com>

On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 16:17:38 GMT, Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org> wrote:

> I backport this for parity with 17.0.18-oracle.

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 084c4b53
Author:    Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/commit/084c4b530e46828ca9e649ef43e64f2be1cc3d3e
Stats:     73 lines in 2 files changed: 34 ins; 23 del; 16 mod

6899304: java.awt.Toolkit.getScreenInsets(GraphicsConfiguration) returns incorrect values

Backport-of: 651ac3cc0f2a8b3edf5cddb42df1d38d4aa0e1a6

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4201

From duke at openjdk.org  Sun Dec  7 23:31:14 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (jyma22)
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2025 23:31:14 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] Integrated: 8282484: G1: Predicted old time in log always
 zero
In-Reply-To: <-Am5V1MJbLp1XcDZGXglTzITE2HUbeQLXDATB2jTFs8=.5f994b63-5e0a-4984-87d1-5be126ebf7be@github.com>
References: <-Am5V1MJbLp1XcDZGXglTzITE2HUbeQLXDATB2jTFs8=.5f994b63-5e0a-4984-87d1-5be126ebf7be@github.com>
Message-ID: <rapf_14dNGlBSsQFyo5fHmW1vVjC3caWW2Rw82Fk7dg=.94f3c08e-52f8-44f3-8148-c6da0590a462@github.com>

On Fri, 5 Dec 2025 19:49:13 GMT, jyma22 <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [d4d1fbc2](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/d4d1fbc27a2382d8d9545b7bf672cdcc81654404) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Thomas Schatzl on Mar 3, 2022 and was reviewed by Albert Mingkun Yang and Ivan Walulya.
> 
> This PR depends on https://github.com/openjdk/jdk17u-dev/pull/3992, so the target would be changed from pr/3992 to master once pr/3992 is approved and merged.
> 
> Testing: jtreg 1-3 gha
> 
> Thanks!

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: e9043582
Author:    Thomas Schatzl <tschatzl at openjdk.org>
Committer: Paul Hohensee <phh at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/commit/e9043582de6c1a0604f592ab8e485e5db6c3f3a5
Stats:     4 lines in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 1 del; 3 mod

8282484: G1: Predicted old time in log always zero

Backport-of: d4d1fbc27a2382d8d9545b7bf672cdcc81654404

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4205

From duke at openjdk.org  Sun Dec  7 23:35:09 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (jyma22)
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2025 23:35:09 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] Integrated: 8283784:
 java_lang_String::as_platform_dependent_str stores to oop in native state
In-Reply-To: <4SR_a2DlKYJsAR2xLYGU4gdKZBRNrYwj3HgLZybSNxY=.2b22a616-4bed-4e23-af25-6963ac1988bb@github.com>
References: <4SR_a2DlKYJsAR2xLYGU4gdKZBRNrYwj3HgLZybSNxY=.2b22a616-4bed-4e23-af25-6963ac1988bb@github.com>
Message-ID: <W4jMoT0X9RScN4udiDeX4-LvZvbYezI3ej-_33zAvv8=.0f28f8a5-49a8-4fcb-a5bb-2c8ae91571bc@github.com>

On Tue, 23 Sep 2025 18:32:07 GMT, jyma22 <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [c9a469a](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/c9a469a4591002e7f51317a8494a2df902db5bfa) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by David Holmes on Mar 30 2022 and was reviewed by Kim Barrett, Aleksey Shipilev, and Stefan Karlsson.
> 
> Testing: jtreg tier 1-3 as sanity test
> 
> Thanks!

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 50145042
Author:    Juyeon Ma <jyma0218 at gmail.com>
Committer: Paul Hohensee <phh at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/commit/50145042443b0950263c59fd22e444ac778d55af
Stats:     7 lines in 1 file changed: 3 ins; 1 del; 3 mod

8283784: java_lang_String::as_platform_dependent_str stores to oop in native state

Backport-of: c9a469a4591002e7f51317a8494a2df902db5bfa

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3988

From duke at openjdk.org  Sun Dec  7 23:35:09 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Daniel Hu)
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2025 23:35:09 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] Integrated: 8337681: PNGImageWriter uses much more memory
 than necessary
In-Reply-To: <XudBs8U6K6JoxYyomOauujeGJLu3IGLOaU4lPLmwwAw=.0f71530a-1bbb-4162-9770-c2506167e829@github.com>
References: <XudBs8U6K6JoxYyomOauujeGJLu3IGLOaU4lPLmwwAw=.0f71530a-1bbb-4162-9770-c2506167e829@github.com>
Message-ID: <PUyiRcYU6KA_MPegbxzKkPRgaXylq_yN54T4sxEhOvo=.da7da53d-1712-4032-bb7c-504e264f2cfa@github.com>

On Tue, 18 Nov 2025 00:52:28 GMT, Daniel Hu <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Clean backport. Fixes issue with the PNGImageWriter making unnecessary copies of raster and data buffers when PNG images are written. Passes GHA. Added test passes.

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: b6eb8ce0
Author:    Daniel Hu <costmuch at amazon.com>
Committer: Paul Hohensee <phh at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/commit/b6eb8ce0b95126f433e7882fa4eaabd544780892
Stats:     200 lines in 2 files changed: 195 ins; 1 del; 4 mod

8337681: PNGImageWriter uses much more memory than necessary

Backport-of: 89a15f1414f89d2dd32eac791e9155fcb4207e56

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4187

From phh at openjdk.org  Sun Dec  7 23:40:00 2025
From: phh at openjdk.org (Paul Hohensee)
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2025 23:40:00 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8370325: G1: Disallow GC for TLAB allocation
In-Reply-To: <AP7jVFtuoHpsdFA3uYSFwKJCuY3awoFCYoSH-lizdXg=.903c42cd-3db4-4e7c-87e3-0a1035dbe319@github.com>
References: <AP7jVFtuoHpsdFA3uYSFwKJCuY3awoFCYoSH-lizdXg=.903c42cd-3db4-4e7c-87e3-0a1035dbe319@github.com>
Message-ID: <7Hl8zKRv9fiZBJTGaieK3rzxjueiT2JUk8ZSWZ2AlVc=.dffc9921-5df1-46c1-8e87-f3a2b9291057@github.com>

On Thu, 4 Dec 2025 15:56:47 GMT, Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org> wrote:

> I backport this for parity with 25.0.3-oracle
> 
> Trivial resolve needed in [g1CollectedHeap.cpp](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/027aea9d2e0dff29fcd00fa7074ca955066929ec#diff-9de15630db460d66fdee5ec408be02b3275a2fbf32764f9fb2910b0d1bff7e3a)

Marked as reviewed by phh (Reviewer).

-------------

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/64#pullrequestreview-3549717278

From syan at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  8 02:23:06 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2025 02:23:06 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] Withdrawn: 8370646: TestLargeUTF8Length.java needs lots
 of memory
In-Reply-To: <XLkcDFwmwj2jKaPDgQge3f4kcrr2ZZYGjOge7KCaVFs=.6e518dfe-fbf1-47f9-a54b-bfa9941f0733@github.com>
References: <XLkcDFwmwj2jKaPDgQge3f4kcrr2ZZYGjOge7KCaVFs=.6e518dfe-fbf1-47f9-a54b-bfa9941f0733@github.com>
Message-ID: <zacMTfX4jXIouVpnvPbFsCebpTipa1yrdwoCIbDjnuY=.a1d63086-dc33-4f22-9b1d-42d8912370e7@github.com>

On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 06:16:01 GMT, SendaoYan <syan at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [3c1010b5](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/3c1010b57f2f8258a2ccf59b9f86fc8debd71918) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Kelvin Nilsen on 31 Oct 2025 and was reviewed by Paul Hohensee, William Kemper and Y. Srinivas Ramakrishna.
> 
> Thanks!

This pull request has been closed without being integrated.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/51

From syan at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  8 02:23:06 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2025 02:23:06 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8370646: TestLargeUTF8Length.java needs lots of
 memory
In-Reply-To: <XLkcDFwmwj2jKaPDgQge3f4kcrr2ZZYGjOge7KCaVFs=.6e518dfe-fbf1-47f9-a54b-bfa9941f0733@github.com>
References: <XLkcDFwmwj2jKaPDgQge3f4kcrr2ZZYGjOge7KCaVFs=.6e518dfe-fbf1-47f9-a54b-bfa9941f0733@github.com>
Message-ID: <fTCbI7gfNcYFnN4zeRu2NBR_HOv0ewaREMkFnsRB53c=.36f15e99-173c-42be-ad4e-89f5fc5b56dd@github.com>

On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 06:16:01 GMT, SendaoYan <syan at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [3c1010b5](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/3c1010b57f2f8258a2ccf59b9f86fc8debd71918) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Kelvin Nilsen on 31 Oct 2025 and was reviewed by Paul Hohensee, William Kemper and Y. Srinivas Ramakrishna.
> 
> Thanks!

Duplicated to https://github.com/openjdk/jdk25u-dev/pull/48

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/51#issuecomment-3624223490

From ssubramaniam at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  8 02:53:58 2025
From: ssubramaniam at openjdk.org (Satyen Subramaniam)
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2025 02:53:58 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8328864: NullPointerException in
 sun.security.jca.ProviderList.getService() [v2]
In-Reply-To: <AjBXIS6NA72W9CEdZouC8d82b0qe0AX_iKiRsEAJjaE=.6749248a-f677-4db5-afc6-141a589aca27@github.com>
References: <AjBXIS6NA72W9CEdZouC8d82b0qe0AX_iKiRsEAJjaE=.6749248a-f677-4db5-afc6-141a589aca27@github.com>
Message-ID: <p7QWgoUeo-Ud6-4odmnSpIOzWByfk6N0MVkm22hOKdA=.86a8915f-43c6-4c28-813d-d85fbc32e40e@github.com>

> Backporting JDK-8328864: NullPointerException in sun.security.jca.ProviderList.getService(). Updated `getService` to check whether `getProvider` returns null when checking for preferred providers, continuing the loop if so. Added NullPreferredList test. Ran GHA Sanity Checks, local Tier 1 and 2 tests. Patch is clean.

Satyen Subramaniam has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains two additional commits since the last revision:

 - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into 8328864
 - Backport cd3a607576bede17f48c3d5ebde2bf05f3b615ba

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3442/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3442/files/a178ee9f..6db01523

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk17u-dev&pr=3442&range=01
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk17u-dev&pr=3442&range=00-01

  Stats: 197251 lines in 2995 files changed: 114243 ins; 66058 del; 16950 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3442.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/3442/head:pull/3442

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3442

From dzhang at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  8 03:14:54 2025
From: dzhang at openjdk.org (Dingli Zhang)
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2025 03:14:54 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8360169: Problem list
 CodeInvalidationReasonTest.java on linux-riscv64 until JDK-8360168 is fixed
Message-ID: <sK7WD0Wi7fqjUaJnyQQR77EclL7PNOUbmefMBVqlrKc=.564e38a5-4cc0-491b-8700-86a257cb92c2@github.com>

Hi all,

This pull request contains a backport of commit [ad1033d6](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/ad1033d68f4dd030cad27f9868d4fa83b5080bcd) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.

The commit being backported was authored by Dingli Zhang on 23 Jun 2025 and was reviewed by Fei Yang, Feilong Jiang, SendaoYan and Doug Simon.

Thanks!

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport ad1033d68f4dd030cad27f9868d4fa83b5080bcd

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/68/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk25u-dev&pr=68&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8360169
  Stats: 1 line in 1 file changed: 1 ins; 0 del; 0 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/68.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev.git pull/68/head:pull/68

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/68

From syan at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  8 08:01:34 2025
From: syan at openjdk.org (SendaoYan)
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2025 08:01:34 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8373086: Make isexceeded001.java more robust
Message-ID: <7PfE29gGLMrgdzYx5u5ciaf3CLM1qmGDKFRX1ZNJUMU=.9fc3906e-f42b-4cc5-bd04-2d25514515af@github.com>

Hi all,

This pull request contains a backport of commit [4d696d0d](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/4d696d0d0ed523e3c99c68214586673913b1c7b5) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.

The commit being backported was authored by Albert Mingkun Yang on 5 Dec 2025 and was reviewed by Joel Sikstr?m and Thomas Schatzl.

Thanks!

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport 4d696d0d0ed523e3c99c68214586673913b1c7b5

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/69/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk25u-dev&pr=69&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8373086
  Stats: 2 lines in 1 file changed: 1 ins; 0 del; 1 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/69.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev.git pull/69/head:pull/69

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/69

From shade at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  8 08:12:10 2025
From: shade at openjdk.org (Aleksey Shipilev)
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2025 08:12:10 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8358686: CDS and AOT can cause buffer truncation
 warning even when logging is disabled
In-Reply-To: <2beDe_xncERyA7wx4HHk1dDds2e_Q1M6egz4HAuRMDQ=.cb045f82-c0ca-4c79-8dc7-db49b2f61252@github.com>
References: <2beDe_xncERyA7wx4HHk1dDds2e_Q1M6egz4HAuRMDQ=.cb045f82-c0ca-4c79-8dc7-db49b2f61252@github.com>
Message-ID: <OhfMkY_utyOkN6NGa29rd6WpYYv6XqeMZWSU0iT7CXo=.af389119-73fa-4e82-a535-63d538ea7ffb@github.com>

On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 11:03:51 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev <shade at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Fairly trivial omission in logging. I have seen -- briefly -- a message like this in local testing. So I would like to pick the fix to 25u.
> 
> Additional testing:
>  - [x] GHA

Push approval granted.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/55#issuecomment-3625537009

From shade at openjdk.org  Mon Dec  8 08:12:11 2025
From: shade at openjdk.org (Aleksey Shipilev)
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2025 08:12:11 GMT
Subject: [jdk25u-dev] Integrated: 8358686: CDS and AOT can cause buffer
 truncation warning even when logging is disabled
In-Reply-To: <2beDe_xncERyA7wx4HHk1dDds2e_Q1M6egz4HAuRMDQ=.cb045f82-c0ca-4c79-8dc7-db49b2f61252@github.com>
References: <2beDe_xncERyA7wx4HHk1dDds2e_Q1M6egz4HAuRMDQ=.cb045f82-c0ca-4c79-8dc7-db49b2f61252@github.com>
Message-ID: <ujiQj_os7ydFMYyShVxXSgc3n1oHNsIG_geXW2jkHHY=.add920a2-a89c-4338-9941-ced3445f8f26@github.com>

On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 11:03:51 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev <shade at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Fairly trivial omission in logging. I have seen -- briefly -- a message like this in local testing. So I would like to pick the fix to 25u.
> 
> Additional testing:
>  - [x] GHA

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 9d12072a
Author:    Aleksey Shipilev <shade at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/commit/9d12072a0dbe4ecce5239a5a98ac27598b617d9b
Stats:     4 lines in 1 file changed: 4 ins; 0 del; 0 mod

8358686: CDS and AOT can cause buffer truncation warning even when logging is disabled

Backport-of: 2e3bdec9857c64b307737ac7afed58170125cca9

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/55